Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Rizzini

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Double Rifles, Single Shots & Combinations >> Double Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
93x64mm
.416 member


Reged: 07/12/11
Posts: 4200
Loc: Nth QLD Australia
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: mchughcb]
      #379082 - 05/09/23 06:27 AM

Nice groups Nemo!
Keep going on your testing, it can be frustrating but when you get there its so worth it!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
85lc
.400 member


Reged: 19/01/18
Posts: 1031
Loc: Georgia, USA
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: 93x64mm]
      #379084 - 05/09/23 09:17 AM

Very nice groups. I have a 444M in a RPM XL pistol and it REALLY helps to hear a padded glove when shooting that pistol. I would rather shoot that cartridge in a rifle.

--------------------
RB


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26998
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: 85lc]
      #379109 - 06/09/23 02:50 AM

Excellent groups, right on the POA, I assume.
If capable of handling normal .444 Marlin pressures of 43,000 PSI, that rifle should do 2,300fps with 265gr. Hornady's and 2,200fps with 300's. My Marlin easily did both and shot into 1 1/2" at 100 meters. Should never have sold that rifle.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39883
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: DarylS]
      #379113 - 06/09/23 07:09 PM



Fantastic regulation. A .444 will make a great medium game double rifle cartridge, anything from moose and brown bear down. In Australia one might use it on scrub bull, banteng and water buffalo. Proper projectiles of course. And careful shots.

And for a new rifle for $5000 a good buy. That sort of price is a good medium calibre price level.

Well done, and a belated welcome to NitroExpress.

I hope to see you posting some hunting stories in the future with your new rifle. It should work well.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nemo
.224 member


Reged: 16/06/23
Posts: 25
Loc: Wisconsin
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: 85lc]
      #379225 - 09/09/23 03:03 PM

Thanks for all the kind words.
Replying to as many as I can :

I have found that with the big hard kicking handguns, using the biggest grip you can will help with the recoil.
I almost bought a Desert Eagle BFR in 444 but instead put that money toward the double rifle.

One of the better decisions of my life.
I deeply enjoy the gun even when I am not shooting it which is most of the time.
It's in a small custom rack where I can see it while I synthesize and model loads in QuickLOAD.

QuickLOAD has a feature that is especially useful to those trying to ballpark a non-standard load for a double rifle.
One of the results is barrel time.
You can play with the various powders to try and match both the velocity and the barrel time to the regulation load.
Graeme Wright suggested as how a little faster powder works best for lighter bullets and slower for the heavy ones.
This is born out when studying those velocity and barrel time numbers.
Maybe I am a little slow but that seems counterintuitive to me as one would think the lighter bullets would
want to be accelerating at the same rate as the heavier regulating bullet.
I am beginning to accept that much is mysterious when it comes to double rifle physics.

The Rizzini is CIP proofed at 64 kpsi and is rated for the CIP 444 pressure of 51,488 psi (3550 bar)
so I have few worries of handling USA ammo or my own loads.
I am not quite sure how they (CIP) arrived at that number as it's quite different from the SAAMI numbers.
The rifle was regulated for the Hornady "LeveRevolution" 444 round which uses the 265 gr. FTX bullet.
This may have been the only factory 444 ammo available in Italy at the time.
Since this bullet is quite long they cut the brass shorter which lowers the velocity compared to the full length
"Superformance" load which uses the regular 265 FNSP Hornady bullet (at around 2330 fps).
This was necessary to allow the cartridge to load into the side of a Marlin.
You can load the FTX in full length brass one at a time into the top when the bolt is all the way back.
The velocity (out of my 22" 444S) for the LeveRevolution is around 2260.
Hence this is the ballpark velocity for regulating other loads.
Being 70 fps slower than the "normal" 265 load gives me some headroom to try regulating a heavier bullet.

I was measuring velocity with the 444S and a Magnetospeed before I got a LabRadar.
This worked fine as when I matched velocities in the single tube, they shot fine in the double.

The fact that my clone of the original Remington 240 gr 444 cartridge regulated right off the bat blew me away.
The grin on my face would have made me look like a South Park character.
This is the load that caused the very slow start to the 444's acceptance as the bullet was a handgun bullet and
sometimes blew up when hitting an animal. They added another cannelure near the bottom of the bullet but it didn't really help.
The 444 did not get reliable until Hornady came out with the 265 SPFP which has a thicker jacket and harder lead.
It was THE standard 444 bullet until just recently when Hornady discontinued it as a reloading supply.
The SuperFormance round which uses that bullet is evidently still being sold.
The main substitute is the Speer 270 FP which also works well.
I have not tried it yet in the double though.

The obvious bullet for a 444 DR is the Woodleigh 444 280 SPFP weldcore.
Definitely fills the role of the "blue-nose" as John Taylor called them.

They are as rare as hen's teeth here in the USA but I have gotten 100 of them and will try to regulate them next.
Going lighter was easy (doesn't get any easier than finding out stuff you already made regulates perfectly).
Going heavier will require some work especially as I want to fire as few of those precious Woodleighs as possible.
If the Swift 280 A-Frame ever becomes available again that will be a good substitute.
I have about 100 of them as well.
The Beartooth 280 WFNGC will be my main alternate while getting close to regulation and for practice as I have several hundred of those.

I am completely satisfied with the Rizzini BR550E.
The stock fits me perfectly after adding a butt-pad (I have long arms).
Most intelligent off-the-shelf stock I have ever encountered.
It's the best value in a double I can imagine.

The load I plan on pursuing Bambi with in a couple of months is that 240 gr. load that regulates so well
but with a Swift 240 gr. A-Frame instead of the Hornady handgun bullet.
Should leave a nice big hole all the way through.
Our whitetails aren't that big. Neither are the black bears around here.

--------------------
Nemo -- Everything 44


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39883
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: Nemo]
      #379250 - 10/09/23 04:12 PM

Quote:

If the Swift 280 A-Frame ever becomes available again that will be a good substitute.
I have about 100 of them as well.




Some people, myself included, are wary about using A or H partitioned jacketed bullets as well as monometal bullets WITHOUT RAISED driving bands in double rifles.

Other shooters of them say they are fine to use.

The solid jacket part can put too much pressure on a non single barreled rifle allegedly.

Perhaps in modern new rifles they might be more acceptable?

Up to the owner/reloader.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nemo
.224 member


Reged: 16/06/23
Posts: 25
Loc: Wisconsin
Re: Rizzini double rifle part 4 [Re: NitroX]
      #379267 - 11/09/23 06:14 AM

Thanks for the warning.
I have read the thread(s) about stressed rifling in here as well as Graeme Wright's coverage of the topic.
I am not too concerned for a couple of reasons.
One is obvious and you mentioned it: modern barrel steel.
The second is not so obvious and has to do with the somewhat arcane original specs for the 444.
As I mentioned above no one really knows now why the 1/38" twist was decided on by Marlin.
That puts a limit on the length of bullets that will stabilize.
Anything over about .9" is questionable.
But the important detail here is the fact that all 444's until near the end of Marlin's existence were made with micro-grooved barrels.
These almost always have slightly over sized bores as well compared to 44 revolvers.
They shoot best with .432" gas-checked cast bullets which is usually the largest size 44 you can get.
For the last few years Marlin finally got wise and changed to a 1/20" twist barrel with "Ballard" rifling but the CIP stayed with the original specs.
Or Rizzini sourced some of the older barrels already rifled.
Anyway the double rifle has the older style rifling exactly like my 1980 444S.
There isn't a whole lot of rifling to stress.

The number of A-Frames I plan on putting thru it will be limited to a handful as well.
They are expensive and currently unavailable so I'll be husbanding them closely
All regulation and practice shooting is done with the Hornady or Sierra JHC until the final 4 or 6 rounds.
I consider the 240 a good size for whitetails and the 280 Woodleigh or A-Frame suitable for elk, moose, bison, and larger bears.
There is a remote possibility I could regulate (or come close enough) the Beartooth 295 gr. WLNGC.
I have several boxes of them and they have a very good reputation in the Marlin owner's forum.
If confronting the big brown bears or grizz, I'd want a load like that.
Sadly Beartooth bullets no longer exists.
Not only did they make excellent bullets but were at the forefront of 444 experimenting and documentation.

Spare old 444SS barrel I got from Numrich after a bunch of cleaning:


--------------------
Nemo -- Everything 44

Edited by Nemo (11/09/23 02:52 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 543 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CptCurl 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 6131

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved