Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

DUGABOY1
.400 member


Reged: 02/02/03
Posts: 1340
Loc: TEXAS USA
Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy
      20/02/12 03:02 AM

Quote:



Regarding negative comments on the Blaser breech system:

ACTUALLY, THE BLASER TILTING BREECH BLOCK SYSTEM IS CONSIDERABLY BETTER THAN THE UNINFORMED WOULD LEAD ONE TO BELIEVE. YES, IT MAY LOOK “STRANGE” TO THE UNINFORMED, BUT IT CERTAINLY ISN'T A “CONTRAPTION.” IT ISN'T HIDEOUS EITHER, EXCEPT IN THE EYES OF THE UNINFORMED. MAY I SUGGEST THAT YOU ALL EDUCATE YOURSELF FIRST, DO A BIT OF READING, BEFORE CRITISIZING SOMETHING YOU DONT' UNDERSTAND?[/COLOR]






Doubleriflejack, it seems the people you are cussing are not the ones misinformed, unless reading Blaser’s advertisements is considered education.

The Blaser S2 is not only about the ugliest “CONTRAPTION” with two barrels I’ve ever seen, but is saddled with some real problems of design. The hood above the chambers for the locking of the breechblock does make the lock-up tight, but is in the way of a fast and effortless re-load in a hurry, and poses a real hindrance to removing a stuck case or clearing a head separation.

However the biggest problem with this double rifle is the auto de-cocking system, and no facility for the rifle to cock it’s self after a re-loading after firing the rifle. This system de-cocks the rifle when it is opened for any reason, and must be manually re-cocked before the rifle can be fired after being opened. This is a dangerous feature when facing dangerous game in close quarters, when the first shot or the first two shots do not stop a determined charge. Anyone who thinks this is a good feature is the one that is misinformed.

Many think the de-cocking system of the Blaser S2 is the same as the Krieghoff system, and it is definitely not the same. The K-double, once cocked and fired and/or opened for a re-load, or any other reason “RE-COCKS IT’S SELF” and is ready to fire as soon as it is closed with nothing more than the pull of a trigger. This is not the case with the Blaser s-2. That rifle has no facility for being automatically re-cocked on opening, and must be manually re-cocked no matter why it is opened or no matter the condition the system was in when opened. This is not a feature that was anyone’s best idea on a rifle chambered for a cartridge designed to be used on dangerous game. Some think the lack of no ejectors is a draw-back, and to some it maybe, but I have double with and without ejectors and I can live with one or the other equally.

The rest of the draw-backs of the S-2 could be tolerated if the system was re-designed to work the same as the Krieghoff. When auto safeties are frowned on, when fitted to dangerous game double rifles, what was Blaser thinking when the designed a system that actually “DE-COCKED” the rifle on opening for any reason, rather than RE-COCKING it making it ready to fire as soon as it is closed.

The stock is poorly designed for a double rifle, and seems to have been done so to be able to use the same butt stock blank used on the straight pull bolt rifle, with the pistol grip too tight for a two trigger double rifle.

On the positive side, the scope attachment is a real plus, and was well designed for a quick detach, and re-attach of a scope for special purpose sighting system.

The designer of the S2 is certainly not INFORMED of standing a charge of something like a lightening fast lion, who kills for a living and knows exactly how to do it quickly!

None of this matters if you are going to use the S-2 for hunting driven wild boar, or roe deer, but many of the chamberings in the S-2 seems to be recommending the rifle for dangerous game. Let’s just hope the Blaser S-2 owner doesn’t get “INFORMED” by a lion or Cape buffalo hitting him while he decides why the rifle is not shooting after a re-load!
..................................................................... [/COLOR]:(

--------------------
..........Mac >>>===(x)===>
DUGABOY1, and MacD37 founding member of DRSS www.doublerifleshooterssociety.com
"If I die today, I have had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator 11/12/03 07:24 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   03/02/12 07:33 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DUGABOY1   20/02/12 03:02 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy MichiganShooter   23/02/12 03:55 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   23/02/12 06:06 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DarylS   24/02/12 06:55 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator   05/10/24 08:36 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy AFRO408   01/02/12 08:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy CHAPUISARMES   01/02/12 08:53 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   01/02/12 11:49 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Grenadier   02/02/12 01:07 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy poprivit   02/02/12 03:46 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   02/02/12 04:26 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 577500WR   02/02/12 08:56 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator   02/02/12 10:57 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   02/02/12 12:23 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   02/02/12 02:15 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy BPEBuff   03/02/12 12:57 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy poprivit   03/02/12 05:39 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   03/02/12 07:35 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 07:44 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   03/02/12 09:30 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 09:32 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   03/02/12 09:52 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   03/02/12 11:02 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   03/02/12 12:05 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 12:12 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy HogPilot   03/02/12 07:28 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   03/02/12 08:26 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   04/02/12 09:44 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   04/02/12 09:56 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   04/02/12 02:18 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   05/02/12 07:25 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mickey   05/02/12 03:34 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   06/02/12 12:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   06/02/12 01:09 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   06/02/12 03:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   06/02/12 08:52 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   06/02/12 10:12 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   06/02/12 01:42 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy HogPilot   06/02/12 05:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   06/02/12 06:48 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   07/02/12 06:53 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   07/02/12 07:33 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   07/02/12 08:12 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   07/02/12 10:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   07/02/12 10:49 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   07/02/12 11:17 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   07/02/12 02:47 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   07/02/12 06:34 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mickey   08/02/12 05:50 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   08/02/12 09:50 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   07/02/12 01:38 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   05/02/12 09:22 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   05/02/12 03:28 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   02/02/12 04:14 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DarylS   02/02/12 03:42 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary DBBill   12/12/03 05:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary mickey   13/12/03 12:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary NitroXAdministrator   05/10/24 08:38 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary grantc   01/02/12 07:49 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 350 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 25327

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved