Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Rigby 350 No2

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Rigby 350 No2
      28/01/04 04:17 PM

Yeah, that was my post on that thread. I'm with you, boss. I wonder the same thing.

Taylor mentioned that the .350 No. 2 was actually slightly hotter than the .350 rimless, although one wonders how he could have known that. A fellow who posts here, Vigillinus, had a best Rigby SLE .350 No. 2 and wrote an article about it for Double Gun Journal a while back. He had some of Rigby's old ammo for it (you know the stuff - loaded for the gunmakers by Kynoch) and said that it chronographed 2660+ if I remember correctly.

Yeah, if 2600+ is right (and it sounds like it is) you would think the pressure would have to be over 17.5. Strange, apparently, the British proof houses did not believe that .350 No. 2 pressures were any higher than .400/.350 pressures. As I'm sure you're aware, as a general rule, the British Proofmasters use the peak pressure of the heaviest bullet used in the normal load as the benchmark for developing the proof load which must produce 130% of the benchmark. Presumably, the assumption is that the heaviest bullet will produce the highest pressure. As stated, the .400/.350 and .350 No. 2 cases are, indeed, identical (factory Kynoch .350 No. 2 ammo often had ".400/.350" headstamps). In fact, they are the same cartridge - the .350 No. 2 is simply a light bullet, high velocity loading of the .400/.350 - and the British proof houses treated them as such. So, original British .350 No. 2 rifles were proofed for the normal powder charge used for the heaviest bullet that was used in the cartridge - 43 Cordite, 310 MAX - the .400/.350 load, NOT the .350 No. 2 load, and original .350 No. 2 rifles are so marked. Vig mentioned in his article that his rifle had the 43 Cordite, 310 MAX proof marks. Another DGJ contributor, in an article about a safari in Namibia, mentioned that his Gibbs 350 No. 2 was so marked, as was another .350 No. 2 advertised for sale by Lewis Drake in DGJ. I've handled a number of .350 No. 2s personally and have always paid special attention to them, because I want one and am curious. I've never seen one that was marked otherwise.
-----------------------------------------

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Rigby 350 No2 4seventy 26/01/04 05:20 PM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 mbogo375   18/02/04 05:52 PM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 JoeR   19/02/04 10:05 AM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 mbogo375   19/02/04 11:25 AM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 400NitroExpress   28/01/04 04:17 PM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 4seventy   28/01/04 11:56 PM
. * * Re: Rigby 350 No2 400NitroExpress   29/01/04 11:43 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 325 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 3461

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved