Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

mstarling
.224 member


Reged: 07/01/04
Posts: 37
Loc: West Virginia, USA
Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS
      21/04/05 02:49 AM

I have a scoped Chapuis in 9.3x74R and a Searcy Field Grade in .470 NE.

The Chapuis also has 20 ga barrels and makes an almost perfect combination for its intended use. It is probably the best shotgun I've ever used on pheasant, grouse, chukkar, and quail. Absolutely wonderful ... with a very, very long reach.

As a 9.3 it has been a little challenging to create loads that match its regulation. When that was done, it has been working very well.

Chapuis stocks tend to be a little long. Recoil of a full house 9.3x74R on such a light rifle is a bit surprising. I'd not want to shoot one in .470 if it is as relatively light per caliber.

The Searcy is more accurate and easier to load for than the 9.3x74R ... but is definitely a "working" gun. Not as slender or "elegant." I think that has been improved on the PH model.

There is a fella on this board with a Chapuis .470 who has shot my Searcy and Chapuis. I understand he has ordered a 9.3x74R Chapuis as well. Maybe he will chime in here. (Frank???)

In the medium bore the Chapuis would be hard to beat. I'd certainly try the fit of both the Chapuis and the Searcy in larger calibers. (I love the Searcy and would not change my choice, but it was driven by cost as I am not well to do any more.) I don't see how Searcy's service could be any better ... hard to say of Chapuis.

I think Chapuis made a 500/416 at one time if not currently ... they provided the chamber drawings that Kreighoff verified they used. If that caliber is available that might be a dynamite compromise. However, I've heard it said that Butch felt that the 500/416 has a recoil almost equivalent to the .470 NE.

mike starling

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* SEARCY vs CHAPUIS bjlooper 20/04/05 06:35 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS larcher   22/04/05 03:05 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS CptCurlAdministrator   22/04/05 03:31 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS new_guy   21/04/05 05:24 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS mickey   22/04/05 03:53 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   22/04/05 05:57 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS mickey   22/04/05 02:21 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   23/04/05 02:59 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS mickey   23/04/05 03:41 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   23/04/05 11:17 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS mickey   23/04/05 03:36 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS NitroXAdministrator   22/04/05 03:55 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS CptCurlAdministrator   22/04/05 08:58 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   21/04/05 12:56 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS NitroXAdministrator   21/04/05 03:24 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS bonanza   20/04/05 10:52 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS new_guy   21/04/05 12:01 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS Rell   21/04/05 12:26 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS mstarling   21/04/05 02:49 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   21/04/05 02:41 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS SteveH   20/04/05 10:52 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS chopper   25/04/05 06:06 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS 500grains   25/04/05 11:35 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS new_guy   25/04/05 01:11 PM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS JeffWemmer470   03/05/05 03:51 AM
. * * Re: SEARCY vs CHAPUIS new_guy   25/04/05 09:33 AM

Extra information
1 registered and 171 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 7274

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved