Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Range Report 35.303

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

Pages: 1
Perry
.275 member


Reged: 09/11/10
Posts: 73
Loc: Qld Australia
Range Report 35.303
      #175876 - 20/02/11 07:34 PM

G/Day Folks

I took my 35.303 to the range today to finish running in the barrel and to find a load that shot nice round accurate groups. Last range session I was cleaning after every shot, then after every 2nd and the Barrel was not Copper fouling to any degree. Today the loads where hotter than last week and I was cleaning after every 3 for the first 12 shots then to a 5 shot cycle for the rest of the day. There was some Copper fouling evident but I have owned Rifles that Copper fouled far more. It's obviously a good smooth bore from the start.

I predicted last week the Rifle was looking like it may like 44 grains of ADI AR2208, CCI 200 primers and 225 grain Sierra Gamekings. Spot on, 43.5 and 44 grain groups where the tightest and roundest groups of the day.

Immediatly above 44 grains the groups opened up. I did load up as high as 45.5 grains of AR2208, the bolt handle lifted with one finger and ejected cleanly, primers where not showing undue flattening etc -------- but it paterned and 45 grains did not pattern much better.

Here's the targets I shot, only at 50 yards and I did not bother adjusting the scope as each load printed a different point of impact. Perhaps a minor bedding issue as there was some stringing but that dissapeared once I found the sweetest load from the batch I had done up

Ignore the .22 calibre holes - it did not go well. The new scope on my Browning BL22 is a dud, could not zero it and the impact point shifted from shot to shot - back to the Gunshop for a warrantee exchange or more likely I'll insist on a full refund. No need to dis any scope manufacturers - they all put out duds from time to time

1st photo 43 - 44.5 grains AR2208


2nd photo - 44.5 - 45.5 grains AR2208


Please no comments about my obvious poor form and trigger control. The Rifle still has the standard Military trigger. I like the 2 stage trigger but it's heavy enough that I torque the Rifle occasionly trying to squeeze a shot off. Overall it's no worse than either of my Lever Rifles and I've never noticed their triggers in the heat of a hunt. It's a cheaper option to import an aftermarket trigger than to have a Smith hone it and swap springs etc. As a Gunsmith I make a good billiards player and I won't attempt stoning new angles etc myself

Next range session I'll fine tune loads around the 44 grain mark and zero the scope properly. I will also set the Recknagel sights and test how repeatable my quick detatch rings are. The barrel is all but run in now, fired 72 rounds sure it may settle in a little more but overall the more I shoot my 35.303 the more I like it.

regards Jacko

--------------------
"To my deep mortification my father once said to me, 'You care for nothing but shooting, dogs and rat catching, and you will be a disgrace to yourself and all your family.' " -Charles Darwin

Edited by CptCurl (28/02/11 12:07 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ben
.400 member


Reged: 22/08/08
Posts: 1917
Loc: Northern Territory, Australia
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: Perry]
      #175879 - 20/02/11 07:54 PM

Glad you're havin' fun, Perry!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39985
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: Ben]
      #175898 - 21/02/11 12:44 AM

Some of those groups look pretty good to me, especially considering the number of shots made.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: NitroX]
      #175903 - 21/02/11 03:50 AM

The upper target sheet I'm counting 10 shot groups, 5 for the lower target sheet.

If mine, I would clean the beejeebers out of that barrel, check the butt stock bolt's tightness as well as the forend snuggness and try some more 44.5 through 45.5 gr. loads.

With efficient ctgs. I find near maximum loadings usually give the best accuracy.

I personally would make a test to find the 'sticky' point, as there is no loading data for this gun. Finding the max. ie: 2 gr. under the start of sticky, gives one a range to load in. This should be done with all powders expected to be used. I'd load upwards one gr. at a time, or 1/2 gr. if you wish, until I feel stickiness of the bolt. Reduce that by 2 full grs. and that is a very safe maximum load.

With Improved or straight walled wildcat cases, it is not that easy. Sometimes there are no signs of pressure(straight cases only) and one must stop and step backwards when one becomes frightened to go further forward. This is one reason why a chronograph is helpful.

If you don't know what you are getting for speed, you really don't know much about your loads. By this, I mean if you aren't getting 2,100fps or more with that bullet, then you have a ways to go before load development is close to completion.

Using ADI powders (Hodgdon Extreme) is a blessing as they are less susceptable to heat caused pressure spikes than other powders. In other words they are easy to work with in a broad range of temps.

One must go carefully - watching all pressure signs - stickiness of the bolt being the primary 'sign' with rear locking lug actions. The tapered case causes stickiness to happen at relatively low, safe pressures.

Further note, insipience head separations with low round count per case is not a sign of pressure. It is a sign of headspeace problems.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Perry
.275 member


Reged: 09/11/10
Posts: 73
Loc: Qld Australia
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: DarylS]
      #175924 - 21/02/11 07:58 AM

Morning fella's

Daryl S thanks again for your input - gives me plenty of information and food for thought.

I am absolutely confident my Gunsmith has set the Rifle up with the correct headspace and cut my chamber to close tolerences. I am paying attention to what you are saying Daryl but at this stage everything appears to be fine. I will be keeping a close eye on things and reviewing this advice regularly.

I have been cleaning the beejeebers out of the barrel which is what is costing me so much time. It's been giving me the irrits actually as all I want to do is shoot the bloody thing, but gotta do things right and a little patience now will pay off in the end.

I loaded 5 cartridges for the lower sheet because it took me most of my available time to shoot [ and clean the bloody barrel ] the previous where 9 shot groups. As I loaded the 45 and 45.5 gr loads at the range I was short on time and decided 5 rounds would tell me all I needed to know. They where loaded in once fired cases that I had neck sized and checked the length.

Next lot of loads will be in once fired , neck sized cases. I will follow your advice and look for a sticky point or until I'm frightened [ big smile ] I have been amazed that the cases are showing no signs of increasing pressure as the recoil has certainly been letting me know things are hotting up. Bystanders have commnented frequently about how hard the 225's are hitting the dirt bank and the volumes of debri thrown up and the audible thump

I have load data supplied to me from another fellow who has a 35.303 and the 225 grain projectile indicates a max load with AR2208 of 47.9 gr for 2320fps [ 24" barrel ]. His rifle is a No1 Mk4, mine a SMLE so I am keeping this in mind and being overly cautious. Again I'm not interested in max loads or squeezing every last bit of velocity from the cartridge.

The Data I was supplied had AR2206, AR2209 AND Win 748 powders. AR2208 is a bulky powder which is one of the reasons I choose it to try out first.Other reasons are it seemed to achieve the best velocities with minimum pressures according to the data I was supplied.

The AR2208 is filling near to the top of the shoulder of the cartridge at 44.5 grains, 45.5 grains and it would be extremely close to the base of the projectile. I can't see how much above 46.5 grains would not be a lightly compressed load

I will check the stock set for tightness before I shoot the Rifle again.

I can't get to the range for 2 weeks now. I will have a Chronygraph as the purpose of the previous 2 trips has been to give me a starting point to fine tune from and expose any issue's with the Rifle. I will report back with the numbers and results

Thanks again for your advice

regards Jacko

--------------------
"To my deep mortification my father once said to me, 'You care for nothing but shooting, dogs and rat catching, and you will be a disgrace to yourself and all your family.' " -Charles Darwin

Edited by Perry (21/02/11 08:07 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: Perry]
      #175943 - 21/02/11 11:37 AM

Sounds good. I am happier to hear of someone else with one. Not having any idea of where to start or where the limits might be, presents a daunting task.

YOu can load to sticky then back off if you want. You will never reach the scary end of things, due to the case shape (taper) and action you are dealing with. It is a strong action, but it's rear locking will show pressure signs very early. Don't be concerned it won't.

2,300fps to 2,350fps is probably fine unless your friend actualy has a #4 rifle adn they are mox, but they don't sound like it, not a #1 MK 4. Maybe I'm confused on the proper designation. I have a #4, where-as the other rifle on my same action was a #5 - the Jungle Carbine. Am I incorrect in these designation?

I thought all #1 Mk 3's were pretty much the same SMLE's etc, strength and load wise, that it was the #4's and #5's that were in the different 'strength' category. My cousin and others he used to shoot with, have/had #4's re-barrelled for the .223 as well as for .308.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: DarylS]
      #176734 - 07/03/11 10:55 AM

Low count head seperation is not always bad headspace it is mostly poor quality brass on minimum size specs not military specs.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: Bindi2]
      #176770 - 08/03/11 05:22 AM

I do little .303 loading but what I've done has given me good case life. I paid attention to headspacing and used the shoulder, as-is normal for me. I did not rely on the rim for headspacing. This loading I am referring to was for Military rifles #3's mostly having military barrels with sloppy, military chambers.

In each rifle, the shoulder had to be moved foreward considerably in order to hold the case firmly to push the ctg. back against the bolt when closing. The actual rim's headspace was sloppy just like all of the chamber's dimensions. Firing factory ammo in these rifles was a good way to limit case life top 2 or 3 shots, which some people think is normal. I chose not to think this way.

A custom barrel job on any action, such as this .35.303 job, should not have a sloppy chamber and should be headspaced for the brass available today - it is a custom job (I think) and should have been chambered to minimum specs for the brass that is going to be used - afterall, the customer paid for a custom job, not a "work in mud and blood" military rifle.

Hopefully, that is exactly what this rifle will show.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: DarylS]
      #176826 - 08/03/11 11:18 PM

I have been reloading for the 303 since the early 70s. It was designed to head space on the rim not the shoulder as rimless cases do. Head space that is tight to to tight is as bad as too loose. Been through the rim gauge stage with multable bolt heads.
I have had 3 case head seperations in the last 2 years second fireing, this was because the brass was of a very poor quality i dont think it would have made brass metal specs not with standing the under sized or minimum size of the case. Certainly smaller than military specs.
I also reload for a 243/303 @ 3800 fps, this rifle has never had a case head seperation plenty of neck shoulder splits if the annealing is not up to the mark.
The only factory loads i have used for years was some Highland (PRIVI)to try out the brass cases.
I also load for a barrel made in 1944 that could only be discribed as a match barrel yet it is on a service rifle with head space between 64 and 74.
These are SMLE and No4 actions.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27093
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: Bindi2]
      #176845 - 09/03/11 08:35 AM

I've never had a problem when headspacing on the shoulder - therefore I have no idea what "to to tight" means? I have never seen headspace too tight. I have seen 0 headspace and I have seen headspace set for minimum brass + .002" which would not allow some makes of belted brass to be used that was wayyyy sloppy(.012" overlength base to belt).

I set my dies to give a light crush fit on initial chambering, then neck size after that and my brass lasts a long time - in every ctg. I load for, rimmed or rimless, including several belted magnums that also had to be loaded using the shoulder to control headspace.

I don't use low quality brass as there is no need to do so. Can't see a good reason why anyone would want to - not today.

I really don't see what the fuss is all about. I merely noticed a formed shoulder that appeared to be well forward of it's original, unfired position.

Moving this shoulder foreward by firing alone, can weaken the brass becsue it has to stretch to move, then it continures to grow in length with each firing, ultimately sepparating - amybe not in 2 or 6 or 8- maybe the 13th or 14th time - doesn't matter to me, it is still stretching, which makes me have to trim it and I hate trimming brass when it can be avoided, easily.

I merely noted how I prevent that from happening & suggested following those steps would help eliminate case head & body separations. I have had to defend those methods in this thread, ever since.

When I build a wildcat, I make certain the reamer used matches the brass I am going to use, then I chamber it to headspace at 0. There is NO slop - not even .001" slop - 0 - crush fit - bright ring around the shoulder/neck junction on chambering and ejecting when testing die settings. When fired, they come out perfectly shaped - I neck size and never need FL sizing nor do I EVER have to bump the shoulder to allow chambering.

Even with rimmed cases, I headspace on the shoulder - my brass lasts almost indefinitely and does not lengthen enough to need trimming in over 5 firings. My Hornet and Bees, which Ken W. says you cannot stop from stretching every time it's fired, did not need trimming until they'd been fired over 16 times - go figure - perhaps I actually did something right? Ken never got them to last 6 firings, let alone 16 - his always separated - read about it in his books. He couldn't figure it out - have I? I don't know if I have, but I do know I have absolutley no problems with rimmed cases or any others, stretching shot to shot.

Using a belt or rim to control all headspace, is not 'accurate' enough for me. That allows brass to stretch. Once it starts, it continues and shoulders also have to be bumped. That is why I do it the way I do - I am not alone and friends and aquaintances in the same sport along with their 'accuracy' gunsmiths, chamber and load the same way as I do - that's where I learned it. Not my idea, but it works.

Guys say that if I don't need to bump my neck sized brass' shoulder at some point, that my loads are solt loads. I think it's because they fireform brass "as-received" and this stretches the brass when they do, therefore their brass moves foreward every single firing and sooner or later, they have to bump the shoulders as a result.

Same goes for rimmed. If making the brass fit before it is fired works for rimmed wildcats and some rimmed, much -tapered ctgs, why won't it work for the .303 case?

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mauserand9mm
.400 member


Reged: 03/09/09
Posts: 1042
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: DarylS]
      #176849 - 09/03/11 09:01 AM

I guess the point is that a rimmed, small shouldered case will last well if the headspacing is set to be correct (tight?) on the rim. Improved cases usually have larger (stronger) shoulders than the parent cases and headspacing on the shoulder instead of the rim will work to give good case life. There are exceptions where it doesn't help - soft brass (and maybe excessive firing pin protusion and strong springs?).

I would definately recommend rim headspacing on the 303 parent cartridge and the 35cal+ derivatives on the 303 case. I think the 27cal and below have a fairly decent shoulder and shoulder headspacing would be okay. I understand that quite a few people have 35 cal derivatives that do work with shoulder headspacing but this will not be the experience for everyone.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
450_Ackley
.375 member


Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: mauserand9mm]
      #176862 - 09/03/11 07:17 PM

I'm still agreein' with ya Daryl!!!

David.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Con
.333 member


Reged: 24/05/04
Posts: 261
Loc: Victoria
Re: Range Report 35.303 [Re: 450_Ackley]
      #176912 - 10/03/11 09:56 PM

Quote:

I'm still agreein' with ya Daryl!!!

David.




Me too,
About to bring a 303British back into work. All brass will be opened to 8mm, then run into the FL die to get a false shoulder and slight crush fit for the first firing.
Cheers...
Con


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 84 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 4412

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved