Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: New Steel vs Old steel

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: New Steel vs Old steel
      24/05/07 03:06 AM

Quote:

Whether it has been applied or not there have been advances in metallurgy and technology over the last 100 yrs.




Which is in no way significant in the DR context.

Quote:

It would seem that the technology is available to manufacture a Double with lighter components, acceptable durability,faster lock time and a stronger action. In theory such guns could weigh the same as bolt guns with one barrel but have the 2nd shot capabilty that Doubles enjoy.Recoil should be no worse than a similar barrel bolt gun of the same weight.




Again, nothing has changed here. This was done 100 years ago, just as it can be done today, it's just that it's a non-starter. Once optimum weight for shootability and handling is achieved, making it lighter just because you can is just plain backward. You can have all of the 9 lb .400s the gods have earmarked for me. One of the reasons I LIKE doubles in the larger calibers is because bolt rifles are so often so stupidly light for caliber.

Quote:

Are the lighter weight 9.3's and Merkel 141's accomplishing this? Are they more desirable over their predecessors? Sounds like these calibers may be becoming a better mousetrap.




Well, they ARE lighter, but I think they're an example of "lighter just because we can" gone berserk.

Despite having my double rifle needs covered and needing another like a hole in the head, I've been kicking around a new Chapuis in 9.3 for years. It's the price that keeps it in my mind. I look at the overall build and regulation quality and see a screaming deal for the money. Despite the "coach gun" barrels, I talk myself into it...and then I shoot another one (I've shot four or five, the last just a few weeks ago), and then I'm off the idea again. At 7.25 pounds bare, it's just too goddamned light. It would swing oh so MUCH better on moving game (which is what it's for) one and a quarter pounds heavier. I know because I've been using an 8 lb, 14 oz medium bore double for years.

As for the Merkel 141 in 9.3....(cue "Twilight Zone" music)

Quote:

Is there a lack of similar applied technology used for Big Doubles or avoidance of techno applications due to weight requirements for recoil management?? Are we making better stronger Big Doubles today or are they inferior to their predecessors?




No. Some are too light for caliber, and I haven't observed the new rifles as being as durable as the old.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc 19/05/07 01:07 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   19/05/07 01:17 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mickey   19/05/07 04:25 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   22/05/07 04:38 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   19/05/07 07:07 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel dnovo   19/05/07 09:09 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel AzGuy   19/05/07 11:59 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Marrakai   21/05/07 01:39 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   23/05/07 02:22 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   23/05/07 11:17 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 03:06 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   24/05/07 06:53 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   24/05/07 07:22 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 06:01 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Grizzly   24/05/07 08:02 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   24/05/07 08:46 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   24/05/07 06:15 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   25/05/07 12:33 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   25/05/07 07:07 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Will   25/05/07 08:30 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Grizzly   24/05/07 12:11 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel CptCurlAdministrator   24/05/07 11:57 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel 400NitroExpress   25/05/07 01:11 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   25/05/07 10:27 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   25/05/07 03:26 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Chasseur   24/05/07 12:27 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel bonanza   23/05/07 10:17 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   24/05/07 02:37 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel AzGuy   21/05/07 02:05 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel Marrakai   22/05/07 01:03 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel NE450No2   22/05/07 04:08 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel hoppdoc   19/05/07 11:22 PM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel mehulkamdar   23/05/07 01:28 AM
. * * Re: New Steel vs Old steel empirevr   19/05/07 09:49 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 628 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 7586

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved