Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: .416 Ruger Article

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1
MarinePMI
.275 member


Reged: 21/04/08
Posts: 92
Loc: San Diego, CA USA
.416 Ruger Article
      #129889 - 18/03/09 03:58 AM

All,

While perusing one of the sites I've come to enjoy reading articles from, I ran across one article on the 416 Ruger Alaskan. An interesting read...

.416 Ruger Alaskan Article

--------------------
MarinePMI


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Der_Jaeger
.375 member


Reged: 09/10/08
Posts: 607
Loc: SE Pennsylvania
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: MarinePMI]
      #129915 - 18/03/09 10:43 AM


Good article but, I gotta tell you, this quote is absolutely absurd!!!!

"Does the sub eight pound Hawkeye kick behind the big .416 Ruger cartridge? You betcha, but it is not severe, not bone jarring and less than I have experienced with my own heavy .375 H&H express guns".

--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe4570
.224 member


Reged: 23/06/08
Posts: 4
Loc: ME
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: Der_Jaeger]
      #129941 - 18/03/09 10:23 PM

Quote:


Good article but, I gotta tell you, this quote is absolutely absurd!!!!

"Does the sub eight pound Hawkeye kick behind the big .416 Ruger cartridge? You betcha, but it is not severe, not bone jarring and less than I have experienced with my own heavy .375 H&H express guns".




Hey! I write lots of absurd things, but this doesn't happen to be one of those times. I handload for, and shoot, four .375 H&H guns. There is a big difference between felt recoil and generated recoil. The .416 Ruger produces approx 74 ft/lbs of recoil, the .375 H&H guns approx 54. The effects of recoil are exponential, so the .416 Ruger is clearly the heavy theoretical kicker in the bunch.

Of the .375s, a CZ handles recoil well as does a Mauser custom I've had for some time. Much older M700 Remington and M70 Winchester rifles leave me with leave me with a deeply bruised rotator cuff and a sore cheekbone after extended range sessions. Probably a function of pull length and the drop of thee heel from stock centerline and barrels that rise sharply under recoil. The Ruger stock pull is a little linger and as straight under the bore as a 2x6. It comes straight back. The Hogue stock does not have an integral aluminum frame, just fiberglass reinforced polymer which probably absorbs shock in accordion fashion, plus the recoil pad is made of very absorbent Sorbothane blend. The Haweye just doesn't feel like much when it kicks. Sharp, short and over.

I would say the same about the larger Weatherby guns. A .416 with or without brake is pretty much a pussy cat to shoot, as is the .338-378 with heavy loads. A marlin Guide Gun loaded with Buffalo Bore loads is severe and last year I ended up with a fracture shooting a .500 Jeffery from the bench during load development. The Ruger really is an enjoyable gun to shoot. You won't doze under recoil, but it just doesn't feel that bad.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike_Bailey
.400 member


Reged: 26/02/07
Posts: 2289
Loc: GB
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: Joe4570]
      #129951 - 18/03/09 11:39 PM

Hmmmm, I'll leave sub 8lb .416 cartridge rifles to you old chap, I value my retinas best, Mike

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MarinePMI
.275 member


Reged: 21/04/08
Posts: 92
Loc: San Diego, CA USA
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: Joe4570]
      #129955 - 19/03/09 12:28 AM

Joe4570,

I didn't realize you were registered here?!?!

Just an FYI, I really enjoy your reviews and writing style. Not too many writers left that inject a bit of humor and self deprecation when writing. My hat is off to you.

v/r

--------------------
MarinePMI


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27005
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: MarinePMI]
      #129979 - 19/03/09 06:22 AM

I've always thought the 9 pound .375H&H comes back with about 40-42 pounds, while a 9 pound .458 is around 56-58 pounds & a .460 WTBY is around 86. Considering the .577 Nitro is around 160 and the 4 bore at just over 200, I assume the .416 Ruger is somewhere in there with the 'light' kickers.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
farshot
.300 member


Reged: 25/01/06
Posts: 106
Loc: Alberta Canada
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: DarylS]
      #129988 - 19/03/09 08:49 AM

The pressure of these new Rugers are getting pretty high in my view. 62,000 lbs

The Rigby can hold that much powder (132 gr) but no one I know loads it that much. Mt CZ shoots a 400 gr TSX or Partition at 2420 ft/s with 100 gr RL-15 in its 24 1/2 inch bbl. And at much much lower pressures.

I remain to be convinced of the greatness of the Ruger rounds. Smaller and compact - for sure. But you have to push the envelope somewhere with the denser round - pressure would be that envelope. I am sure it is safe, but your margin for error must be shrinking. I am still willing to carry that extra 1-2 lbs to allow for low pressures and long nosed bullets, and a lesser recoil.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe4570
.224 member


Reged: 23/06/08
Posts: 4
Loc: ME
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: MarinePMI]
      #130024 - 19/03/09 09:39 PM

Quote:

Joe4570,

I didn't realize you were registered here?!?!

Just an FYI, I really enjoy your reviews and writing style. Not too many writers left that inject a bit of humor and self deprecation when writing. My hat is off to you.

v/r




I like the discussions on this board. Interesting firearms that are, unfortunately, not often covered and discussed elsewhere and a good group personality.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe4570
.224 member


Reged: 23/06/08
Posts: 4
Loc: ME
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: DarylS]
      #130025 - 19/03/09 10:00 PM

Quote:

I've always thought the 9 pound .375H&H comes back with about 40-42 pounds, while a 9 pound .458 is around 56-58 pounds & a .460 WTBY is around 86. Considering the .577 Nitro is around 160 and the 4 bore at just over 200, I assume the .416 Ruger is somewhere in there with the 'light' kickers.




Sure, the numbers you referenced could just as easily be used as a statement of relative recoil. My reference was a calculation (http://www.realguns.com/calculators/recoil.html) based on some of my own 300 and 350 grain .375 handloads and a specific rifle. I took into consideration a specific gun's weight, bullet, charge, and velocity and we tend to push a little on the velocity side. In this case I did apply the same method of calculation to the .416 Ruger so I would be close to an assessment apple to tangerine assessment.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe4570
.224 member


Reged: 23/06/08
Posts: 4
Loc: ME
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: farshot]
      #130029 - 19/03/09 10:38 PM

Quote:

The pressure of these new Rugers are getting pretty high in my view. 62,000 lbs

The Rigby can hold that much powder (132 gr) but no one I know loads it that much. Mt CZ shoots a 400 gr TSX or Partition at 2420 ft/s with 100 gr RL-15 in its 24 1/2 inch bbl. And at much much lower pressures.

I remain to be convinced of the greatness of the Ruger rounds. Smaller and compact - for sure. But you have to push the envelope somewhere with the denser round - pressure would be that envelope. I am sure it is safe, but your margin for error must be shrinking. I am still willing to carry that extra 1-2 lbs to allow for low pressures and long nosed bullets, and a lesser recoil.




For sure there is a lot more pressure intensity in the newer shorter high aspect ratio cases. So you get the double thrill of high pressure working on chamber walls and increased bolt thrust and lug stress working on these guns. We have a CZ .416 Rigby in queue for review and I am looking forward to it. We've done the .416 Weatherby, another high pressure case, amd I am sure the Rigby in the big CZ action could handle the same pressure levels, but we want to take a look at comparative penetration and bullet expansion between the two, loaded at proper levels. My guess is they will be quite similar and the Rigby will put a lot less stress on the shooter and firearm.

I think Ruger is working toward a very specific type of application with the Hawkeye and these not quite stubby rounds. They offer the M77 Magnum in .416 Rigby and .458 Lott in a more conventional size package as well as in the No. 1. Ssomething I noticed about Ruger and Hornady is that they have a lot of gun geeks per capita as employees and magagement. Their tech departments are loaded with hunters, competitive shooters and handloaders. If you ask the basis for designs they always begin from the perspective of an enthusiast. There is always some hunting or shooting goal they are trying to achieve. I don't think they are trying to replace or displace other cartridges as they can just as easily chamber for any standard, I think they are pretty much like most of us, they like to experiment and try new concepts.

Personally, I have no favorites in modern firearms. I just look forward to the next gun as a form of enjoyment. I like a lot of the older early 20th century firearms. There are crafts represented that are long gone, even from custom shops and limited production guns.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 27005
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: Joe4570]
      #130045 - 20/03/09 03:12 AM

I don't know why some think 62,000psi is too high for Africa or hot climates anywhere - .270Win, 7mm and .300 mags all of them - Weatherby ctgs. - all run 62,000 to 63,000psi as well as the .416 Taylor andother wildcats - 63,000psi - no problem with correct powders. Even my daughters .260 and my .375 IMP, 9.3x62- they all run 63,000psi - normal pressure. I guess if you say 50,000 to 55,000CUP or CIP, it sounds better.

Low pressure is fine if you can handle the recoil, but I'd rather be shooting 84gr. of powder than 100gr. when we're getting the same ballistics.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JabaliHunter
.400 member


Reged: 16/05/07
Posts: 1958
Loc: England
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: DarylS]
      #130049 - 20/03/09 05:43 AM

Quote:

Low pressure is fine if you can handle the recoil, but I'd rather be shooting 84gr. of powder than 100gr. when we're getting the same ballistics.



That's an interesting way of putting it


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ripp
.577 member


Reged: 19/02/07
Posts: 16072
Loc: Montana, USA
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: DarylS]
      #130084 - 20/03/09 12:35 PM

Quote:

I don't know why some think 62,000psi is too high for Africa or hot climates anywhere - .270Win, 7mm and .300 mags all of them - Weatherby ctgs. - all run 62,000 to 63,000psi as well as the .416 Taylor andother wildcats - 63,000psi - no problem with correct powders. Even my daughters .260 and my .375 IMP, 9.3x62- they all run 63,000psi - normal pressure. I guess if you say 50,000 to 55,000CUP or CIP, it sounds better.




Agree and have always felt it is a load of BS in most cases..hear the same BS about the .416 Rem--have shot litterally shot hundreds of 416 Rem's in hot weather--both here in the US and in Africa..knock on wood..but no problems what so ever--even with the "cheap" Remington extractors..

Have installed a Sako on it now and the other is a mauser action --but again, no problems with either...

Ripp

--------------------
ALL MEN DIE, BUT FEW MEN TRULY LIVE..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
capoward
.224 member


Reged: 09/08/07
Posts: 12
Loc: Southern California, USA
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: DarylS]
      #130088 - 20/03/09 01:09 PM

Quote:

I don't know why some think 62,000psi is too high for Africa or hot climates anywhere - .270Win, 7mm and .300 mags all of them - Weatherby ctgs. - all run 62,000 to 63,000psi as well as the .416 Taylor andother wildcats - 63,000psi - no problem with correct powders. Even my daughters .260 and my .375 IMP, 9.3x62- they all run 63,000psi - normal pressure. I guess if you say 50,000 to 55,000CUP or CIP, it sounds better.


It almost makes one wonder how the much beloved .375 H&H with its heralded modern performance could ever be used in Africa or any other hot climate environment considering its SAAMI’ 62,000 psi rating...guess they’d rather hear the 53,000 cup rating instead and think that it’s a low pressure cartridge.
Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
farshot
.300 member


Reged: 25/01/06
Posts: 106
Loc: Alberta Canada
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: capoward]
      #130139 - 21/03/09 05:00 AM

hmmm you are right -- I sat down and looked at the pressures of various rounds and wondered why I thought some were so high... they are not relatively speaking.

Basically only some of the rimmed NE or 45-70 etc have the markedly lower presures - the rest are all up there.

I chalk it up to too much propaganda.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Der_Jaeger
.375 member


Reged: 09/10/08
Posts: 607
Loc: SE Pennsylvania
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: farshot]
      #130179 - 21/03/09 11:18 PM

Quote:



I chalk it up to too much propaganda.




Well said!

--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JabaliHunter
.400 member


Reged: 16/05/07
Posts: 1958
Loc: England
Re: .416 Ruger Article [Re: Ripp]
      #130208 - 22/03/09 08:44 AM

Quote:

Agree and have always felt it is a load of BS in most cases..hear the same BS about the .416 Rem--have shot litterally shot hundreds of 416 Rem's in hot weather--both here in the US and in Africa..knock on wood..but no problems what so ever--even with the "cheap" Remington extractors..

Have installed a Sako on it now and the other is a mauser action --but again, no problems with either...

Ripp



However unlikely, for curiosity's sake check out p72 of "Africa's most dangerous" by Kevin Robertson. I've heard this criticism alot, but this is the only substantiated claim I've come across.
Quote:

photo caption This sight should be enough to give any PH sleepless nights. Its the bolt face of a push-feed Remington 700 action minus its extractor! Excessive chamber pressure caused the bolt to freeze right in the middle of an elephant hunt. The extractor was ripped off while attempting to shuck a .416 Remington Mag case, effectively turning the rifle into a club! From a PH's perspective, this is most definitely not the type of bolt action to use on dangerous game.



I guess that is a least one thing in favour of the .416 Ruger is the M77 claw extractor...

Edited by JabaliHunter (22/03/09 10:19 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 139 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6212

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved