Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Hunting >> Hunting in Australia, NZ & the South Pacific

NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39879
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo
      21/11/12 12:12 AM

Quote:

I just wasn't to impressed with them in the 404. They just sailed through with seemingly little damage even if they hit serious bone. Didn't have the hard hit the woodleighs had. If you had to bust through horns or skull to get at the brain in a tight spot they would be appreciated. Thought they might give a smaller calibre more bone breaking ability?




The various hydroshock type pullets ie flat nosed mono metal bullets were originally invented to get around idiotic laws against lead or lead core bullets in such places as California.

If the bullet is banded they do give eg a double rifle or other rifle with a thinner barrel an ability to shoot a solid type bullet, as a lead core is not possible. The lead core has some give for the rifling as compared to a mono solid which doesn't.

The flat nose is a compromise between a FMJ or round nose solid and a solid point or other controlled expansion bullet.

The reason the mono bullets are usually light for calibre is not because they have all the penetration they need, so they are going for flatter trajectory. Instead it is because mono bullets are heavy for length, and a full weight bullet would be too long if it was a mono solid. Therefore you might get a 230 gr mono instead of a 300 gr FMJ. The 230 gr mono may still be longer than the 300 gr FMJ.

I have seen and heard various reports on them often quite different from the usual ones on the net.

Myself I regard them as essential for places like California but everywhere a fad and a compromise.

My reasoning? Lets take the most essential use for a FMJ or Solid. Elephant hunting. I would not take a light weight mono bullet at high velocity against an elephant's skull or other heavy bones. There are reasons the 300 gr in .375, the 400 gr in .400's, the 480 to 500 gr in the .450's etc have always been the best choices. Why sacrifice lesser weight for a fad flat nose mono bullet. Speed is not needed, penetration and section density is. I still think these light for calibre monos will deflect more. JMO.

Secondly why use a mono or solid for medium game hunting? Many reports of inadequate expansion. Just like any other solid. Sometimes solids are used for lesser meat or skin/fur damage of course. Why not just use a good controlled expansion soft point bullet? The bullet that is proved to work the best. I don't really understand the excitement about them, other than being marketing buzz.

The "hydro" bubble in front of a flat nose, sounds like to me a lot of pseudo science. JMO. But obviously better than a pointed spitzer mil style FMJ if comparing. The big holes in medium game photos ... well they can be seen with other bullets. I have a photo of a pig where its rear leg and hip is almost blown off.

One problem hydro style bullets may be compensating for, is the extreme velocity cartridges that exist today. It is a simple fact that many bullets or no bullets on the market exist for these cartridges. For example some of the bigger bore high velocity cartridges. Simply put there are no controlled expansion bullets designed to work reliably for them. One reason for big bores, smart guys go for increased calibre diameter, and bullet weight, not increased velocity eg the .460 Wvy Mag vs a .500 Jeffery. It is not rocket science which is more effective. Anyway a flat mono bullet may be an answer for such extreme velocity cartridges, and would probably be very effective in them.

A lot of this is off topic!

Claydog,

It would be interesting if you ever tried your .275 on buffalo. No doubt it can kill a buffalo with a good heart shot or just above the heart. Brain or spine shot too. I reckon a good 175 gr Woodleigh SP would do the job. Be interesting to see what a hydro in 7mm would do. Of course with the limitations that a small calibre has for lesser ability for dropping wounded or charging animals.

Good photos gentlemen and interesting comments.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (21/11/12 12:13 AM)

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Claydog 19/11/12 01:02 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Rigby350   19/11/12 05:02 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Rule303   19/11/12 06:05 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo NitroXAdministrator   20/11/12 02:29 AM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo DarylS   20/11/12 02:42 AM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Claydog   20/11/12 08:26 AM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo 93mouse   20/11/12 09:56 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Claydog   20/11/12 11:14 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo NitroXAdministrator   21/11/12 12:12 AM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo VonGruff   20/11/12 04:49 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Claydog   20/11/12 07:37 PM
. * * Re: British Boltguns, Bulls and Buffalo Ben   19/11/12 06:01 PM

Extra information
1 registered and 33 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 5597

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved