Quote:

---

Another advantage is the costs associated with reloading your ammo. I have done some checking and found the components for the .303 are slightly higher in price than are the 30-30 components.

So, if you wanted to compare the costs, and not the nostalgia of the calibers, I think the 30-30 wins that one.

---

Bit of a moot point when talking about double rifles, and the difference must be tiny and very dependent on location.

The simple fact is, if buying ammo, the .303 will out do the .30-30 everytime.

But who buys ammo for a double and doesn't reload?

If buying components, I can't see the components being any different in price?

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"

Edited by NitroX (12/05/11 05:01 PM)

Post Extras