Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

Pages: 1
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06
      #92699 - 27/12/07 02:37 AM

It appears that some american gunmag has an articel with someone who takes on biggame in africa.
I have allways admired the 45-70 myself in the 1886 winchester, but never thought of it as an "elephantcartrdge". If one should choose between some different cartridges, but pick one only for all african biggame like elephants, lion buff etc etc, howmany in here would pick the 45-70 really. I myself have no experience with african biggame hunting, but it could be interesting to see those who have would pick the 45-70.
I would take 45-70 anytime anywhere for africas biggest game
You may choose only one
yes
no
I`D rather take a 30-06 with 240grain solids
You may choose only one
yes
no


Votes accepted from (27/12/07 02:35 AM) to (No end specified)
View the results of this poll



Edited by rigbymauser (27/12/07 02:38 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: rigbymauser]
      #92707 - 27/12/07 03:22 AM

: No one in their right mind would choose either for anytime, anywhere use in Africa, but either would have it's place, I suppose, given the circumstances.
: This is a silly comparison, but then, that's just my opinion and everyone has one of those.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: DarylS]
      #92708 - 27/12/07 03:51 AM

Quote:

: No one in their right mind would choose either for anytime, anywhere use in Africa, but either would have it's place, I suppose, given the circumstances.
: This is a silly comparison, but then, that's just my opinion and everyone has one of those.




I could have said .375 H&H or .416 Rigby instead of 30-06...but then the answers would be obvious. The 30-06 and the 45-70 both share the same Ft/Ibs, and both can be loaded in a leveracion with scope. In reading Boddington book, there is a place where he states that he wouldn`t mind shooting buffs with 30-06. I think the 30-06 has a slight edge in the versatility dept, other then that they are both good/bad cartridges for africas biggest, but where most people has agreed for many years that the 30-06 is too small for africas biggest, now suddenly the 45-70 is having following controvertial or not


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39990
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: rigbymauser]
      #92709 - 27/12/07 04:16 AM

I voted for the .30-06 as the 240 gr FMJ would have the best penetration of the two choices mentioned.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
peter
removed


Reged: 11/04/07
Posts: 1493
Loc: denmark
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: NitroX]
      #92711 - 27/12/07 04:42 AM

i voted 30-06 but like daryl i am not to fond of either for the africa idea. for europe i would take the 45-70

peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: peter]
      #92715 - 27/12/07 06:19 AM

Peter - for hunting here in B.C., the .45/70 wins hands down in my books, but there are those who would choose the '06.
; FPE is pretty much as far removed from actual killing power as one can get, but if those numbers mean much to you, OK, so be it.
; With a 400gr. bullet loaded to 43,000PSI, the .45/70 Marlin will develop 2,100fps, which is: 2,100 x 2,100 = 4,410,000 x 400 = 1,764,000,000 divided by 450240 = 3,918 foot pounds of energy.
; I wasn't aware the old '06 even came close to that number - heh, learn something new every day. What load would that be in the '06 - anyway? That '06 must have had an UltraMag case around it.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5522
Loc: United States
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: DarylS]
      #92758 - 28/12/07 01:06 AM

Quote:

: No one in their right mind would choose either for anytime, anywhere use in Africa, but either would have it's place, I suppose, given the circumstances.




Precisely.

The question sparks a curiousity...

I would love to shoot both in my test media: .30-06 with "240 grain FMJ's" {2200 fps?} and .45-70 with 500 grain jacketed FMJ running at about 1700 fps. I am not certain which would penetrate farther but it would be fun to find out.

By the way, who makes a .30 cal 240 grain FMJ? Also, not to overANALyse a just-for-fun question, but depending on length of the actual bullet, a 240 might require a tighter-than-standard 1/10 twist, something along the lines of 1/8 or 1/9.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: 9.3x57]
      #92767 - 28/12/07 02:44 AM

Quote:

Quote:

: I am not certain which would penetrate farther but it would be fun to find out.

By the way, who makes a .30 cal 240 grain FMJ? Also, not to overANALyse a just-for-fun question, but depending on length of the actual bullet, a 240 might require a tighter-than-standard 1/10 twist, something along the lines of 1/8 or 1/9.



; I think an 8" might work. I do recall the typical 10" twist wasn't too hot when the 250gr. Barnes were running around the moose woods here with some guys. Accuracy was quite poor, except in the magnums which, of course, drove them somewhat faster. The 2,200fps or 2,250fps of the '06 was deemed to be a bit too slow for these pencils. If you want to compare this with the .318Rigby, don't, the .318 shot a .330" bullet, I believe and twist requirements are, of course, slower for the larger bore, shorter bullet.
: A 'good' 250gr. solid .30 cal bullet 'should' out-penetrate any 480gr. or 500gr. .458, 500gr. .470 or 520gr. .50 when they are all driven at the same velocity as penetration, given identical bullet construction is dependent upon stability inside the target material and sectional density alone. Is this now saying that the '06 is 'better' because it penetrates more deeply? Is this deep penetration the only criteria to establish a ctgs 'desirability' on dangerous game? I think not to both.
: Then, to compare the suitability or a 250gr. .308 bullet from an '06 against a 400gr. or 450gr. .458 bullet from a .45/70 - why? what does this prove, asking a bunch of guys who haven't used either, which they would prefer.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39990
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: DarylS]
      #92824 - 28/12/07 03:20 PM

Quote:

Quote:

: I am not certain which would penetrate farther but it would be fun to find out.

By the way, who makes a .30 cal 240 grain FMJ? Also, not to overANALyse a just-for-fun question, but depending on length of the actual bullet, a 240 might require a tighter-than-standard 1/10 twist, something along the lines of 1/8 or 1/9.



; I think an 8" might work. I do recall the typical 10" twist wasn't too hot when the 250gr. Barnes were running around the moose woods here with some guys. Accuracy was quite poor, except in the magnums which, of course, drove them somewhat faster. The 2,200fps or 2,250fps of the '06 was deemed to be a bit too slow for these pencils. If you want to compare this with the .318Rigby, don't, the .318 shot a .330" bullet, I believe and twist requirements are, of course, slower for the larger bore, shorter bullet.
: A 'good' 250gr. solid .30 cal bullet 'should' out-penetrate any 480gr. or 500gr. .458, 500gr. .470 or 520gr. .50 when they are all driven at the same velocity as penetration, given identical bullet construction is dependent upon stability inside the target material and sectional density alone. Is this now saying that the '06 is 'better' because it penetrates more deeply? Is this deep penetration the only criteria to establish a ctgs 'desirability' on dangerous game? I think not to both.
: Then, to compare the suitability or a 250gr. .308 bullet from an '06 against a 400gr. or 450gr. .458 bullet from a .45/70 - why? what does this prove, asking a bunch of guys
who haven't used either, which they would prefer.




Good points Daryl.

The .318 Westley Richards is basically a .30-06 with a 250 gr bullet in .330 calibre.

Bell used his .318 extensively for elephant with FMJs, but then I don't like quoting Bell as he was such a remarkable man.

However the .318 was a very popular chambering.

Compare this to the .45/70 and perhaps the equivalent Imperial .577/.450 which was quickly superseded once better cartridges were available.

IMO in hunting dangerous game, calibre size is nothing without adequate penetration.



--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (28/12/07 03:22 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: NitroX]
      #92835 - 28/12/07 05:11 PM

The .577/450 loaded with black powder, was about 100fps faster than the black powder loaded .45/70 when used with the same weight bullet. Smokless powder does change that, somewhat.
; I can see where people who aren't handloaders might look at WW or RP factory .45/70 ammo and sneer at the .45/70's ballistics. I understand there would be confusion in this case. Afterall, how can anyone take 1,320fps with a 405gr. bullet seriously, for anything that might bite back?
; Considering the same weight bullet with modern designed jackets and cores, driven at 2,100fps changes things a bit.
; The BP rounds ran around 20,000PSI, whereas these modern rifles can handle up to 43,000PSI. This changes things a bit.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39990
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: DarylS]
      #92850 - 29/12/07 12:18 AM

Quote:

The .577/450 loaded with black powder, was about 100fps faster than the black powder loaded .45/70 when used with the same weight bullet. Smokless powder does change that, somewhat.
; I can see where people who aren't handloaders might look at WW or RP factory .45/70 ammo and sneer at the .45/70's ballistics. I understand there would be confusion in this case. Afterall, how can anyone take 1,320fps with a 405gr. bullet seriously, for anything that might bite back?
; Considering the same weight bullet with modern designed jackets and cores, driven at 2,100fps changes things a bit.
; The BP rounds ran around 20,000PSI, whereas these modern rifles can handle up to 43,000PSI. This changes things a bit.




Thanks for the info. An African PH once said to me the .577/.450 was the equivalent of the .45/70 so I just relied on that. I knew someone would correct me if I was mistaken.

This PH was actually sympathetic to the .45/70 in lever action form as he had a good number of horses and used them for horse back game viewing safaris. He had an idea of using a .45/70 as a backup rifle.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: NitroX]
      #92858 - 29/12/07 04:14 AM

For BIG bears, there is hardly a better 'normal' gun for the guide, than a heavily loaded M1895 Marlin.
; My buddy's 18 1/2" Guide gun gets 2,007 fps with 400 gr. Barnes FN with standard listed 34,000PSI loads. Considering his particular rifle is getting 150fps higher velocities than the book says he should, his pressure must be higher than the books says - yet - fired cases give no indications at all of other than soft loads - [primers, mesurements, extraction, all indicate low pressure.
; Considering Harold Johnson of Cooper's Landing, Alaska liked his .450 Alaskan M86 Winchester loaded with 400gr. Barnes FN's at 1,900fps for protection from the coastal browns, the modern Marlins seem to stand up quite well on their own, even the short barreled ones.
; People lacking in experience with the larger bores seem to lack an appreciation for what a seemingly 'standard' velocity, large calibre round does to game. They look at the straight case compared to the radically necked modern ones, or to the cavernous cases designed for the low presssure requirements double guns using volitile cordite powders, and fail to realize that within standards for today pressure and still 20,000psi lower than many of the considered normal modern rounds, they are equal or adequate in performance when compared to the old favourites.
; Frank C. Barnes, in Ctg. of the world, when writing the 'brief' on the .45/70 ammo's use in a Model 86 lever action, wrote that that round gave "impressive knockdown on our largest species of big game". He was talking of a 400gr. bullet, 53gr. 3031 at 1,850fps as well as referring to moose, elk and brown/grizzly bears. Today, we drive the same weight but better constructed bullets at upwards of 2,100fps, in similar rifles, yet some people are still thinking in the black powder age.
; I cannot fathom why a .40 cal. 400gr. bullet at 2,050fps(suggested velocity) that penetrates completely through a buffalo, is immensley superior to a .458 calibre, 400gr. bullet travelling at the same speed(chronographed velocity), that penetrates completely through a buff.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JabaliHunter
.400 member


Reged: 16/05/07
Posts: 1958
Loc: England
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: DarylS]
      #93023 - 31/12/07 07:44 AM

Not sure how many big bears there are in Africa, but if there are, Iīd definitely choose the 45-70 for them . However, If I had to put a bullet through an elephants head, I would vote for a 240gr 30-06 and its high SD and good penetration over a 400gr .45 calibre. Its the same old light for calibre versus heavy for calibre debate, and IMHO the 400grain .45 is light for calibre. Plus I donīt really want a .45 calibre hole in my impala steaks...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plains99
.300 member


Reged: 10/11/04
Posts: 225
Loc: Dodge City, Kansas, USA
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: JabaliHunter]
      #93359 - 04/01/08 02:35 AM

Neither the .45-70 or the .30-06 should be considered all-purpose rounds for African hunting. A fellow could do alright in the bush with a .45-70 on up to 500 pound plains game and the same thing can be said of the .30-06... but the thing is that neither is adequate for larger game. I'll take my .375 H&H or even the 9.3X62 over either of the traditional American cartridges that were not designed to do what you are asking them to do.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigbymauser
.400 member


Reged: 15/05/05
Posts: 1972
Loc: Denmark
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: Plains99]
      #93448 - 04/01/08 07:39 PM


If I should choose "onegun" for africa I would take my .416Rigby or .333Jeffery...both calibers have a very good reputation upon all game...just like the .375 H&H.
Bror Blix were asked once if he had to choose one gun for all, and he replied: " .318 Westley Richards". I think I read somewhere that John taylor said that the .318 WR penetrated more than anything else. It appeares to me(without personally having experience in african game yet)that the old hunters preferred PENETRATION above anything else. Sir Samuel Baker hated hollow pointed bullet
and preferred solid lead bullet in all his hunting, either 10 bore DR or the .577ex, because penetration was back then a key factor for succes.
If shooting a frontal shot on elefant, which bullet would have best chance of getting to the brain of the two poll calibers? Both calibers can choose the best bullet available. Distance = x.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plains99
.300 member


Reged: 10/11/04
Posts: 225
Loc: Dodge City, Kansas, USA
Re: Poll: 45-70 .versus 30-06 [Re: rigbymauser]
      #93473 - 05/01/08 04:25 AM

I think, and this is pure opinion, that the reason for the penetration preference by both of these men was the poor quality of soft point bullets available to them. There were a lot of bullet failures on African game when the move was made to velocities beyond 2,400 fps. These men, in light of the bullet failures and general poor performance, relied on penetration arguments as their alternative. They had no other way to go at that time.
Today, we have bullets from several companies that provide both penetration and proper expansion at higher velocities... but the possible solution still remains that many of the older rounds at moderate velocities get the job done very well. I've come to the opinion that our current emphasis on high velocity projectiles actually works against finding a good balanced load for a wide variety of conditions and game size. Many of the turn of the century rounds continue to provide more consistent performance than newer high velocity versions.
Writers stress very small long range trajectory advantages (many of which are impractical for most hunting conditions and ranges) and completely ignore how the round penetrates and delivers trauma.
I also think that this is why the Garret (SP?) .45-70 hard cast loads have performed so impressively for some hunters in Africa and it has given the .45-70 the opportunity to even be considered as an African big game rifle. Also I have read and heard of cases where the heavy .30-06 loads have outpenetrated the .300 Weatherby Magnum on African game. I believe this is for much the same reason. I have a .300 Weatheby Magnum and use it often on North American game as well as .45-70 and .30-06 rifles... but I agree with you that there are much better rounds for African game than any of these including those you mention.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 107 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3486

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved