Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity
      29/12/09 03:47 PM


Too much or too little velocity can ditch the effectiveness of a given bullet.

My father had been student to the gun from his early boyhood on.
Years ago we'd been discussing the 'cupro-nickel' era.
One part of the talk had to do with penetration of FMJ solids.
He'd noted that there was a specific envelope of terminal velocity where the (6.5/160gr for instance) would be most effective, and at times the relatively low velocity numbers had me second guessing...

Years later in my own studies I'd found British munitions trials data that spoke directly to what my dad had been telling me years earlier (Dear ol Dad, rest in peace!) -- I could dig this up, or anyone here could do a Google Books Search for the data from any number of Victorian-era publications.


As it seems to me, the cartridges (back then specifically) were designed soup-to-nuts, with everything developed to maximize the performance to a set of 'command performance' criteria.
Want maximum penetration from a very compact cartridge that's easy on rifles and riflemen, but hell on whatever it's pointed at?
Want that penetration at a minimum of recoil?
Fine!
I have enjoyed many a long night up reading 19th century gun industry engineering texts.
Great stuff!




Cheers
Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity Ripp 18/12/09 01:10 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity Paul   18/12/09 08:00 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity chuck375   28/12/09 01:43 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity DarylS   29/12/09 05:12 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity DarylS   10/01/10 02:22 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 9.3x57   29/12/09 01:25 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity cooch   30/12/09 02:16 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 9.3x57   31/12/09 01:06 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity chuck375   10/01/10 01:40 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity JabaliHunter   10/01/10 02:22 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity Der_Jaeger   10/01/10 05:55 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity chuck375   18/01/10 03:45 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity Ripp   29/12/09 02:48 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity tinker   29/12/09 03:47 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 9.3x57   30/12/09 12:37 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 458ONLY   30/12/09 12:18 PM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 9.3x57   18/12/09 01:24 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity bonanza   18/12/09 02:00 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity 9.3x57   18/12/09 03:29 AM
. * * Re: Big Bore bullets--sectional density vs velocity Ripp   18/12/09 02:10 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 169 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 7376

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved