Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

kuduae
.400 member


Reged: 13/01/10
Posts: 1792
Loc: middle of Germany
Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy
      04/02/12 09:44 AM

IMHO an action invented before WW1 may not be called "new-fangled" exactly. Franz Jaeger of Suhl patented his "break-open block action" quite early, German DRPatent Nr. 209113 of 1909 and US patent 928608 of 1908. What some of you called a "breech cover" is in fact an essential part of the lockup, a top extension of the barrels or, in case of the Blaser, of the monoblock. The moveable breechblock, containing the strikers, is L-Shaped. On closing such a gun the block slides up behind the breechends at a right angle, just like a falling block. The lower end of the L hooks over the rear barrel lump. The ridge on top of the block engages a groove in the underside of the barrel extension. The block has to be movable to allow the gun to break open around the hinge pin, but when closed, it is locked directly to the barrels. In fact, you may disassemble barrel and breechblock from such a gun, load the barrels, slip on the breechblock, keep it in place by a rubber band or a piece of tape and fire the barrel by hitting the firing pin with some hammer. All pressure is contained within barrel and breechblock, the action body merely keeps everything, lock, stock and barrel together and transfers recoil to your shoulder.
I do not defend Baser guns, I don't like them at all. In fact, someone once suspected me of catching pimples from touching a Blaser gun, but I criticize style and workmanship, not old Franz Jaeger's basic action design. But on a double rifle I deem it unnecessary. Simply don't use rimless, belted or high-pressure "modern" cartridges in a double. Proper dr cartridges are rimmed and comparatively low pressure, simply as old-fashioned as a double. Then a conventional break-open action with a long water table, generously designed double underbolting and some sort of third bite / top fastener is sufficient. But too many hunters believe now that they cannot kill anything without a load making at least 3000 fps. They are the buyers of Blaser's contraptions.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator 11/12/03 07:24 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   03/02/12 07:33 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DUGABOY1   20/02/12 03:02 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy MichiganShooter   23/02/12 03:55 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   23/02/12 06:06 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DarylS   24/02/12 06:55 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator   05/10/24 08:36 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy AFRO408   01/02/12 08:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy CHAPUISARMES   01/02/12 08:53 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   01/02/12 11:49 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Grenadier   02/02/12 01:07 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy poprivit   02/02/12 03:46 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   02/02/12 04:26 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 577500WR   02/02/12 08:56 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy NitroXAdministrator   02/02/12 10:57 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   02/02/12 12:23 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   02/02/12 02:15 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy BPEBuff   03/02/12 12:57 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy poprivit   03/02/12 05:39 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   03/02/12 07:35 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 07:44 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   03/02/12 09:30 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 09:32 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   03/02/12 09:52 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   03/02/12 11:02 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   03/02/12 12:05 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   03/02/12 12:12 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy HogPilot   03/02/12 07:28 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   03/02/12 08:26 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   04/02/12 09:44 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   04/02/12 09:56 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   04/02/12 02:18 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   05/02/12 07:25 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mickey   05/02/12 03:34 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   06/02/12 12:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   06/02/12 01:09 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   06/02/12 03:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   06/02/12 08:52 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   06/02/12 10:12 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   06/02/12 01:42 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy HogPilot   06/02/12 05:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   06/02/12 06:48 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy doubleriflejack   07/02/12 06:53 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   07/02/12 07:33 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy kuduae   07/02/12 08:12 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   07/02/12 10:31 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   07/02/12 10:49 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tophet1   07/02/12 11:17 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   07/02/12 02:47 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Mike_Bailey   07/02/12 06:34 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mickey   08/02/12 05:50 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy mauserand9mm   08/02/12 09:50 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy tinker   07/02/12 01:38 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy 500Nitro   05/02/12 09:22 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy chuckT   05/02/12 03:28 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy Huvius   02/02/12 04:14 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversy DarylS   02/02/12 03:42 AM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary DBBill   12/12/03 05:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary mickey   13/12/03 12:37 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary NitroXAdministrator   05/10/24 08:38 PM
. * * Re: Double of the Day - a bit of controversary grantc   01/02/12 07:49 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 542 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 25417

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved