Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: homemade doubles

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)
Ron_Vella
.333 member


Reged: 29/04/05
Posts: 432
Loc: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Bloodnativ]
      #33026 - 14/06/05 07:11 AM

Here are some thoughts from one who has built 3 and is on # 4. Regular tin/lead solder will do fine but, as Tony pointed out, Force 44 tin/cadmium solder from Brownells is far superior. It has a tensile strength of about 28.000 psi versus 4-5000 psi for tin /lead solder. Silver is NOT necessary and I HIGHLY recommend against using it. Tin/lead melts at about 400 deg.F. Force-44 melts at about 600. Silver melts at 1150 to 1350. You need near "red heat" to melt silver solder and at those temperatures, molecular changes are occuring in the steel which are NOT strength-enhancing. Whether you use tin/lead or Force 44, it is necessary to pre-tin both the sockets of the mono-bloc, and the shanks of the barrels, before final assembly. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE to get 100% coverage and cohesion by relying on capillary action alone!!!! I'VE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES, AS EXPERIMENTS, THEN DISASSEMBLED TO INSPECT. YOU'RE LUCKY IF YOU ACHIEVE 60% COVERAGE THAT WAY.

There are two advantages to threading rather than soldering. Of course, you need a lathe or a machinist friend to do this. First, you are able to achieve a "crush fit" between the barrels and the monobloc which makes the seam very difficult to see if done right. It's difficult in the extreme to achieve that with a soldered joint. That's why makers like Beretta roll-engrave that seam, to camouflage it.


Secondly, once they are threaded in, you don't have to worry about applying longitudinal pressure on the barrels, later, when you're soldering up the forearm hook, the spacer-blocks, and the ribs. When you get that far, the whole assembly needs to be heated well above the temperature where a solder joint in the mono-bloc will flow.

A word to the wise, from one who had it happen to him. If you solder, rather than thread, then you must make up a spring-loaded jig to hold the barrels into the mono-block during the rib-laying process, If you clamp things up rigidly, the barrels WILL expand and lengthen during the heating process, to the point where they may actually accordion on you. A spring-loaded jig allows the barrels to expand longitudinally while still keeping them in close contact with the mono-bloc. That ain't hearsay folks, I ruined two good barrels to discover that, and wasted a hell of a lot of time and effort that I'd spent in turning and polishing them as well. Boy, am I ever long-winded today!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3482
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33036 - 14/06/05 10:31 AM

Long-winded wisdom on building double rifles is gold-dust, Ron. Keep it coming!

So I take it Force 44 solder is tin/cadmium? The stuff I use in Oz is tin/silver, and despite the presence of 5% silver it still melts in the normal soft-solder range. Not to be confused with silver-solder which, as you say, requires red-heat to flow.

The early literature refers to the process of 'tinning' rather than soldering. Do you know whether they used pure tin a century ago, or did it contain additional metals like the silver or cadmium alloys of today?

Apologies for the questions, always been curious about this.

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ron_Vella
.333 member


Reged: 29/04/05
Posts: 432
Loc: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Marrakai]
      #33040 - 14/06/05 10:51 AM

Tony, First off, I had, what we here refer to as a "brain-fart". Force-44 is tin/silver,as you say, not tin/cadmium. Cadmium is bad stuff when vaporized, not good for the health, what.

Not positive on origin of term "tinning" as used for applying thin coat of solder to surfaces, prior to final assembly. I have read of the old boys applying pure tin with a rosin flux. Very possble some may still. Seems logical that that's where the term "tinning" arose.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33050 - 14/06/05 06:23 PM

In reply to:

Silver is NOT necessary and I HIGHLY recommend against using it.




Ok, so i guess Ruger, Winchester,and others have been doing it wrong when fitting (shotgun) barrels to their monoblocks.


In reply to:

at those temperatures, molecular changes are occuring in the steel which are NOT strength-enhancing




I find it interesting that you seem to be concerned about the strength of steel but are not at all concerned about the strength of a soft soldered joint between barrels and monobloc.

I agree that top quality solders like force 44 are very good for some jobs on doubles.

I have used these solders on wedges and ribs on several occasions and various doubles but I do not consider it ideal for the barrel to mono joint.

A question.
How many double rifles, old or new, featuring chopper, dovetail or shoe lumps, or monobloc system, rely on SOFT solder to join the lumps, attach the lumps to the barrels or attach the barrels to the monobloc?





Edited by 4seventy (14/06/05 07:55 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ron_Vella
.333 member


Reged: 29/04/05
Posts: 432
Loc: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: homemade doubles [Re: 4seventy]
      #33059 - 14/06/05 10:46 PM

Alan Moon, You seem to have very strong opinions on this subject, based on what experience I don't know. Here's a brief explanation for MY opinions. Those manufacturers to whom you refer, are using oven-brazing equipment, not a hand-held torch. They are able to control temperatures precisely, control the cool-down period precisely, and heat-treat later as required. Same applies to brazing chopper-lumps together, These jobs aren't done by some ordinary Joe with a torch and some brazing rod, They're done with metal/flux pastes, a jig to hold everything in place, and into the oven. There have been hundreds of thousands of guns built on the monobloc system, using nothing but tin/lead solder. All that the solder does is to hold the barrels into the mono-bloc, it contributes zero to the ability of the assembly to retain and withstand pressure. THINK ABOUT IT!

Edited by ronvella (14/06/05 11:06 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33133 - 15/06/05 09:16 PM

In reply to:

Those manufacturers to whom you refer, are using oven-brazing equipment, not a hand-held torch. They are able to control temperatures precisely, control the cool-down period precisely, and heat-treat later as required. Same applies to brazing chopper-lumps together, These jobs aren't done by some ordinary Joe with a torch and some brazing rod, They're done with metal/flux pastes, a jig to hold everything in place, and into the oven.




Glad you brought that up. I knew someone would.
Have you ever stopped to wonder why "they" would go to all that trouble when "they" could just use your much simpler and easier and cheaper SOFT solder method?

In reply to:

There have been hundreds of thousands of guns built on the monobloc system, using nothing but tin/lead solder





Hundreds of thousands of guns built by which makers?

In reply to:

All that the solder does is to hold the barrels into the mono-bloc, it contributes zero to the ability of the assembly to retain and withstand pressure. THINK ABOUT IT!




Yes, I have THOUGHT ABOUT IT, perhaps it's time you thought about it also.
You need to think about AXIAL FORCE.
Axial force is the most powerfull force acting on a double barrel rifle action.
Axial force is the reason for developments like chopper lumps and third fasteners (and others).
Axial force results from chamber pressure pushing on the action face, trying to push the barrels away from the standing breech.
Of course the jointing of the monobloc to the action will contain this.
So Axial force is transmitted from the cartridge pressure acting against the action face, to the barrel/s, to the monobloc and then to the action.
The important thing here is "the BARRELS TO THE MONOBLOK".

The joining of the barrels to the monoblock will have to endure and contain this strongest of forces to act on the double rifle, the Axial force.
You may be happy to use any soft solder for that purpose, I'm not.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
It doesn't matter a stuff how strong the action frame is or how strong the jointing of monoblok to the action frame is.
The overall strength of the entire monoblok system relies on the strength of the barrel to monoblok join.
That's why I prefer high temp solders for that task, as they offer far superior strength to any of the soft solders, especially the basic tin/lead types.

This is just what I prefer for double rifles built on monoblok shotgun actions and anyone else can use whatever solder they like.










Edited by 4seventy (15/06/05 09:35 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3482
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: 4seventy]
      #33135 - 15/06/05 10:47 PM

One is reminded of the chamber-sleeving repair to the Rigby nitro double described and illustrated in the opening chapters of Ellis Brown's book. Bloody tragic!

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ron_Vella
.333 member


Reged: 29/04/05
Posts: 432
Loc: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Marrakai]
      #33161 - 16/06/05 06:57 AM

Allan Moon,
Unfortunately you choose to argue only those points which support your argument. Nobody would be foolish enough to argue that the tensile strength of silver solder is not greater than, say, Force- 44. That strength is not necessary in this aplication. If you continue to ignore the fact that the amount of heat required to do this job with a torch will change the strength of the steel, then you are free to flaunt your ignorance of even the basics of metallurgy to the world.

If one starts with a known alloy, knows its chemistry, is familiar with its properties, undertands what molecular changes occur in that alloy at 1350 degrees Fahrenheit, understands what heat treatment will be required after assembly, has access to a brazing furnace, and has access to a computer-controlled heat-treating furnace, then by all means, silver-solder to your heart's content. Unfortunately, the average guy contemplating a shotgun to rifle conversion has none of these luxuries. That is why a good Tin/Silver solder is the material of choice and yields a joint strength, if properly done, far in excess of that required. As I said earlier, Force-44 solder has a tensile strenth of 28,000, pounds per square inch. Calculate the surface area of the joint and you will find that the total joint strength is FAR in excess of the force generated by ANY rifle cartridge.

Tony, the failure in the Rigby rifle, to which Brown refers, was caused in large part by failure to pre-tin, and poor soldering technique, as I discussed in an earlier post. Ellis does discuss that very thing in the book.
Best,
Ron.

Edited by ronvella (16/06/05 10:54 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33188 - 16/06/05 03:57 PM

In reply to:

Here are some thoughts from one who has built 3 and is on # 4. Regular tin/lead solder will do fine but, as Tony pointed out, Force 44 tin/cadmium solder from Brownells is far superior. It has a tensile strength of about 28.000 psi versus 4-5000 psi for tin /lead solder.





In reply to:

There have been hundreds of thousands of guns built on the monobloc system, using nothing but tin/lead solder. All that the solder does is to hold the barrels into the mono-bloc, it contributes zero to the ability of the assembly to retain and withstand pressure.




Ron,
In the above statements you say that tin/lead solders are fine and you then say that tin/lead solder has a tensile strength of only 4-5000 lbs.

In you most recent post you are now saying that you use Force 44 with 28000 lbs.

Make your mind up please.

Flaunting my ignorance eh.
Ok, the gloves are off!
I'll say right now that I think that anyone who thinks that

>>>>All that the solder does is to hold the barrels into the mono-bloc, it contributes zero to the ability of the assembly to retain and withstand pressure<<<<

and anyone who would claim that 4-5000lb strength tin/lead soft solder is ok to use to attach the barrels to the monoblok of a double rifle,

is, well, not really worth having a debate with.

hmmm ......tactfull Alan very tactfull.

Ron, if you want to impress me, try answering the questions in my last post.
Start with supplying the makers names who build hundreds of thousands of guns with nothing more than tin/lead soft solder joining the barrels into the monoblok.






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bloodnativ
.275 member


Reged: 14/11/04
Posts: 69
Loc: South Carolina, USA
Re: homemade doubles [Re: 4seventy]
      #33189 - 16/06/05 05:03 PM

This was shaping up to be a very informative thread until all the mud-slinging started. COME ON GUYS! Some of us would REALLY like information on this particular subject. If someone wants to do something one way versus another then so be it. It's the reader's (read:learner's) responsibility to verify any and all information given. If I take one person's word that tin/lead solder is adequate and the gun blows up in my face, who's fault is it? It's mine and only mine. It may have worked for your application but failed for mine. That's MY problem. Not yours. Stop sweatin' it. It's a situation of "reader beware". I know I will probably NEVER be able to buy a new (or even used) DR (though I will try) so building one may be the ONLY way I ever get to realize that dream.

I have, as many of you have, read Mr. Brown's book cover-to-cover several times. I still have questions. For instance, Couldn't you thread the full length of the barrel shank and simply crush fit as most, if not all, bolt actions are assembled? What should the profile be for a set of barrels for say a 450 No.2? What is the minimum barrel wall thickness for something up to 450 No.2?

Please guys let's stop the bickering and help those of us that truely seek the knowledge. I, for one, would be most grateful.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Bloodnativ]
      #33203 - 16/06/05 08:46 PM

Bloodnativ,
I wasn't aware of any mud-slinging.
I think that perhaps some of my points have been missed.
I have already stated that while I may prefer a certain solder method, anyone else can use whatever solder they like.

The thing that concerns me is that there are quite a few errors in some of the statements made in this thread.

Things like...
In reply to:

Tin/lead melts at about 400 deg.F. Force-44 melts at about 600. Silver melts at 1150 to 1350. You need near "red heat" to melt silver solder and at those temperatures, molecular changes are occuring in the steel which are NOT strength-enhancing




To start with , the melt temp is not that important as solder will not be much use at melt temp.
FLOW temp is the important one.
Force 44 does NOT melt at about 600! It actually flows at 475 F.
Perhaps the writer of that info is getting confused with HI-Temp Force 44 which flows at 650 F.

Silver solder actually flows at just over 1200 F.
This is still a full 200-250 F Deg below the minimum temp required to soften or anneal medium carbon steels.
"red heat" gives a very vague description of how hot the steel actually is.
1200 F will only take the steel to a DULL red colour, 1400 F will make dull cherry red and 1600 will produce full cherry red.

In reply to:

All that the solder does is to hold the barrels into the mono-bloc, it contributes zero to the ability of the assembly to retain and withstand pressure




This one really gets me going and is totally wrong.
On any double, the join of barrels to the lumps is CRITICAL regarding the strength of the whole deal.
This is why chopper lumps are considered to be the ultimate system as the lumps are forged integrally to the barrels.
On a monoblok system the lumps are part of the monoblok and the barrel to mono solder join has to withstand the FULL AXIAL LOAD.

In reply to:

As I said earlier, Force-44 solder has a tensile strenth of 28,000, pounds per square inch. Calculate the surface area of the joint and you will find that the total joint strength is FAR in excess of the force generated by ANY rifle cartridge.




Actually, Force 44 has a MAXIMUM tensile strength of 28,000.
Its true strength, even with a good join may be only HALF that at 14,000.

Also it has been stated more than once that 4-5000 psi tin/lead solder will "do fine" but the writer wants us to do any calculations at 28,000!


This is not meant to be mud-slinging or bickering.
It is just dealing with what has been stated in this thread.

Now to avoid any confusion I'll say this again.

Use any solder you like.

For double rifle barrel to mono join I PREFER silver solder.
Why, because the tiny caress of finger on trigger ignites a 50,000 psi bomb only a couple of inches away from your face.
Think about that and then do your calculations at the 4000 psi strength of tin/lead soft solder.
You may get a shock!





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bloodnativ
.275 member


Reged: 14/11/04
Posts: 69
Loc: South Carolina, USA
Re: homemade doubles [Re: 4seventy]
      #33220 - 17/06/05 12:15 AM

I guess "mud-slinging" an "bickering" weren't the right words but fit for lack of better ones at 1a.m. after quite a few beers . However it does seem to have gotten stuck on this whole "I'm right and you're wrong" concerning solder temps. A quick look at Brownells' catalog verifies what you said. Hi-Force flows at 475, HI-TEMP Hi-Force flows at 650, and Silvaloy flows at 1205. I'm with you man. Use the strongest stuff you can, UNLESS there is an easier way that will work just as well.

That brings me back to the questions in my last post. Will just a crush fit, like when barreling a bolt action, work just as well or are the axial forces of a DR making that method inadequate? Also what about barrel profile and barrel wall thickness for something up to 450 #2? As I've said I'm planning to build one chambered for something between 450/400 up to 450 #2. I figure if I go with a profile and wall thickness that is adequate for 450 #2 then anything smaller (450/400 3-1/4" or 450 3-1/4") will be covered.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ron_Vella
.333 member


Reged: 29/04/05
Posts: 432
Loc: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Bloodnativ]
      #33248 - 17/06/05 08:44 AM

Bloodnative,
I want to apologize to you and the other readers for allowing myself to be drawn into this "mudslinging". I would like to explain my credentials and then I shall bow out of this forum permanently. I am a relatively new member here, having joined about 2 months ago. I am 62 years old with 3 grown kids and 3 grandkids. I point that out to show that I'm not some pseudo-expert, teen-age troll.
I own a 9" x 54" South Bend Lathe with milling attachment and thousands of dollars worth of tooling. I'm no tool and die maker but I have become fairly proficient in the use of this equipment over the years. I have been welding, both gas and electric, for 35 years. My educational background is heavy on chemistry and physics. My father spent 5 years with the Royal Canadian Electrical and Mechanical Engineers during the war, teaching welding at a trade school in London. He spent 30 years as a welding engineer with Massey Ferguson. He spent several years on loan to a company in Chicago helping to develop high-temperature metal-deposition systems for re-entry vehicles in the US space program. He then spent 15 years as an inspector and tester with the Canadian Welding Bureau. You could say that I have had the best advice that money can buy when it comes to the topic at hand.

I have hunted and owned guns for 50 years. I have been in love with double guns and double rifles for 30 years. Like you, I would never be able to afford a double rifle, short of winning the lottery, so I decided to build one. I was well aware of the potential dangers and spent literally 100's of hours on research, correspondence, etc. I have built 3 so far. The first was a 12 gauge rifle, as I was only working with pressures up to about 12,000 psi, for my first attempt. I have killed 7 whitetails with that gun and it has fired hundreds of rounds of Lightfield slugs. The second was a .22 Hornet which again has fired thousands of rounds and puts 5 lefts and 5 rights into 2 inches at 50 yards with iron sights. The third was a 10 gauge by .54 caliber Cape Gun which is my deer gun during our muzzleloading season. I am currently building a .450 #2 NE which I plan to take back to Africa to shoot a second Cape Buffalo.

I see discussions like this one quite often, where some guy is right where I was 20 years ago, anxious to build a double rifle and thirsting for the knowhow and advice. I thought that I might have some useful information to offer here, based on experience, and some tough mistakes. I thought that I had presented that information in a polite and well-thought-out manner. Mr. Moon obviously thought otherwise, as a re-read of his post after mine will show. He basically told me and the rest of the world that I don't know what the hell I'm talking about, and he did so in a damned rude and abrasive manner. Perhaps he believes that rudeness is part of the moderator's job description.


Mr. Moon points out that chopper-lump assemblies are put together by brazing and then advocates, very strenuously that a rifle be mono-blocked with silver solder. He then makes a blanket statement as to the flow temperature of silver solder.

Not all chopper lump assemblies are brazed. Some are, in fact, silver soldered. Also, the temperature at which silver solder flows, varies from as low as 1040 degrees to as high as 1700 degrees, depending on the alloy and its shape. The liquidus temperature of the average bronze alloy is in the 1600 degree range. Do you see where I'm going with this? You may choose to ignore the potential degradation of the steel's strength at these temperatures, as Mr Moon is wont to do. But think whether you will be able to silver solder those two tubes in, achieve the temperature where capillary action draws the silver solder into every nook and cranny, and be absolutely positive that you don't get things up that extra 200 degrees where the braze joint between the lumps starts to fail? If you can do so you are a far better man with a torch than I am. Someone will say, "Well just clamp the lumps together first". That still doesn't stop the braze joint from liquifying and doesn't ensure that no hidden oxidation and resultant impurities are introduced into that hidden joint.

In answer to your question, yes a threaded assembly is by far the strongest and requires no solder at all. Use the finest possible thread, as the finer the thread, the shallower the thread form and the more "meat" you leave in the monobloc. As an example, the .22 Hornet was built on a .410 shotgun. The thread which I used was .670"-36, which is the tap and die set for the "N"-frame Smith And Wesson revolver. It requires some very careful measuring and calculations to do this though, as you've got to deal with the amount that the assembly tapers from the rear of the barrels to the front of the flats. If you re-read my original post above, you will note that I talked about the fact that this crush fit delivers an almost undetectable finished joint.

Again, my apologies for the mud-slinging. Life is way too short for this nonsense. If anybody has any questions, I can be reached on PM and would be glad to answer. So long all, I leave with a heavy heart as this seemed a damned fine board at first.
Ron Vella.

Edited by ronvella (17/06/05 09:03 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Marrakai
.416 member


Reged: 09/01/03
Posts: 3482
Loc: Darwin, Top End of Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33256 - 17/06/05 11:14 AM

Thought about this for a while, and feel I should comment: mainly advice for ronvella, but don't take it personally mate.

This forum is indeed much more civilized than others like AR and HA, and with few exceptions most members are well-mannered, and keen to learn and pass-on hard-won wisdom. Nevertheless, there will be inevitable differences of opinion, even among the experienced, as life's lessons are dished-out in a wide range of circumstance.

It is that breadth of experience which sets internet forums apart from other media resources, such as books, magazine articles, and TV shows. The dynamic, real-time nature of a lively forum like this one ensures that each topic is thoroughly explored, and unlike books or TV will not be restricted to the limits of a single author or editor's knowledge or experience (..or opinion!).

BUT.... you do need a tough hide to actively participate. All of us have been involved in dust-ups from time to time, and the trick is knowing when to walk away from a thread, not the whole forum. You have been a member of other boards for a long time, Ron, so it surprises me that you would toss-in the towel here. Other members are reading all these posts, and forming their own opinions, but most will be conservative about wading-in because it inevitably means 'taking sides' and only perpetuates the confrontation.

****************

Although this particular thread has definitely turned to sh!t, NitroExpress is still the best double-rifle forum on the web by a country mile, and I suspect ronvella's exit will leave both him and the rest of us (including 4seventy!) the poorer in the longer term.

--------------------
Marrakai
When the bull drops, the bullshit stops!
--------------------------------
www.marrakai-adventure.com.au


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bloodnativ
.275 member


Reged: 14/11/04
Posts: 69
Loc: South Carolina, USA
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Marrakai]
      #33283 - 17/06/05 03:42 PM

Very well said Marrakai. Couldn't have said it better myself and you are absolutely right. Just because one thread turns south doesn't mean someone needs to leave the forum. This is the BEST forum on the net. I, as many of you probably do, visit others such as AR and HA and this one is the most civilized and informative. It also seems to have the most members with REAL experience. That's why I visit here almost daily. I may not post very often but I don't usually have much that I can add that will be of much benefit. I'm just starting to learn about double rifles, big bores, reloading for them (though I already load for a few other more common cartridges), and dream of the day I can hunt plains game in Africa and DG anywhere. This site has been a major source of information and inspiration. It would be a shame to lose someone with vast experience and knowledge just because a thread turns sour. My intent was not to make someone leave but merely to get the thread back on track.

Ron, I am not the kind of guy to beg someone to stay where they don't want to be. However, I would hate to see someone with your experience leave over something like this. I hope you were just blowing off steam.

I think I'll probably NOT post on this thread anymore. I'll just let it die for now and post unanswered questions in a new thread later.

Keep the info flowing guys. I'm just eatin' it up.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33296 - 17/06/05 08:55 PM

What is all the fuss about.
Ron, you like one solder and I like a another.
Why such high drama over a simple difference in opinion?
Hell, nobody wants you to leave including me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ALAN_MCKENZIE
.400 member


Reged: 24/03/04
Posts: 1214
Loc: Western Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: Ron_Vella]
      #33297 - 17/06/05 10:08 PM

Gidday Ron,Your surname has come up before in conection with ISSF pistol shooting.
Iff you are the same person then you would be a retired school teacher..
My wife is a member of the Australian Pistol Team and I'm sure the name Vella from Canada has come up before.
Al

--------------------
"Dogs always bark at their master"
Sir Seretse Khama.25th June 1949


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deant
.224 member


Reged: 13/02/04
Posts: 47
Re: homemade doubles [Re: ALAN_MCKENZIE]
      #33307 - 18/06/05 01:01 AM

I believe I saw pictures of the 22 double rifle on another forum once. If its the one i saw its a beauty! Looked like it was very well built. I emailed Ron and he was very open to share his knowlege.
Dean


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39245
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: homemade doubles [Re: deant]
      #33337 - 18/06/05 04:22 PM

These sorts of discussions are beyond me. I have no desire to build a double nor the ability but they are interesting from a learning and technical point of view.

Differences of opinion will always occur and sometimes get a little heated. Heated discussions without dropping to the level of name calling or abuse are part and parcel of any alive forum.

Different people have different approaches too , some are more direct and some just let it pass by. Dealing with all sorts of people is part of life let alone the internet.

What I suggest is everyone just take a step back, relax a bit and cool down. Nothing here even comes close to what happens at other forums. Then maybe re-approach the issue from the point of view of a discussion on the issue, techiques etc rather than personalities. Hopefully in a polite and gentlemanly manner even if the individuals completely disagree with other.


Ron Vella,

I don't think you need to leave or drop out for six months or whatever. You are welcome to stay around. Disagreements happen from time to time.

***

Gentlemen,

Please do not let this thread die off. It is interesting to a considerable number of people. Lets get back to the discussion of the issues and techniques perhaps.



--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: NitroX]
      #33340 - 18/06/05 09:04 PM

In reply to:

Please do not let this thread die off. It is interesting to a considerable number of people. Lets get back to the discussion of the issues and techniques perhaps




John,
I honestly believe that sometimes the best information on a subject like this will come out of debate between those who have experience in the matter and have "been there and done that."
Ron is obviously someone who has this type of experience in building double rifles.
However it would be a rather useless debate if one person said "this is how you must or must not do it" and everyone else agreed.

Threads on homemade doubles IMO can be put right next to threads on 45-70 for DG, 458 Win vs 458 Lott, buckshot for DG, and buffalo charges on video.
All those topics seem to bring out the best and worst from forum members at times.

Any statements I make regarding double rifles built on shotgun frames will deal with safety as the NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.
Also I will not get deeply involved in threads where I do not have some experience.
ANY claims that I make or have made here, I am happy to back up.
I would also like to mention that I do not participate in any other forums involved in shooting or hunting or building rifles.
There is far too much drama involved on other forums and I am not interested in the constant fighting like what seems the norm at other sites.

As others have said you do need to have a thick hide to avoid being offended at times on the net type discussions.
Those who think their hide has been pierced could maybe sometimes benefit from reading some of their own words which may well have done a little hide piercing themselves.
It usually takes two to tango.

Ron,
One of the good things to come out of this is that we have all found out something about your background and experience building your own doubles.
As Marrakai and others have said we can all benefit from what you know.
I really cannot see any reason for you to want to leave over a difference in opinion.
Lets bury the solder issue right now and you do it your way and I'll do it mine.
Enough said about solder.
You ain't gonna change your mind and I sure as hell ain't gonna change mine so lets move on and talk some more about doubles.
Yes, life is too bloody short.
Cheers
four7tee






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ALAN_MCKENZIE
.400 member


Reged: 24/03/04
Posts: 1214
Loc: Western Australia
Re: homemade doubles [Re: 4seventy]
      #33343 - 18/06/05 09:34 PM

DITO

--------------------
"Dogs always bark at their master"
Sir Seretse Khama.25th June 1949


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39245
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: homemade doubles [Re: ALAN_MCKENZIE]
      #33355 - 19/06/05 02:10 AM

Alan

I agree with a lot of what you said in that post. Not interested in taking sides in a dispute at all though.

As for the role of a MODERATOR on NE.com. i saw some comments on that and wanted to elaborate for the benefit of members.

These forums are pretty open forums. "Moderators" is a hard coded term used by the forum software. I prefer the term "Forum Leader". I discussed with every "Forum Leader" what is required or what the role basically is. One of the main considerations was to keep discussions going, help with info or answer questions when possible. We don't really get into "moderation" much at all and members need to understand that. People are expected to try to keep good manners however. "Forum Leaders" aren't paid anything and are here for fun and interest. Similarly membership is free so no one can complain if the forums is not what they personally want.

Alan raised the safety issue and I do see a "forum leaders" role as including pointing out when they think something posted may not be safe or advisable. If the reader then can read the original statement and the contary view, well it is up to them if they want to do it or not. In some cases we will definitely ACT and remove the comments (eg if someone posts an obviously excessive reloading charge). Safety as an issue is paramount when people provide advice on what to do when reloading or building firearms.

I agree these "building homemade doubles" are quite likely to get contary opinions. The nature of the beast.

To anyone that can build their own double and isn't a professional in the trade I also respect that too.

Alan McKenzie summed it up well with DITTO.

Enough said I think.


--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deant
.224 member


Reged: 13/02/04
Posts: 47
Re: homemade doubles [Re: NitroX]
      #33470 - 20/06/05 08:55 PM

I hope to build one someday. I have to finish my 600 OK first and then one more bolt rifle.(dont have a longrange rifle other than a 45/110 sharps if I get drawn for pronghorns) I thought I had a donor action. I bought a crossbolt 12gauge shotgun CHEAP. It turned out to be a real wj jeffery 12 gauge hammer shotgun. I decided not to cut it up as it is in good shape.
I want to build a 303british double so the action was a bit on the big side also.
I might be crazy but with todays materials, machines and wealth of knowlege I think a man with talent can build a double rifle himself. They were built by men not witches.
The hard part is finding someone willing to share that knowlege that isnt just blowing smoke.
Dean


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39245
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: homemade doubles [Re: deant]
      #33477 - 20/06/05 11:33 PM

On these doubles built on a shotgun frame, what is the ideal "donor" shotgun actions to consider - for a smaller medium sized chambering such as a .303, .318,. 333 or even a 7x65 R.

Preferably a side by side. And not so big in frame that it is unweildly. Would a 20 gauge be better than a 12 gauge ?



--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
unspellable
.300 member


Reged: 06/03/04
Posts: 187
Loc: Iowa
Re: soldering the monobloc [Re: NitroX]
      #33484 - 21/06/05 01:10 AM

At this point in time I will offer no opinions as to what solder is suitable and what solder is not. However, I will point out that comparing tensile strengths of various solders is totally irrelevant as the solder is not placed in tension. The question is one of shear strength. The shear strength of the solder is the property that should be considered. The area of the joint is quite large so given a good quality joint the required shear strength of the solder may be less than intuition would lead one to think. I would hazard to guess that the quality of the joint may be of more importance than the choice of solder.

Also the stress is related to backthrust of the cartridge rather than pressure. I have noticed a tendency for people to think solely in terms of pressure when considering the stresses placed on a fire arm, to the exclusion of other stress factors which are often more important. The prime example being the cycling operation of a recoil operated self loading handgun where the cartridge impulse is far more important than the pressure which is almost irrelevant.




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 170 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating: **
Topic views: 19345

You rated this topic a 2.
Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved