Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifle Photos & Archive

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
Kapu
.275 member


Reged: 12/03/07
Posts: 53
Loc: Finland
Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE
      #78167 - 07/05/07 11:04 PM

Allmost unused best quality Lancaster oval bore, like been carried out at yesterday from 11th Panton Street shop




Edited by CptCurl (15/07/10 12:32 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mehulkamdar
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/04
Posts: 3688
Loc: State of Ill-Annoy USA.
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #78171 - 08/05/07 01:19 AM

Superb gun, Kapu! You really have a treasure!

Good hunting!

--------------------
The Ark was made by amateurs. Experts built the Titanic.

Mehul Kamdar


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EzineAdministrator
.333 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 485
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: mehulkamdar]
      #78221 - 08/05/07 11:05 PM

Photo of double rifle relocated to NE Server.

Very nice.

--------------------

Ezine.NitroExpress.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #78266 - 09/05/07 07:09 AM

That is very nice. Let us know how it shoots.

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dnovo
.333 member


Reged: 21/02/05
Posts: 490
Loc: Chicago & SE Wisconsin
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: bonanza]
      #78357 - 10/05/07 10:14 AM

The condition looks great. Is it original or has it been refinished? Dave

--------------------
Time Wounds All Heels


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Kapu
.275 member


Reged: 12/03/07
Posts: 53
Loc: Finland
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: dnovo]
      #78663 - 15/05/07 01:22 AM

Unfortunately all original, as it will be limiting majority of the usage in the wet and miserable conditions. If would have a time machine, I could go back to late 1909 and sell it as used for 6 months only.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AzGuy
.333 member


Reged: 23/03/06
Posts: 388
Loc: Prescott, Arizona, USA
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #78664 - 15/05/07 01:29 AM

Beautiful rifle! What does it weigh?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: AzGuy]
      #78822 - 18/05/07 03:28 AM

Built by Webley for Lancaster in 1909. This is Webley's W & R C Model.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #80387 - 12/06/07 05:49 AM

Is it cased & how are the bores?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #80486 - 13/06/07 09:31 AM

This is quickly becoming the new again calibre of choice, over many of the countries I have been hunting of late.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Nitro
.450 member


Reged: 06/01/03
Posts: 7244
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: ]
      #80493 - 13/06/07 09:47 AM


I agree.

A very underated calibre.

I love the guns I have in it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: 500Nitro]
      #80551 - 14/06/07 01:35 AM

Quote:


I agree.

A very underated calibre.

I love the guns I have in it.




I have a Dan'l Fraser sidelock ejector in this calibre as well as a 1930's vintage Purdey, and have taken much game, including HUGE bull Elephant with this round.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Kapu
.275 member


Reged: 12/03/07
Posts: 53
Loc: Finland
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: ]
      #83610 - 07/08/07 12:46 AM

some answers for the questions;

It is cased.
Bores are like they should be in a rifle used a couple of times, one very light scratch on the left barrel, otherwise the original barrels blueing is not having any signs of use. Inside as mirrors.
Shooting 2-3 inch groups at 100 meters.

Kicks like 22 rimfire, if I compare to my J.Nowotny .450 31/4 NE, which is pretty light one.
More pictures will follow later on.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
xausa
.400 member


Reged: 07/03/07
Posts: 2037
Loc: Tennessee, USA
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: Kapu]
      #83649 - 07/08/07 02:51 PM

What are the stock measurements? It looks like it has quite a bit of drop.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: xausa]
      #85205 - 06/09/07 02:24 AM

Quote:

What are the stock measurements? It looks like it has quite a bit of drop.




Looks like normal drop for an iron sighted double to me.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: ]
      #85214 - 06/09/07 10:13 AM

Is it because of the doubles built on this cartridge, or the cartridge itself. I could see the advantage if the rifle was a slim 9 pounder, but would be piggish in full sized double.

If the double was in the 10-11 pound range, then the 450 3.25" is superior in my opinion. You can load it from to 450 Nitro for Black with a 350gr projectile to a 500 grain full Nitro hammer. What flexibility.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: bonanza]
      #85215 - 06/09/07 11:23 AM

Quote:

Is it because of the doubles built on this cartridge, or the cartridge itself. I could see the advantage if the rifle was a slim 9 pounder, but would be piggish in full sized double.




You mean just like your 10 1/2 lb .375 Merkel?

Quote:

If the double was in the 10-11 pound range, then the 450 3.25" is superior in my opinion. You can load it from to 450 Nitro for Black with a 350gr projectile to a 500 grain full Nitro hammer. What flexibility.




Guess that means your clunk 11 3/4 lb .450 No. 2 Jeffery should have been a .577.


What a ridiculous statement.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: 400NitroExpress]
      #85228 - 06/09/07 10:29 PM

Perhaps I should be more specific. Width versus weight. The Merkel weighs in at 9.8 lbs but is very narrow compared to the Jeffery, which is damn wide. Also the Jeffery has a 28" bbl making it feel heavier that is is. No, I don't want to whack them off

So, I'll agree that 11-12 lbs is just right for a 450, I'd say that 10 lbs would be perfect for a 450/400.

I've never shot a 500 or 577 and have not clue what they should weigh.

Funny think about weight is the Ying & Yang. A light rifle is easy to carry and a heavy one absorbs recoil. I doubt this will be the last we hear of this topic.

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: bonanza]
      #85233 - 07/09/07 01:17 AM

Sure, weight is a trade-off. Too heavy and it's a club. Too light and it doesn't swing well for snap shooting on moving game, and recoil goes up, and recovery time increases. My Leonard built .400 is 10 lbs, 2 oz, and I wouldn't want it any lighter. Heym's new PH/88B in .400 will be 9.75 lbs.

I understand what you're saying about width vs. weight, and yeah, and you're exactly right. There's a BIG difference between the British and Teutonic guns here that dates back to the origins of the design. The British DR "formula" that emerged as the DR developed was very different from the Teutonic designs. The British prized "weight between the hands" - 50% of the weight in one-third of the length - to give a heavy DR sparkling handling characteristics. The Teutonic designs have always prized slimness over weight distribution. If you look at say, a Merkel .465 from the '30s and compare it to a current Merkel .470, you'll see that nothing has changed. At the same time, they never built the quantity of large bores that the British did.

You're right. Compare the action of a Merkel .470 to your Jeffery .450. It looks like a sports car parked next to a U-Haul truck. The action size is the cornerstone of weight distribution. The British guns use larger actions with much more barrel profile to concentrate the weight between the hands. With the tiny German actions, it's utterly impossible to achieve this. The small action requires much smaller barrel shanks which permit much less barrel profile, resulting in a lot more weight in the ends of the gun - anathema to really great handling in a 10 to 11 pound rifle. The trap that many fall into is in thinking that slimness equals great handling. It doesn't.

Of course, not all of the British guns are the same. The Leonard design is more agressive in this regard (it's a big action), while the Webley built doubles, like Kapu's lovely Lancaster, are slimmer. The Webley actions are still substantially larger than the German though. Curiously, the Leonards in .400 are usually 4 to 6 ounces lighter than the Webleys are in .400. At least that's true with the boxlocks, I don't know what Kapu's sidelock weighs.

Regarding the .577s, I've shot them at 13.5 pounds, and it isn't as bad as you might think. I find the .500s more unpleasant.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."

Edited by 400NitroExpress (07/09/07 01:35 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
xausa
.400 member


Reged: 07/03/07
Posts: 2037
Loc: Tennessee, USA
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: 400NitroExpress]
      #85262 - 08/09/07 01:20 AM

400,

You raise an issue I've never really understood. How do you go about measuring "weight between the hands"? On page 38 of "Gough Thomas's Gun Book" a mysterious device is illustrated which is "testing a gun for balance" by "timing the horizontal oscillations of the gun in its suspended cradle." There is no explanation as to how this is done.

Gough Thomas goes on to say that he tests handling quality and amount of energy required in shooting by measuring weight, point of static balance, least traverse moment of inertia and radius of gyration, without describing his methodology. Maybe some of our British correspondents can shed some light on this phenomenon.

I think this is what you are talking about, but other than measuring the dimensions of actions and barrel breeches, I have no idea as to how to go further.

Bill Warren


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: xausa]
      #85279 - 08/09/07 07:47 AM

Measuring it exactly on a finished gun would be difficult enough that I'm not sure I'd waste my time, especially since the difference is so easy to see and feel.

It strikes me that perhaps the best way is determine how breech heavy the barrels and fore-end are as a unit, and how action heavy the action and butt-stock are as a unit. An action size that is correct for caliber permits thicker chamber walls and greater barrel contour downtube, thus concentrating more weight over the action, which also makes it easier to balance well. DRs built on grossly undersize actions (Merkel, Krieghoff, etc) must have thinner chamber walls to fit the action and, consequently, can't have much barrel contour if the target weight is to be achieved. This puts a materially greater percentage of barrel weight forward, and less between the hands. Combined with the small action, this also often means that weight must be added to the butt (ala Merkel) in order to achieve balance, making the linear weight distribution even worse.

Comparing the two types, side by side, the difference is visually graphic. The difference in handling and feel is equally graphic.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: 400NitroExpress]
      #85280 - 08/09/07 10:43 AM

For those who are mathematically inclined, we turn to physics again. The quantitative expression of "Sparking handling" is described by Polar moment of inertia, the resistance to torque. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_moment_of_inertia

I like to grab my DR by the action from above and twist to get a "feel" for the PMOI.

It also explains why a mid-engine sports car can "turn-in" better than a front-engine. Interestingly, the Corvet is considered a mid front-engine as the engine sits well behind the front axle.

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clark7781
.375 member


Reged: 28/10/04
Posts: 612
Loc: Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: bonanza]
      #87459 - 20/10/07 08:04 AM

Would someone be kind enough to education us uneducated ones what an "oval bore" is.

I'm perplexed.

--------------------
Clark

Double Rifle Shooters Society
.500 NE and .577 NE


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Nitro
.450 member


Reged: 06/01/03
Posts: 7244
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: clark7781]
      #87460 - 20/10/07 08:34 AM



# Oval Bore – was a design for rifling where the bore of the gun was an oval that was rotated in helix fashion down the tube of the gun.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Kapu
.275 member


Reged: 12/03/07
Posts: 53
Loc: Finland
Re: Charles Lancaster 450/400 31/4" NE [Re: 500Nitro]
      #164143 - 14/07/10 10:55 PM

Pictures from Panton Street 11 Oval Bore creation





















Just to make sure that correct case legth is used;





and to make sure also the correct case is placed to right chameber


and you never can be sure then with left chamber unless it is stated as well























Edited by CptCurl (15/07/10 12:37 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 33 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 17748

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved