Forums.NitroExpress.com

Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact NitroExpress.com: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies

*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

You are not logged in. [Login]

Main Index · Search · Active Topics
New user · Who's Online · FAQ · Calendar

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Lee Speed Forum & Archive

Juglansregia
.275 member

Reged: 20/04/08
Posts: 51
Loc: Tasmania

Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's
13/11/14 01:41 PM

Respectfully, I considered your statement to the effect of the set being 90% machined as being a "misnomer", and given the literal meaning of the word I think I have very fair grounds for my reaction. I considered those few words very carefully, and I tried hard to make no hasty assumptions. My interpretation of those words and what seemed to be the context of their use, was that you were not happy with the quality of the machining job, because they took you so long to fit - and therefore that my work was responsible for that. Those words made me feel as though you thought the set had been mis-represented, which I do take personally. Hence my use of the term "rough" machining as by labelling it a misnomer, you clearly didn't think the job a clean one.

I have no problems with you stating your viewpoint, or posting it. My other comments were made to state my viewpoint, and to attempt to qualify it. Perhaps you could qualify your opinion about the inletting/machining "misnomer" - as it is the sole basis for my original post?

I had and have no wish to make a direct, or subversive, attempt at denigration of the quality of your own work - but rather make statements based on my own experiences. I would not ever have the desire to spoil someones enjoyment of this work. However in reflection I can see how you may have taken my comments personally, especially considering "assumptions and sensibilities". My use of the term "decent stocker" was admittedly not the best choice of words, and would have been much better written as "professional stocker" or "accomplished stocker" to best put my words into perspective and avoid unintentional offense. Other than that I think the statement is a fair point, made in a democratic forum.

My only intention was to state my objection about the "misnomer", which remains, as does my explanation of it. Perhaps my willingness to state things from my perspective could be regarded as a positive rather than a negative? There are two sides to a coin.

Post Extras

Print Post

Remind Me!

Notify Moderator

Entire topic
Subject	Posted by	Posted on
BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	12/06/14 07:09 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	CHAPUISARMES	12/06/14 07:25 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	14/06/14 08:39 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	20/06/14 05:37 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	20/06/14 05:41 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	23/06/14 03:22 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	gryphon	23/06/14 04:32 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Huvius	24/06/14 12:22 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	25/06/14 03:36 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	26/06/14 04:59 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	27/06/14 01:04 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	27/06/14 01:07 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	27/06/14 01:10 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Sarg	29/06/14 07:12 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	29/06/14 07:38 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Sarg	30/06/14 06:46 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	01/07/14 03:00 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Deutsche_Vortrekker	01/07/14 08:23 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	93x64mm	01/07/14 08:51 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	tinker	01/07/14 08:49 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	02/07/14 07:22 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	rigbymauser	03/07/14 02:19 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	03/07/14 11:36 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Jorge_in_Oz	24/10/14 03:56 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	tinker	03/07/14 03:30 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Nailcreek	04/07/14 11:56 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	06/07/14 10:02 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	08/07/14 03:37 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	08/07/14 03:44 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Euan	09/07/14 09:07 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	23/07/14 09:22 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Claydog	23/07/14 09:39 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	27/07/14 01:28 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	31/07/14 02:14 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Nailcreek	02/08/14 12:27 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	CarlsenHighway	06/08/14 08:15 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	07/08/14 11:10 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	08/08/14 12:03 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Nailcreek	11/08/14 12:00 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	11/08/14 01:31 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	16/08/14 08:55 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Euan	18/08/14 07:16 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Tentman	19/08/14 05:36 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	19/08/14 06:53 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Euan	20/08/14 06:42 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	eljefedouble	20/08/14 12:39 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Euan	20/08/14 06:54 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	24/08/14 02:08 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Juglansregia	13/11/14 01:41 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	24/08/14 02:11 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Juglansregia	13/11/14 10:16 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	13/11/14 10:46 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Igorrock	24/08/14 04:12 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	25/08/14 10:35 AM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Igorrock	25/08/14 02:51 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	Deutsche_Vortrekker	03/07/14 01:43 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	03/07/14 12:46 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	03/07/14 12:48 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	30/06/14 01:40 PM
Re: BSA 1900 No 1 Sporter q's	VonGruff	29/06/14 01:46 PM

Extra information

0 registered and 17 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator: NitroX

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 19937

Jump to

NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5

Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact

Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved