Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 416 comparisons

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
375Brno
.333 member


Reged: 18/10/05
Posts: 354
Loc: Brisbane, Australia
416 comparisons
      #43733 - 11/12/05 09:24 PM

Hi

Would appreciate comments on the pros and cons of the various 416s available. I know there are a number but would appreciate comments on the rigby, taylor, and remington to keep it simple.

Pressure, availability of ammo, ease of reloading, and anything else relevant would be helpful. I did a few searches and while all are mentioned there does not appear to be a comparative thread in existence.

Thanks & Regards
375Fetish


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3598
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 375Brno]
      #43737 - 11/12/05 10:54 PM

There's no practical ballistic difference between the three. The Taylor can be made for a few hundred bucks on a Mauser 98, so will always be popular, however its a wildcat so no over-the-counter factory-loads. The Rigby exudes Brit nostalgia, though the cases can be expensive sometimes, and it definitely needs a magnum action. The Remington is 'US Made', which means something to some people, and is available as a cheaper factory-load than the Rigby.

All three are easy to reload, and all three will achieve 2400fps with a 400gr bullet at safe Mauser pressures with modern powders. The Rigby has the lowest pressure, the Remington is mid-range, and the Taylor is pushing it a bit with some powders but still safe. All three will stun buffalo with accurate bullet placement!

You choose!

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
500Nitro
.450 member


Reged: 06/01/03
Posts: 7244
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 375Brno]
      #43741 - 11/12/05 11:50 PM

375Fetish

Suggest you get a copy of Cartridges of the World (COTW)
as this gives a good write up on all 3 including velocity etc
with various weigt bullets.

It's also a damn good reference that every Rifle owner should
have.

It's available all over Brisbane.

Being in Brisbane you have access to all the components
at Rebl Gun Works for most calibres including odd balls.

500 Nitro


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
**DONOTDELETE**





Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 375Brno]
      #43771 - 12/12/05 09:24 AM

In the field they are all identical for all practical purposes. The Rigby requires a magnum sized action, which typically drives the cost of the rifle up considerably. I personally prefer the Rigby, but I like the magnum mauser action (and modern clones/derivatives).

Scott


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grizzly
.333 member


Reged: 05/12/05
Posts: 359
Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: ScottS]
      #43776 - 12/12/05 10:26 AM

I have two rifles in 416 Ribgy. I love the round. Ballistics compared to the others are virtually indentical (except for the 416 Weatherby which pushes out a 400 grain bullet at over 3000 fps).

For most shots, the Ribgy is outstanding. Up to 200 yards - although 200 is pushing it. The Weatherby can pick up the slack at 200 yards and over. It is a big bore flat shooter. I also have a Weatherby PH Dangerous Game rifle in 416 Weatherby, and it will reach out and touch someone or something. Recoil is surprisingly not that bad, but that is due to the design of the rifle.

If you think Rigby ammo is expensive, than stay away from Weatherby.

I would take the Rigby over the Weatherby in 95% of all situations. Why? Because too high a velocity just punches holes in an animal at ranges where most shots are taken. It suffers from the 9mm syndrome. Poking holes in things only pisses them off. Now, if you only used the Weatherby at 200 plus yards, its velocity would have slowed to a point that it would wreck havoc with the innards of a large beast.

Compare the 9mm to a 45. The 45, by any standard is fat and slow (I know the feeling). But in close quarters combat, were one would actally use a sidearm, it stops even a drug induced maniac.

I like the larger case of the Rigby. It allows you to use some of the slower burning powders (not to exceed SAMMI pressures, of course), which will increase velocity and flexibility. For experienced reloaders only.

The remington is cheaper to shoot if you buy over the counter ammo. But if you reload, the costs are pretty much the same. Besides, the first few shots with brass are just fireforming it to the bore of your bolt rifle. And fireformed brass makes a big difference, in my opinion, on the reliability of each shot.

Once you get to the big bores, even if you do not reload, you should know how to do it. And once you learn how to do it, you will reload. With dangerous game, it is kind of like packing your own parachute versus relying on the lowest paid person in your unit to get you safely on the ground.

If I have a choice, I'll roll my own.



--------------------
SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
DRSS Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bloodnativ
.275 member


Reged: 14/11/04
Posts: 69
Loc: South Carolina, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 375Brno]
      #43793 - 12/12/05 02:36 PM

Definately get a copy of COTW. There is some good info there. A-Square (www.a-squarecompany.com)does offer a 416 Taylor factory load with all three of their bullets (Monolithic Solid, Dead Tough, and Lion Load). It runs about $80-$90US. Empty cases are available from them as well for about half that price and even cheaper through MidwayUSA.com (I don't know anything about their international shipping policies) Hope this helps.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
416rigby
.300 member


Reged: 16/11/05
Posts: 141
Loc: Port Angeles, Washington USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Bloodnativ]
      #43857 - 13/12/05 09:02 AM

The Weatherby excluded, the reality is that from the animal's perspective they are all the same. The Weatherby is just the Rigby case with a belt and the radiused shoulder. In fact, when Rigby cases were very hard to find, folks simply turned off the Weatherby's belt and presto...cases for their Rigby. The Remington is the way to go if you don't handload. Much cheaper to shoot, but if you intend to get a rifle in 416, you'll either take up handloading or won't shoot your rifle very much. I've had my 416 for 10 years and have a couple thousand rounds through it. You just can't do that if you don't handload...unless you have deep pockets. Handloading the 416's is the same as loading a 30-06. You don't need to do anything special or different.

I have to disagree with Grizzly, though, about a couple things. First, the 416's...any of them...most certainly do not run out of gas at 200 yards. No, they were not designed for long range shooting like a 300 magnum, but when loaded with 300 or 350gr Barnes X-Bullets they shoot remarkably flat. I'd not hesitate to shoot an elk-sized animal at 300 yards with one if conditions were perfect and it was the only shot I was going to get. I'm not promoting long distance gunning, but the rifle is most certainly capable if the shooter is well practiced.

Also, I can't quite figure out this comment about the Weatherby..." Because too high a velocity just punches holes in an animal at ranges where most shots are taken.

I've always heard the exact opposite from Weatherby shooters, and shooters of other very high velocity rounds. At the higher impact velocity, the bullets fail at close range, not just zip through. The 378 Weatherby had (and still has) the same issue. "Regular" bullets are not designed for such a high impact velocity, blow up and fail to penetrate to the vitals. Not trying to start an argument, but this is very well documented by folks with much more experience than I, such as Ross Seyfried, etc.

Bottom line is you'll enjoy whichever 416 you choose. They are very cool rifles.

Rick



--------------------
"Life's too short to hunt with an ugly gun"

U.S. Coast Guard, retired


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grizzly
.333 member


Reged: 05/12/05
Posts: 359
Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 416rigby]
      #44036 - 15/12/05 11:51 AM

No fight wanted..

First of all, I know how accurate the 416 Rigby is. It is accurate out to 300 yeards plus. The issue is penetration. I have no idea why someone would hunt elk with a 416 - it destroys way to much meat. A 375 H&H is the upper limit for elk.

I suppose it is possible to get a 300 yard shot on an elk, but that is not common. You may well indeed hit it with a 416, but it has lost a ton of energy by then.

I was talking about the kind of game a 416 is best suited. Dangerous game. You sure as hell don't launch a 300 yard shot on dangerouos game, period.

As for the Weatherby, yes it does tend to bounch around at short ranges. That is because the bullet takes longer than thadistance to stabilize. That is know as keyholing. In my personal opinion, it is unsortsmanlike to shot any animal with a round that keyholes.

In that scenario, the round never stabilizes, hits the target, and immediately goes off track and deforms. It destroys rather than penetrate. If you want to torture animals you shoot, go for it. I for one will never do that.

But you can kill a lot of game with very little meat. If that's your cup of tea, all well and good.

Be careful about what you "hear". 80% + on the internet is total BS. And 15 out of the other 20 is half BS, which means it is unreliable.

If you purchased even one bllistics chart on any given round, you would wake up to the realities of big game hunting.

Go to Arfica with a Weatherby and keyhole a lion at 30 yards. I dare ya.

--------------------
SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
DRSS Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3598
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Grizzly]
      #44044 - 15/12/05 01:45 PM

No fight offered, Griz ol' mate, just a couple of points: even discounting your wanting to have passionate sex with double rifles, you sure got some funny ideas!

If a high-velocity bullet from one of your rifles key-holes within 30 yds of the muzzles, CHUCK THE BLOODY THING AWAY! Its stuffed! Go buy a new one.

...and if you reckon there's a significant difference (in terms of destroyed meat) between a 300gr .375 through the ribs at 2500 fps and a 400gr .416 through the ribs at 2400 fps, then IMHO you have a very vivid imagination!

Regarding the 300yd shot on elk with a .416 "losing a ton of energy by then", you will find that a 400gr.416 PSP at 300yds has about the same striking energy as a 180gr .30-06 bullet at 100yds. That combination has killed millions of elk over the years......

You got this right, though: "what you 'hear': 80% + on the internet is total BS". I was just thinking that as I read your post!

No hard feelings I hope... ?

O & BTW, I'm not buying a used double off you unless you disinfect it first! Eeeeeew!

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AdamTayler
.375 member


Reged: 22/03/04
Posts: 688
Loc: B.C.
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Marrakai]
      #44056 - 15/12/05 04:47 PM

I put a 300 grainer through the ribs of an elk this year with my 375. It was enough gun though my partner was using an 8mm Rem Mag with 200 gr NP and they were a little light in my opinion (for the round; in a 8mm mauser I'm sure they would have been fine). Elk are a hell of a lot tougher than moose or deer so I would not hesitate to take a 416 elk hunting.

--------------------
It's the journey, not the destination.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
416rigby
.300 member


Reged: 16/11/05
Posts: 141
Loc: Port Angeles, Washington USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Marrakai]
      #44059 - 15/12/05 06:07 PM

Well, I never said a 416 was an ideal elk hunting rifle. I said I wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk sized animal with one. For some one to say that a 416 wouldn't have enough penetration on an elk at 300 yards is sheer folly and just shows their ignorance.

I do 99% of my hunting with handguns. I have killed deer, bear and mountain goat. The longest shot I have ever taken was a deer at 300 yards. I had burned a lot of powder that summer preparing for a goat hunt and knew I could make that shot. From a 12 ¾” Contender, with a rock solid rest, I broke that deer’s shoulder blade into three pieces with a 165gr Nosler Ballistic Tip from a 309 JDJ (444 Marlin necked down to 30 cal) and dropped it where it stood. The bullet destroyed the lungs and took out a rib on the way out the other side. If a 165gr 30 caliber bullet will do that at the lower muzzle velocity of a single shot pistol barrel, then a 416 on an elk would be the same.

I also shot a mountain goat with the same gun at 200 yards and he never took a step. Those two were the longest shots I’ve ever taken. I mush prefer to get close. Heck, I shot a black bear at 7 yards with a 44 mag…that was the most incredible rush I’ve ever had. I love getting close, so I am not advocating long range shooting all the time.

I can always tell when some one has no experience shooting animals with what would be considered “too much gun” for that animal. Their reaction is always the same…”Geeze, is there anything left?” or “Must blow them to pieces” or something similar. That is absolutely, positively, 100% not true. Not even close. I’ve shot white tail deer with my 416...just for the fun of it, to take it out on a nice day…and the meat damage is less than a 30-06.….or a 308 or 30-30 or any other “normal” deer round. The entrance and exit holes are finger sized and as they say, “you could eat right up to the hole.” Most bullets for the bigger rounds are tougher and don’t expand much on lighter game like deer.

Case in point…a short range shot with the 416. Big bodied white tail in Pennsylvania that I shot while visiting family. Range of not more than 40 yards. Load was a 325gr Barnes X-Bullet. The buck almost fell at the shot, but managed to stumble badly about 20 or 30 feet and went down. When we butchered the deer, it was an eye opener to some of the folks in camp who think like you do about meat damage. They simply couldn’t deny the evidence in front of them. We lost very little shoulder meat. I’ve seen more bloodshot meat from a 30-30.

As far as shooting dangerous game at long range, you are absolutely right…I would never shoot at game like that at over 100 yards. Since I normally use handguns, I like to get close…that’s the fun of it. I like to get within 50 yards or so I’d say my average shot distance overall would be about 60 yards or so.

I also agree with you on the internet…for all I know you could be a 16 year old kid on mom’s computer…for all you know, so could I. I take everything I see online with a grain of salt. What I was referring to when I talked about Weatherby people sharing their hunting results was not from what I heard online…it was from friends I know who hunt with the rifles. One had a 30-378 and another a 338-378.

I got a good chuckle at your comment about suggesting I read some computer program to “wake me up to the realities of big game hunting.” Now that’s funny! I prefer to get my reality at the range, not from some paper chart or ballistic computer program. Range time is the reality check, not sitting in front of a computer or reading a magazine.

By the way, we have our share of dangerous game right here.






--------------------
"Life's too short to hunt with an ugly gun"

U.S. Coast Guard, retired


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
**DONOTDELETE**





Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Grizzly]
      #44071 - 16/12/05 01:04 AM

In reply to:

Be careful about what you "hear". 80% + on the internet is total BS. And 15 out of the other 20 is half BS, which means it is unreliable.






That is one of the most accurate statements I have ever read on the internet! I commend you for your honesty with that statement!

With regard to the destructive power of a 416 caliber rifle on an elk (or 405 Win). I have shot a few elk with a 416 Rigby. Load have been 300gr Barnes (really bad choice in my opinion), 350 gr Speer, and 400gr Hornady. Compared to a 300 Win mag shooting 200gr Sierra Gamekings the volume of tissue trauma is about 50% greater with the 416, unless you are using the crappy Barnes bullets then it is about 75% of the damage of the 300 Winnie. Inside of 100 yds (as far as I will shoot an open sighted rifle) the 405 Win (300gr Woodleigh @ 2450+ fps) and the 416 Rigby (350gr Speer @ 2780 fps or 400gr Hornady @ 2620 ffps) are for all practical purposes identical (I would challenge anyone to tell them apart). The longest shot I have taken at an elk with the 416 Rigby is ~ 270 yards and the 350 gr Speer went sailing on through with no apparent significant loss in velocity (based upon the trauma comparison from entrance side of the rib cage to the exit side of the rib cage). The 300 Win mag's 200 gr Sierra (going 2970 fps) are stopped at ~ 200 yds and are left under the offside hide on a broadside double lung shot. No the Sierra's didn't fail, they didn't shed their jackets, and they looked like perfect little mushrooms of copper and lead (granted the jacket was loose and you could rattle it around a bit on the core). I haven't recovered any 416 or 411 bullets, because they pass on through. By they way, the 416 doesn't really seem to drop the elk any quicker than the 300 does either.

Now, the 500 drops them thar elk real quick, indeed. A 570gr Woodleigh at 2370 fps, at a range of 180 yards is awesome with the ol' double lung shot. Blood everywhere, the elk makes it about 20 feet forward, with that forward travel consisting of a jump and a forward shoulder roll. Tissue trauma differential between the 416 Rigby (which if no one noticed is loaded to 416 Weatherby velocities and doesn't even think about keyholing) and the 500, well the 500 generates about 4 times the volume of blood shot tissue. Simply awesome.

BTW, I am not starting a fight or anything just sharing what little I know from first hand experience in the field.

Regards,
Scott


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grizzly
.333 member


Reged: 05/12/05
Posts: 359
Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: ScottS]
      #44085 - 16/12/05 07:06 AM

Great insight. I never considered using the 416 for Elk. And the information on the 500 is awesome.

Practical experience wins over ballistics tables, that's for sure.

My experience was with a Brown Bear. My guide had me take a 250 yard shot, and it really pissed off the bear. By the time I put another round in the chamber, he was running at full steam down the mountain and was less than 80 yards away. Hit him again at about 50 yards and he tumbled head over heels coming to rest about 15 yards away. The closer shot hit him like a ton of bricks.

My trusty guide claimed he got a shot off, but I sure did not hear anything, and he was only 3 feet away from me.

Nice to know it works well on elk. I have my Ribgy ranged for 100, 200 and 300 yard intervals. I know it is very accurate at 300 yards.

--------------------
SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
DRSS Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
k80
.333 member


Reged: 07/05/04
Posts: 314
Loc: San Antonio ,Texas, U.S.A.
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Grizzly]
      #44103 - 16/12/05 11:44 AM

Dont forget the 500/416 just
in case you want this in a
double.

--------------------
Ken
San Antonio

Welcome to South Texas


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jro45
.300 member


Reged: 25/12/03
Posts: 192
Loc: DE, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 375Brno]
      #44291 - 18/12/05 03:58 AM

I own the Rem. 416 Mag. I reload all my rounds, but they seem to be available every where. This rifle doesn't recoil bad either.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
416rigby
.300 member


Reged: 16/11/05
Posts: 141
Loc: Port Angeles, Washington USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: jro45]
      #44432 - 20/12/05 12:09 PM

Interesting stuff, Scott. I sure like the Barnes X...why do you not like it? Do you find it overly destructive? I've never tried the 300gr. X. I loved the 325gr...too bad they stopped making it. The 350 is amazing in my rifle...very accurate.

What kind of 500 are you shooting? I have a .500 NE 3 1/4" in a No. 1 and just love it. I'm trying to get a good cast bullet load for it and so far I'm getting pretty good results with a 460gr. RNFPGC from Huntington's. I'd like to work up a good light load for deer...just for fun. Why just hunt the big stuff with these big guns? They're just too much fun to leave home all the time. Cast Performance has a 440gr. LBT that I'm going to try next.

--------------------
"Life's too short to hunt with an ugly gun"

U.S. Coast Guard, retired


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
**DONOTDELETE**





Re: 416 comparisons [Re: 416rigby]
      #44443 - 20/12/05 02:31 PM

416rigby,

In reply to:

I sure like the Barnes X...why do you not like it? Do you find it overly destructive?




Actually just the opposite! The Barnes bullets didn't do anything but punch caliber sized holes in the animal generating very little tissue trauma. Needless to say the animals didn't go down quickly (even with heart shots, as I had one bull stand around almost two minutes with the bottom of his heart "ventilated", it took a second shot to drop him). The Woodleigh 340 gr are very good bullets, but not enough better than the 350 gr Speer. I seldom use the Rigby anymore anyways as it has never really impressed me. One day it will undoubtedly become a 50 caliber of some sort. I am glad that the Barnes have worked well for you.

My primary hunting rifle is a 500 AHR (500 Jeffery Improved if you will). It is night and day better at dropping things with one shot than the 416 Rigby. I use three different loads for anything from squirrels to buffalo. They are based upon bullet weigth (535gr, 570gr, and 600gr all Woodleighs).

Regards,
Scott


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
shakari
.400 member


Reged: 09/02/03
Posts: 1107
Loc: South Africa
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: ScottS]
      #44446 - 20/12/05 03:53 PM

Scott,

A lot of my clients use the Barnes X bullet and I'm usually very impressed with it, however it seems to me that it's very speed sensative. Too fast and as you say it just punches holes and doesn't expand....... perhaps you should chronograph a few rounds.... if I remember correctly there is something printed on the box about optiminal terminal velocity.

I personally use my .500 Jeffery wherever I'm hunting and have found that with expanding bullets the Woodleigh range work very well but you have to have the right bullet for the right game to get best results. There's a big difference between the SP & PSP. I also like the Stewart bullets.

Regarding solids, I always use mono solids and won't use any FMJ solid but have just ordered some flat nosed mono's from GS custom to try.

All that said, there's plenty of good quality bullets out there nowadays so if you don't personally get on with one make part of the fun is trying others.......

--------------------
Steve "Shakari" Robinson
Kuduland Safaris (Africa) Ltd
info@kuduland.com
www.kuduland.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
**DONOTDELETE**





Re: 416 comparisons [Re: shakari]
      #44463 - 21/12/05 12:35 AM

shakari,

You are probably right about the speed sensitivity of the Barnes bullets, and I firmly believe that is a universal constant for all bullets. I tried the 300gr at two speeds, 2670 fps and around 2900 fps, I hunted with it at both speeds and had identical results (caliber sized holes just like a solid). Digging bullets our of loose sand back stops showed shed pedals at velocities down to 2400 fps with the 325gr. I understand that this isn't necessarily the same thing as what may happen in a game animal, but considering that the 400gr Hornady bullets recovered were nicely expanded I figured more than likely that the Barnes bullets were shedding the pedals and then behaving like solids.

In any event my 416 was never very accurate with any of the Barned bullets (like 2.5 to 3 MOA) that fact coupled with my bad experiences with them on game and I gave them up. Actually, I don't use the Rigby for anything any more than recoil conditioning and plinking, the 500 is just so much better. Eventually, I will rebore this old Ruger RSM and make it a 500 A^2 or something esle equally useful.

What have been your experience with the PPSP Woodleighs in your 500 Jeffery? I haven't shot too many, but they seem very tough and do not expand on body hits unless one is driving them through heavy bone. My initial desire for using them was head shots on buffalo, which tend to tear up the standard 535 gr and 570 gr Woodleigh SN pretty good. My load is a 600 gr PPSP at ~ 2300 fps.

Regards,
Scott


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
shakari
.400 member


Reged: 09/02/03
Posts: 1107
Loc: South Africa
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: ScottS]
      #44473 - 21/12/05 03:57 AM

Scott,

I use the SP on cats and they're truly fantastic..... they knock the shit out of them. The bullet on this Lion entered just under the eye and the exit hole was three fingers big..... if that makes sense.



If you check my website anytime after the middle of this week you'll see a picture of a Leopard I shot in the face with the same type of bullet and it travelled all the way down the length of the cat and left an exit hole about 2 inches across.

I use the PSP on Buffalo etc and again they perform really well. A couple of years ago, I took a texas heart shot at a running, previously wounded Buffalo bull. The bullet travelled the length of the animal and spun him 180 degrees and dropped him like a sack of coal. We found the bullet in the front of the chest cavity.

I've also shot Buff through small trees occasionally with (Stewart) mono solids and they've even held together in those circumstances...... but I've gotta say, I'm looking forward to trying the GS custom bullets for comparison.

FWIW, I load my ammo to have a MV of 2200.

As to the Barnes X, I might be wrong, but I seem to remember they need to travel at around 2400 fps to perform at their best...... but I guess it'll be on their website somewhere.

--------------------
Steve "Shakari" Robinson
Kuduland Safaris (Africa) Ltd
info@kuduland.com
www.kuduland.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
**DONOTDELETE**





Re: 416 comparisons [Re: shakari]
      #44474 - 21/12/05 04:02 AM

shakari,

Thank you for the information. My rifle likes two velocities for the 600gr PPSP, one is the 2300 fps mark the other is 2200 fps. I have loaded ammo in both flavors, and will most likely opt for the 2200 fps now (it kicks noticably less) based off of your comments.

Thanks again,
Scott


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
shakari
.400 member


Reged: 09/02/03
Posts: 1107
Loc: South Africa
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: ScottS]
      #44475 - 21/12/05 04:20 AM

Scott,

Glad to be of help....... although I guess I should have said that I use the 535g bullet and not the 600..... don't know how or if that would affect things.

Please let me know how you get on.....

--------------------
Steve "Shakari" Robinson
Kuduland Safaris (Africa) Ltd
info@kuduland.com
www.kuduland.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grizzly
.333 member


Reged: 05/12/05
Posts: 359
Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: shakari]
      #44519 - 21/12/05 01:46 PM

Let's get the record straight. I am no 16 year old on his mamma's computer.

I have less big game experience than most on this board. To hunt big game requires money, and I have worked my ass off for most of my almost 50 years to get to the point to where I could hunt because I liked it rather than hunting for a damn piece of meat.

My background is US military. And yes, I do the equations and charts before I buy or hunt with any caliber. I suppose it is just force of habit.

Regarding the 416 Weatherby, it is one hellacious shooting machine on paper. But in practice, e.g. in the field, it is a long distance rifle.

No, I do not hang my jewels out there before I take a weapon into the field. Field experience is great, but I have been trained to make sure that the weapon at hand is just right for the job.

Which led to my comments on overkill. I have hunted most North American game, with the exception of elk, and I was pleasantly surprised to hear that the 416 was fit for that job.

Again, it has taken most of my life to be in a position where I could actually consider an elk hunt or a trip to Africa. The brown bear hunt was a gift.

So, to be in this position and to be dismissed as some 16 year old or some whack touting the virtues of a ballistics program is really intolerable.

I did go overboard on the 416 Weatherby. I do not like it. And I certainly did not have the experience hunting as most on this board claim to have with the 416.

I am new to this board, and I thought this was one hell of a nice place to exchange information.

I will not belabor how we did things in the military, only to say that you did it all on paper before you went to the field. People's opinions did not matter. Lives were at stake depending on your conclusion, not the conclusion of some friend who made a 3000 yard shot with a 22.

Please excuse me if I went overboard. I was brought up in the old school - a kill with a smaller caliber means more meat.

The true old timers used to take elk and deer with a neck shot - why? - to get the most meat.

I am open to new ideas, and I truly believe I expressed that here. The greatest disappointment was the conedescending response with no attempts to contact me directly via PM or to question my conclusions in anything but a mocking forum.

If you have a disagreement with me, or disagree with a conclusion I have drawn or an opinion I have reached, you are always free to PM me.

Most on this board have had access to more money than I would have thought possible growing up. I came to this board to draw on experience and to hopefully join a community with a common goal.



--------------------
SCI Life Member
DSC Life Member
DRSS Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ALAN_MCKENZIE
.400 member


Reged: 24/03/04
Posts: 1214
Loc: Western Australia
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Grizzly]
      #44523 - 21/12/05 02:39 PM

Hey Grizz dont get your tits in a twist.
You are out of order with some of your comments !
Move on and learn from the experience.
As far as being military trained ,BIG DEAL.
So are a lot of other members on this site,and yes we have fired the odd angry shot.
Al

--------------------
"Dogs always bark at their master"
Sir Seretse Khama.25th June 1949


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3598
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: 416 comparisons [Re: Grizzly]
      #44525 - 21/12/05 02:47 PM

OK Griz, I re-read the posts on this thread, and buggerit, mate, you DO have some funny ideas! Your flatly stated 'facts' on calibre suitability, velocity vs meat destruction, and key-holing are cases in point.

Another couple: it is probably considered 'cowardly' by most posters here to flame someone by PM. If there is an issue with someone's post, it should be challenged in open forum where the validity or veracity is open to peer review. This helps everyone learn, and helps in assessing whose opinions or experiences are likely to be more credible.

Also, your assessment of the financial resources of other forum-members here may help you to justify a rift between their opinions and yours, but I can assure you that no such division exists. I for one have never hunted beyond Aust/NZ/PNG, and have never been able to afford a paid hunt in my life. While others here may, I feel sure that they have made personal sacrifices in order to do so and probably don't appreciate the snob inference.

This is a public forum, with a great many knowledgeable contributors, most of whom are here to learn more if they can. Nevertheless, you must expect your posts to be challenged if they can't be substantiated. That's how forums work.

Just lighten up a bit Griz, and you will find there is much to be gained by continued participation in NitroExpress.com, easily the best shooting forum on the internet!

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 189 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 5926

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved