Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

PatagonHunter
.300 member


Reged: 20/01/06
Posts: 249
Loc: Bariloche, Patagonia Argentina
Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash
      06/09/21 08:40 PM

Hi Rule,

I am still asking myself what was the goal of that large case when designed around 1900...
Even with the 150 gr bullet, the 8x57 with the same bullet weight (slightly lower BC than the.30") had an advantage of 200 f/s over the 30-06, when fired in the 29" barrel lenght of the GEW 98.

The 7,65x53 Belgian-Turkish-Argentine, in the time of adoption order, was the first smokeless Mauser designed cartridge. The diameters of rim, extraction groove and head dimentions were not the same as the ones in the 8x57. The 7,65x53 cases does NOT derives from the 8x57. By the way, the 8x57 was NOT A MAUSER CARTRIDGE no matter the actual name. It was a developement of the 1888 Commission, together with the 1888 rifle.
The bullet with the first 7,65x53, the 1889, 1890 and 1891 rifles, were tipical round nosed heavy for caliber bullet of around 210 gr (depending of the country) at, more or less, 2000 to 2100 f/s.
When the 1909 Argentine Mauser was adopted to update from the excelent 1891 one, the bullet weight went, following the trend, to around 150 gr, flat base at 2800 f/s or so, from the 29" 1909 Mauser barrel lenght.
Later, a 12 gr/185 gr bullet was provided, developed and used in the machine guns, a boat-tail design at around 2500 f/s in the long rifle barrel.
In 1950, the military arsenals made a batch of mach grade cartridge with a 12 gram bullet. This batch was of truly great match quality!!!!
The last military 7,65x53 cartridge made for our 1909/1891 Mauser rifles was the FN HERSTAL 1978 contract. EXCELENT, perhaps THE BEST AMMO EVER MADE for them. Great quality brass, Berdan primed, ball sferical powder with an extreme boat tail bullet of .312" and 174 gr.
Match quality cartridges seldom seen as military ammo!!!! In 60 cm barrel lenghts, the velocity is around 2400 f/s.

Best Regards

PH

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp 09/09/20 02:18 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   09/09/20 07:08 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   09/09/20 07:26 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   09/09/20 08:55 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash 93x64mm   09/09/20 10:12 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash DarylS   10/09/20 02:04 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   10/09/20 02:37 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash DarylS   10/09/20 10:13 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   10/09/20 01:09 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash DarylS   10/09/20 03:18 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   10/09/20 06:21 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   10/09/20 11:37 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   11/09/20 02:24 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   11/09/20 11:42 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash szihn   12/09/20 01:04 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   12/09/20 07:08 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   12/09/20 07:23 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash rpeck   26/08/21 10:07 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   28/08/21 07:50 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Homer   29/08/21 09:07 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Northman   01/09/21 01:08 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   05/09/21 07:57 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   05/09/21 08:27 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   05/09/21 09:44 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash crshelton   05/09/21 10:42 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash kodiak   05/09/21 01:40 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   05/09/21 09:46 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   05/09/21 10:20 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash 9.3x57   07/09/21 09:00 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   06/09/21 07:19 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   06/09/21 08:40 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   07/09/21 09:07 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Northman   08/09/21 08:50 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash 9.3x57   07/09/21 09:12 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   07/09/21 07:00 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash PatagonHunter   07/09/21 07:14 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   02/09/21 03:27 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   03/09/21 02:24 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash rpeck   03/09/21 10:57 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash topcat   04/09/21 09:04 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   27/08/21 02:04 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   27/08/21 01:42 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash rpeck   23/12/21 10:04 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash 260rem   23/12/21 01:28 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Postman   26/08/21 11:25 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   27/08/21 02:03 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash 9.3x57   07/09/21 11:03 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   12/09/20 06:56 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash NitroXAdministrator   11/09/20 02:08 PM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash crshelton   11/09/20 04:48 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rule303   11/09/20 07:05 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   11/09/20 11:03 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash EDELWEISS   11/09/20 09:46 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Ripp   11/09/20 10:59 AM
. * * Re: 375 H&H vs 9.3x62-Cartridge-clash Rod4861   10/09/20 07:46 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 41 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 12669

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved