Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Disappointed

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Disappointed
      #67846 - 23/12/06 05:46 AM

My Chapuis 9.3 was scary accurate when I first got it (2 ea L's & R's in <1" @ 100yds, benchrest, S&B ammo). After about 100 rounds or so the accuracy seemed to have "gone south". The "groups" were non-existent with bullet impact @ 100 yds +/- 5" (vert. and horizontal)and purely random. As noted in an earlier post, I wasn't sure exactly where the problem(s) were occurring, but have since sorted it out for the most part.

The first problem was the scope (Leupold VX III 1.5X5). I took the scope off the rifle and replaced it with another scope I had on hand on another rifle (Bushnell Elite 2x7). The randomness went away immediately. This is the second time that particular scope has failed. I sent it back to Leupold and they reportedly rebuilt it, at least that is what the form included with the scope indicated when I got it back. Anyway, it's off to Leupold (again) with a request to replace it rather than repair it, but we'll see what comes back from them this time around.

The second problem is definitely the rifle. It is now cross firing about 2.5" at 100 yds. I've eliminated the ammunition as the problem as my chronograph showed the ammunition used in the first groups with a velocity of 2230 fps, while the last ammunition showed 2229 fps (same ammo, brand, conditions, etc.). I've looked at the rifle pretty closely, and cannot see what might have changed. The only ammunition that has been used is S&B factory, and handloads using Nosler Partitions (286 gr.) and Ballistic Tips (250 gr.) over either H4350 or H4831. The barrels and rib seem to be attached (no gaps, etc) even though that appears to be one of the Chapuis' more common faults. My gunsmith has had threee Chapuis with loose ribs (2 ea 9.3's and one .375 H&H) in for his repair. Since I'm no way an expert in these rifles, I'm pretty much stumped at this point. Accuracy wise, 2.5" cross firing @ 100 yards (6.3 cm @ 90 m) to me is not good enough. If I thought that 100 m/yds was all the range I needed, I might stop "as is", but no way is 100 m/yds adequate here in the NW for hunting purposes.

The rifle has a one year warranty which will be up in another few months, so I contacted the dealer where I bought the rifle (W. Larkin Moore) and their response was 10 cm @ 80 m was the Chapuis acceptance standard, so I was on my own, so to speak. That is disappointing to me. If I'd known what the Chapuis standard was, I might not have purchased the rifle. I was advised by many knowledgeable DR fans prior to my purchase that, on average, the Chapuis would most likely be the most accurate, besides being the "toughest" among the entry level rifles, and based on that information, I bought the UGEX.

I just got off of the phone with my gunsmith and he will re-regulate the rifle for me. The only plus I can see out of all this is the rifle will be re-regulated for a handload using bullets and powders commonly available here in the NW (WA State, USA). I've pretty much settled on 4350 powder, H or IMR, and Nosler partitions for the load. Any recommendations for me? TIA Pilgrim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67851 - 23/12/06 06:37 AM

Have you attempted to develop a load that will 'shoot to regulation' in this rifle before considering re-regulation?

Powders, primers, bullets, OAL...
There are variables to work with, might it be quicker and cheaper to just work on a new load?

You can move POI by messing with the variables, while staying within safe pressure and velocity limits.


--Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39885
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Disappointed [Re: tinker]
      #67856 - 23/12/06 07:09 AM

Can shooting a Nosler Partition in a double damage the barrels ie the solid brass cross-section of the H partition?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500grains
.416 member


Reged: 16/02/04
Posts: 4732
Loc: Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: NitroX]
      #67857 - 23/12/06 07:25 AM

I was going to ask the same thing but bit my tongue hard.

I suggest you consider sending the rifle to JJ at www.champlinarms.com for an evaluation of what the damage might be, and what might have caused it. Re-regulating might be futile if partition-style bullets are the cause of the problem.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: NitroX]
      #67859 - 23/12/06 07:36 AM

Re: Loads...I've tried a several different powders, primers, and bullets. The OAL for all of those loads was set to keep the bullet off of the lands a smidgeon (~.030" or so). The rifle starts to regulate with loads below 2000 fps. How far below 2000 I'm going to have to go to get regulation I'm not sure. But based upon the work to date, I'd guess the velocity at which it will regulate would be in the neighborhood of 1900 fps, maybe a bit less. I've gone as low as 1980 fps so far and it was still crossing by an inch or so. I stopped at that velocity as that velocity is way too low for the use I have planned for this rifle.

Nitrox - I don't know if the Nosler is a problem or not. I don't think so. My smith uses that bullet in the 9.3s' he loads for (custom loading) and has regulated rifles, and has developed loads for that bullet without problems developing. I'm still getting mixed messages re: Barnes TSX and Swift A Frames from the dealer and those on this board, so I plan on talking to the Chapuis folks face to face the end of January about bullets, and I'll make my decision and go from there. I will post on this board the results of that discussion. I will also post the results of the re-regulation and what the smith found while working with the rifle.

Pilgrim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: 500grains]
      #67865 - 23/12/06 08:06 AM

500 grains - The rifles' accuracy went south before a single handload was fired in it, so I don't think the Nosler is the problem. In fact, the Chapuis was regulated at the factory using the same brand and load of ammunition I had fired in the rifle, so I don't accept that the problem is ammunition based. All of the bullets that were used originally and up to it's accuracy going south were the S&B 286 gr. SP factory loads, the same load for which the rifle was regulated according to the target sent with the rifle.

Quite frankly, I respect all of the info I've received via this board and the experts thereupon. That's why I haven't used any of the Swifts or Barnes bullets that reside on my loading bench. On the other hand, others have allowed as how the bullets I have used, and those I have considered using are OK in this rifle. Those recommendations include the dealer from whom I bought the rifle. If that dealer will approve other bullets, and accept that he will have to pay for repairs if the bullets cause damage, I suspect that they probably are OK, since he is willing to put his money where his mouth is, so to speak. He has indicated that he has spoken to Chapuis directly about these other bullets, but as noted below, I intend to confirm that at the SCI convention at Reno the end of January.

I accept the preposition that the Woodleighs are more than OK. On the other hand, at this point I'm not convinced that the recommendation for the Woodleighs exclusively isn't based to a certain extent upon heresay vs. hard data. Clearly using the Woodleighs exclusively, one won't experience a problem with barrel damage. I have no doubt that the older British doubles have problems with the harder bullets (partitions, TSX and any similar bullets). I also have no doubt that at some time in the past a rifle had its' rib shot loose using those other bullets, perhaps more than one rifle. What I don't know is if that specific rifle might have had problems regardless of what bullet was used. Have other modern rifles had this specific problem? If so, I haven't read or heard of this being common. As noted in my earlier post, this DR gunsmith has fixed three Chapuis with loose ribs and I seriously doubt all of them used Noslers or Barnes or any other bullet exclusively, although I do not know that to be factual. I do know that the smith di NOT identify ammunition as the basis of the loose ribs in those Chapuis he has fixed. This DR smith has been recommended to me by one of the larger dealers and has all of the work he can handle. Based upon that info, and the fact that the DR community is rather small, he is most likely pretty good or the word would be around to avoid him. He lightened the triggers in my double, and he also reworked the comb for me. I am perfectly satisfied with what I've seen of his work to date. He works on DRs exclusively. Pilgrim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67869 - 23/12/06 08:51 AM

What's the name of your DR smith?


--Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: tinker]
      #67871 - 23/12/06 09:44 AM

Keith Kearcher

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
470evans
.333 member


Reged: 30/03/05
Posts: 278
Loc: Texas, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67878 - 23/12/06 11:00 AM

I would suggest JJ as well. He has done substantial work for me and I have always been very pleased with his work. It takes time but everything good is worth the wait. I had read Keith was a good metal man so I had him relay the ribs on a Fox and was very disappointed in the finished product... just my 2 cents.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bulldog563
.400 member


Reged: 21/10/05
Posts: 1153
Loc: California
Re: Disappointed [Re: 470evans]
      #67887 - 23/12/06 01:56 PM

Have your handloads ever shot acceptable groups? I ask because maybe (if you only shot good groups with the S&B ammo at first) you are shooting S&B ammo from a different lot number and there are small changes in the different lot of ammo causing the difference.

If I were you I would send it to JJ at Champlins for a check up. If all is ok I would either work up a load that shoots to regulation myself or if for some reason wasn't able to would have Champlins do the load development. I have heard that Superior Ammunition also does load work for DR's but don't know how good or bad they are at it.

Good Luck.

Out of curiosity... To the othe Chapuis 9.3 owners on the board, How accurate was your rifle out of the box? Were the barrels crossing at 100yds?

--------------------
Join the National Rifle Association:
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NE450No2
.375 member


Reged: 10/01/03
Posts: 942
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67894 - 23/12/06 03:09 PM

Pilgrim

Try this,
Seperate the barrels from the stock.
Hold the barrels by the bottom "hooks" letting them hang down.

Careful do not drop them.
With your knuckle or something wood, like a hammer handle gently rap the bbls.

You should hear them "ring".
If they do not "ring" but sound flat, the solder on the bbls/ribs could be loose.


Also are you shooting your rifle at the range off of bags. Try shooting it sitting more upright [pile the bags higher], simulating standing.
Hold the forearm resting, only the back of your hand on the bag just enough to steady you.
Do not use a rear bag.

Let us know what happens.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500grains
.416 member


Reged: 16/02/04
Posts: 4732
Loc: Salt Lake City, Utah USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67896 - 23/12/06 03:20 PM

Quote:

Clearly using the Woodleighs exclusively, one won't experience a problem with barrel damage.




Although that is true of Woodleigh softs, it is not true of Woodleigh solids.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DoubleD
.400 member


Reged: 23/11/03
Posts: 2437
Loc: Retired in Oklahoma
Re: Disappointed [Re: 500grains]
      #67900 - 23/12/06 03:53 PM

Applying single barrel problem solving to to a double barrel..could you have a copper fouled bore. One rough barrel would be compounded by two rough barrels.

--------------------
DD, Ret.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: 500grains]
      #67907 - 23/12/06 04:39 PM

500Grains - Will do. For "the record"...until very recently, I assumed I was the problem. After all the rifle shot like a house afire originally and nothing had changed as near as I could tell. I piled my sandbags higher, put 'em on top of a 6x6, always have kept my hand under the forend, tried lower bags, tried with and without the scope, tried with the bags under the receiver (hand still between the bags and forend), different powders, different primers & bullets, different seating depth, continued to shoot with S&B factory loads as a control...and probably other stuff that escapes my mind right now. I talked to JJ earlier today and he suspects that the replacement scope may have caused the crossing problem (more weight). I'm not sure, but in deference to his expertise, I'm going to wait until I get the Leupold back and put it back on the rifle and try it again.

I tried to get the rifle to regulate by using handloads. I continued to get closer to regulation, but not quite there. As I had to lower the powder to much lower levels than I expected, or thought reasonable, I began to suspect all was not well. Reloading books that have the 9.3x74R aren't all that common, but those that I have (and I have a bunch of 'em) all indicated that with a 24" barrel I should have been getting standard velocities (~2250 +/- fps) at powder levels as much as 8 grains more than I was using. Figuring that the manuals couldn't be THAT far off, I checked velocity over my chronograph (Oehler Model 35P). When I saw that my velocites were down to 1980, and STILL not preventing crossing, I figured I was on a fools errand with the reloads re: solving the problem. Reloading is not a stranger to me. I've got some 40+ years of it including making my own bullets (cast and jacketed), wildcat development, case forming, etc. I'm so deep into that game I had over 100 sets of dies on my bench and more than 100# of powder in storage. Sick...

I stepped back...said a few working words, and thought about where I was and where I had been with this rifle. When I combined the randomness of the "grouping", with what appeared to be crossing, as well as looking at that original group (I kept it on the wall above my bench to remind me of where I wanted to go) I knew (finally) that I might be part of the problem, but no way ALL of the problem. That's when I started shooting at 50 yards w/ & w/o scope and at 100 yards with a different scope.

I shoot the rifle at 50 yards without a scope using the open sights. My eyes aren't all that good anymore (diabetic w/ tri-focals), but I believe I was getting ~ 1" crossing at 50 yards. It was only a half dozen shots or so, but 1" cross at 50 would pretty easily translate to 2" at 100 yds, at least in my mind. That's why I'm wondering about JJ's suggestion that scope weight might have been the latest problem. I dunno...We'll see in the not too distant future I suspect. BTW - For those not familiar with diabetes...as my blood sugar level varies (goes up and down), the fluid pressure in my eyeballs also varies. As the pressure varies, my vision varies. As a result of this variation a pair of prescription glasses are really only "right" at a specific blood sugar level. I generally have my eyes tested early in the morning or late afternoon which is the best I can do for a normal sugar level that I can expect more often than not. My vision never goes away, but it can get sorta fuzzy at times which prevents me from seeing fine detail. That is the reason I gave up hunter benchrest shooting. I couldn't always see the rings or the bull in enough detail to be competitive! Anyway, this tutorial is now over & class dismissed.

I will try the hang and clang method to see if perhaps the barrels have come "loose" but not separated enough that it can readily be seen. Per W. Moore request I've looked at the seams between barrels and rib (upper & lower) with a magnifying glass looking for any indication of separation...I didn't see anything, but then again...my eyes, etc.

In the meantime, I believe I'll try and find a good handload with velocities in the 2300 fps range. My goal will be to get as much velocity as I can get with pressures in the 40 - 42k psi range.
The Hodgden manual indicates that a compressed load of H4831 should give me roughly 2230 fps or so from a 24" barrel with pressures less than 40k psi. H4350 will get me a bit more velocity with a few grains less but at a higher pressure (~41k psi) . The Hodgden site also has the Winchester loading data and I accessed that data as well and it indicates that W760 would get me 2350 fps or so with pressures in the 40 kpsi range. I don't have any W760, but I do have quite a few pounds of H414 which is the same powder. This relaoding work will be to find "the load" for which the rifle will be re-regulated if that should become necessary.

I've vented enough...I'll check back to see if anybody comes up with something I haven't tried yet. Pilgrim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Shanster
.275 member


Reged: 02/10/06
Posts: 73
Loc: Seattle WA
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67915 - 23/12/06 06:52 PM

try cleanibg it with wipe out. If you need help I will be in portland soon and I could give you a hand. I have a machine rest that eliminates the shooter from the equation.
Shan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: Disappointed [Re: Shanster]
      #67919 - 23/12/06 07:11 PM

A machine rest will work with any kind of pistol or revolver that I know of, and any single shot, bolt, lever, auto, or pump action rifle. It would be utterly useless with a double rifle. The regulation of a double rifle is entirely dependent on being held in the hands and fired from the human shoulder. Machine rests, conventional benchrests, lead sleds, etc., do not work.

--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: 400NitroExpress]
      #67953 - 24/12/06 05:52 AM

I tried the hang and clang...the rifle rings like a bell with both barrels. No loose ribs here. I rather suspect that the crossing may be due to my adding a recoil pad, and lowering the comb of the rifle by ~ 1/4" or so. That combined with the scope probably upset the regulation. Like I noted before, I'll try the rifle again w/o the scope (as soon as the snow melts ), and with the Leupold when I get it back from Leupold. I'm beginning to get resigned to the idea of re-regulation. For those of you who have done this, am I looking at a cost of $100's or around a $1000 or so? or? Pilgrim

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DBBill
.300 member


Reged: 25/05/03
Posts: 137
Loc: Southern California, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67972 - 24/12/06 11:31 AM

Have you checked the mount?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: DBBill]
      #67975 - 24/12/06 01:21 PM

Screws in the bases and in the rings were all tight. Beyond that I'm not sure how one would check the mounts. The mounts being used are EAW swing mounts. Pilgrim

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JPK
.375 member


Reged: 31/08/04
Posts: 734
Loc: Chevy Chase, MD
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67977 - 24/12/06 01:53 PM

If your loads are too short on recoil you will shoot crossed and low.

This happens with my rifle with very low velocity and recoil loads with full weight bullets.

As we all know, the barrels of a DR point down and crossed, relative to the sights. If there isn't enough recoil the rifle stays down and there is no recoil arch to pull the barrels up and right or left as appropriate.

At 1980fps I wonder if you've gone so low that you are below where the "rules" apply.

JPK


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JPK
.375 member


Reged: 31/08/04
Posts: 734
Loc: Chevy Chase, MD
Re: Disappointed [Re: JPK]
      #67978 - 24/12/06 02:02 PM

Before blowing the roughly $600 to $1000 on a reregulation - price varying depending on whether you need a reblue after reregulation or if it went easy on the blueing - you need to find out what, if anything is wrong with the rifle.

Reregulation is only fixing a symptom, not curing a cause.

JPK


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: JPK]
      #67981 - 24/12/06 02:35 PM

I hear you on that one...unfortunately, I can't find a doggone thing wrong with the rifle. The scope went south on me, but everything else having to do with the rifle seems to be OK. Until I prove otherwise, except for the scope, I still wonder what is causing the crossing. Until proven otherwise, I'll still consider myself and the rifle modifications as prime suspects. I'll try the heavier loads and see if that helps. The last time I used "normal" loads the rifle crossed by a foot or more. At the same time, the factory S&B didn't cross anywhere near as severely. Strange, eh what? I'm afraid that I've made enough changes to the rifle (recoil pad, lowering the comb, lightening the triggers, and then adding a scope) that I'm not sure where to begin to untangle the question. I'm going to go back to GO as near as I can and re-install the Leupold when I get it back. I will also try the rifle without the scope (again) and with "normal" handloads as well as the S&B factory stuff I'm using as a baseline. If I still continue to experience the crossing problem, then I'm going to foot the bill and re-regulate the rifle and get on with my life. I simply don't need the aggravation. Pilgrim

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JPK
.375 member


Reged: 31/08/04
Posts: 734
Loc: Chevy Chase, MD
Re: Disappointed [Re: Pilgrim]
      #67984 - 24/12/06 04:00 PM

In my limited experience, I have found that different powders, even with the same bullets, come together at very different velocities. For example, I have three different powders, with one bullet, that shoot to regulation at Xfps, X + 125fps and x + 190fps.

If I were to load powder one to the velocity of powder two's load it would cross. Likewise powder one or two to powder three's velocity.

Throw in different bullets and the issue is compounded.

Changing trigger pulls won't effect regulation. It is extremely unlikely that you changed the weight or balance of the rifle enough with pad or comb work to throw the rifle out of regulation.

JPK


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rusty
.333 member


Reged: 08/02/03
Posts: 464
Loc: Missouri City, Texas
Re: Disappointed [Re: JPK]
      #68011 - 25/12/06 12:13 AM

I probably missed this from a post above but have you clean the rifle with something like Wipe Out or Sweets? I'm sure you have just throwing out ideas.

--------------------
Rusty
We band of brothers!

DRSS


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pilgrim
.275 member


Reged: 25/05/04
Posts: 57
Loc: Washington State, USA
Re: Disappointed [Re: Rusty]
      #68017 - 25/12/06 04:13 AM

I've been using wipe out for 6 or 8 months now. Amazing stuff. Sure makes cleaning easier, although quite a bit slower. I use it for two reasons. First, is it is amazingly effective. The second reason is I figure the fewer timess a cleaning rod has to go down the barrel the less chance of barrel damage.

When the snow melts off I'll go back to shooting the rifle and will report back if I discover anything that helps. Pilgrim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)



Extra information
1 registered and 609 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6333

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved