Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: .458wm

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
atkinson6
.375 member


Reged: 26/01/04
Posts: 678
Loc: Idaho
Re: .458wm [Re: mickey]
      #19295 - 19/09/04 03:00 AM

I am with Will, if you short stroke a bolt action rifle then you probably can't chew gum and walk at the same time...

I don't accept that short stroke therory at all...You pull the bolt back until it hits metal and won't come any further, to stop it in midstream is ludicrus if not seemingly impossibe IMO...Not saying who is right or wrong in this issue, just putting my perspective in the thread...

Mudbug,
I know Harry Selby and his son Mark very well.. Harry only used the 458 for a very short period at a time when nothing else was available to him and he couldn't get ammo for his 450-400-3" and he didn't have the money for a 416 Rigby..He correted that situation shortly thereafter when he came into some chips in the form of tips...That is from the horses mouth...He didn't care for the 458 or the push feed M-70...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cooch
.300 member


Reged: 21/09/03
Posts: 192
Loc: Southern NSW
Re: .458wm [Re: atkinson6]
      #19321 - 19/09/04 10:59 PM

To apply the best of modern reloading techniques to one cartridge and then compare it to published data on cartridges loaded nearly a century ago isn't valid.

To load a cartridge to pressure levels acceptable only in strong actions made of the best modern alloys and then compare it to cartridges loaded to be safe in actions using 19th century metallurgy isn't valid.

Try chambering one of your +P .458 winmags in a circa.1900s double and see what happens.

Until you're shooting identical projectiles at identical pressures, you're not comparing cartridges but actions, powders and projectiles ..... which isn't exactly scientific.

I alswo belong to the group which believes that people who short-stroke a magnum-length action have a 90% probability of short-stroking a standard length action.
Working at that speed and under that level of motivation, one doesn't regulate the length of stroke so neatly that it makes a difference. One either cycles it fully to hit the bolt-stop, or one doesn't.

Regards.......... Peter

--------------------
"The only logical response to an animal that lives obsessed with avoiding capture is to chase it." - Jose Ortega y Gassett


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Will
.333 member


Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 303
Loc: Kansas
Re: .458wm [Re: mickey]
      #19325 - 20/09/04 10:06 AM

What I think! is that some PH's and most appies have no idea what the hell they are doing. A recent few days in the presence of a Zim appy revealed that he didn't really understand the important difference between a push-feed and a CRF action. He also complained of how his 458 to Lott conversion om a push feed Mod. 70 sometimes jammed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And this dude wants to take clients on DG hunts, and will soon be taking his practical exam (the final step to a license)!!

Short-stroking or whatever is just a tiny problem in the apparent scheme of problems.

--------------------
_________________________________________________
Bill Stewart

Once you have been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
atkinson6
.375 member


Reged: 26/01/04
Posts: 678
Loc: Idaho
Re: .458wm [Re: Will]
      #19520 - 29/09/04 05:08 AM

Cooch,
Were talking about a 458 Win. it was not around in the early 1900s, it came about in the late 50s or early 60s, which pretty much voids your point if I understand what you are saying....

I agree Will, they are turning out some real hummers in the PH game these days, every farmers kid in RSA is a PH it seems, and listen to the tales of daring do and numbers of Buff/elephant and Lion they have killed!! where and when I always wonder, the culling, fly, and meat hunting days have come and gone with dangerous game. The profession is beginning to swell with BS on a daily basis....


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
atkinson6
.375 member


Reged: 26/01/04
Posts: 678
Loc: Idaho
Re: .458wm [Re: PP_skåne]
      #19733 - 13/10/04 12:23 PM

IMO the real problem with the 458 Win. is with any load that will churn up 2100 FPS you are at 110% load density and that means you have compacted the load, and that is what gave the 458 its bad reputation, and deservably so..powder should never be compacted in a dangerous game rifle, particularly if it is to be used in a hot climate..

For those that refuse to accept this, so be it, but I will not use the caliber because of that, I want all the odds in my favor when Tembo is near..Give me a 458 Lott loaded at a mild 2200 FPS and thats a $50 fix...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mudbug
.275 member


Reged: 08/12/03
Posts: 51
Loc: U.S.A/Wyo.,Ak.&La./H.K.&P.R.C.
Re: .458wm [Re: atkinson6]
      #20231 - 30/10/04 06:39 PM

Thanks, Ray. That is an education in and of itself about Selby and that particular gun. Reading back, I can see that Will's reply said as much.

There's still something about a, say, scoped, outfitted, 20-21" barreled, 8lb .458 winnie that tickles my fancy. The 1st few rounds might change my mind about that, though.

Mudbug


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: .458wm [Re: DUGABOY1]
      #21363 - 27/11/04 11:08 AM

In reply to:

The 458LOTT can easily dup the 470NE with a 500 gr bullet, the 458 Win Mag cannot!




Mac,
I've carried this one over from another thread.

I was gonna let this one rest but seein' that you brought it up again...

In reply to:

The 458 was designed to match the 450NE 3 1/4" double rifle round, and It did not in it's new round days



Ok, "young bucks" like my self don't have the experience that older guys like yourself have with the origins of the 458 Winnie.

So perhaps to make your statements a little more convincing you can enlighten us and tell us what the ACTUAL velocities in sporting rifles were for the 450 NE and for the 458 win at the time of the 458's introduction.
Say Kynoch ammo from 28" barrels for the 450 NE and Win factory ammo in the 25" barrel for the Winchester.

Come on now, here's your big chance to back those opinions up.

I'm hearing you on this one Mac, it's just that I'm waiting on some evidence to support what you are saying.





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wombat
.300 member


Reged: 06/03/04
Posts: 163
Loc: Australia
Re: .458wm [Re: atkinson6]
      #21364 - 27/11/04 11:48 AM

When Selby replaced his 458 what did he buy?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ThomasEdwards
.300 member


Reged: 04/01/04
Posts: 246
Loc: Newport Beach, CA
Re: .458wm [Re: atkinson6]
      #21365 - 27/11/04 12:51 PM

hi ray,

...would the same dynamics affect the .416 rem. mag., given its use of the .375 h&h casing (as compared to the .416 rigby with it magnum-length and large diameter casing)?...

...thanks..



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
400NitroExpress
.400 member


Reged: 26/11/03
Posts: 1154
Loc: Lone Star State
Re: .458wm [Re: 4seventy]
      #21390 - 28/11/04 10:11 AM

4seventy:

I read Wright's book long after having done load development in .450/.400 3 1/4", .450/.400 3" and .470 and and seem to remember being surprised at some claim he made about Kynoch ammo in the big nitros running way below listed velocity, as this had not been my experience at all. Did he say 80 to 100 fps? I liked his book so much that I gave my copy away. Your reminding me of this prompted me to go find some of my old notes.

When beginning load development in any particular nitro double, I always fired original Kynoch in it to establish a base line. I was impressed at how predictable the old Kynoch was relative to listed velocity and two variables, barrel length and priming compound, in all three calibers. Corrosive primed Kynoch from the '50s was consistently 20 to 40 fps faster than non-corrosive stuff from the late '60s and early '70s (Original Kynoch ammo is marked on the box with a date code showing month/day/year). Corrosive stuff usually ran right at listed velocity in 28" barrels (as mentioned, standard velocities were usually taken from 28" barrels, sometimes even 30"). It was my impression that Cordite was particularly sensitive to barrel length. Shorter barrels gave slower velocities as expected - seems to me to be roughly 25 fps loss for 2" of barrel.

Here are a few samples.

Watson Bros. .450/.400 3 1/4" (listed vel. 2150); 28" barrels.
Corrosive, 1953 -----------------------2141
Non-corrosive, 1968 ------------------2105

Wilkinson .450/.400 3 1/4"; 24" barrels
Corrosive, 1953 -----------------------2094
Non-corrosive, 1968 ------------------2060

Hollis .450/.400 3" (listed vel. 2125); 26" barrels
Corrosive, 1956 -----------------------2094
Non-corrosive, 1972 ------------------2070

Rigby .470 (listed vel. 2125); 26" barrels
Corrosive, 1956 -----------------------2110
Non-corrosive, 1972 ------------------2076

I've never had the occasion to try original Kynoch in a .450 3 1/4" but I have no problem believing that Kynoch from the old days (the corrosive primed stuff) actually gave 2150 in the 28" barrels that many of the original .450s had.
-----------------------------------


--------------------
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: .458wm [Re: 400NitroExpress]
      #21400 - 28/11/04 03:52 PM

Ok then, lets give the 450 NE the benefit of the doubt and assume that it delivered the claimed ballistics of a 480 gn bullet at 2150 fps.
This gave it an energy level of 4930 ft lbs.

The 458 Win factory load was tested independently for Rifleman magazine in 1961 and was credited with 2087 fps for the 500 gn bullet in a 25 inch barrel, and, that reading was taken 20 feet from the muzzle.

Seeing that we are using an "assumed" velocity for the 450 NE it would I think be fair to also assume that an extra 13 fps could be added to the 458 WIN velocity if it was taken at the muzzle, and this would give the 458 an "assumed" speed of 2100 fps or somewhere very close to that figure.

That would have given the 458 Win Mag an energy of 4895 ft lbs compared to the 4930 ft lbs for the 450 NE.

No, the 458 may not have equaled the 450 NE in those early days but it achieved better than 99%!!!!!

99+ PERCENT! And this with a heavier bullet!

IMO the 458 Win Mag was given a severe flogging by a few people quite some time back and while it was down, plenty of bystanders have been slipping the boot in ever since!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
4seventy
Sponsor


Reged: 07/05/03
Posts: 2210
Loc: Queensland Australia
Re: .458wm [Re: DUGABOY1]
      #21465 - 30/11/04 01:06 AM

I'm bringing this from the "Poll Question" thread.
In reply to:

the factory loads are the problem with the 458 WM, being loaded too high for it's case capacity,........ The imporper loading in the 458 WM, causes failiers,




Good point, but that's one problem that has, or had, little effect on my use of the 458 Win.
The reason being that I never used any of that early "problematic" factory ammo for any hunting of big game.
I put maybe 4 packets of later production factory ammo through my 458, mainly shooting pigs and chrongraphing.
Any serious hunting was done with handloads in my 458 just the same as with all the other rifles I use.
You see I don't use factory loads in ANY of my centerfire rifles.
For me reloading means being able to get the best from a rifle cartridge combination in terms of bullet selection, velocity, accuracy, economy, dependability, and of course safety.
With the reloaded 458 ammo and 500 gn SP and solid bullets I never experienced any of those dramas that the factory ammo was reported to produce back in the early days.
The guy who now has my rifle still has and uses some reloads that I put together 8-10 years ago some of which has been bounced around the Northern Territory, Cape York, Outback Queensland and New south Wales during that time.
Temperatures in some outback areas reach mid to high 40's (C) and despite all this they still work fine.
The 500 grainers were loaded to 2080fps for solid and 2120 for the softs.

Lots of things have changed since The 1950's.
I mean you could probably duplicate the way the 458 cartridge was first loaded and duplicate those alleged problems but you would be crazy to do so when there is a better way!
Modern powders and primers are capable of improving faults that existed in the past.

The big Nitro Express cartridges USED TO BE LOADED with powder and primers that eroded barrel throats, often burnt chamber walls and breech faces, rusted the bores and were very capable of doing permanent damage to the rifles.
Do we still load them like that or have we improved them by using more modern components?

So who cares if Winchester original factory loads didn't work in the early days.
Then was then and now is now.
It's all about keeping an open mind I believe.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 57 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 11524

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved