Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: New Steel vs Old steel

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: New Steel vs Old steel
      24/05/07 06:15 PM

Quote:

Whew! Talk about prejudices!




Well, yeah, I always knew you were prejudiced against double rifles, Bill (I know, the double triggers DO defeat a handful of people), and I appreciate the candor, but there's really no need to observe the obvious.

Quote:

The end of the barrels on the Chapuis 9.3x74R are thin where most of the weight reduction comes from. Though I'm not up to stuff on my cylinder stress calculations, it is not far-fetched that the barrels on a 470 or whatver could be just as thin, from a strength standpoint.




Of course they can, and it isn't far fetched at all. In fact, it's been done for a loooong time. The Chapuis barrels ARE thin. I measured two at DRSS last January. Min wall went .078" and .079". A good friend's 1928 vintage Holland .465 measures .086". That rifle weighs 10 lbs, 12 oz. The owner is 75, and just got back from 25 hunting days in Bots with it, where he got a 70 pounder. Loves the rifle and was thrilled with how well it worked out for him.

Quote:

The pressure of a 470 and a 9.3x74R are no different




They're quite different, but...

Quote:

so why not have a lightweight 470 or 450/400? If one can take the recoil abuse, why not?




Look at it realistically. For makers like Heym, Merkel, Chapuis, etc., why should they shoulder the cost of setting up to build a 9 lb .470 that will appeal only to a handful of tools who want to be crash test dummies? They can't afford such nonsense and still keep their prices within their market niche. Most Heym .470s come in at 10 lbs, with the Merkels at 10.5 or so. Look at how many of those end up with a pound of mercury up their butts. The makers know that, and realize that it's a pretty good indicator that they're already pushing it as it is.

Why give a .400 the extra recoil and recovery time of a .470 by building it underweight? Likewise, why turn a .470 into a .500 in every sense except power?

Quote:

I guess everyone is different but the 410 double shotgun feel to the 7.3 lb. Chapuis 9.3x74R can hardly be compared to a 10+ pound 470.




Who made such a comparison?

Quote:

Even John Taylor several times said to the effect that doubles were obese.




Untrue. In fact, Taylor wisely pointed out that it was a mistake to build them too light.

Quote:

(this should get 400 NE going!).




Come now William, we both know that if a pound of gun weight makes that much difference to you at the end of the day, you're either too old for the activity, or you just need to get in better shape.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc 19/05/07 01:07 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   19/05/07 01:17 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mickey   19/05/07 04:25 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   22/05/07 04:38 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   19/05/07 07:07 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel dnovo   19/05/07 09:09 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel AzGuy   19/05/07 11:59 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Marrakai   21/05/07 01:39 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   23/05/07 02:22 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   23/05/07 11:17 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 03:06 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   24/05/07 06:53 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   24/05/07 07:22 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 06:01 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Grizzly   24/05/07 08:02 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   24/05/07 08:46 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 06:15 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   25/05/07 12:33 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   25/05/07 07:07 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   25/05/07 08:30 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Grizzly   24/05/07 12:11 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel CptCurlAdministrator   24/05/07 11:57 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   25/05/07 01:11 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   25/05/07 10:27 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   25/05/07 03:26 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Chasseur   24/05/07 12:27 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   23/05/07 10:17 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   24/05/07 02:37 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel AzGuy   21/05/07 02:05 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Marrakai   22/05/07 01:03 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel NE450No2   22/05/07 04:08 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   19/05/07 11:22 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   23/05/07 01:28 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel empirevr   19/05/07 09:49 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 644 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 7586

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved