Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Shoot an elephant to save Africa

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Hunting >> Hunting in Africa & hunting dangerous game

Pages: 1
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 41294
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Shoot an elephant to save Africa
      #395471 - 01/01/26 09:31 PM


Shoot an elephant to save Africa
Leon Mangasarian



An elephant in South Africa's Kruger National Park (Getty Images)
Leon Mangasarian

31 December 2025 4:15 PM
Africa’s elephants are out of control, and the continent’s people, and plants, are paying the price. Far too many elephants, with far too little territory – surrounded by ever more people and with culling hampered by Western animal rights groups and green activists – risk contributing to a wildlife-induced forest ecocide. Millions of mopane, baobab and other trees, are being pushed over, devoured or shredded into bushes. Great national parks are in danger of being transformed into desert-like scrubland.

Elephant numbers have exploded in Kruger over the past century

During a week hiking in what should be forest but now is a degraded bushland near the Olifants River on the edge of South Africa’s Kruger National Park, I saw elephants everywhere. On the first day, we ran into a herd of six elephants in less than an hour. Circling around them we encountered another larger herd tearing the tops off the already denuded trees. Trying to avoid this group, we blundered into three, young elephant bulls.

The largest of the trio caught wind of us and angrily flapped his ears forward. Trumpeting as he advanced in our direction, it was some comfort to be accompanied by two professional hunters armed with rifles. At about 70 meters, the bull broke off his shuffling canter in our direction and headed back to his pals. Wian Esbach, one of the guides, laughed: ‘That was typical. It’s always the young bulls who cause the most trouble. A bit like with us people.’

Elephant numbers have exploded in Kruger over the past century. They now number over 31,000 up from ‘just a handful’ in the early 1900s, according to South Africa National Parks website. Kruger Park did not respond to three emails asking if there are plans to reduce elephant numbers.

‘We cannot cull elephants anymore because ‘the public wouldn’t like it’,’ says Ron Thomson, a retired game warden and field ecologist, and a founder of the NGO True Green Alliance. But something needs to be done – and urgently – to address the number of elephants in order to save Kruger’s biological diversity.

How many of the giant pachyderms are too many for the park’s almost five million acres? According to Thomson, the ‘carrying capacity’ for the park – the maximum number of an animal species a habitat can have without causing irreparable damage to the vegetation and eco-system – is just 3,500 (give or take 500) elephants. Some might dispute these exact numbers. But any visitors to Kruger will see for themselves the devastation elephants are causing.


‘Over 95 per cent of the trees here have been torn up and browsed by elephants and some parts of the park are even worse,’ Esbach said. ‘What do you notice? There are no birds or small animals. They need the big trees.’

Big trees are crucial nesting sites for countless African birds, including eagles, vultures and owls. No big trees; no big birds of prey. Giving limitless protection to elephants destroys the habitat for other wildlife.

There’s another ecological problem caused by elephants destroying the tree canopy: less trees mean less leaves and less leaf mass to rot and improve the soil. The whole nutrient cycle is ruined.

Centuries ago, elephants roamed across huge areas and were often kept moving by their only real enemies: human hunters who pursued the animals for meat, hides, ivory or in self-defense. Today, Africa’s human population is over 1.5 billion – up from an estimated 140 million in 1900 – and expected to rise to over three billion by 2070. This means even less space for mega-fauna and far more chance that human-elephant conflicts turn deadly.

Decades of global campaigns have simplistically claimed elephants are threatened across Africa. Not true. Elephants may be struggling in Kenya, which banned hunting in 1977, but their population is stabilising or rising across southern Africa, which tries to use hunting as a management tool.

Emotional campaigns by well-funded animal rights groups make all elephant culling – either by state game wardens or controlled trophy hunting – a political minefield. This has contributed to the current problems: Germany’s Greens have played a big role in European efforts to ban elephant and other trophy hunting. Unable to force African leaders to do their bidding, the Greens instead sought to destroy the economic basis of African big game hunting by Diktat from Berlin.

‘The import of hunting trophies must be completely banned,’ said the German Greens in a 2021 election manifesto. This is what Germans call ‘Wasser predigen und Wein trinken’ (preaching water but drinking wine). Back at home, the Greens are shrill in their demand for massive shooting of Germany’s roe and red deer to reduce populations to protect trees from browsing. The magnitude of woodland damage in Southern Africa would trigger an instant and deadly response if it happened in German forests.

‘No more than ten per cent tree damage is acceptable,’ said Harald Malek, a certified and state-appointed wildlife damage assessor in Saxony-Anhalt state’s Altmark. ‘But 95 per cent damage? That would lead to drastic orders to massively reduce deer numbers by hunting. And there would be huge compensation claims.’

Botswana, which has 130,000 elephants, was so angered over the German Greens’ attempted trophy ban that it suggested sending 20,000 elephants to Germany as a gift. Germans should try living with elephants that trample people to death and destroy crops and damage villages, Botswana’s then president, Mokgweetsi Masisi, told Bild newspaper. ‘This is no joke,’ he said. Botswana has since resumed elephant hunting which it had temporarily banned.

Left on their own, an elephant population can double every ten years

Kruger’s problem is similar to that of Yellowstone National Park in the United States, where wapiti (which the Americans also call elk) were devastating the vegetation. The release of wolves into the park in the 1990s led to a reduction in the elk population from about 20,000 to 8,000. Trees and woody vegetation have since recovered. But elephants are the apex animal in Southern Africa, and their only real historical enemy has been people. Left on their own, an elephant population can double every ten years.

On my last night at the Olifants River lodge, there was a tremendous racket outside at 3 a.m. Half asleep, I thought it was a helicopter. At breakfast, Wian showed a me a film on his mobile phone of an elephant herd rampaging through the grounds. They knocked down one of the last big trees still standing, just 50 meters from where I had been sleeping. ‘Some bull showing who’s the boss here,’ said Wian.

The metropolitan-green brigade and animal rights NGOs will hate it, but if you want to help save Southern Africa’s forests: book a safari and shoot an elephant.

https://www.spectator.com.au/2025/12/shoot-an-elephant-to-save-africa/

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
85lc
.400 member


Reged: 19/01/18
Posts: 1339
Loc: Georgia, USA
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: NitroX]
      #395477 - 02/01/26 04:36 AM

Great article. Thanks for posting. Too bad so many people are ignorant about conservation and demand policies that impact nature.

--------------------
RB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5412
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: 85lc]
      #395484 - 02/01/26 08:28 AM

A Good article. I have been aware of the danger to the environment that Elephants are for a few years now. I have seen what happens when a herd goes through and area once when dry. I have also seen where they have been through twice when dry. Not much left after the second trip through, a third trip through and the area would certainly be desert.

The most destructive animals on earth are Man followed by Elephant. There is a huge gap between the two and a decent gap between the Elephant and whatever comes next in environmental destructiveness.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
93x64mm
.416 member


Reged: 07/12/11
Posts: 4689
Loc: Nth QLD Australia
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: Rule303]
      #395489 - 02/01/26 09:00 AM

Nature will always work out its checks & balances - given time!
Seeing starving animals is never a good thing, but in reality what nature does to limit numbers.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hunter4752001
.300 member


Reged: 25/01/10
Posts: 151
Loc: Australia
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: 93x64mm]
      #395491 - 02/01/26 09:52 AM

An excellent article highlighting the real issues around elephants. I'd gadly book an elephant hunt except for the massive cost involved. If African coutries were truely dedicated to saving their ecosystems by reducing elephant numbers, they would bring the costs down to a reasonable level. Those countries that do support elephant hunting, only do so in tiny numbers and for great cost. As such it does nothing to solve the over-population problem but only raises revenue.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 41294
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: Hunter4752001]
      #395494 - 02/01/26 04:47 PM

I wonder how elephants populations were kept in manageable numbers before modern weapons.

Lions killing young and very old.

Humans did hunt them with drop spears. Large hunting parties. Pit falls.

But that can't have controlled numbers to a large effect.

If course they travelled and roamed over large areas.

Maybe localised starvation and then migrating kept them in control. With the ability to shift location, the forests were able to recover?

In the early English elephant hunting books, the elephant had already been shot out of the Cape. By the Dutch and the Hottentots. The British hunters were already needing to travel to the "far North" across the Limpopo.

The advent of muzzle loading bigger bore guns.

What a time it would have been to be alive.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LRF
.375 member


Reged: 28/03/11
Posts: 532
Loc: minnesota ,usa
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: NitroX]
      #395500 - 02/01/26 11:02 PM

There are some really deep question being asked in this thread and also statements of fact. For example:

-I wonder how elephants populations were kept in manageable numbers before modern weapons.

-The most destructive animals on earth are Man followed by Elephant.

-I'd gladly book an elephant hunt except for the massive cost involved.

To the question of manageability archeologist studying the demise of the Wholly Mammoth in North America now feel that early natives played a significant role in killing them off. So possibly African hunters played a bigger part then we may think in controlling early Elephant populations. Just throwing that out there. And them just throwing spears.

I agree with the premise on destructive animals so which ones population needs to be controlled? And who gets to decide? Unfortunately for the Elephant I am pretty sure they are not going to get to have a word in the debate. And the humans that speak for them are are so blinded with their own agendas we have kind of an all encompassing term for them, "Tree huggers", if you get my drift. And then when we use these terms back at them we are also just as blinded and nothing gets done. My support goes out to the people who work tirelessly everyday in the field and halls of government trying to find compromises that work for the native African farmer living in the villages and the Elephant just trying to live.

As to cost, what is massive? can that be defined. A friend and I were just yesterday after reading the initial post here were discussing what it would cost to reduce a 100,000 herd by 20%. The costs are staggering. For example take ammo, 20,000 rounds of say 416 something at say $3 a round that's $60,000. That is just the least cost involved. The rest skyrocket from there. Easily topping $200 million IMO. Who is going to pay that? African hunts are expensive because they are worth it. I have never been on one. Always afraid to spend the money because I was concerning I wouldn't have enough in retirement. Now I see that was silly, money is not an issue, but now my health is slipping and it's to late.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5412
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Shoot an elephant to save Africa [Re: LRF]
      #395508 - 03/01/26 08:48 AM

One Game Ranch in Namibia that I had the pleasure to stay at while carrying out some culling had done some Elephant control at great cost to themselves. They moved 10 (I think it was) Elephants by road and ship to Congo. This was an experiment to see if it was feasible and if the Elephants would stay there. I must write to them to see what the outcome was.

Nature may well take care of the areas with over populations of Elephant with drought and starvation.
However the two main areas Hwange Nat Park in Zimbabwe and Chobe Nat Park in Botswana have very good water supply, and food supply. That is the Zambeze River and the Nat Park. In time this will lead to these areas being turned into desert. As their sizes decrease, as is happening now due to over grazing by Elephants, either a mass die off due to starvation or the Elephants will spread and more villages will want them shot as they wreck the Villages crops.

A very conservative estimation for Chobe to survive is there needs to be 5000 Elephants a year killed off. That is just to maintain the status quoe. The real number is probably above 10,000 a year to actually reduce the population. Who is going to do that, who is going to pay for it. I dare say, nobody.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 287 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 268

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved