dok
.275 member
Reged: 21/04/05
Posts: 87
Loc: NT, Australia
|
|
Recieved my brand new CZ 550 "American Safari" in .416 Rigby the other week...
Whilst I wasn't totally impressed with the finish (and fitting) on first looking at the rifle straight out of the box, I did think that it would still make a very good bush gun. I do a lot of buffalo shooting so I didn't really want a gun that I would be worried about getting a scratch here or there.
I was planning to get some minor work done on the gun to fine tune it and a couple of other little things.
I then had a closer inspection...
The express sights were interesting. When flipping up the 200 yard sight, the white sight line was about 1.5 mm to the right of the 100 yards sight line. When the 300 yard sight was flipped up, it was about 1mm to the left of the 100 yard sight line (I was going to work out the variation over the distances but could'nt be bothered).
I wondered which one was actually correct (maybe none of them).
I then placed the bolt into the receiver...
Yes, a little rough but I didn't expect anything different from a brand new rifle. I worked the bolt a few times and it actually jammed when working the bolt rearward. The bolt actually jumped a little when it cleared the front receiver and then jammed when it was about about 5 to 10 mm rearward.
Well, tried as I might, I couldn't work out why it was doing this. I thought it might just be because it was new and needed it to be worked over gently and worn in a little bit.
I did this for a while, working the bolt back and forth. it didn't help, it only got worse.
I decided to send it to the Gunsmith that was going to do the work for me (he just happens to be an authorised CZ dealing as well).
He had one look at it and gave me a call and told me the bad news. He was going to send it straight back to the importer for them to have assess the rifle. He said he wasn't going to touch the rifle (and rightly so) because he believed the fault was quiet serious (no kidding).
I just can't believe that a new rifle of this quality (or lack of it) can pass quality control, not once (factory) but twice (I was told the Aust. importer looks at each rifle as well??).
I haven't even had a shot of the rifle yet. Not impressed (which is an understatement but continuous swearing on the forum isn't the right place for it).
I don't know if they'll give my money back (they should), but I am hoping they'll give me another rifle. I have been told the Australian importer for the CZs is quite good to deal with, I hope so).
I was considering the Ruger M77 in 416 Rigby but at an extra $1000 more (than the CZ) I wasn't going to get that passed by the bank manager (polite name for the wife).
I really didn't think that I could go too wrong with the CZ, as I owned an early BRNO 602 in 458 and it was a great solid rifle. But sadly, there is no comparison between the two.
I hope that I do get my money back and I'll order a Ruger and seeing that it'll take three months to arrive, it might give me enough time to scrape up the extra money or i might sell another one of my rifles (which I dislike doing).
I'm just shaking my head, I've read the other posts about some of the problems with CZ rifles but I thought these people were just damn unluckly, "how wrong can a brand spanking new rifle be". Well, I get more pissed off the more I think about it.
I'll keep you posted.
Cheers
-------------------- DOK
|
wombat
.300 member
Reged: 06/03/04
Posts: 163
Loc: Australia
|
|
Sorry to hear of your problems. I have the same rifle that was rough out of the box-similar to your troubles but nowhere near as bad-responded well to slicking up at the 'smiths.I also changed to Mod 70 style safety-you can accidently snick the standard one on when working a bolt in a hurry. Get money back or replacement rifle-don't get stuffed around with promises of "repairs" However,mine is the earlier hog-back version of the 550
Edited by wombat (05/11/05 06:02 PM)
|
500Nitro
.450 member
Reged: 06/01/03
Posts: 7244
Loc: Victoria, Australia
|
|
CZ is distributed in Australia by Winchester (Olin) in Geelong.
I very much doubt they check every rifle before shipping.
I would certainly NOT accept repairs but I would try another rifle before buying a Ruger.
The CZ550's are not as good as the old 602's.
Good luck
500 Nitro
|
Bushie
.224 member
Reged: 24/10/05
Posts: 36
Loc: Australia
|
|
dok , Unfortunately you read a lot of similar stories about the CZ 550 in magnum calibres . The smaller calibre CZ's seem to be much better for some reason .I just bought a CZ 527 and it's great ! Olin might swap you for a Winchester Model 70 if you don't want another CZ . Don't think you can get them in .416 but they do a .375 and I think a .458 .
|
500grains
.416 member
Reged: 16/02/04
Posts: 4732
Loc: Salt Lake City, Utah USA
|
|
It seems that CZ, Land Rover and Winchester are competing for the annual award for worst quality control.
|
Gibbs505
.333 member
Reged: 09/08/03
Posts: 442
Loc: BC, Canada
|
|
I hope that it gets better for you!
-------------------- So I can't spell, so what?
Those who beat their swords into ploughshares, will plough for those who don't!
Those who fail to learn from history will be doomed to repeat it
|
dok
.275 member
Reged: 21/04/05
Posts: 87
Loc: NT, Australia
|
|
Well, the rifle has been sent back to the people at Winchester (Olin - Australia) and they have agreed that the rifle will be replaced. They will be taking up the fault with CZ and also asking about the express sights.
I must admit, they were good people (Olin) to deal with and did not mention once that they wanted to have a go to repair the rifle rather then getting me a new one. Well done.
All I have to do is to wait for another rifle, which isn't a real problem as I haven't received my 100 rounds of handloads yet.
Cheers
-------------------- DOK
|
jro45
.300 member
Reged: 25/12/03
Posts: 192
Loc: DE, USA
|
|
None of my rifles are CZ so I can't complaine about them but I hope they streighten out for you.
|