Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Souping the good ole .405

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Single Shots & Combination Guns

Pages: 1
Zapata
.224 member


Reged: 20/01/04
Posts: 11
Souping the good ole .405
      #7148 - 20/01/04 03:14 PM

Hey, Y'all
I've been hoping that someone would acquire either one of Ruger's #1s in .405, or one of the "Davidson" high wall Winnies, in that same caliber, and then play with it to find out just how good this old cartridge can be. I suspect that with a little development, a 400-gr. .411 solid could be shoved along at 2050-2100 fps. That would make Teddy Roosevelt's "big medicine gun" into real "big medicine"
Just about perfect, with a softie OR a solid for that pesky rhino or lion that keeps turning over your trash can every night, what? I've had no trouble at all in being able to move a Barnes 300-gr. at 2400 fps, and this from an early original '95.
Ken Waters did a great workup on this cartridge in Reloader Magazine some years back, wherein there are some super loads using Reloder-7 and several different bullets, and this is where I got my information for working up the 300 gr.-Re-7 load. He also had some loads for the 210-gr. Hornaday pistol bullet, again with a whole bunch of Reloder-7, at 2500-2600 fps, and I loaded a herd of these. Just let me tell ya, when this lightly-constructed hollow point, at 2600 fps, comes in contact with ANYTHING, it's Nagasaki time all over again. Loads of fun on 100-150-yard groundhogs.
I do believe that with the right propellant and primer, in a good, strong single shot, the 350-400 gr. 2100 fps figure is attainable.


"When in doubt, use more gun!!!"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DPhillips
.375 member


Reged: 09/10/03
Posts: 819
Loc: Alaska
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #7197 - 21/01/04 07:54 AM

I suspect if you get a 400 grain pill moving 2,100 fps out of the 405 Winny, you'll be pushing something in the neighborhood of 70,000+ psi pressure. Don't try to make the cartridge something it isn't.

If you do use those type of loadings very long, you'll likely shoot your rifle loose or have it come apart in your hands. Either way, its not a good idea.

The Ruger No.l is a very strong action, but if you are going to try to make the 405 a 400/450, why not just rechamber to that round and hold the pressures down?

Edited by DPhillips (21/01/04 07:56 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zapata
.224 member


Reged: 20/01/04
Posts: 11
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: DPhillips]
      #7296 - 23/01/04 11:04 AM

Hey, Y'all,
The original suggested upper pressure limitation for the original .405 chamberings ( Mods. '95 lever, '85 Hi-wall, Hotchkiss boltgun) was 45,000 psi. This was slightly above the pressure figures of the then-as-loaded 300 gr. solids and softies, at an m.v. of 2300 fps. When Ken Waters did his work-up on this case, he moved the velocity window up to 2400 fps and better, while suggesting that none of his test loads surpassed that 45,000 psi limit.

Now I'm not your average dumbass, and I am in no way suggesting that anyone approach 2050-2100 fps. with a 400 grainer the first crack out of the box! The newly produced Hornaday .405 loads are rated at 2225 fps M.V., and I'm dead sure certain they're loaded to lower pressure levels than the early ammo, since we all now live in "Lawyerville", and Hornaday can't control what some mental cripple's gonna try to fire 'em in (shades of "wimpy 45-70 factory fodder", doncha know).

Let's look at some numbers here, just for conversation's sake. The 400 gr. .411 bullet, or for that matter the .400 gr. .416, is nearly identical in ballistics coefficient and sectional density to a 500 gr. .458, and the shape of about all the offerings in 400/.411, thusly, have slightly less bullet-to-bore contact than a 500/458. Case capacity-to-projectile mass (the limiting factor in all straight-wall cases) is slightly BETTER in the .405 case, the case length being 2.580 nom. as opposed to 2.500 for the .458 Mag., again keeping in mind the similarities in SD and BC of the projectiles used. Also, the availability of newer propellants now on the market have allowed the .458 Mag to finally become what it was intended to be, while still keeping the lid on chamber pressures (most of the reloading sites are reporting 2150, even 2200 fps with a 500 gr. bullet). The reason I keep referring to the .458 Win Mag in this comparison is that these two cartridges bear striking similarities in every category. Let's never forget that this .405 cartridge was a "magnum" in 1904, fully eight years before the introduction of the .375 H&H Magnum.

I don't have the foggiest where you came up with the pressure figure you quoted, but I'm sure that any reloader worth the title would stop way the hell short of that figure. If you have some secret formula for figuring chamber pressures without ever firing even one round, please publish it for all our edification.

Also, keep in mind that the .416 Remington Magnum is regularly loaded, at the factory, to 65,000 psi chamber pressure, and there are folks out there that are surpassing factory ballistics figures every day in this round. Talk all you want about trying to make a cartridge something it isn't, when it's a stone fact the .416 Remington will NEVER come close to what the poor, old, outdated .416 Rigby will do with 15-20% LESS PRESSURE!!! JOHN RIGBY FOREVER!!!

My original wish still stands: the .405 needs to be experimented with, using the heavier 350-400 gr. bullets. The ONLY complaint that was ever murmurred about the .405 when talking about dangerous game was the lack of penetration with the original thin-skinned 300 gr. Winchester solids. With the advent of the superlative #1 Ruger in .405, we have the makings of a true, old-fashioned, AMERICAN, dangerous-game round, and one that one that doesn't come up lookin' too awful bad beside the numbers for all the old .40-.45 Express rounds, or even the well-deserved reputation as a sure killer of the .404, at factory numbers of 2100-2150 with a 400-grainer.

I feel confident that someone will take this fine old cartridge to the level of performance it is capable of, because the .405 Winchester was laid to rest 'way too early, and deserves the attention of an intelligent reloading world. And thanks for lettin' me rant a while about one of my old favorites.

"When in Doubt, Use More Gun!!!"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DPhillips
.375 member


Reged: 09/10/03
Posts: 819
Loc: Alaska
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #7530 - 27/01/04 11:21 AM

My apologies, Zapata. I came off waaaayyyyy too gruff, and I apologize for that. My experience with the 411 Hawk (based on cylindical '06 brass, which is very similar in case capacity). Pressure tested loads for the Hawk chambering in a 27" tube at 60,000 psi will give you roughly 2,100 fps. To get that velocity out of a 24" barrel would require higher pressures.

The 405 is a grand cartridge as designed. It will handle any of the North American game animals, as is. To get the results you are looking for is similar to turning a 30-06 into a 300 Mag. It can be done, but what's wrong with the 300 Mag? If I wanted 450/400 results from a Ruger No.1, shoot the rifle is loosely mimicking the Brit Farquharson (at least aesthetically), why not rechamber? To get the 405 into that velocity range, its not a 405 anymore. It's well beyond the design of the cartridge.

I really don't mean to sound like a jerk, though I suspect I am, but it seems very similar to those fellows trying to turn their 45/70's into 458's.

Again, I apologize for coming off so ill sounding.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Holmes
.300 member


Reged: 01/12/03
Posts: 159
Loc: Wyoming, USA
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #7545 - 27/01/04 04:21 PM

Interestingly enough, I was just burning 30 minutes at a local gunshop and spied a #1 405 hangin' on the wall lookin' all kinds of lonely.

Got me thinking about this thread. I don't know how high I'd take this cartridge, but I like things that are different.

Now, if that poor Ruger only had nice walnut furniture instead of that grey stump....

Good discussion, gentlemen. Thanks.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
atkinson6
.375 member


Reged: 26/01/04
Posts: 678
Loc: Idaho
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Holmes]
      #7805 - 30/01/04 10:03 AM

Seems like trying to make a silk purse out of a sows ear to me, but if you can get a 400 gr. bullet at 2100 FPS safly in the Mod.95, then I will surely buy one...I am sure it would be much easier to do with the strong Ruger No.1, but I would prefer to rechamber it to a 450-400-3" and be done with it...

By the way I have a set of RCBS Custom wildcat dies I would sell at less than whole sale if anyone wanted a real neat SS on a Ruger no.1...They are 450/416 3" dies.....A 450/400 necked up to .416 for a better choice of bullets and weights...Its a great cartridge


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Holmes
.300 member


Reged: 01/12/03
Posts: 159
Loc: Wyoming, USA
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: atkinson6]
      #7844 - 30/01/04 04:12 PM

In reply to:

They are 450/416 3" dies.....A 450/400 necked up to .416




Hmmm.... sounds like a very interesting one, Ray. And I doubt anyone else in my neck of the woods has got one!

Know anybody that has a reamer?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zapata
.224 member


Reged: 20/01/04
Posts: 11
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Holmes]
      #8231 - 05/02/04 04:36 PM

Hey, Y'all,
Hey, partner, no need to apologize for anything said to me in reply. Having been a dumbass for the greater part of my 56 years, I've developed a fairly thick hide. Why, my wife reminds me of my limited mental capacity on a regular basis!!! Besides, I can come off rather salty myself sometimes.
Someone might have gotten the wrong impression of what I was getting to, because I would NEVER condone any load above the aforementioned factory pressure limit of 45,000 psi in a '95 lever action, new or old. My comments were strictly in reference to hot-rodding a really strong single-shot, such as the Ruger #1. If I misled, then please accept my apology.
One thing that might come into play with the necessarily longer 400 gr. bullet would be the amount of free-bore (or lack thereof) built into the Ruger chamber design. That would definitely be something to check out before assembling any loads with said bullet.


"When in Doubt, Use More Gun!!!"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick_R
.300 member


Reged: 03/07/03
Posts: 118
Loc: WV, USA
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #8944 - 13/02/04 12:54 PM

Early in 2003 I decided that I wanted a "big bore rifle", no specific reason just something that sounded like "BOOM!" when it went off.

I'd read where Ruger was coming out with the #1 in .405 Win and remembering "African Game Trails" I decided to use the President's cartridge. No intent to hunt anything with it, just something different than the usual, run-o-mill rifle.
Not too big for my usual quarry, whitetail but not too small for most everything else I'll ever be able to afford hunting.

Did a bit of searching at our local gun stores and bought a slightly used #1-B in 7mm Rem Mag. Off it went to a friend with connections and a lathe, destined to come back in .405 with a long throat and 1 in 12" twist.

After a bit of judicious load development I've found that the Barnes 400gr X, Barnes 400gr solid and Woodleigh 400gr soft point all shoot sub inch 100 yard groups to the same point of impact when loaded to 2,000fps! The 300gr bullets from Hornady and Barnes shoot to radically different points of impact from every other bullet and don't group nearly as well. I do have one load using a 265gr wide nosed swc/gc that does 1,400fps and is like shooting a .38spl. that hits very near the 400gr loads at 100yds.

Then a few months later, I find data for the .405 on Hodgdon's webpage showing that they are getting 1,900fps plus with the Woodleigh loaded short to fit in a 1895 levergun and using one grain less powder than I do. I'm just relieved to see that I'm not about to blow my fool self up

Unfortunately, Barnes quit making the .411 400gr bullets so if Woodleigh's become unavailable it's off to the barrel guy for some other flavor. But for now, it's pretty good.


Hope I helped you scratch your .405 itch.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
475Guy
.400 member


Reged: 22/08/03
Posts: 1088
Loc: Kali, US
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #9064 - 15/02/04 04:46 AM

If you like the particular cartridge, then by all means buy the gun. If you want raw power, get the 375, 416 or 458 and have them rechambered all the way up to 600 NE. My hunting partner has two 1895's, one in '06 he'd picked up about 6 months ago and a 405 he had just snagged last week. This has no bearing on the cartridge except that it has limited case capacity for hot-rodding.

--------------------
Lo do they call to me,
They bid me take my place among
them in the Halls of Valhalla,
Where the brave may live forever.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Robgunbuilder
.275 member


Reged: 18/02/04
Posts: 64
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: 475Guy]
      #10790 - 03/03/04 03:30 PM

check out my thread on a long throat .405 win on an Encore! I'm pretty certain 2100 fps with a 400 gr woodleigh is attainable. This is not a lever gun load as I expect it will take 55-56 Kpsi to get there. I'm throating out about .500 with a parrell throat and putting a new cannelure on the bullets to crimp on. Of course it would be easier to just rechamber to 450/400, but then what would the challenge be? I've hit 2250fps out of a long throat .458 winchester, so I expect this will work also.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick_R
.300 member


Reged: 03/07/03
Posts: 118
Loc: WV, USA
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Robgunbuilder]
      #10795 - 03/03/04 04:02 PM

Rob,
Where's the thread posted? Hopefully not on the AWOL AR forum

I guess you get to fiddle with whichever cartridge you load, the 450/400 apparently needs filler, careful powder selection and expensive brass. The .405 is going to run a bunch of pressure to catch up but the Hornady brass is readily available and apparently very strong.

Ray's 450/416 would be right interesting, you could even leave the barrel marked "450/400" so your brass matched and not be in danger of anything but rotten accuracy if someone put the original factory load in by accident. Bullets would surely be easier to come by in .416" flavor.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hawaiian_Hunter
.224 member


Reged: 25/02/04
Posts: 19
Loc: MAUI NO KA OI
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Zapata]
      #11387 - 11/03/04 10:53 AM

Hi Zapata, here's an article you might enjoy:
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_No1_405.htm

--------------------
Illegitimus Non Carborundum


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RLI
.375 member


Reged: 01/10/03
Posts: 534
Loc: Victoria, Australia
Re: Souping the good ole .405 [Re: Hawaiian_Hunter]
      #131434 - 04/04/09 01:13 PM

The .405Win can duplicate .450/400 using a Ruger No1, but just get a 450/400! I just got one of each a Winchester 1895 in .405Win and a Ruger No1 in .450/400, the 405 was designed for the 1895 and the 450/400 for single and double rifles.

--------------------
"Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid." — John Wayne


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 73 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Huvius 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 5720

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved