Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 458 Winchester Magnum Question

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
LFOD1776
.224 member


Reged: 04/09/09
Posts: 18
Loc: Austin, TX
458 Winchester Magnum Question
      #141628 - 06/09/09 07:04 AM

I have a question for any experts out there in this particular caliber.

I read that the 458 WM was really never able to achieve the ~5000 ft. lbs of muzzle energy originally hoped for, without sacrificing reliability -- compressed charges allegedly resulting in occasional ignition failures. The general concensus seems to be that Winchester should have stuck with a longer case like the 458 Lott, and the 458 Winchester Magnum can practically only achieve ~4000 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy.

Then I read about Hornady and Ruger teaming up to produce some new "short magnums" like the 375 Ruger, with Hornady using some magical whizz-bang powder. This made me wonder if Hornady might be manufacturing any 458 Winchester Magnum with this new powder of theirs, that lives up the original promise of the cardridge. I've read some reviews (link) indicating this may indeed be the case!

Has anyone here chronographed this ammunition out of a 24" barrel to verify whether this is indeed the case?

--------------------
NRA Life Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #141629 - 06/09/09 07:26 AM

I get 1950 fps with 67 grains of Varget and a 500 grain RN, 74 grains is supposed to give 2150. There is nothing wrong with compressed loads as long as you do let them sit too long.

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tatume
.400 member


Reged: 09/06/07
Posts: 1091
Loc: Gloucester, Va USA
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: bonanza]
      #141631 - 06/09/09 08:02 AM

Actually, I think compressed loads of ball powders are more troublesome than with extruded powders. It is not too hard to get 2100 - 2150 fps with 500 gr bullets in the 458 Win Mag. My favorite powder is my old favorite, IMR-4895. It will make the requested 5000 ft-lbs.

To answer the original question, Hornady loads their "Heavy Magnum" 458 Win Mag ammo to equal the 458 Lott.

--------------------
Take care, Tom
NRA Life Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: Tatume]
      #141633 - 06/09/09 08:19 AM

LFOD1776 -


You've been reading stories from the history books.
With modern powders -- Accurate Arms 2230 and 2015, as well as others, getting 2150fpsMV with the 500gr bullets is not an issue at all. The Accurate Arms powders not very temperature sensitive at all, and full-kitty loads tend to transport and store without powder 'clumping' problems or hangfires or misfires.

With modern over-the-counter powders, the 458 Winchester is everything it claimed to be from the start, without the problems of the powders it was originally loaded with waay-back-when.





Cheers
Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1356
Loc: France / Germany
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question *DELETED* *DELETED* [Re: tinker]
      #141637 - 06/09/09 09:01 AM

Post deleted by grandveneur

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
controlled_feed
.300 member


Reged: 23/05/08
Posts: 227
Loc: NSW, Australia
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: grandveneur]
      #141639 - 06/09/09 10:46 AM

I used a CZ 550 Safari Magnum in 458 Winchester Magnum on my recent African Safari. I didn't chronograph it, but the 500 grain Woodleigh softs and solids shot through the same ragged hole at 100 yards, using 73/71 grains of 2206 (not sure what the equivalent is).

A 41" Cape Buffalo died with one solid through the chest, and 7 other animals from Klipspringer to Giraffe also died.

There is not a thing in the world wrong with the 458 with modern components.

I love mine and will be taking it back to Africa next time.

CF


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LFOD1776
.224 member


Reged: 04/09/09
Posts: 18
Loc: Austin, TX
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: controlled_feed]
      #141643 - 06/09/09 11:52 AM

Wow, thanks for all the responses guys -- what a great forum!

Of course I would never mean to imply that the 458 isn't "enough gun" to fell any beast roaming Africa (or any other continent) -- even at "only" 4000 ft. lbs. I was just curious to know if factory loads had improved since Boddington's write-up. According to the "history books", 5000 ft-lbs has stood as the definitive measure of stopping power since the black-powder 8-bores of yore.

--------------------
NRA Life Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #141644 - 06/09/09 01:32 PM

All you need is 2122fpsMV with a 500gr bullet to get 5000ft/lbs ME

There are quite a few loads that get more MV than that with the .458 Winchester and 500gr bullets - safely and reliably.




Cheers
Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: controlled_feed]
      #141645 - 06/09/09 01:34 PM

2206 = H335

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: bonanza]
      #141646 - 06/09/09 01:40 PM

Not only will the .458 WM safely crank out 5000+ ft/lbs (painfully), it will willingly replicate 45/70 BP loads and even whisper (subsonic) with Trail Boss - try that wif yore Lott!

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #141649 - 06/09/09 02:04 PM

LFOD1776,

How rude of us. Welcome to nitro express. This is -the- site for gun nuts, especially big bore, double rifles and safari.

Regards;
Bonanza

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LFOD1776
.224 member


Reged: 04/09/09
Posts: 18
Loc: Austin, TX
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: bonanza]
      #141661 - 06/09/09 11:30 PM

Quote:

LFOD1776,

How rude of us. Welcome to nitro express. This is -the- site for gun nuts, especially big bore, double rifles and safari.

Regards;
Bonanza




Thanks! I feel quite welcome already with the friendly replies to my inquiry.

I am an incurable gun nut. While I'm new to the Safari calibers, I'm not a stranger to recoil or expensive ammunition, as I've been playing with 50BMG for several years. I just decided that it's high time I had something a bit handier than a Barrett 95 for felling stray elephants.

--------------------
NRA Life Member


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #141667 - 07/09/09 12:20 AM

Thanks to Bonanza for catching us on the welcome gesture.
I hope you have good times here on the site.

You're sure to enjoy a proper sporting rifle set up for a classic Dangerous Game cartridge.
On the topic of recoil, the .458 Winchester in a correctly fitting rifle with 500gr bullets at 2150fpsMV is 'nary a love-tap'
Also, in a properly fitting and well-built rifle the .458 can be very very accurate.




Cheers
Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
controlled_feed
.300 member


Reged: 23/05/08
Posts: 227
Loc: NSW, Australia
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: tinker]
      #141677 - 07/09/09 09:01 AM

Very accurate, this is three shots with open sights at 50 yards over the bench. 73 grains 2206, 500 grain Woodleigh RNSN.

As far as recoil is concerned, there is none. I love shooting my .458

CF



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ozhunter
.400 member


Reged: 18/08/04
Posts: 1692
Loc: Sydney, Australia
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: controlled_feed]
      #141691 - 07/09/09 05:42 PM

Although 2100+fps with 500grn bullets is not suppose to be a problem to achieve, I intend to use Woodleigh 480grn 458Win Mag bullets and hope to get a MV of 2150fps which is basically the great 450NE load .

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarg
.400 member


Reged: 20/01/07
Posts: 1365
Loc: Nil
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: ozhunter]
      #141695 - 07/09/09 06:38 PM

Yes , Im with you on that , that's what Winchester should have done in the first place !

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5521
Loc: United States
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: ozhunter]
      #141700 - 07/09/09 11:12 PM

Quote:

Although 2100+fps with 500grn bullets is not suppose to be a problem to achieve, I intend to use Woodleigh 480grn 458Win Mag bullets and hope to get a MV of 2150fps which is basically the great 450NE load .




I have always been a little confused as to why they didn't roll this bullet weight out as standard in the first place. Maybe the 500 gr .470 Nitro was the goal, or maybe the fact that the 500 grain weight was a standard .45-cal bullet weight in the USA for many years before {.45-70}. Regardless, as you say, the real deal was the .450 and it tossed a 480 grain bullet.

Funny how these things work. If Winchester had spun out the load in 480 weight to start with, maybe the controversies {and excuses?} surrounding the .458/500 would never have occured and who knows whether the Lott would even exist!

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DUGABOY1
.400 member


Reged: 02/02/03
Posts: 1340
Loc: TEXAS USA
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #141732 - 08/09/09 09:34 AM

As many have already said there is zero problem with the 458 Win Mag today! With modern powders the cartridge is a little work horse! I think I was probably involved in the discussion on another web-site you mention. I post there as MacD37.

There is no denying that the 458 LOTT is a superior cartridge to the old Win Mag, but it is not needed if the 458 Win Mag floats your canoe! Still as you say all the problems could have been avoided if they had just used the longer case in the first place, even with the powder they had in the 1950s. It could also been avoided by using a lighter bullet, made the case slightly longer, and seated the 450, 480 gr bullet seated out a little farther and still used the standard actions. Winchester's mod 70 was a full length 375 H&H action anyway, so that case could have been used, with no problem. The reason the 500 gr bullet was used was because though they knew the speed wouldn't be there in the 22" barrels of their rifles, the extra 20 grs of weight would give it more momentum, and equal the old 450NE 3 1/4" it was replacing in a bolt rifle. Rather than fix the problems when they became aware of them Winchester simply waited another 45 to 50 years to let the powder companies do the fix.

On the side of Winchester, they didn't experience the failures that happened in the field. That is because they were using 30" test barrels and shooting fresh ammo at their plant. It was a far different story in the heat of Africa, when the ammo had been bouncing around in the hunting car for days. The out and duds, and hang-fires were a real problem in a place where you don't need problems. By the time Winchester figured out the problem two or three private experimenters had solved the problem by simply going to a longer case. Watts was the first I'm aware of, followed soon after by LOTT. What amazes me is the guys who shoot the 458 Win Mag get so angry when you say the cartridge was a real dud in it's infancy, and say the problems experienced back when the 458 Win Mag came out are simply old wife's tales.

In any even the rifle chambered for the 458 LOTT today is a real deal because with it you have two choices of ammo if you ammo gets lost in transit. the 458 Win Mag will shoot in the Lott chamber with no ill effects, if your Lott ammo can't be found, much like the long, and long rifle in the .22 rifle, or the 38 spcl, in a 357 Mag. If however, the rifle is the 458 Win Mag the lott ammo will not work, also like the 38 spcl pistol can't shoot the 357 Mag ammo.

So with a two rifle safari being a 375 H&H, and a 458LOTT the 375 H&H will do the whole safari if the 458LOTT breaks, or if the Lott ammo is lost you can get 458 Win Mag ammo in Africa fairly easily. So no matter what happens you are not left with useing a crap camp rifle to do your safari.

--------------------
..........Mac >>>===(x)===>
DUGABOY1, and MacD37 founding member of DRSS www.doublerifleshooterssociety.com
"If I die today, I have had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bonanza
.400 member


Reged: 17/05/04
Posts: 2335
Loc: South Carolina
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: DUGABOY1]
      #141734 - 08/09/09 10:07 AM

I think Winchester's stock bullet weight was 510 grains.

--------------------


"Speak Precisely" G. Gordon Liddy.

"Life is absurd, chaotic and we must define its purpose with our actions" Abert Camus

"I''m the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude."

"Yo! Mr. White"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5521
Loc: United States
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: bonanza]
      #141738 - 08/09/09 11:49 AM

Quote:

I think Winchester's stock bullet weight was 510 grains.




510 Soft.

500 FMJ IIRC.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
KILLERtj
.224 member


Reged: 06/10/09
Posts: 19
Loc: Northern Illinois, USA
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: 9.3x57]
      #143225 - 06/10/09 02:39 PM

I follow Barnes loads quite often for my .458 WM/Lott.

458 WinMag
500gr 67-72grains IMR4895 pushing 2000-2200fps
458 Lott
500gr 74-79grains Hogdon4895 pushing 2200-2350fps

Getting the WinMag over 5000ft-lbs is not very hard.

KILLERtj

--------------------
"Speed kills, rock maim"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Indy
.224 member


Reged: 23/04/04
Posts: 22
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #145146 - 04/11/09 02:17 PM

With a 22" barrel in the .458 Winchester, it's no trick to get 2200 fps with a 500 grain bullet and AA2230, without dangerous pressures, at least in my rifle. AA2230 is a better powder for the .458 than 4895 because it is denser.

Longer range? Using H4198 and the 350 grain TSX, I can get 2700 fps. That equates to 5700 foot pounds of energy.

The Lott is a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bipbigbore
.224 member


Reged: 06/10/05
Posts: 42
Loc: USA
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: Indy]
      #146131 - 18/11/09 09:51 AM

I have put the Hornady heavy mag loads through a chronograph.

I got an average velocity of 2160.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27005
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: 9.3x57]
      #146188 - 19/11/09 02:49 AM

Quote:


maybe the controversies {and excuses?} surrounding the .458/500 would never have occured and who knows whether the Lott would even exist!




Fctory solids for the .458 Win Mag were 510gr., I seem to recall and the softs were 500gr. Yes - a good 480gr. would easily have made the grade for speed, indeed, today, would probably make 2,240fps, if a person thought that was necessary, that is.

The .450 Watts wildcat using the full length .375H&H case was identical to the very much newer .450 Lott in every way, except the Lott has a gentle sloping entry to the leade of the chamber, instead of a sharp corner and 45 degree angle. Thus when shooting short rounds, such as the .458 Win Mag. in the longer chamber, the 'corner' doesn't scrape off jacket material as it tries to enter the throat, weakening the jacket and damaging accurcy. The sloping angle more gently guides the rounded ogive of the bullets into the throat. That is the only difference between the Lott of 1980's and the .450 Watt's of the 1950's.

Back in the late or early 1960's, Winchester chambered up a few M70 magnums in .450 Watts. I had the pleasure of shooting one of them in 1973, factory marked .450 Watts by Winchester. 3 shots split the stock, which turned out to be poorly glass bedded. We were shotoing 600gr. Barnes with a compressed load of whatever powder Les' friend had put in them.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
458ONLY
.224 member


Reged: 20/06/08
Posts: 24
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 458 Winchester Magnum Question [Re: LFOD1776]
      #148189 - 17/12/09 10:10 AM

I've owned a CZ550 in .458 Win Mag for about 2 years. Have taken it moose and bear hunting so far. Killed a bl. bear with one shot using the 350 TSX at 2753 fps. Yes, you read that right... 2753 fps is the average of 8 shots with a SD of 2! Also, that's my moose load.

H335 has been the powder for 500s in my rifle. 2200+ fps is possible, and again that is very accurate and consistent regardless of outside temps. For the 350's I use H4198.

Using 2 bullet weights, I could hunt anything in the world... 350 TSX's and 500gr Hornady or 500 Barnes Banded Solid. Don't need any other rifle for any big game huntin', anywhere. The .458 Win Mag will do it ALL!

Some of you guys are still livin' in the dark as to the GREAT .458 WINCHESTER!


Bob

www.bigbores.ca


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 208 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 20971

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved