Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr?

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***
You are not logged in. [Login] Main Index · Search · Active Topics
New user · Who's Online · FAQ · Calendar

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles
Previous topic Previous   View all topics Index   Next topic Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
165, 180, 200 or 220 gr?
      #133624 - 27/04/09 10:48 AM

Okay, I've decided that I am going to bring just my .30-06 on my plains game hunt. Here's my question - I will be hunting a variety of game. From as small as duiker and steinbok all the way up to gemsbok and kudu. What grain bullet do you suggest and why? All and any comments/opinions are welcome. Thanks, Christopher

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133629 - 27/04/09 11:24 AM

Have used both the 180 and 200gr for game exactly as you described...however it was out of my 300 Ultra-mag...have to say..in that caliber--I preferred the 200's...if you get a chance at an Eland--I would rather have the 200's as well---but, the 180's will do just fine...

IMHO, when it comes to those 2 in an '06 or any caliber for that matter..placement of shot and bullet construction is much more important..that .20grs of lead...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Caprivi
.375 member


Reged: 30/09/08
Posts: 811
Loc: America's Serengeti, Buffalo W...
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Ripp]
      #133638 - 27/04/09 01:03 PM

I have come to prefer the 165tsx in the .30'06. Plenty tough bullet at decent velocity, with seemingly much less recoil.

--------------------
To live life as it is handed to me from God

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Caprivi]
      #133639 - 27/04/09 01:06 PM

The 165 gr is what I have been shooting, but I'm worried that it may not be enough to put down a kudu.

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133673 - 27/04/09 11:25 PM

Quote:

The 165 gr is what I have been shooting, but I'm worried that it may not be enough to put down a kudu.



Kudu are smaller than elk ..I have seen plenty elk taken down with much smaller bullets than a 165gr out of a '06...again, with what I call too small of a bullet shot placement becomes even more critical..as in a .243 caliber rifle--

If you have been shooting 165's and they shoot good--go with them...it will be plenty....

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Der_Jaeger
.375 member


Reged: 09/10/08
Posts: 607
Loc: SE Pennsylvania
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Ripp]
      #133680 - 27/04/09 11:57 PM

For Elk, my favorite is a 180 grain Barnes-X out of my .300 Wby. I still have three boxes left of that precious, but discontinued, load! I would also use the 180 Nosler Accubond.

--------------------

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Der_Jaeger]
      #133684 - 28/04/09 02:19 AM

The 165 gr that I currently shoot is the Federal Premium Trophy Bonded Bear Claw. I bit pricey, but very accurate. I really thought it may not be enough, but maybe I'll re-think it.

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133698 - 28/04/09 04:37 AM

Quote:

I bit pricey, but very accurate. -



And how much are you paying for this hunt, airline tickets, etc???

It is easy to get caught up in all the hype when heading over---but in the end--the game over there is no tougher really than the game anywhere else..just need to place your shots correctly..IMHO...and the 165's will drop everything in its tracks...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tatume
.400 member


Reged: 09/06/07
Posts: 1091
Loc: Gloucester, Va USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Ripp]
      #133699 - 28/04/09 04:53 AM

I've used Nosler Partitions in both 165 and 180 gr on American game, and found both to be excellent. My 30-06 handloads using H4350 give 2800 fps to the 165 gr bullet, and 2700 fps to the 180 gr Partition, both with excellent accuracy. The Nosler Partition bullet in either weight from a good 30-06 rifle will get the job done with aplomb.

--------------------
Take care, Tom
NRA Life Member

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1356
Loc: France / Germany
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133714 - 28/04/09 05:57 AM

This is a message directly from West Africa. I hunt buffalo's in Burkina Faso. When i see the game, buffalo's or plain game, i prefere bigger caliber's! In this time, i use my 460WM !

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JabaliHunter
.400 member


Reged: 16/05/07
Posts: 1958
Loc: England
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: grandveneur]
      #133724 - 28/04/09 07:23 AM

I would use a 180 or 200, but if the 165 Barnes is what you know, can shoot accurately and place shots well, then go for it. I've not tried Barnes X but it looks tough and retains weight. The only negative I've heard is losing petals when pushed too fast, but shouldn't be an issue with a .30-06. i'd be happy up to Kudu but would definitely go heavier from there on...
Have a great trip!

Grandveneur - I'm looking forward to a report and photos!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tophet1
.400 member


Reged: 15/09/07
Posts: 1873
Loc: NSW, Australia
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: JabaliHunter]
      #133731 - 28/04/09 10:35 AM

Kudu are not that hard to kill. The toughest animal you list is the Gemsbok if you shoot a mature bull. The locals use .270's with 130's and .308 with 150's for Kudu without problems.

.30-06 will do fine. Use whatever premium it shoots well. I would use a ballistically efficient premium 165 and know I had a flatter trajectory for the smaller animals you list.

Here's my old Gemsbok bull killed with a 165 Woodleigh from a .308W at 50+ yards.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiD5aoNAfTI


The recovered projectile weighed 157 grains or 95% weight retention. It was found on the far side of the animal with the petals of the expanded projectile clearly 'feelable' under the skin.



EDIT: The 165 TBBC you mentioned in earlier posts would be perfect if you shoot it accurately.

Edited by tophet1 (28/04/09 11:55 AM)

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
osix
.224 member


Reged: 13/07/07
Posts: 20
Loc: Australia
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: tophet1]
      #133749 - 28/04/09 06:00 PM

From my somewhat limited African experience, having shot or seen shot Gemsbok, Kudu, Zebra and Eland.
The 30 06 will do the job, but it wouldn't be my first choice; would far prefer a 338 Win Mag for awkward situations and exits, entry wounds don't bleed enough.
Gemsbok will go a long way if not hit properly, need reliable combination of expansion and deep penetration, I'd use 180 grain A Frames or Northfork.

Edited by osix (28/04/09 06:01 PM)

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: osix]
      #133819 - 29/04/09 06:45 AM

tophet1, thanks for sharing the youtube video - nice gemsbok.

osix, I was seriously considering bringing my .338 to hunt with, but my .338 rifle is a Browning BAR and from what I understand, that rifle is illegal to bring into South Africa (correct?)

My .30-06 is a Browning A-Bolt, and I know that's legal. If somebody understands this differently, I'd love to hear your opinion, because I'd love to take my BAR - it is a very nice rifle. Otherwise, I'm thinking it will be the .30-06.

I am very confident with the Federal Premium Trophy Bonded in 165 gr. and my shooting skills out to 150 - 200 yards. It's very flat shooting and if it can penitrate like tophet's picture, than I think it may be the ticket... it think.

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tophet1
.400 member


Reged: 15/09/07
Posts: 1873
Loc: NSW, Australia
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133831 - 29/04/09 09:17 AM

No worries. The old bull had to go. He was preventing the younger bulls from breeding but couldn't do the job himelf. He was a cull animal, the farmer was very pleased and I got him cheap.

I leave for my second African Hunt in 5 weeks. Every second day I'm out practiseing.

Buy a heap of that ammo you shoot well, leave the bench and shooting mat at home and get out and practise shooting prone unsupported, sitting and standing leaning against a post or something. The more you do now the better.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: tophet1]
      #133833 - 29/04/09 10:00 AM

Wow 5 weeks - where are you going and what's on the agenda to hunt?

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tophet1
.400 member


Reged: 15/09/07
Posts: 1873
Loc: NSW, Australia
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133836 - 29/04/09 10:20 AM

PM Sent

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39894
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #133843 - 29/04/09 10:46 AM

Quote:

From as small as duiker and steinbok all the way up to gemsbok and kudu. What grain bullet do you suggest and why? All and any comments/opinions are welcome.



Christopher,

The PHs normally recommend a 200 gr bullet. Use one of good construction.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: NitroX]
      #133918 - 30/04/09 03:03 AM

NitroX,

I will check with my PH and see what he recommends, but looking at the variety of Federal bullets currently available (which is my brand preference), it dosen't appear that they offer a premium grade bullet in anything larger than 180 gr. Federal does offer a 200 gr and a 220 gr for the .30-06, but I fear that the lower grade bullet will actually be less effective than the 165 gr or 180 gr premium trophy bonded.

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #134007 - 30/04/09 11:42 PM

Quote:

NitroX,

I will check with my PH and see what he recommends, but looking at the variety of Federal bullets currently available (which is my brand preference), it dosen't appear that they offer a premium grade bullet in anything larger than 180 gr. Federal does offer a 200 gr and a 220 gr for the .30-06, but I fear that the lower grade bullet will actually be less effective than the 165 gr or 180 gr premium trophy bonded.





FYI..

Just read an article this morning in SportsAfield while having breakfast---where Kevin Robertson, "the magazines African Hunting authority"... a hunter heading to Africa asked if his .308W would work for plains game...Kevin's answer was Yes..he stated he like the 180's better but the 165's would be o.k.....

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Edited by Ripp (01/05/09 10:36 AM)

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5521
Loc: United States
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: crkennedy1]
      #134009 - 01/05/09 12:16 AM

Quote:

Federal does offer a 200 gr and a 220 gr for the .30-06, but I fear that the lower grade bullet will actually be less effective than the 165 gr or 180 gr premium trophy bonded.



RIPP's citation is interesting.

I like this Robertson fellow.

His recommendations often check out with my testing. For example, this bit. In my media, I have found mere bullet WEIGHT to be a very poor predictor of bullet penetration AND recovered expansion weight and diameter.

Sometimes a light bullet will penetrate more deeply and expand better than a heavier bullet. Sometimes not. Bullet construction is the key.

As NITRO and RIPP intimate here, check with your PH. If he has any time in the field at all, he has opinions, and since you are hunting with him, take his advice. If he doesn't know what to pick...don't hunt with him!

Having said all that, as RIPP said earlier, a well-placed 165 grain bullet from any of the major manufacturers is going to kill a kudu.

One last thing. It makes lots of sense to practice field position shooting before the hunt. Doing so with Premium bullet can be cost preventive. So the use of a similar/same weight cheaper bullet for practice makes good sense. However, do not assume the same weight bullets will print to same POI. Make sure you shoot enough of your hunting bullets to know where they will print at all reasonable ranges.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
crkennedy1
.375 member


Reged: 05/12/08
Posts: 501
Loc: Utah
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #134032 - 01/05/09 05:06 AM

Good advice. Spoke with my PH - he says the 165 gr will do the job and he likes the Federal Premium trophy bonded too - so I'm in business. I think I'll get some shooting sticks and head out into the wilderness and do some off-handed, simulated safari shooting!

--------------------
DOUBLE or NOTHING

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #134056 - 01/05/09 10:39 AM

Quote:

Quote:

One last thing. It makes lots of sense to practice field position shooting before the hunt. Doing so with Premium bullet can be cost preventive. So the use of a similar/same weight cheaper bullet for practice makes good sense. However, do not assume the same weight bullets will print to same POI. Make sure you shoot enough of your hunting bullets to know where they will print at all reasonable ranges.



9.3
Excellent advice---one of the biggest complaints I hear when talking to PH's is the poor shooting ability....practice, practice, practice...

There are many times you will not have much time to take the shot...so get very used to the firearm...and happy hunting...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EXPRESSBOY
.224 member


Reged: 03/07/08
Posts: 9
Loc: italy
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: Ripp]
      #134378 - 04/05/09 07:48 AM

hy friends,

insted of grains i tink is more important put the bullet in the right place !!!

For kudu or zebra I think all 30 are good With a good 180 grain.
I using a 180 Vulkan (norma bullets) for generic use and for long range up to 300 mt using a sierra 180 bt
For precision shot in 30-06 with barrel 1/10" use only 180 or more


bye bye bernard

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ALAN_MCKENZIE
.400 member


Reged: 24/03/04
Posts: 1214
Loc: Western Australia
Re: 165, 180, 200 or 220 gr? [Re: EXPRESSBOY]
      #134394 - 04/05/09 12:57 PM

200 grain round nose woodleigh's.
Work well in a 308 as well on everything including buff.
Al

--------------------
"Dogs always bark at their master"
Sir Seretse Khama.25th June 1949

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)


Previous topic Previous   View all topics Index   Next topic Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Extra information
0 registered and 245 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 11858

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved