Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 375H&H mag - load observation

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1
mauserand9mm
.400 member


Reged: 03/09/09
Posts: 1039
Loc: Queensland, Australia
375H&H mag - load observation
      #336975 - 24/01/20 09:26 PM

I bought a chronograph fairly recently and it's a good thing because it gives me more reason to go through the gun safe and fire some rifles that had become otherwise dormant.

I put some of my 270gn handloads through my 375H&H CZ550 and recorded the results thinking nothing of it - average of 2858ft/sec with a SD (10 shots) of 13ft/sec. I've since found out that that is actually a fairly "healthy" velocity. Loads are far from hot (primers look good, cases extract easily, brass lasts a long time etc). I guess this must me due to the longish barrel.

Anyone else have chrono results for comparison?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26998
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: mauserand9mm]
      #336983 - 25/01/20 03:53 AM

Long barrel certainly helps, but also, many of today's powders are much better than those of 20 years ago.

As P.O.Ackley once wrote, brass longevity is the final judge on a load's integrity.

The .375H&H is a 60,000PSI cartridge.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5061
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: mauserand9mm]
      #337009 - 25/01/20 09:28 AM

I think I chronied some of my 300grain projectiles from the CZ550 375H&H but that was some years ago. Those results will take a bit of finding. So, from memory they were a bit slow but I was using AR2206 as recommended by some blokes I know. AR2209 got the bullets up and moving a bit better.

I'll see if I can find that data.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mauserand9mm
.400 member


Reged: 03/09/09
Posts: 1039
Loc: Queensland, Australia
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: Rule303]
      #337021 - 25/01/20 12:26 PM

I use AR2208 for most loads in the 375. Others recommend AR2209 but I can't fit enough into the case. My loads are quite a bit over ADI listed loadings but they are okay pressure wise. ADI show 50,000 cup for their maximum loads (not sure how these equates to PSI).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5061
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: Rule303]
      #337068 - 26/01/20 08:25 AM

Found the data. AR2209 gives me just above listed max velocity with the 300grainers. Can still stuff another couple of grains in. With monometal bullets I need to go back to AR2206H to get enough powder in and getting book velocities.

I need to experiment with BM8208 with the monometals.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26998
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: Rule303]
      #337091 - 27/01/20 06:20 AM

Yes - the longer monometal bullets will require faster powders taking up less space.
There should, however be no problem in achieving "book" speeds.

In 1912, the ballistics were: 2,600fps for 270gr. and 2,400fps for 300's.
Those are the ballistics, with which the .375 earned it's African all-round game killing reputation.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: DarylS]
      #337097 - 27/01/20 11:09 AM

Using 300 grain TSX, I get ~ 2400 FPS out of my 375 H&H 20” bbl Sako Kodiak. I get a similar velocity out of my 26” barrel Heym .375 Flanged Magnum. My loads are near max according to modern/current reloading manuals. No signs of abnormal or high pressure. I’m a conservative reloader. I do not hot rod my rifles. What would be the point? If you want or need more power than a given cartridge was designed to provide, I prefer to simply acquire a more powerful cartridge. I value my fingers, hands, eyes and general good looks and have no desire to rearrange my physique for an extra 50 or 100 FPS.

Edited by Postman (27/01/20 11:11 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.450 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 5061
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: DarylS]
      #337107 - 27/01/20 07:02 PM

Quote:

Yes - the longer monometal bullets will require faster powders taking up less space.
There should, however be no problem in achieving "book" speeds.

In 1912, the ballistics were: 2,600fps for 270gr. and 2,400fps for 300's.
Those are the ballistics, with which the .375 earned it's African all-round game killing reputation.




Yes however modern book velocities are around the 2600fps mark for the 300grain. Modern powders and I am more than happy with these velocities. Like the earlier loads they simply work.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Postman
.375 member


Reged: 25/09/13
Posts: 846
Loc: Canada
Re: 375H&H mag - load observation [Re: Rule303]
      #337111 - 27/01/20 10:51 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Yes - the longer monometal bullets will require faster powders taking up less space.
There should, however be no problem in achieving "book" speeds.

In 1912, the ballistics were: 2,600fps for 270gr. and 2,400fps for 300's.
Those are the ballistics, with which the .375 earned it's African all-round game killing reputation.




Yes however modern book velocities are around the 2600fps mark for the 300grain. Modern powders and I am more than happy with these velocities. Like the earlier loads they simply work.




This seems about right, based on what I see with my Sako Kodiak rifle assuming a loss of ~ 50 FPS per inch of (shorter) barrel length. Also, most reloading manuals tend to use 26” test barrels, another factor to contemplate.

Edited by Postman (27/01/20 10:55 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 45 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3209

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved