Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: What have we here?

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Mauser Discussion Forum

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
CptCurlAdministrator
.450 member


Reged: 01/05/04
Posts: 5272
Loc: Fincastle, Botetourt County, V...
Re: What have we here? [Re: Kebco]
      #107546 - 16/06/08 08:57 PM

This rifle is definitely not a G33/40.

The G33/40 is a small ring Mauser action, but it has the appearance of a large ring action because of a step behind the receiver ring. That's one of the attractions to this action, in my opinion. Here's a photo:



The rifle is definitely on a small ring mauser action, just not a G33/40.

Curl

--------------------
RoscoeStephenson.com

YOUR DOUBLE RIFLE IS YOUR BEST FRIEND.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: What have we here? [Re: Kebco]
      #107559 - 16/06/08 10:15 PM

Quote:

It is not a G33/40, from the pics it looks to me like a converted KAR small ring 98.
Sorry Pjaln, but you are wrong, the G33/40 is a small ring 98 action.




Correct.

As I mentioned above, a 98a...but...

Has anybody actually made a close comparison between a KAR 98a and a so-called transitional 98 small ring action?

For example, IIRC, all 98a/KAR actions had manufacturer's stampings on them. This one appears to have a clean receiver ring. From the pix it appears so to me, tho it may be scrubbed.

What are the salient differences between the 98a and transitional actions?

I mean, it is easiest for us to say "It isn't an Original Waffenfabrik Mauser", call it a guild gun or post-War conversion, etc, but according to Speed's Volume 1, and Vol III Archive {just yesterday I was given that one...EXCELLENT book!}, the more we know, the more we don't. Evidently many guns were made up on so-called transitional actions during a wide range of dates. These actions must have laid in storage for years at times and were used up catch-as-catch can.

This has been a very interesting gun to speculate about.

Rick R:

Can we pester you for some pictures of the bolt gas relief holes?

Also, how about a full list of the markings on the gun?

Thanks for posting!

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick_R
.300 member


Reged: 03/07/03
Posts: 117
Loc: WV, USA
Re: What have we here? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #107588 - 17/06/08 09:01 AM

Mr. Fiftyseven,

The only markings on the rifle are these:

Left


Right


bottom of the barrel


I notice that I posted the charge it was regulated with as "2,65" and it's actually 2,85.
The camera doesn't have 49 year old eyes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pjaln
.375 member


Reged: 08/06/06
Posts: 708
Loc: massachusetts ,U.S.A.
Re: What have we here? [Re: Rick_R]
      #107590 - 17/06/08 11:12 AM

model g33/40barrel shankdiameter.980,reciever ring diameter 1.295,wall thickness left side .085



model 98 1.100 1.420 .150


paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: What have we here? [Re: pjaln]
      #107593 - 17/06/08 12:51 PM

It is common to hear of the 33/40 called a "smallring". The weakness of such terms is that they are generic and are both right and wrong. It IS a smallring of sorts, but it isn't in the sense of the smoothsided Mauser 94, 95, 96 and transitional models.

OK, so it lacks the BUGN proof, but per Speed, has the Crown/N indicating nitro proof years 33-39, export model. StmG indicates a full metal jacket bullet type. As for the serial number, doesn't it fit in the range and placement of transitional models?

Speed says parts were known to lay around for years before being assembled.

So...?

Rick R, can we bother you to shoot a couple pics of the bolt, specifically the gas vent holes?

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick_R
.300 member


Reged: 03/07/03
Posts: 117
Loc: WV, USA
Re: What have we here? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #107596 - 17/06/08 02:05 PM

Sorry, you did ask for an order of bolt pix to go with that.







Hope these help.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: What have we here? [Re: Rick_R]
      #107597 - 17/06/08 02:34 PM

OK gents...

Large oval gas relief holes says regular 98 {technical term } to me.

Thanks Rick!

This has been a very interesting post. Hopefully the markings and bolt will be enough for somebody to give us a full description of what you have there!

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bpesteve
.300 member


Reged: 18/11/03
Posts: 106
Loc: Sunset side up
Re: What have we here? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #108055 - 25/06/08 01:06 AM

The style of the powder charge/bullet type mark is what was used between 1892 and 1912. After 1912 it became

St.m.G.
-------
13 gr.

That is, bullet type over bullet weight, no mention anymore of powder at all. It's also not usual to see just crown-over-N (nitro proof), there should also be crown-over-U (final inspection) and crown-over-G (rifled barrel).

Looks like a very nice "mom-'n-pop shop" German sporter, and it appears to shoot really well - congrats!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick_R
.300 member


Reged: 03/07/03
Posts: 117
Loc: WV, USA
Re: What have we here? [Re: bpesteve]
      #108100 - 25/06/08 12:38 PM

Steve,

Thanks, I had read that the crown over N didn't go into effect till after the early 1930's but hadn't found the info about the change from load data to bullet weight.

I wonder if it took a while for the older gun builders to make the change from one style to the other.

If you gents are bored with the Mauser we can try to figure out where my SMLE has been.





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 85 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  NitroX 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 9862

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved