Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Colt vs Smith & Wesson

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Handguns

Pages: 1
beleg2
.375 member


Reged: 15/08/07
Posts: 591
Loc: Bahía Blanca - Argentina
Colt vs Smith & Wesson
      #116148 - 03/10/08 12:31 AM

I had an argument with another shooter about Colt vs S&W revolvers.
He told me something I never hear about the old Colt revolvers having poor design because the extractor rod usually bent.

My question is:
How often have you see Colt revolvers with the extractor rod bent after a fall?

I have asked the same question to some gunsmith here and they have never have one bent for falling. A couple of extractor rods was bent by the owner trying to fix another problems.

Thank you very much
Martin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tinker
.416 member


Reged: 12/03/05
Posts: 4835
Loc: Nevada
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: beleg2]
      #116163 - 03/10/08 04:57 AM

Martin-

I don't know about bent ejector rods due to dropped guns, but I'll say this -- I just prefer the feel of the S&W action.

With a good example of either, I doubt you'll have problems with either brand.


--Tinker

--------------------
--Self-Appointed Colonel, DRSS--



"It IS a dangerous game, and so named for a reason, and you can't play from the keyboard. " --Some Old Texan...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bigmaxx
.375 member


Reged: 13/06/07
Posts: 660
Loc: Bowling Green KY U.S.A.
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: tinker]
      #116188 - 03/10/08 11:59 AM

It would depend on series, production run, and sometimes caliber. What are the apples or oranges you are comparing?

--------------------
One day at a time...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5501
Loc: United States
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: beleg2]
      #116210 - 03/10/08 11:40 PM

Quote:

My question is:
How often have you see Colt revolvers with the extractor rod bent after a fall?




I'm a little surprised your gunsmiths have never seen a bent ejector rod. I've seen them bent on Smith revolvers. Offhand I do not remember if I've seen any on Colts, but then, I have seen 100 Smiths for every Colt I've seen.

I think the point is that on older Colts {Army Special, Official Police, New Service} there is no shroud protecting the rod and they lack the front ejector rod lock that itself provides a bit of protection. The Colt rods are hardened to about a spring temper, and do give a bit if the cylinder is in battery and crane {yoke} is locked and pressure is applied to the rod from the side or pushing up toward the barrel.

All of them can bend if the gun is dropped while the cylinder is open. But in that case at least some crane damage is frequently a result, also.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beleg2
.375 member


Reged: 15/08/07
Posts: 591
Loc: Bahía Blanca - Argentina
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: 9.3x57]
      #116212 - 04/10/08 12:40 AM

Thank you for your answers!
Thr point was that that Colt revolvers were inferior to S&W because of the ejector rod bending.
He have a picture of a rod bent very much but for what I find on Internet S&W have this problem more often than Colt.
Just want to know if Im right.
Thank you very much
Martin

BTW: I love my old Python.LOL


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Checkman
.333 member


Reged: 15/03/08
Posts: 256
Loc: Idaho
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: beleg2]
      #116233 - 04/10/08 10:27 AM

Well back in ancient times police officers would use their revolvers to thump the heads of miscreants. This was pre-Taser and pre-Pepper Spray days mind you. The Smith and Wesson design was preferred because the ejector rod was protected by the shroud. Other than that I don't really think the Colt design was better or worse than the S&W design. However the debate between Colt and Smith & Wesson fans continue to this day.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5501
Loc: United States
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: Checkman]
      #116234 - 04/10/08 11:10 AM

Quote:

Well back in ancient times police officers would use their revolvers to thump the heads of miscreants.




I believe you are mistaken.

I have heard of quite a number of unfortunate situations involving suspects who have bumped their heads against officer's service revolvers, but never have I even heard of an officer who used his revolver to put a dent in a suspect's head.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
88MauSporter
.375 member


Reged: 06/06/07
Posts: 530
Loc: Alaska / Texas
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: 9.3x57]
      #116241 - 04/10/08 01:36 PM

My first Colt revolver was a Colt Mod. 357. This was the the pre-Python model. A very nice double action with medium frame and 6 inch barrel. Fixed Sights. It was great with full house 158 gr .357 mag loads. I was young and could not yet handle the sharp kick and the muzzle blast. It was a companion for a few years in Alaska. I wish I had it now. The issue above with bent ejector rods could be, as stated previously by others, the exposed rod under the barrel. No underbarrel shroud. The early Smith & Wessons had the forward detent plunger that took the supprted the rod end under the barrel, even before the shrouds were put in place. The Colt did not have this. My Colt Agent (carried on my ankle or a belly band for a number of years when in that line of service) has the unsupport ejector rod. If I had a perp or target bump his knoggin very hard against it while I was swinging it down from an overhead possition, It would have likely bent. Never did. Still works well, a number of years in service.
I do have a Buenos Aires Argentina Special police issue Spanish copy of a S&W M&P that has a slightly bent ejector rod. In spite of the rod end support. Guess that is opposite of the previous assertion.

--------------------
"A hunter should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everthing goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." 88MauSporter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bigmaxx
.375 member


Reged: 13/06/07
Posts: 660
Loc: Bowling Green KY U.S.A.
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: 88MauSporter]
      #116287 - 05/10/08 11:10 AM

I have had plenty of both, Smiths and Colts and have never had a bent ejector rod. I have used them for about as severe a service as possible. Never a bent rod. Maybe I'm just lucky? I have mostly Rugers now and never any problems with them either.

--------------------
One day at a time...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beleg2
.375 member


Reged: 15/08/07
Posts: 591
Loc: Bahía Blanca - Argentina
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: bigmaxx]
      #116290 - 05/10/08 03:53 PM

Thank you all!!!
Martin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CptCurlAdministrator
.450 member


Reged: 01/05/04
Posts: 5269
Loc: Fincastle, Botetourt County, V...
Re: Colt vs Smith & Wesson [Re: beleg2]
      #116600 - 10/10/08 01:43 PM

In regard to double action revolvers I think the S&W is heads above the Colt.

S&W just had the extra expertise as to the DA design. The Colts are nice, but the Smiths just define the market. I really like them. The actions are so easy to tune, and the results are so gratifying.

Curl

--------------------
RoscoeStephenson.com

YOUR DOUBLE RIFLE IS YOUR BEST FRIEND.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 16 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  NitroX 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3492

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved