Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)
Norsk
.224 member


Reged: 06/08/17
Posts: 9
Loc: Norge
Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?
      #323948 - 29/01/19 05:08 AM


I live in Scandinavia where Blaser repeating Rifles are quite popular.I have inspected and fired quite a few and just do not see where the money goes into these Rifles?

Many of the Rifles owners are convinced they own an example of the very pinnacle of Gunsmithing and hunting prowess.

Personally I see another example of CNC machining and mass production.

I would love to be proved wrong.Please educate me if you can?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Norsk]
      #323950 - 29/01/19 05:21 AM

I'm not interested in proving anything here, but in my opinion the Blaser system is solid and very well engineered.

I don't own one - the guns are expensive and I'm more inclined to spend my money on obsolete equipment from long ago, but as a modern hunting tool they're in a class on their own.

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: tinker]
      #323951 - 29/01/19 05:28 AM

Couple guys I know locally, love their Blasers.
One other guy had his blow up at the club range.
Reassembled incorrectly, or something. I do not know the story, but
he campaigned hard to have them declared a dangerous design or some such, to no avail.
edited:
I just remembered, just as he chambered a round & before closing the bolt, the rifle fired. The bolt erupted from the action ripping out a chunk of his face.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: tinker]
      #323957 - 29/01/19 08:10 AM

Quote:

I'm not interested in proving anything here, but in my opinion the Blaser system is solid and very well engineered.

I don't own one - the guns are expensive and I'm more inclined to spend my money on obsolete equipment from long ago, but as a modern hunting tool they're in a class on their own.




I resemble that statement..

I actually do own one--have two barrels, 300Win and 416Rem..
Very well balanced, accurate, quick firing and is a great package to travel with..

IF i were to head to Africa in the not too distant future, pretty sure this is one that would come along for plains game..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Edited by Ripp (30/01/19 12:18 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #323968 - 29/01/19 11:51 AM

I’ve had several.... An R93, an R8, and two K95s......

My thoughts? ( for whatever they may be worth anyway):

Tolerances are held very tight on all Blaser rilfes I have had opportunity to own or fondle.

The R93 was very ergonomic, relatively light weight and unbelievably accurate..... This one went in for a trade when it went click when it was supposed to go bang far too many times, i.e., almost once every magazine full this unacceptable cantankerous behaviour was evident....... The R93 design is considered by many to be extremely unsafe and there is record of several serious injuries when the bolt lets go and blows much of the user’s face away.

The R8 was built far more robust (and noticably heavier) than the R93.... same design principle but the fact that the manufacturer redesigned the bolt and it’s locking fingers in the manner in which they did would appear to be as close to a manufacturer’s admission that the R93 was truly a dangerous and unsafe design..... So some would say..... Anyhow, I find the forearm much blockier and nowhere near as nice and ergonomic as the R93..... The R8 was also cantankerous and would shoot factory ammo fine, but would not chamber any reloads no matter which of several die sets I used nor whether I used small base sizing dies or not......

I think that if Blaser had built the R8 as a pump action rifle, they would have achieved creating a rfile that is truly fast to cycle, although maybe they didn’t because pump action rifles are frowned upon in many countries and viewed to be nearly as evil as a self loading semi automatic. The R8 cycles very quickly due to the straight pull design but it makes one lift or tilt their head away from the stock to avoid having a cheek or nose getting smacked by the sharp metal edges at the rear of the bolt.... The bolt throw is overly long for most cartridges as there is only one receiver size available and associated bolt throw length. Maybe if a shooter is built with a nice short neck this may or may not be an issue but it sure was for me, being 6’ 3” with a long neck.

Now on to the K95s...... Super light weight, unbelievably accurate, ( so accurate, you wouldn’t be inclined to believe me if I related just how accurate they are!!!). ergonomic to a fault and perfect functioning, each time, every time.... can’t say enough good aboout them.

All the Blasers mentioned above made use of the wonderful and repeatable Blaser saddle mount..... Again, an engineering marvel and something I have total resepect for.

Now back to the question as to whether they offer value to the end user...... I’d have to say they absolutely would if they didn’t exhibit the R93 click vs bang (and in some cases boom vs bang!!!) or the R8 fail to chamber issues.

Edited by Postman (29/01/19 12:28 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #323972 - 29/01/19 12:19 PM

Interesting, Postman, must have been a R93 then.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #323973 - 29/01/19 12:39 PM

Quote:

Interesting, Postman, must have been a R93 then.




Hi Daryl:

Yes I suspect so...... Such a pity because I really really want to like the R93 and there are a few new ones still up for sale at significant discounts, but hell, who wants a rifle that just might act like a Bouncing Betty, particularily if one is shooting it on a very remote hunt with medical help a long ways off...

Edited by Postman (29/01/19 12:59 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Homer
.416 member


Reged: 07/04/09
Posts: 3081
Loc: Canberra, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #323979 - 29/01/19 03:49 PM

G'Day Fella's,

Norsk, I have never owned a Blaser R3/R8 bolt gun myself but several mates/customers do, and they love them.

They did have some serious issues, when as you mentioned, the bolts came back into the faces, of sereral of their users.
From what I was told, these were all chambered in .300 Weatherby.
Also, I was told that when this occured, apparently Blaser bought the name and manufacturing rights, etc, for Mauser.
Apparently, this was just as an emergency "Plan B", in case the Blaser R93, turned out to be a dud?
Some time after the above occured, the Blaser R8 appeared on the scene .............

I have heard of the Blaser's being referred to, as "Yuppy Guns" but maybe, only by people that could never afford one?
I have never seen R93/R8 that won't shoot, and by this I meen, finger nail size 5 x shot groups with factory ammo (@ 100 M/Yards)!

Apparently, they also had some issues, when used in area's with high dust levels.
Apparently, if the rifle action and barrel extension was not cleaned regularly (maybe daily?), there could be "A Failure to Funtion" issue.
Not good if, your after dangerous game ...........
Also, this dust aspect, may have been the reason that the Blaser, Tac 2 sniper rifles, seems to have died a natural death with the Military Special Forces?

One of my above mates, gave up taking anything but his Blasers on international hunting trips.
Just for the convienience of taking down the rifle, and packing it in with his clothes, in his suit case/check in luggage.

I do have one issue, with the Christensen Arms Carbon Fibre version, of the Blaser.
The transition of the sporting pistol grip, into the rear action area of this one piece stock, was exceedingly unpleasant to hang onto and made a lump of rough sawn 4" x 2" (or 2" x 4", in the US), feel ergonomic by comparison.

Norsk, whilst I would not hesitate in purchasing a Blaser R8 myself, I'm too old and set in my ways, using 90* Turn Bolt rifle's, to change now.

Hope that helps

D'oh!
Homer

--------------------
"Beware the Lolly Pop of Mediocrity,
Lick it Once and You Will Suck Forever"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Homer]
      #323982 - 29/01/19 07:25 PM

Re the R93/ I know the Australian Federal Police tested the holding power of the bolt by breaking of one locking petal at a time until down to just 3. These were spaced equal distances apart. Calibre was either 300WM or 338 Lap, do not know which one. It held.

However if it didn't lock up properly look what happened. Yes all of them have very fine tolerances and as I understand it high maintinance to keep them reliable in very dusty conditions.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarg
.400 member


Reged: 20/01/07
Posts: 1365
Loc: Nil
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #323995 - 29/01/19 09:30 PM

We used to get a lot of clients with the R93, dust & dirt were a issue but amazingly accurate, I read all I could on the mishaps & how strong the action was, I think if a case failed from over load or bad case/loading the escaping gases could flow back into the finger locking breech & open the bolt heck bolt in faces ?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
93mouse
.375 member


Reged: 17/08/07
Posts: 744
Loc: Slovenia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Sarg]
      #324001 - 29/01/19 10:02 PM

I own R93 since 1998 - odd 20 years, it was around from dusty october Zim heat to snowy freezing Alpine tops, mud, pouring rains...never failed me.

IMO R8 was mainly a marketing thing since market was getting floded with R93 - they indeed add the removable magazine/trigger part since with R93 you must empty magazine round by round from the top and it might be anoying...all the rest is - give or take - the same, but the trade continued to blossom.

On exploding Blasers - I don't know, must have been some innovative waaaay out of line stuff (I've heard something about reloads with pistol powders but that is just a hearsay...?). With all the laws here in EU (German even more so)...with a tiny hint of flaw (design, material, production...) then there would be no Blaser anymore.

Here is a vid of rifles with obstruction in the barrel - R93 is at 0:43...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4AqMl1A4aQ

Only thing related I remember back in the early days, was a recall of all the R93's since there was a batch of pins from the trigger mechanism that were accidentaly made of regular instead of stainless steel and installed into some rifles - wasn't mine - since every R93 has a "P" stamped on the factory trigger.

http://www.handgunrepairshop.com/blaser.htm

Amyway - R93 works for me and I don't see any reason to change it for R8, YMMV.

P.S. It is a tool more than a rifle tho


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 93mouse]
      #324006 - 30/01/19 12:23 AM

Quote:

I own R93 since 1998 - odd 20 years, it was around from dusty october Zim heat to snowy freezing Alpine tops, mud, pouring rains...never failed me.

IMO R8 was mainly a marketing thing since market was getting floded with R93 - they indeed add the removable magazine/trigger part since with R93 you must empty magazine round by round from the top and it might be anoying...all the rest is - give or take - the same, but the trade continued to blossom.

On exploding Blasers - I don't know, must have been some innovative waaaay out of line stuff (I've heard something about reloads with pistol powders but that is just a hearsay...?). With all the laws here in EU (German even more so)...with a tiny hint of flaw (design, material, production...) then there would be no Blaser anymore.

Here is a vid of rifles with obstruction in the barrel - R93 is at 0:43...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4AqMl1A4aQ

Only thing related I remember back in the early days, was a recall of all the R93's since there was a batch of pins from the trigger mechanism that were accidentaly made of regular instead of stainless steel and installed into some rifles - wasn't mine - since every R93 has a "P" stamped on the factory trigger.

http://www.handgunrepairshop.com/blaser.htm

Amyway - R93 works for me and I don't see any reason to change it for R8, YMMV.

P.S. It is a tool more than a rifle tho




WOW--the vid with the barrel obstruction is impressive..
Thx for posting that..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SharpsNitro
.375 member


Reged: 12/08/08
Posts: 729
Loc: Arizona, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324019 - 30/01/19 03:07 AM

I owned an LRS2 for a few years in 308, it was a very accurate rifle but it was expensive. The cost of magazines and other accessories was obscene.

For a multi caliber rifle I’m sold on the Desert Technology SRS for a switch barrel rifle. It is much better laid out as long as you can acclimate yourself to the bolt manipulation. It’s also much more affordable and flexible when most gunsmiths can spin up a barrel for it. The only limit is that it was designed around the 338 Lapua so if you want to go with a bigger bore you would have to do some magazine and skin modifications. They just released the A2 version at SHOT last week, they took a little over two pounds out of it so it should be better to carry in the field.

Here is mine in custom Cerakote, it’s wearing the factory 16” 308 barrel, Tangent Theta TT525P scope and a Thunderbeast 338 suppressor.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Norsk
.224 member


Reged: 06/08/17
Posts: 9
Loc: Norge
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: SharpsNitro]
      #324024 - 30/01/19 07:59 AM

Thank you all for your interesting replies.

I cannot remember seeing any guides carrying them in Alaska or seeing any pictures of PH's bearing Blasers in Africa.Despite their quick reloading ability,perhaps it is due to their intolerance of dirt?

I would say that in Norway a Blaser is what many aspire to in a Hunting Rifle.

Personally I just cannot see where a mass produced CNC machined Rifle can command such a high price.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Norsk]
      #324027 - 30/01/19 09:33 AM

Quote:

Thank you all for your interesting replies.

I cannot remember seeing any guides carrying them in Alaska or seeing any pictures of PH's bearing Blasers in Africa.Despite their quick reloading ability,perhaps it is due to their intolerance of dirt?

I would say that in Norway a Blaser is what many aspire to in a Hunting Rifle.

Personally I just cannot see where a mass produced CNC machined Rifle can command such a high price.




Its the way of the world my friend... I get your point.. Look at Swarovski, Schmidt and Bender, Zeiss, and Leica do it all the time.. Consumers help set the price..public demand apparently allows them to charge the price and get away with it.. otherwise they would have gone broke a long time ago..

I like mine (Blaser)..have no issues with it, have never had any issues with dirt, but I kind of baby my rifles.. its the poor farm boy in me , but dont think it is better than many other rifles I have.. I did build 2 customs in the past couple years and fankly would never trade them for a Blaser..BUT, they may be a slight bit more in cost as well.. and definitly NO issues with dirt..

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: SharpsNitro]
      #324034 - 30/01/19 01:07 PM

Quote:


Here is mine in custom Cerakote, it’s wearing the factory 16” 308 barrel, Tangent Theta TT525P scope and a Thunderbeast 338 suppressor.






THAT'S a really nice looking rig..thanks for posting..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324056 - 30/01/19 09:09 PM

Quote:

Quote:



WOW--the vid with the barrel obstruction is impressive..
Thx for posting that..




Not really Ripp. That video has been torn to piece more than I care to remember. It was set up to show certain rifles in a bad light. There is nothing to show the obstruction in each barrel, the charge load of each round fired or the calibre. Also the vice seems to be tighter on some barrels than others.

Now if somebody conducted that experiment covering all those criteria and it was done in a reputable laboratory then it would have some relevance.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324060 - 30/01/19 11:49 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



WOW--the vid with the barrel obstruction is impressive..
Thx for posting that..




Not really Ripp. That video has been torn to piece more than I care to remember. It was set up to show certain rifles in a bad light. There is nothing to show the obstruction in each barrel, the charge load of each round fired or the calibre. Also the vice seems to be tighter on some barrels than others.

Now if somebody conducted that experiment covering all those criteria and it was done in a reputable laboratory then it would have some relevance.




Good to know..and yes, some completely came apart.. too bad is not credible.
Thank you for the info..appreciate it

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Homer
.416 member


Reged: 07/04/09
Posts: 3081
Loc: Canberra, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324089 - 31/01/19 08:08 AM

Quote:

Re the R93/ I know the Australian Federal Police tested the holding power of the bolt by breaking of one locking petal at a time until down to just 3. These were spaced equal distances apart. Calibre was either 300WM or 338 Lap, do not know which one. It held.

However if it didn't lock up properly look what happened. Yes all of them have very fine tolerances and as I understand it high maintinance to keep them reliable in very dusty conditions.




G'Day Fella's,

Rule303, I have actually seen this bolt head.
It used to sit on Chis B's office desk (X-Tec/Blaser agents, at the time), as a talking piece.
Typical mind set, and lack of understanding of engineering principles, by the AFP.
If you want a good laugh, I could tell you about how they tested the Glock pistols ...............

D'oh!
Homer

--------------------
"Beware the Lolly Pop of Mediocrity,
Lick it Once and You Will Suck Forever"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Homer]
      #324090 - 31/01/19 08:33 AM

Homer - when you said:

"G'Day Fella's,

Norsk, I have never owned a Blaser R3/R8 bolt gun myself but several mates/customers do, and they love them.

They did have some serious issues, when as you mentioned, the bolts came back into the faces, of sereral of their users.
From what I was told, these were all chambered in .300 Weatherby."

You were spot-on - I wonder why it was .300 WTBY?

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SharpsNitro
.375 member


Reged: 12/08/08
Posts: 729
Loc: Arizona, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324094 - 31/01/19 09:12 AM

Quote:

THAT'S a really nice looking rig..thanks for posting..




Thanks. I finished up its “little brother” a couple of weeks ago. This one is a 10/22 Takedown SBR with a 9” Tactical Solutions barrel in the MagPul Backpacker stock..



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
paradox_
.375 member


Reged: 12/05/07
Posts: 645
Loc: Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: SharpsNitro]
      #324101 - 31/01/19 12:13 PM

I owned an R 93 a few years ago, thinking like most that it would an indestructible piece of hunting equipment for rough conditions where I didn't want to take any " decent vintage" items.
Mine , a 7X64 backed out primers from day one. Took it to Africa ( along with a vintage WR 500NiTRO), came up on a Wharthog, closed the bolt and it went " click"
I waiting wondering if I had a hang fire, and finally with baited breath opened the action. There was a very slight indentation on the primer .
Took it back to camp, threw it in the tent , and picked up my 100 year rifle.....problem solved.
Rang the agent upon return home. They informed me I didnt have the action closed properly!!!
I do admit there is a very small amount of " feel" as the action locked, however it was closed sufficently to let the firing pin fall, at least some way.
Following week had a phone from A senior manager at Blaser who kindly offered me a full refund....I took it.
It was and is IMHO a piece of shite.
Whatever pocessed me to use anything other that a conventional turnbolt action, I cant say. I can only say that I too was taken in by all the BS that is written about them. Lesson learned.
To be fair the later model may be different , but I never want to find out, but no doubt the R93 had serious issues.

As for taking one to Africa......never again any engineers rifles for me..

--------------------
Walk softly and carry a big stick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: paradox_]
      #324157 - 02/02/19 12:40 PM

I dare say that a modern M98 and a Blaser R8 are both manufactured using similar CNC machines, modern metals and construction methods. No doubt both are marketed to the same high standard. They are also both marketed at and sell for quiet substantial amounts. Are they worth that money? Well I think so!

Which is better? Well that's a personal choice...me I love both. I have hunted with a R8 a bit within the last 5 years. I love it! It's reliable and functional. I also own a couple of new Rigby's but to date I've not hunted with neither. I have hunted a substancial amount with older manufactured 98's and similar like the Brno 602's The hunts of done of late were better suited for the Blaser.

As to the comment about not seeing Alaskan guides carrying them...well I'm not surprised that they don't. All the Alaskan guides that I have met and or hunted with carry good old USA manufactured stuff. Marlin, Winchester, Remington, Dakota and of course the exception to the rule is the good on CZ550. They also have a preference for Leupold scopes... I dare say that if Blaser were made in the USA and were as cheap as US manufactured arms then it would be a different story. I haven't seen too many guides carrying Sako's or Sauers either.

Blaser's make a great product. I don't know if Blaser will still be manufacturing R8's in 100 years from now...it will probably be hard to equal the longevity of the Mauser 98. But I reckon Blasers are soo good that we'll be buying and using them well past my life time.

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod

Edited by Rod4861 (02/02/19 01:13 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: paradox_]
      #324159 - 02/02/19 02:59 PM

Quote:

I owned an R 93 a few years ago, thinking like most that it would an indestructible piece of hunting equipment for rough conditions where I didn't want to take any " decent vintage" items.
Mine , a 7X64 backed out primers from day one. Took it to Africa ( along with a vintage WR 500NiTRO), came up on a Wharthog, closed the bolt and it went " click"
I waiting wondering if I had a hang fire, and finally with baited breath opened the action. There was a very slight indentation on the primer .
Took it back to camp, threw it in the tent , and picked up my 100 year rifle.....problem solved.
Rang the agent upon return home. They informed me I didnt have the action closed properly!!!
I do admit there is a very small amount of " feel" as the action locked, however it was closed sufficently to let the firing pin fall, at least some way.
Following week had a phone from A senior manager at Blaser who kindly offered me a full refund....I took it.
It was and is IMHO a piece of shite.
Whatever pocessed me to use anything other that a conventional turnbolt action, I cant say. I can only say that I too was taken in by all the BS that is written about them. Lesson learned.
To be fair the later model may be different , but I never want to find out, but no doubt the R93 had serious issues.

As for taking one to Africa......never again any engineers rifles for me..




That’s precisely the behavior exhibited by my (ex) R93..... Click and a small primer dent. sometimes click and no primer dent at all. To say that the bolt wasn’t properly closed would be a fantasy. I hammered it closed rather agressively on purpose to make sure it was closed, locked and good to go.... No joy..... I dumped that rifle pretty damned fast and will be very hesitant to try the latest newfangled technology.......


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #324162 - 02/02/19 03:55 PM

I don't own a Blaser.
In bolt guns, I have some Mausers, pair of M70's of which one is a Palma Trophy Match rifle, and a 1936 Model 70 hunting rifle.
I also one one Browning, one Weatherby, one model 700 Rem., a model 96 Swede and some ML's bunch of .22's & a shotgun or 3. (I know I'm forgetting some - too laze to open up the safes to see which ones.
The early M70 and the Mausers I trust implicitly - the Browning not as much as the bolt has an issue which means until I get that rectified, it does not go hunting with me, it's for smacking the 1000 meter steel buffalo - over and over ad-nausium (for my brother).

So - choice - #1 - M70 .30USGOVT first, then the sporter Oberdorf 9.3x62 M98, Mauser 98 with Zastava bl. then the Mark 10 Mauser .375/06IMP.

The others are quite simply, - toys.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324165 - 02/02/19 07:57 PM

The reason no one sees African PHs using Blasers is one, they cost too much, and two, they are unreliable crap ... why would ANYONE who is a serious PH carry a Blaser, when a PH could carry a reliable and trustworthy Mauser 98. CZ etc? Even the Blaser double rifles are crap and unreliable. One of our members purchased one, yes they are cheaper, he sold it before the year was out.

The R93's are well known for being dangerous. A member of years gone by had the earlier model of Blaser than the R93. He wanted to sell it. I was interested in buying it, but the price at the time was too high for me. An extremely light firearm, in 7 mm Rem Mag and .375 H&H, about 6 1/4 lbs including ammo and scope in .375. It was not pleasant to shoot.

Anyway he said the common name in German for the Blaser was "Rausch-Bomb" (or something like that).

The R8 was redisgned supposedly to remove the denied alleged problem fo the Blaser R93's bolt of blowing back into people's faces ...

However its design is also crap. A magazine of 2 rounds for at least some chamberings. Also who on Earth designs a rifle where the trigger is part of the removable magazine??? Utter crap design ...

Having said all that, I would consider having the R8 in an hot magnum cartridge chambering suitable for plains or mountain hunting, and in a light version of the rifle. The shorter length and lightweight would be handy for mountain shooting. And a inadequate magazine of two rounds only, is still one more than a single shot. And not too much of a hinderance for mountain trophy hunting.

As for the R93, seems OK, but how can one have confidence shooting it, not knowing if you are going to have an explosion in your face, even if rare. As the alleged problems IMO are very real.

I don't own any Blasers. I would consider a single shot Blaser, which are reputed to be accurate.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Homer]
      #324167 - 02/02/19 08:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Re the R93/ I know the Australian Federal Police tested the holding power of the bolt by breaking of one locking petal at a time until down to just 3. These were spaced equal distances apart. Calibre was either 300WM or 338 Lap, do not know which one. It held.

However if it didn't lock up properly look what happened. Yes all of them have very fine tolerances and as I understand it high maintinance to keep them reliable in very dusty conditions.




G'Day Fella's,

Rule303, I have actually seen this bolt head.
It used to sit on Chis B's office desk (X-Tec/Blaser agents, at the time), as a talking piece.
Typical mind set, and lack of understanding of engineering principles, by the AFP.
If you want a good laugh, I could tell you about how they tested the Glock pistols ...............

D'oh!
Homer




Homer, please do tell in a PM. Very interested.

Cheers
Greg


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fuhrmann
.333 member


Reged: 04/01/05
Posts: 326
Loc: Switzerland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324169 - 02/02/19 08:22 PM

Coming back to the original question:
in my eyes the Blaser bolt action rifles are combining both:
modern engineering, with focus on slick functioning and cheap production - so a big difference to traditional gunmaking. With that focus they obviously forgot or neglected the reliability of the product.
And they are very good at marketing and that is where they spend the money saved in production...

fuhrmann


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ahmed577
.333 member


Reged: 13/06/13
Posts: 333
Loc: Western Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: fuhrmann]
      #324172 - 02/02/19 09:27 PM

I own a blaser single shot k95 stutsen royal, 5.6 x 50R. Love the gun. No other blaser guns interest me. I have a few good mates who love BLASER in all there configurations. Buy a German Mercedes and after 40 years it won’t exist a top Blaser will with all its warts still attached.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ahmed577]
      #324173 - 03/02/19 12:16 AM

I owned a Blaser S2. I tend to forget about that one but it was accurate beyond belief when assessing each individual barrel. The barrels shot diagonal to each other and it required the judicious whack of a 2 pound ball peen hammer to bend the brass yoke at the muzzles to get both barrels shooting on the same horizontal plane. The wedge adjuster between the barrels was very effective at drawing the individual barrel groups together but only on the horizontal plane once hammer surgery was performed for the vertical plane, for an incredibly accurate composite group at 100 yards. This thing was in .470NE. The Blaser saddle mount was excellent to quickly (and repeatably) mount and remove scopes for accuracy testing.

The tilting block was hell for strong and the incredible strength gave me the confidence to do a lot of load development experimenting - confidence I would not have had with a traditional hinged double. I was also new to the big nitro express calibers at the time so I was naiive as to what made a good double rifle. It was a costly first endeavor,

Negatives? Yup:

1. Ergonomics that would make a steel two by four more appealing.
2. Hood over the barrels necessary for the action lockup made loading slow.
3. Extractors only. Some would see this as a feature. Others would see this as a defect
4. The cocking device would uncock upon opening whether the cartidges were or were not discharged. Very safe but utterly slow and reqiures retraining one’s brain to remember to recock the rifle every time before shots could be taken.
5. The rubber strips running between the barrels was ungainly and absolutely a departure from the soldered in barrel ribs of a traditional double rifle.
6. The stock wood was very pretty but the rifle kicked the snot out of me.... Back to poor ergonomics.
7. Price - Although priced slightly and I mean very slightly cheaper than a new entry level Merkel safari caliber double, the price asked for the Blaser was incredibly expensive for what one got. The reason doubles are expensive is because of the craftmanship and the effort it takes to regulate properly. No such factory regulation is done on the Blaser because it is “partially” user adjustable with simple hand tools...... I say fully adjustable if one is willing to perform surgery with a ball peen hammer as I did.

Am I raining on the Blaser parade.... No. (As a previous poster commented, “if you don’t like it, simply don’t buy it and avoid the negative commentary”). But I am relating my personal findings so other members of the forum can benefit from my costly experiences. I note that the S2 is no longer made nor sold by Blaser - I suppose they figured out that the market wasn’t ready for an overly expensive and modern take on the classic double rifle with a concept that lacks all the artistry that makes a double rifle so special and costly. Nice try Blaser - possibly a sad attempt at capitalizing on the retail dollars possible to be had in the double rifle market - maybe they’d still be selling them if the S2 was priced at $3000 vs $9000.

Had I known all these things about it before I bought it, I would NOT have wasted my time, effort and considerable pile of hard earned money on it. I ended up utimately owning a Merkel and then a Heym double that did go overseas with me to hunt buffalo. The Blaser would have done the job, but it would have been a definite and significant handicap given how that hunt went. Buffalo ARE tough and in my case it took 7 shots before that big boy tipped over. The Blaser “no way no how” would have been capable of letting me shoot like that Heym did.

I no longer have a horse in this race other than my K95 single shot which I’m absolutely smitten with and will never part with it. It shares the tilting block design with S2 double and the decocker, but in a single shot, and non-dangerous game rifle I welcome the strength and the accuracy afforded by this design. I can’t say enough good about the K95 - I like it so much I am on a slow quest to acquire new barrels for it so I continue to invest in this particular platform and have absolutely zere regrets doing so - in fact I look forward to adding new calibers for it as finances allow. Currently it is in 7x57R and I have a 9.3x74R on order. I will at some point add a .257 Weatherby barrel (and/or a 7mm rem mag) and a .22 Hornet.

Edited by Postman (03/02/19 12:48 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324180 - 03/02/19 03:23 AM

Quote:

I dare say that a modern M98 and a Blaser R8 are both manufactured using similar CNC machines, modern metals and construction methods. No doubt both are marketed to the same high standard. They are also both marketed at and sell for quiet substantial amounts. Are they worth that money? Well I think so!

Which is better? Well that's a personal choice...me I love both. I have hunted with a R8 a bit within the last 5 years. I love it! It's reliable and functional. I also own a couple of new Rigby's but to date I've not hunted with neither. I have hunted a substancial amount with older manufactured 98's and similar like the Brno 602's The hunts of done of late were better suited for the Blaser.

As to the comment about not seeing Alaskan guides carrying them...well I'm not surprised that they don't. All the Alaskan guides that I have met and or hunted with carry good old USA manufactured stuff. Marlin, Winchester, Remington, Dakota and of course the exception to the rule is the good on CZ550. They also have a preference for Leupold scopes... I dare say that if Blaser were made in the USA and were as cheap as US manufactured arms then it would be a different story. I haven't seen too many guides carrying Sako's or Sauers either.

Blaser's make a great product. I don't know if Blaser will still be manufacturing R8's in 100 years from now...it will probably be hard to equal the longevity of the Mauser 98. But I reckon Blasers are soo good that we'll be buying and using them well past my life time.

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod




+1
Agreed

For anyone who has access and is interested, ironically there is an article on the Blaser R8 in this months edition of HUNT ALASKA magazine..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324192 - 03/02/19 08:06 AM

Now I do not own a Blaser and think those who do are ghay I do know a few ghay blokes and am assured from an engineering point the safety on the R8 is the best and most fool proof in the world. To answer the OP I would say the R8 are more engineering than marketing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324200 - 03/02/19 11:12 AM

Quote:

The reason no one sees African PHs using Blasers is one, they cost too much, and two, they are unreliable crap ... why would ANYONE who is a serious PH carry a Blaser, when a PH could carry a reliable and trustworthy Mauser 98. CZ etc? Even the Blaser double rifles are crap and unreliable. One of our members purchased one, yes they are cheaper, he sold it before the year was out.

The R93's are well known for being dangerous. A member of years gone by had the earlier model of Blaser than the R93. He wanted to sell it. I was interested in buying it, but the price at the time was too high for me. An extremely light firearm, in 7 mm Rem Mag and .375 H&H, about 6 1/4 lbs including ammo and scope in .375. It was not pleasant to shoot.

Anyway he said the common name in German for the Blaser was "Rausch-Bomb" (or something like that).

The R8 was redisgned supposedly to remove the denied alleged problem fo the Blaser R93's bolt of blowing back into people's faces ...

However its design is also crap. A magazine of 2 rounds for at least some chamberings. Also who on Earth designs a rifle where the trigger is part of the removable magazine??? Utter crap design ...

Having said all that, I would consider having the R8 in an hot magnum cartridge chambering suitable for plains or mountain hunting, and in a light version of the rifle. The shorter length and lightweight would be handy for mountain shooting. And a inadequate magazine of two rounds only, is still one more than a single shot. And not too much of a hinderance for mountain trophy hunting.

As for the R93, seems OK, but how can one have confidence shooting it, not knowing if you are going to have an explosion in your face, even if rare. As the alleged problems IMO are very real.

I don't own any Blasers. I would consider a single shot Blaser, which are reputed to be accurate.




I have never owned nor shot a R93 and know nothing of them except from what I have read. The only Blaser which I have fired is the R8, which I own. I have 3 barrels for it; 30/06 (4 shot mag) 9.3x62 (4 shot magazine) and a 223 (5 shot). I have hunted with it in extremes from -18C to 38C. It has been in snow, dust, sleet and rain. It is NOT a safe Queen. I know the R8 very well. I cannot fault the rifle. It is my first choice for hunting anything in the Americas and if I ever get there, Europe.

As for mountain trophy hunting; any cartridge suitable is going to have a (R8) magazine capacity of 3 at the very minimum. I doubt if many sheep get nailed with 505's or even 416 Rigbys for that matter.

I'm at a loose to see how the removable magazine/trigger housing is a disadvantage. Do you have any examples of instances where that has been a problem? I haven't heard of any and tend to look at that feature as a positive.

The R93 may have faults?? I can't say as I have no first hand experience. But I can definitely say, from experience, that there are no flies on the R8.

Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324201 - 03/02/19 11:15 AM

Quote:

Now I do not own a Blaser and think those who do are ghay I do know a few ghay blokes and am assured from an engineering point the safety on the R8 is the best and most fool proof in the world. To answer the OP I would say the R8 are more engineering than marketing.




Hey Greg, you know you can get a 270 Winchester barrel for one if you want!!

Cheers Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324209 - 03/02/19 01:48 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Now I do not own a Blaser and think those who do are ghay I do know a few ghay blokes and am assured from an engineering point the safety on the R8 is the best and most fool proof in the world. To answer the OP I would say the R8 are more engineering than marketing.




Hey Greg, you know you can get a 270 Winchester barrel for one if you want!!

Cheers Rod






--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324211 - 03/02/19 06:22 PM

Quote:

Rule303: I do know a few gay blokes and am assured from most answer the OP I would say




Didn't know you asked them?? Should I be happy for you?
sry - really sorry - da devil made me do it.
I got into the cooking sherry.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fuhrmann
.333 member


Reged: 04/01/05
Posts: 326
Loc: Switzerland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324212 - 03/02/19 07:28 PM

Quote:


I'm at a loose to see how the removable magazine/trigger housing is a disadvantage. Do you have any examples of instances where that has been a problem? I haven't heard of any and tend to look at that feature as a positive.






No firsthand experience but I have heard from people loosing their R8 magazine while on a hunt. So you might keep an eye on this.
Besides, the sense of an expensive spare magazine with a trigger attached escapes me.
fuhrmann


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: fuhrmann]
      #324214 - 03/02/19 08:59 PM

Quote:

Quote:


I'm at a loose to see how the removable magazine/trigger housing is a disadvantage. Do you have any examples of instances where that has been a problem? I haven't heard of any and tend to look at that feature as a positive.






No firsthand experience but I have heard from people loosing their R8 magazine while on a hunt. So you might keep an eye on this.
Besides, the sense of an expensive spare magazine with a trigger attached escapes me.
fuhrmann




Well from my experiences the magazines don't fall out.

And I guess I'm a belt, braces and elastic type of bloke. I like the idea of having a spare magazine just in case. When I carried Sako 75 or 85's I always had a spare magazine ( & they are not cheap)and never lost one of those either.

Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: fuhrmann]
      #324215 - 03/02/19 09:03 PM

Quote:

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod




If the people who don't like them aren't alklowed to talk about them, who would be left?

I would very much LIKE to like the R93. I did consider one at one point. But the marketing to down play the safety issues doesn't remove the actual problem.

When I hunted with ErikD in Norway, he used to have a R93, but got rid of it and instead bought a Mauser M03. Which I used. Got to like it. So ended buying one myself, in the Synthetic Extreme configuration., Later added a second Mauser M03 with a Germanic Schnabel style stock. Four barrels so far, two actions and stock, several bolt heads and magazines. The only complaint so far is a weak magazine spring in the .222 magazine, so it is used as a single shot. Myalls promised me a free replacement magazine years ago. Still have to act on it.

The Mauser M03 is a real bolt action rifle.

Interesting since then ErikD has sold off his Mauser M03 and bought a Blaser R8.

I would consider a R8, EXCEPT I really hate the limited magazine and even more hate the removable trigger/magazine BS engineering to overcome an obstacle of extremely poor design.

The Blaser does usually have a much lighter weight. And does pack in a smaller shoebox when travelling than the Mauser M03.

One thing I don't think anyone has mentioned, is what one Baron in Germany claims is essential for driven game shooting and that is speed of reloading. Presumably semi autos and maybe pump actions are banned (?). He claims a double rifle is inadequate having only two shots, and a normal turn bolt action way too slow for quick reloading when shooting driven running game. Now a Blaser with its two or three shot inadequate magazine doesn't seem an improvement. I think he shoots some other over engineered weird straight pull German rifle creation. Designed for shooting from hochsitz's.

Why is a magazine/trigger a prlem?

First it is so obvious. Who on Earth designs a combined magazine trigger which has to be removed to be reloaded? A crazy person ...

Secondly, as said, something else to go wrong, and forgotten. Especially where it is required to have the magazine removed from a rifle during travel or other times. Not a huge problem to loose a removable magazine, a useless firearm without a trigger ...

I would buy a R8. But probably would have a dozen or two other choices or priority rifle choices in front of it .... And for a nice takedown, given unlimited funds, a nice set of Mauser 98 or 98 styled actions and barrels in takedown form would be 1000% better. Some makers do make them.

Maybe the next Blaser model could be designed by actual hunters and riflemen!

Added: I think Staffan/Sville had a Blaser, I forget which model, probably R93 and I MAY have carried it for an afternoon. Never shot it. Mostly he loaned to me a 9.3mm double rifle he has.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (03/02/19 09:21 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324217 - 03/02/19 09:49 PM

Quote:

Quote:

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod




If the people who don't like them aren't alklowed to talk about them, who would be left?

I would very much LIKE to like the R93. I did consider one at one point. But the marketing to down play the safety issues doesn't remove the actual problem.

When I hunted with ErikD in Norway, he used to have a R93, but got rid of it and instead bought a Mauser M03. Which I used. Got to like it. So ended buying one myself, in the Synthetic Extreme configuration., Later added a second Mauser M03 with a Germanic Schnabel style stock. Four barrels so far, two actions and stock, several bolt heads and magazines. The only complaint so far is a weak magazine spring in the .222 magazine, so it is used as a single shot. Myalls promised me a free replacement magazine years ago. Still have to act on it.

The Mauser M03 is a real bolt action rifle.

Interesting since then ErikD has sold off his Mauser M03 and bought a Blaser R8.

I would consider a R8, EXCEPT I really hate the limited magazine and even more hate the removable trigger/magazine BS engineering to overcome an obstacle of extremely poor design.

The Blaser does usually have a much lighter weight. And does pack in a smaller shoebox when travelling than the Mauser M03.

One thing I don't think anyone has mentioned, is what one Baron in Germany claims is essential for driven game shooting and that is speed of reloading. Presumably semi autos and maybe pump actions are banned (?). He claims a double rifle is inadequate having only two shots, and a normal turn bolt action way too slow for quick reloading when shooting driven running game. Now a Blaser with its two or three shot inadequate magazine doesn't seem an improvement. I think he shoots some other over engineered weird straight pull German rifle creation. Designed for shooting from hochsitz's.

Why is a magazine/trigger a prlem?

First it is so obvious. Who on Earth designs a combined magazine trigger which has to be removed to be reloaded? A crazy person ...

Secondly, as said, something else to go wrong, and forgotten. Especially where it is required to have the magazine removed from a rifle during travel or other times. Not a huge problem to loose a removable magazine, a useless firearm without a trigger ...

I would buy a R8. But probably would have a dozen or two other choices or priority rifle choices in front of it .... And for a nice takedown, given unlimited funds, a nice set of Mauser 98 or 98 styled actions and barrels in takedown form would be 1000% better. Some makers do make them.

Maybe the next Blaser model could be designed by actual hunters and riflemen!

Added: I think Staffan/Sville had a Blaser, I forget which model, probably R93 and I MAY have carried it for an afternoon. Never shot it. Mostly he loaned to me a 9.3mm double rifle he has.




Its fine for people to have and express their opinion but it would help if those doing so were speaking from first hand experience. Most of the negative comments regarding the R8 start with "I've got a mate who heard.........."

The magazines/trigger housing does not have to be removed when traveling and or for storage in Queensland. And I know for a fact that it is not a requirement for overseas travel to the USA and NZ from Australia. I seriously doubt if it is required in any Australian State...but who knows perhaps in WA. WA is a weird and special case.

You keep mentioning a magazine capacity of 2 or 3 rounds ? The R8 has a magazine capacity of 4 for cartridges like te 30/06 & the 9,3x62. Yes it is only three when using belted magnum cartridges like the 300 Win Mag. Which means the R8 magazine capacity is pretty much on par with Remington model 700's, Winchester 70's, and many other popular rifles with fixed magazines. For some instances, primarily culling or when hunting some dangerous game then yes, a big magazine can be an advantage.

I should also point out that the R8 magazine does not have to be removed to load. It can be loaded either fitted or detached.

The R8 is a great rifle but it is not perfect for every hunting situation. I'm sure I could find a better outfit for culling large numbers of animals, and whilst I have no experience with driven game (as known in Europe) I'm sure there may be a better choices than an R8. But I reckon if all I had for such circumstances was an R8 then I wouldn't feel naked.

My R8 is my goto rifle for most hunts these days. I have hunted pigs, Brown bear, Dall sheep and other stuff with it and it does very well. In saying that I also have a Sako Finlight which is my NZ rifle and I've got 2 Rigby's which will get to Africa within the next few years. And I almost forgot got an FN model 98 in 9.3x62 which has killed it's fair share of game. Damn thing has a double set trigger so I guess it was designed to shooting from hochsitz's too. Still love it; horses for courses so they say.

Anyway, if you want to bag the R8, or Blasers in general, for the sake/entertainment of bagging them then fine. I get that! I enjoy rubbishing ghay boys and their ghay useless 270 Winchesters too.

Oh and I forget to mention those poor dumb bastards (but not ghay unless chambered in 270) who shoot Mauser 03's

Have a good night.

Cheers

Rod

Edited by Rod4861 (03/02/19 09:58 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324218 - 03/02/19 10:48 PM

Crazy idea I know..but an actual review from someone who has both..and in the gay .270 caliber..

https://www.gunmart.net/gun-reviews/firearms/rifles/blaser-r8-v-mauser-m03

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Edited by Ripp (03/02/19 11:13 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324219 - 03/02/19 11:36 PM

Quote:

Crazy idea I know..but an actual review from someone who has both..and in the gay .270 caliber..

https://www.gunmart.net/gun-reviews/firInterestearms/rifles/blaser-r8-v-mauser-m03




Thanks for posting that. Interesting to read. But it does read to me like a marketing/advertising article for the corporate group that owns and makes both rifle models. Mostly good points pushed on both and only minor criticisms on either.





Interesting new stock.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324220 - 03/02/19 11:48 PM

Quote:

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod




Quote:

Its fine for people to have and express their opinion but it would help if those doing so were speaking from first hand experience. Most of the negative comments regarding the R8 start with "I've got a mate who heard.........."




I find it "quaint" when posters try to bully off anyone who will make negative comments right from the beginning ... and keep trying to do it.

Now someone doesn't have to buy something they feel is not worth buying, to make a comment on it. And yes, one does not have to buy one, to handle one, try one, and also listen to knowledgeable persons. Owners who have had one and got rid of it. Or sometimes even like them.

Quote:

The magazines/trigger housing does not have to be removed when traveling and or for storage in Queensland. And I know for a fact that it is not a requirement for overseas travel to the USA and NZ from Australia. I seriously doubt if it is required in any Australian State..




I suggest you do some research before travelling and maybe putting your beliefs to the test.

And in any case, a magazine is removed. Can be removed. Is removed. If it has a trigger connected on it, can be lost. And is lost.

"Ghay". That was a joke by the poster.

Now back again to th opening question. Is it marketing or engineering? Obviously both. Modern over engineered. And huge amounts of marketing to sell them. Buying several other makers and brands, many much better, to add to the stable.

Now I did have a joke, about how God would have designed the human body if he was a Blaser engineer, but I will reserve that one.

Now I like over one hundred year old designed rifle. And my ideal ideal take down would be a Mauser 98 with the locking lug collar on the removable barrel, not the action. But cost is a factor to actually buy.

Now if you can't handle other peoples opinions, get over it.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324221 - 04/02/19 12:33 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Crazy idea I know..but an actual review from someone who has both..and in the gay .270 caliber..

https://www.gunmart.net/gun-reviews/firInterestearms/rifles/blaser-r8-v-mauser-m03




Thanks for posting that. Interesting to read. But it does read to me like a marketing/advertising article for the corporate group that owns and makes both rifle models. Mostly good points pushed on both and only minor criticisms on either.





Interesting new stock.




Another view of it.



--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324225 - 04/02/19 04:34 AM

I wouldn't mind own a Blaser R8. Maybe not in a fancy style but for at shooter and a contrast to all the classic walnut guns I have. The Blasers are in generel good accurate guns. It is a Topperware gun too. I would bold to say the Blaser rifle is a little blow of fresh air into relativly conservative marked.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarg
.400 member


Reged: 20/01/07
Posts: 1365
Loc: Nil
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: rigbymauser]
      #324227 - 04/02/19 06:05 AM

Not all Tupperware, my buddy bought one of these in .500 Jeffery a while back, looked flash !

R8 SELOUS



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324233 - 04/02/19 09:08 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Rule303: I do know a few gay blokes and am assured from most answer the OP I would say




Didn't know you asked them?? Should I be happy for you?
sry - really sorry - da devil made me do it.
I got into the cooking sherry.




Didn't have to ask them Daryl, they wear arseless chaps and carry a Blaser, sort of stands out

Rod the Blaser users who use a 270 are almost Un-Ghay. Damn fine calibre that one

Ripp, if I could find an Up You emoticon you would be getting bit


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324234 - 04/02/19 09:30 AM

Quote:

Crazy idea I know..but an actual review from someone who has both..and in the gay .270 caliber..

https://www.gunmart.net/gun-reviews/firearms/rifles/blaser-r8-v-mauser-m03




Good article Ripp.

Bloke does know what he is talking about as he uses that truly magnificent calibre, 270 and knows his off road machines as well.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324236 - 04/02/19 10:03 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA arseless chaps


--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324242 - 04/02/19 02:38 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Rule303: I do know a few gay blokes and am assured from most answer the OP I would say




Didn't know you asked them?? Should I be happy for you?
sry - really sorry - da devil made me do it.
I got into the cooking sherry.




Didn't have to ask them Daryl, they wear arseless chaps and carry a Blaser, sort of stands out

Rod the Blaser users who use a 270 are almost Un-Ghay. Damn fine calibre that one

Ripp, if I could find an Up You emoticon you would be getting bit [/quote)
--


Ah...my work here is through

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Edited by Ripp (05/02/19 12:10 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324244 - 04/02/19 04:53 PM

Quote:

Quote:

If you don't like Blasers..buy something you do like. Life is too short to waste talking about things you don't like or appreciate !

Cheers
Rod




Quote:

Its fine for people to have and express their opinion but it would help if those doing so were speaking from first hand experience. Most of the negative comments regarding the R8 start with "I've got a mate who heard.........."




I find it "quaint" when posters try to bully off anyone who will make negative comments right from the beginning ... and keep trying to do it.

Now someone doesn't have to buy something they feel is not worth buying, to make a comment on it. And yes, one does not have to buy one, to handle one, try one, and also listen to knowledgeable persons. Owners who have had one and got rid of it. Or sometimes even like them.

Quote:

The magazines/trigger housing does not have to be removed when traveling and or for storage in Queensland. And I know for a fact that it is not a requirement for overseas travel to the USA and NZ from Australia. I seriously doubt if it is required in any Australian State..




I suggest you do some research before travelling and maybe putting your beliefs to the test.

And in any case, a magazine is removed. Can be removed. Is removed. If it has a trigger connected on it, can be lost. And is lost.

"Ghay". That was a joke by the poster.

Now back again to th opening question. Is it marketing or engineering? Obviously both. Modern over engineered. And huge amounts of marketing to sell them. Buying several other makers and brands, many much better, to add to the stable.

Now I did have a joke, about how God would have designed the human body if he was a Blaser engineer, but I will reserve that one.

Now I like over one hundred year old designed rifle. And my ideal ideal take down would be a Mauser 98 with the locking lug collar on the removable barrel, not the action. But cost is a factor to actually buy.

Now if you can't handle other peoples opinions, get over it.




There is nothing wrong with people having and expressing opinions, even those that differ from mine. And I’d suggest that there is also nothing wrong with correcting inaccuracies in comments. Some may even consider that “quaint” but I doubt that many would consider it “bullying”.

In relation to your comment that magazines must be removed for travel. That comment is incorrect.

Finally, Rule 303 and I are mates. We take the piss out of each other all the time. Perhaps we need a stirring icon to avoid confusion by those not in the know. Considering he shoots a 270, owns a Land Rover, drinks cheap nasty piss and can't keep a secret concerning arseless chaffs; I'm surprised I even speak to him (stirring icon needed)

Cheers

Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DORLEAC
.333 member


Reged: 22/01/12
Posts: 465
Loc: Perpignan, France
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324246 - 04/02/19 08:14 PM

Gentlemen,

I think this type of discussion about the comparative merits of BLASER rifles versus classic ones does not lead to anything.
We compare quite different objects, a bit like comparing a jacket to shoes or a roast beef to an apple pie!
BLASER R93 and R8 rifles are tools and should be considered as tools.
This type of rifle is the brainchild of the engineer Meinhard ZEH who developed the system in 1993.
In their excellent design there is no reference to the traditional gunsmithing and their manufacture - with the exception of the barrel - is closer to that of a microwave oven or any other modern household object than a Mauser rifle whose mechanism dates back to well over a century.
The used materials - aluminum, synthetic, rubber, cast steel - like the assembly - springs, screws, elastic pins - confirm the modernity of their design optimized for the lowest possible manufacturing cost
That said, they are very good tools perfectly adapted to their use but, in my eyes, they are not rifles in the traditional sense of the term.
The only problem with these products is their price that is twice as high compared to their real cost, products whose life, because of the materials used, is necessarily limited in time.
We sold the first R93 twenty years ago and now we are facing irreparable wear problems (steel sliding in aluminum) and the only solution proposed by BLASER is to go to the new R8 model….
The R93, provided you choose it in a standard caliber, was a much better proposition than the R8 which is bigger, heavier and which allows you to lose the trigger when you drop the magazine (!)
Finally I don't believe that in a few years fans will be passionate about collecting R8 variants, even the rarest plastic with leather inserts stocked versions or "Luxus" models with molded aluminum laser engraving...
Some will tell me that they are the best rifles now on the market… everyone has their own tastes and preferences, but I sincerely believe that the current offer leaves enough choice at reasonable prices for at least equal or better performances.

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
93mouse
.375 member


Reged: 17/08/07
Posts: 744
Loc: Slovenia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #324252 - 04/02/19 10:52 PM

Well said - Thank you Dorleac.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324253 - 05/02/19 12:32 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Crazy idea I know..but an actual review from someone who has both..and in the gay .270 caliber..

https://www.gunmart.net/gun-reviews/firInterestearms/rifles/blaser-r8-v-mauser-m03




Thanks for posting that. Interesting to read. But it does read to me like a marketing/advertising article for the corporate group that owns and makes both rifle models. Mostly good points pushed on both and only minor criticisms on either.





Interesting new stock.




The thumb through stock is actually NOT that new..it was available when I purhased mine about 5 years ago... FYI

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324282 - 05/02/19 04:45 PM


In relation to your comment that magazines must be removed for travel. That comment is incorrect.

Finally, Rule 303 and I are mates. We take the piss out of each other all the time. Perhaps we need a stirring icon to avoid confusion by those not in the know. Considering he shoots a 270, owns a Land Rover, drinks cheap nasty piss and can't keep a secret concerning arseless chaffs; I'm surprised I even speak to him (stirring icon needed)

Cheers

Rod




Considering Rod has traveled through those countries he listed with rifles, Blaser included I would think he knows what he is talking about. The other thing to consider is how do you remove a magazine from a Rem 700, M98, Win M94 etc. Short answer, as we know, is you can not. So any jurisdiction with a must remove magazine in their law must have some other wording to allow for firearms where the mag can not be removed.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #324283 - 05/02/19 04:47 PM

Dorleac, thanks for that insight. To sum up if I may, Very good engineering but with the materials used and work they won't last a lifetime, let alone 2 or 3 lifetimes.

Please correct if my summary is incorrect.

Edited by Rule303 (05/02/19 04:48 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Boswell
.400 member


Reged: 21/07/06
Posts: 1276
Loc: Queensland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324285 - 05/02/19 08:22 PM

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DORLEAC
.333 member


Reged: 22/01/12
Posts: 465
Loc: Perpignan, France
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324287 - 05/02/19 11:27 PM

Quote:

Dorleac, thanks for that insight. To sum up if I may, Very good engineering but with the materials used and work they won't last a lifetime, let alone 2 or 3 lifetimes.




Yes, modern engineering, modern "look", as for lasting...a lifetime seems much too long !

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 500Boswell]
      #324289 - 06/02/19 01:04 AM

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''




-- the last I checked, parts if needed, were still available..so no need to be disposed of, just repaired as do some of the 2-3 lifetime guns need...

Reading all the posts, IMHO, people are looking for flies where there aren't any...but, hey, feel free to comment and enjoy reading this post. Been quite entertaining actually..

I used a R8 while hunting in Spain..performed perfectly..no issues of any kind..no lost magazines, triggers, slings, stocks, bolts, etc... harvested numerous types of game throughout the country.. zero problems... come back home and bought the exact same model for myself.. I will say you do see quite a few while out there will doing mountain hunts..have not seen many or any for that matter in Africa on my travels..have seen them in Alaska..and in the "stan" countries often.. easy to travel with and the easy of caliber change.. met one guy in Alaska..told me he had something like 17 different barrels for his..had traveled the world hunting with it..again, no issues...

Oddly, the only 2 rifles I have actually ever had to take to a gunsmith for repair, as in they were not functioning correctly, were both built on mauser actions.. so....there you have it..none are infallible. At least in my experience..

BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Edited by Ripp (06/02/19 02:46 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324300 - 06/02/19 03:15 AM

Another Takedown--Strasser..

https://www.americanrifleman.org/article...m_campaign=0219

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SharpsNitro
.375 member


Reged: 12/08/08
Posts: 729
Loc: Arizona, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324308 - 06/02/19 07:10 AM

Quote:

Another..
https://www.americanrifleman.org/article...m_campaign=0219





https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/01/tyler-kee/new-2017-strasser-rs-14/

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/10/foghorn/gun-review-strasser-rs-14/

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/12/jeremy-s/gun-review-strasser-rs14-evolution-rifle/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324310 - 06/02/19 07:31 AM

The only rifle I've ever taken to a gunsmith for repair or suggestions, is a Browning A3. The bolt keeps falling out. Go figure. Never had that happen to one of my Mausers.

My Remington M700 needs careful attention when replacing the bolt after cleaning, as the bolt retention button sticks in the 'release' position.

Never had that happen to one of my Mausers.

I've only been using 98 Mausers since 1968- maybe one day, I'll have trouble with one. Guess I've been 'extra' lucky.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Boswell
.400 member


Reged: 21/07/06
Posts: 1276
Loc: Queensland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324314 - 06/02/19 09:18 AM

If I ever bought one it would have to have the Steel action ,the other point was that someone ''above'' saying it would not accept reloads, only factory ammo ???

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: SharpsNitro]
      #324323 - 06/02/19 01:38 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Another..
https://www.americanrifleman.org/article...m_campaign=0219





https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/01/tyler-kee/new-2017-strasser-rs-14/

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/10/foghorn/gun-review-strasser-rs-14/

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/12/jeremy-s/gun-review-strasser-rs14-evolution-rifle/




Thanks for posting these--stellar reviews...

In todays world the suggested retail of $2600 which means will actually probably be around 22-$2300..reasonable price for what it offers...

Edited by Ripp (06/02/19 01:42 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324326 - 06/02/19 01:52 PM

Quote:

The only rifle I've ever taken to a gunsmith for repair or suggestions, is a Browning A3. The bolt keeps falling out. Go figure. Never had that happen to one of my Mausers.

My Remington M700 needs careful attention when replacing the bolt after cleaning, as the bolt retention button sticks in the 'release' position.

Never had that happen to one of my Mausers.

I've only been using 98 Mausers since 1968- maybe one day, I'll have trouble with one. Guess I've been 'extra' lucky.




One of my mauser action customs would go into lock down mode after firing 2 quick rounds in succession.. bolt did not want to open..third one, forget it..done..took it back to the guy that built it..long time ago, so forget what he told me was wrong..but, have not taken it on a DG hunt as that thought still haunts me..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 500Boswell]
      #324329 - 06/02/19 04:50 PM

Quote:

If I ever bought one it would have to have the Steel action ,the other point was that someone ''above'' saying it would not accept reloads, only factory ammo ???




Really....will not accept reloads ???(we need a rolling about on the floor pissing myself laughing icon)

Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324332 - 06/02/19 07:55 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''






BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp




Ripp, I would say she has excellent tastes except she married you


Rod, I have read about rifles that won't except reloads. It must be true, it was on the internet


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Boswell
.400 member


Reged: 21/07/06
Posts: 1276
Loc: Queensland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324333 - 06/02/19 08:02 PM

Do people roll on the floor pissing themselves laughing, when their mate says he just bought a Blaser, and is going to take it to Africa to shoot the Big Five ? bahahahahahahah

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324334 - 06/02/19 08:04 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''






BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp




Ripp, I would say she has excellent tastes except she married you


Rod, I have read about rifles that won't except reloads. It must be true, it was on the internet




Yeah...a friend of my cousin reckons his friends uncle heard it's only a problem with the 270 Winchester cartridge.

Cheers
Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 500Boswell]
      #324337 - 06/02/19 08:11 PM

Quote:

Do people roll on the floor pissing themselves laughing, when their mate says he just bought a Blaser, and is going to take it to Africa to shoot the Big Five ? bahahahahahahah




You wouldn't happen to know the friend of my cousin who reckons his friends uncle heard about the reloading thing would ya?

Nah seriously. I reckon it's probably more likely to be poor quality control with the reloads than a problem with the Blaser. I've got 3 barrels for the R8 and they all accept reloads.

Cheers
Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? *DELETED* [Re: Rod4861]
      #324342 - 06/02/19 11:45 PM

Post deleted by Postman

Edited by Postman (07/02/19 12:08 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #324343 - 07/02/19 12:26 AM

I just love shooting the 416.

https://youtu.be/TxYKJg8jAXA


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324344 - 07/02/19 12:28 AM

I love shooting the F16

https://youtu.be/b372Fv4Ibbk


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324345 - 07/02/19 12:33 AM

I love shooting the BBF97.

https://youtu.be/bfyfLvp6QqA


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324349 - 07/02/19 03:08 AM

Quote:

I just love shooting the 416.

https://youtu.be/TxYKJg8jAXA




That's pretty cool..certainly seems to show the quickness of the Blaser

And Yes, I too like shooting the .416

Its like a .270, only for men...

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324350 - 07/02/19 03:13 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''






BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp




Ripp, I would say she has excellent tastes except she married you


Rod, I have read about rifles that won't except reloads. It must be true, it was on the internet




No problem, we all have had momentary lapses in judgment from time to time..

A lot of other women my wife knows also shoot .270's..

Think its the perfect caliber for women, children, adult males of smaller stature, weak and frail frames, etc...



--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324354 - 07/02/19 05:41 AM

Yeah - .270 is a chick ctg. My buddy's wife shoots one and shot a record-class Kudu with it, last Sept.
The PH wanted TSX used in all guns and specifically 150's for the .270, so Keith loaded her 130's as they kicked less and were more accurate.
One shot drop at 130 some yards.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
3DogMike
.400 member


Reged: 29/01/15
Posts: 1464
Loc: Western Slope, Colorado USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324360 - 07/02/19 06:54 AM

Quote:

Yeah - .270 is a chick ctg. ......



Years ago the .270, courtesy of Jack O’Connor, got some respect..........now: “The Mazda Miata of rifle cartridges”?
- Mike

--------------------
"Will Rogers never met a fighter pilot"
- Anon

“Always carry a flask of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore always carry a small snake."
-- W. C. Fields


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 3DogMike]
      #324368 - 07/02/19 09:01 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Yeah - .270 is a chick ctg. ......



Years ago the .270, courtesy of Jack O’Connor, got some respect..........now: “The Mazda Miata of rifle cartridges”?
- Mike



Mazda Miata??? Really????
That is funny...

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DORLEAC
.333 member


Reged: 22/01/12
Posts: 465
Loc: Perpignan, France
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324409 - 08/02/19 06:13 AM

Not being, by nature, neither a woman nor, alas for me, a child, I'm certainly some kind of adult male of smaller stature, weak and frail frames….because if unfortunately I had to keep only one rifle it would be one of my beloved .270W !

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5520
Loc: United States
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #324413 - 08/02/19 07:44 AM

Poor .270!!!

You guys are rough!

Reading this thread is like watching Mike Tyson in the ring with Mr Bean!!



--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #324416 - 08/02/19 09:50 AM

My money's on Mr. Bean.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324427 - 08/02/19 05:12 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''






BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp




Ripp, I would say she has excellent tastes except she married you


Rod, I have read about rifles that won't except reloads. It must be true, it was on the internet




No problem, we all have had momentary lapses in judgment from time to time..

A lot of other women my wife knows also shoot .270's..

Think its the perfect caliber for women, children, adult males of smaller stature, weak and frail frames, etc...






Art you forgot to include "And those who can shoot."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Boswell
.400 member


Reged: 21/07/06
Posts: 1276
Loc: Queensland
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #324428 - 08/02/19 05:57 PM

hahahah

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #324431 - 09/02/19 12:39 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Disposable rifles for the ''Well to Do''






BTW, Greg, my wife likes her .270...

Ripp




Ripp, I would say she has excellent tastes except she married you


Rod, I have read about rifles that won't except reloads. It must be true, it was on the internet




No problem, we all have had momentary lapses in judgment from time to time..

A lot of other women my wife knows also shoot .270's..

Think its the perfect caliber for women, children, adult males of smaller stature, weak and frail frames, etc...






Art you forgot to include "And those who can shoot."






Agree with 9.3x57, this thread is out of hand, but in a funny kind of way..nothing wrong with a little humor...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #324432 - 09/02/19 12:43 AM

Quote:

Not being, by nature, neither a woman nor, alas for me, a child, I'm certainly some kind of adult male of smaller stature, weak and frail frames….because if unfortunately I had to keep only one rifle it would be one of my beloved .270W !

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com




JUST so you know, that comment was made in jest for the benefit of Rule303...

In all seriousness, I personally don't care for the .270, but many do, which is perfectly fine.. I have no problem with those who care to shoot an inferior caliber/cartridge..

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324454 - 09/02/19 06:47 AM

LOL

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #324464 - 09/02/19 08:51 AM

I am in for the .270.....


..weatherby.


They almost don't come better.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ahmed577
.333 member


Reged: 13/06/13
Posts: 333
Loc: Western Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: rigbymauser]
      #324478 - 09/02/19 09:38 PM

I am enjoying the the good humoured banter.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ahmed577]
      #324513 - 11/02/19 08:32 AM

Haven't read all the previous posts ... but some might think I don't like the Blaser R8. If I had unlimited funds I might become interested in acquiring one in 6.5x68 if a nice long barrel was purchasable. And another barrel in 8x68S. However this would be my fifth 6.5 ... and second 8x68S ... Unfortunately Mauser does not list my preferred 6.5x68 as a barrel option for the M03 and has even dropped the 6.5x65 which I do have. I really wanted the 68 to go with the 8x68S. Add a larger barrel say in 9.3x64 and I would have another safe queen duplicating existing rifles ... therefore the comment about "unlimited funds".

However I will NEVER have a rifle chambered in .270!

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324789 - 17/02/19 10:39 PM

Today I went to the range with a double case with my Blaser R93. Now its old school. I had one barrel in 30-06 and one barrel in 9.3x62. Waidmannsheil was the RO and we discussed this thread. So I thought I'd post.

Somehow I managed not to lose an eye and shot okay.

https://youtu.be/A8cetNPyuTE

https://youtu.be/gv7CNl-_XRQ


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324793 - 18/02/19 01:40 AM

Quote:

Today I went to the range with a double case with my Blaser R93. Now its old school. I had one barrel in 30-06 and one barrel in 9.3x62. Waidmannsheil was the RO and we discussed this thread. So I thought I'd post.

Somehow I managed not to lose an eye and shot okay.

https://youtu.be/A8cetNPyuTE

https://youtu.be/gv7CNl-_XRQ




Good shooting and fun to watch...

Question..Who is this Will guy and why do they keep shooting at him??

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Waidmannsheil
.400 member


Reged: 19/04/13
Posts: 2441
Loc: Melbourne Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Ripp]
      #324808 - 18/02/19 06:52 AM

Yes, that question gets asked quite a bit. I guess no one likes him, probably a greenie.

On the Sunday the Victorian BGRC had a friendly shoot and competition between us and the ADA (Australian Deer Association) and a good day was had by all, just over 40 competitors and after all four events were shot we tallied the scores and for the ninth year in a row the BGRC gave the ADA a hiding. Regular practice makes all the difference, not only for better shooting but ironing out equipment problems. The ADA provided the food for the day which was all Venison and was well received.
A lot of fun especially as most people get in and help where required. Running a day like that takes a bit of work but as we shoot monthly the club has the whole thing down pat.

Curl has been here and shot with us and had a ball. Any other NE members that happen to be in Australia are more than welcome to come and shoot with us for the day. Always happy to entertain other gun enthusiast from around the world.

Matt.

--------------------
There is nothing wrong with vegetarian food, so long as there is meat with it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324822 - 18/02/19 04:40 PM

Quote:

Today I went to the range with a double case with my Blaser R93. Now its old school. I had one barrel in 30-06 and one barrel in 9.3x62. Waidmannsheil was the RO and we discussed this thread. So I thought I'd post.

Somehow I managed not to lose an eye and shot okay.

https://youtu.be/A8cetNPyuTE

https://youtu.be/gv7CNl-_XRQ




Looks like a good shoot.

Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324831 - 19/02/19 12:06 AM

That is impressive shooting!!

On the first video with the .30-06 barrel about 6 shots in, the rifle goes “click” instead of “bang”....... Looks like the famous R93 “Blaser Click” is alive and well..... My R93 did that just about once every magazine full.........


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #324834 - 19/02/19 01:14 AM

Well picked up. For some reason I had very bad extraction and for about the first time it never picked up the round on the way through. So the click was because a round wasn't chambered rather than not closing the bolt. This was because of me not paying attention because of my frustration with ejection. I've given a very good scrub with borepaste to remove any carbon build up and hopefully extraction won't be difficult. I've got a batch of a hundred rounds and use that in both my 30-06 and in the single shot the primers aren't flat at all but this weekend they were very flat in the R93.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26943
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324848 - 19/02/19 04:51 AM

Yeah - caught that too, but I was too nice to mention it. lol
Also noticed it was a shooter or gun screw-up on feeding, but I was too nice to mention that too - but since you brought it up yourself? well?

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324864 - 19/02/19 07:28 PM

Quote:

Well picked up. For some reason I had very bad extraction and for about the first time it never picked up the round on the way through. So the click was because a round wasn't chambered rather than not closing the bolt. This was because of me not paying attention because of my frustration with ejection. I've given a very good scrub with borepaste to remove any carbon build up and hopefully extraction won't be difficult. I've got a batch of a hundred rounds and use that in both my 30-06 and in the single shot the primers aren't flat at all but this weekend they were very flat in the R93.




Wouldn't have happened with an R8 (stirring icon needed)

Cheers
Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324866 - 19/02/19 08:34 PM

I guess you can have one poop day, but end result is steel on target so I can't complain too much.

Not ready to transition to a R8 just yet as I've got the eye on a F16 shotgun or BD14 bockdrilling.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324867 - 19/02/19 09:06 PM

Quote:

I guess you can have one poop day, but end result is steel on target so I can't complain too much.

Not ready to transition to a R8 just yet as I've got the eye on a F16 shotgun or BD14 bockdrilling.




F16 is my next purchase.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #324868 - 19/02/19 09:30 PM

Perfect. The nicest shotgun I've used.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324869 - 19/02/19 09:48 PM

Quote:



Somehow I managed not to lose an eye and shot okay.





Ha ha. But an eye patch looks very cool and piratety ... if one's dominant shooting eye however it is a major pain.

Actually I had an eye patch for a couple weeks or so once. IT IS A MAJOR PAIN. As one looses all depth judgement. If walking a person has to estimate how far away a chair is, otherwise it is easy to walk into things. If driving one estimates how many car lengths the vehicle in front is, or the tunr is. It is no longer automatic. Binocular vision is essential for depth anmd distance estimation. I guess with time one gets used to be a one eyed Blazer shooter ...

The loosing eye stuff I reported came from an Austrian friend and member in the past. He used to say it was common for the Blaser to be called the ":rausch-bombe" (or some such spelling) in Gemrnay and Austria and on German language forums and websites.

Marketing kept the R93 out of the blown up face Top Ten lists.

The R08 was undoubtably designed to overcome the R93 reputation and hopefully also the dangerous design flaws.

Have to look at your videos. No doubt they will be entertaining.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324870 - 19/02/19 09:52 PM

When people talk about "blaser" they are generally referring to the straight pull rifles. However the other models in their range are top notch and I'd say the F16 shotgun is good value for money compared with the equivalent beretta or browning in that price range.

https://youtu.be/b372Fv4Ibbk


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324871 - 19/02/19 09:52 PM

PS Haven't been on the forums for a few days. having a dispute with telstra and refusing to pay a bill where they erroneously charged me 24 months mobile and data cancellation fees ...

After seven phone calls, they have restored my blocked access for thirty days, while a case manager allegedly will examine if their latest complete cock up is actually their fault and problem.

But forget all that. Funny this thread is still going.

Have fun guys.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324872 - 19/02/19 09:57 PM

BTW for any guys thinking I am unfair to the Blaser rifles. I actually dislike most of these new crap modern German and Euro rifle designs. Most of these new straight pull rifle designs are simply aweful.

The Mauser M03 and the Sauer 202 are the exceptions in my opinion, and worth owning and using. I went for a Mauser ,M03 because I had used one previously and I didn't mind it. Also the rifle was offered to me at an attractive price. And all the barrels, mounts, bolt bits and mags at more or less wholesale price. A small margin. By the dealer in Queensland, no longer in business. The rifle I purchased was his own rifle.

I would have preferred at the time a Sauer, but not for two to three thousand doillars more.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324877 - 19/02/19 10:35 PM

Wasn't that much difference in price between a Mauser M03 and Blaser R93 when I bought mine. I wanted a 22LR kit and the blaser was a few hundred grams lighter. That is what gave the blaser the nod.

However I love my K95 and BBF97 even more. If I'd bought them first I'd not bought the R93.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324879 - 19/02/19 10:37 PM

Quote:

When people talk about "blaser" they are generally referring to the straight pull rifles. However the other models in their range are top notch and I'd say the F16 shotgun is good value for money compared with the equivalent beretta or browning in that price range.

https://youtu.be/b372Fv4Ibbk




Good point.

Except for the Blaser side by side double rifle, which is not top notch one bit.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324880 - 19/02/19 10:44 PM

Quote:

Wasn't that much difference in price between a Mauser M03 and Blaser R93 when I bought mine. I wanted a 22LR kit and the blaser was a few hundred grams lighter. That is what gave the blaser the nod.

However I love my K95 and BBF97 even more. If I'd bought them first I'd not bought the R93.




I got mine at the time relatively cheap. The Qld dealer was selling his own rifle and offered me all the extra bits at pretty much wholesale price.

You would know the name of the dealer at the time.

I might have gone for an R8 if the price was right. I still don't like the removable combined trigger and magazine.

As I posted earlier i would consider a Blaser single shot. But would compare them to a number of other German, Austrian and Euro makers. Not in the market currently anyway.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #324886 - 19/02/19 11:28 PM

Well the blaser kipplauf and BBF is a step up on the Merkel models in finish. I've compared both in the field.

Nobody every fired my K95 or BBF97 and didn't start smiling when they gave it back.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mchughcb
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/14
Posts: 381
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324914 - 20/02/19 06:53 AM

Blaser S2 is discontinued. Ive shot standard and safari . They can shoot alright.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
3DogMike
.400 member


Reged: 29/01/15
Posts: 1464
Loc: Western Slope, Colorado USA
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: mchughcb]
      #324916 - 20/02/19 07:02 AM

couple of shooting buddies with R8’s......not my style, but I must admit they are amazingly accurate.

--------------------
"Will Rogers never met a fighter pilot"
- Anon

“Always carry a flask of whiskey in case of snakebite, and furthermore always carry a small snake."
-- W. C. Fields


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: 3DogMike]
      #344520 - 23/08/20 08:56 AM

So, here I am again at the jaws of the tiger, or the anal orfice of the elephant. I just came home with an R8 with steel receiver and a stable of barrels. Lets see how this one works!!!! Hopefully I don’t drown in elephant shit..... range reports to follow once I get a thong to stay strapped on to my ears!!!!!


Edited by Postman (23/08/20 09:00 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39804
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #344528 - 23/08/20 02:49 PM

What barrels did you get?

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: NitroX]
      #344545 - 24/08/20 03:26 AM

.375 H&H
.300 Win Mag
6.5 Creedmoor
.22-250

I will at some point also pick up a .416 Rem Mag, and a .257 Wby Mag.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Postman]
      #344551 - 24/08/20 07:19 AM

Yep. That’s certainly a stable of barrels. Well done.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #344577 - 25/08/20 02:49 AM

The Blaser rifles are very good rifles. The are practical and dern accurate. I too should get used to the design as I am more traditional like Mauser 98s, Winchester 70s etc.
I handled a few and shot a few but never owned one. I just here last weekend handled their Silenced model in 9,3x62. Nice gun and I decode the concept. The price however was something like €7000plus mounts plus scope. As there was no sights on the gun the buyer is forced to invest in full package right away. The price keeps me away as I start to think I could buy a nice vintage english doublerifle for just about the same money which is a better investment. The Blaser rifle is like a new car. Once you crank it and drive out from the dealership you lost 40% instantly.
If I were to ever buy a Blaser R8 a .270wea witha spare barrel in .375 H&H barrel was to be my set-up. New Swarowski Z8i scopes ofcouse.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rpeck



Reged: 06/12/13
Posts: 435
Loc: Canada
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: DarylS]
      #346858 - 15/11/20 12:35 AM

Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?

Yes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: rpeck]
      #346868 - 15/11/20 01:03 PM

Quote:

Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?

Yes.




Yep.....but it’s only been that way since they started offering them in 6.5 Creedmore ...

Cheers
Rod


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5045
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rod4861]
      #346895 - 16/11/20 12:55 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?

Yes.




Yep.....but it’s only been that way since they started offering them in 6.5 Creedmore ...

Cheers
Rod




Folks you need to make allowances for Rod. He is a bit long in the tooth and his mind is faltering a bit now days.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rod4861
.300 member


Reged: 12/06/07
Posts: 243
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering? [Re: Rule303]
      #346903 - 16/11/20 08:06 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Blaser Rifles:Are they more marketing than engineering?

Yes.




Yep.....but it’s only been that way since they started offering them in 6.5 Creedmore ...

Cheers
Rod




Folks you need to make allowances for Rod. He is a bit long in the tooth and his mind is faltering a bit now days.




Yeah....fair call.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 118 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 26672

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved