Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or????

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3699
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or????
      01/01/07 11:08 AM

Slightly off-topic, but reading Weiland's DGR book brought this query to the front-burner. I believe the correct terminology for the US Enfield was Pattern 1914 or P-14 (.303) and Model 1917 or M-17 (.30-06).

I take Terry Weiland's repeated use of the term 'P-17' to be in error. The only text I have specifically dealing with the P-14 and M-17 is Ian Skennerton's book "The US Enfield", which is a definitive text IMO, and I have checked this in a number of other military texts and rifle encyclopaedias on my bookshelf.

I think we should try to stick to the correct nomenclature wherever possible on these forums, Weiland's enthusiasm notwithstanding! Unless you're into steam locomotives, or HIV genetics, there is no such thing as a "P-17".

And here's another thing: I notice that Americans are hung-up on 'cock-on-closing' for their bolt-rifles, which makes absolutely no sense to me for two important reasons. Firstly, the bolt has the dual role of primary extraction of the case, and cocking the striker. Why put both these functions onto the same bolt-lift, when their resistance is cumulative? Isn't it smarter to do one on the lift, and one on the close, thus seperating their resistance, and avoiding their cumulative effect? The second point involves simple ergonomics: far more force can be exerted by the outstretched arm pushing downwards and inwards, than can ever be brought to bear pushing upwards and outwards! Try it for yourself!

Most Australians of my generation were brought up on Lee Enfields and P-14s, and cock-on-closing is second nature. I stand in awe at the amount of money changing hands within the US custom rifle industry to convert 'cock-on-closing' to 'cock-on-opening', when to me it defies common logic.

Anyway, there, finished.
Back to the virtues of the .300 H&H, which I would roundly endorse (in a properly customised P-14 or M-17) over the .300 Win Mag any day of the week!

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? Woodbeef 01/01/07 02:54 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? WyoJoe   02/01/07 05:05 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? DarylS   01/01/07 04:44 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? mickey   02/01/07 12:01 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? Woodbeef   01/01/07 11:09 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? DoubleD   01/01/07 03:58 PM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? Marrakai   01/01/07 05:03 PM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? Marrakai   01/01/07 11:08 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? DarylS   03/01/07 04:53 AM
. * * Re: Convert P-17 to 300 H&H or???? Raff   01/01/07 03:32 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 24 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 3301

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved