Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: 9x57 information

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Mauser Discussion Forum

Pages: 1
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
9x57 information
      #217333 - 29/09/12 03:54 AM

I recently picked up a couple of small ring mausers in 9x57 to go with my large ring type C in that cartridge. I wanted something that I could take to the bush and modify to suit my aging eyes. Both have barrels that aren't bored out military wih similar German proof marks. I've only taken the stock off one, but on the underside of the barrel that one has a crown beside a crown over an N for nitro proof. There is also an 8.7 m/m over 6,28 and 316 below that. I assume the 316 is March of 1916. On the left side of the receiver ring there is St M G over 18.3 Gr.. The rifle with 316 on it has a more recent looking stamp on the left side of the barrel just ahead of the receiver ring that is 0600.02. That looks like it was stamped with individual number punches. The second rifle has the same St M G over 18.3 Gr. on the left of the receiver ring, but I haven't checked under the stock. One has double set triggers and the other a two stage trigger.

I did a search and the most recent reloading posts were a couple of years ago. I followed the advice in those posts and shot a factory Kynoch 245 grain in each new arrival to check the neck diameter. One of the brass allows a 225 grain Sierra .358 BTSP to fall into the case while barely touching the neck. The other the bullet has to be lined up very straight and a bit of a push to slide it into the neck. Does that mean this rifle needs swaged bullets? I'd rather not mess with the brass by turning the neck. Is the small ring mauser weaker to the point that loads have to be reduced?

I had a mis-step while duck hunting a couple of days ago and took a dip in the marsh with my camera in my pocket. I'll take some pictures of the new arrivals and post them when I replace it. Any info or comments in the meantime would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
xausa
.400 member


Reged: 07/03/07
Posts: 2037
Loc: Tennessee, USA
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217334 - 29/09/12 05:22 AM

Quote:

One of the brass allows a 225 grain Sierra .358 BTSP to fall into the case while barely touching the neck. The other the bullet has to be lined up very straight and a bit of a push to slide it into the neck. Does that mean this rifle needs swaged bullets?




In my experience, any fired case which will allow a bullet to be pushed into the neck reflects sufficient neck clearance. If you have the means, I would recommend measuring the thickness of the brass at the neck. There may be a variation between the two cases.

If you form brass from 8X57IS cases, which I would suggest doing, you will find that the case neck thickness is reduced by the forming process, which may well solve the "problem" with that rifle. I have experienced an original neck thickness of .014" reduced to .012" by neck expanding.

I have had no experience with recently manufactured Kynoch ammunition, but the old ammunition used to be quite thick at the neck. Cases formed by necking down 9.3X57 brass could be expected to thicken at the neck, and cases formed from .30-'06 would almost certainly require neck reaming or turning.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: xausa]
      #217335 - 29/09/12 05:48 AM

Thanks for the reply, xausa. I just checked the neck wall thickness with my digital caliper and both cases are 0.0085". I'm not sure of the vintage of the factory Kynochs. Over the last couple of years I've come across and bought 4 boxes of the 245 grain Kynochs and one of RWS 281 grain in 9x57. The type C also came with 8 factory rounds that have a different headstamp than the others. Not sure who made those. The bullets are silver like the RWS, but much shorter in a lighter bullet. I wonder if the neck thickness would be less if I sized up a 7x57 case instead of a 8x57? I have rifles and brass in both those calibers. I've got 9x57 dies and I'll give it a try later.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kuduae
.400 member


Reged: 13/01/10
Posts: 1770
Loc: middle of Germany
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217340 - 29/09/12 07:39 AM

About the proofmarks: The CROWN - crown/N proofmarks indicate proof using the "4000 atm proof powder" according to the proof rule of July 23,1893. 8.7 is the bore (not groove or bullet) diameter as measured by the proofhouse. 6,28 = June 1928 is the proofdate, while 316 is a proofhouse ledger number, gun # 316 proofed 6,28. The stamping of the ledger number shows your rifle being proofed by the Zella - Mehlis proofhouse, so the barrel and gun were probably made there, not in Suhl.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: kuduae]
      #217341 - 29/09/12 09:15 AM

Thanks kuduae, the 1928 date makes sense. In the barrel channel of the stock there is 1928 and what looks to be a signature written in pencil. I was looking at an old thread when I did a search and the posters were using the three digit ledger number as the date code. So do you think these would be scrubbed and re-barreled army rifles? I suppose it is tough to give an opinion without pictures. Is the "4000 atm proof powder" considered a stiff test load or would a large ring get a heavier charge?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GK
.300 member


Reged: 29/10/09
Posts: 161
Loc: Adelaide
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217344 - 29/09/12 10:13 AM

A while back l built up a modern version of a 9x57 on a kar98 (small ring m98) using a .358 barrel. However, l managed to get a brand new set of rcbs dies that look like the are very old. I believe that these are for the original .356 cal bullets, but they have been fine with the .358 bullets and l have been forming cases from privi 8x57 cases.

All the reloading info was very mild sounding but l decided to start of low. Anyway, the highest load that l ended up taking with me to its first range trip was 50.5gr of Varget with the 250gr hornady interlocks. These were still very mild in my rifle and with a 20.5 inch barrel l got 2250f/s. I'm confident l could go another couple of grains so l might see another 100f/s which is pretty good. Ultimately l want to go with some 280gr cast loads.

Edited by GK (29/09/12 10:16 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: GK]
      #217382 - 30/09/12 01:45 AM

Bob - the small rings, M96's, M94's and/or M98's are or have all been chambered at one time for the 6.5x55, 7x57, 8x57, 9.3x57, 9.3x62, and now, .30/06.
The SAAMi and/or CIP standards for those rounds run a low of 55,000PSI for the 6.5, with the others except for the '06 running 57,000psi. The '06 is 60,000psi.

Thus, normal loading should be just fine.

Many of the old rounds were developed at a time when the smokeless powders were 'flighty' to say the least. They were prone to wide jumps in pressure and were also very sensitive to heat. Thus rounds that might be seen to go to Africa, were loaded very softly. Today, such rounds are still being loaded softly, except for the 7's and 8's on the 57mm case as loaded in Europe by Norma and others. Today, most of the 9's, 9.3's and 9.5's are still loaded quite softly. One can improve upon factory ballistics by a measurable amount.

Since the case capacity is slightly more than the .358 Winchester, it's ballistics should be approachable in your rifles, through careful load development. If not fully confident in this, one could always stay with factory level ballistics.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217384 - 30/09/12 02:23 AM

Thanks GK. I have some Varget and will give that a try. One of the new ones has a 23 3/4" barrel and the other is 22". I'm not sure when RCBS stopped making the 9x57 dies, but I think it has been quite a while. My dies are Redding. They too are fairly old looking even though they don't appear to have been used much. Redding still lists them as available. I bought mine at a small gun show. It surprised me to see them there.

Thanks Daryl. I was hoping you would post to this thread. My Modern Reloading book by Richard Lee has the 358 Winchester at 2390 fps max with a 250 grain bullet. I was hoping to reach 2400 fps with a 250 grain bullet if that doesn't appear to push it too much.

I took the stock off the second rifle. The proof marks are the same as the first other than this one has the date of April 1926 and the ledger number of 132. I'll have to fix a crack just back of the magazine box and try to find out how to adjust double set triggers. This one won't set the trigger and it takes some effort to use the one trigger.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217388 - 30/09/12 09:33 AM

Bob - I'm not sure I'd push to 2,400fps with a 250gr. from the 57mm case. I had 2,200fps to 2,300fps in thought when I typed out my response. I'd certainly go to the 2300fps range + a bit in a M98, but as always, keeping an eye on pressures & presure signs, case appearance, extraction and lastly primers.

Do make the brass fit the respective chambers (if possible) before it's loaded for fireforming. It will last longer due to no stretching when finally formed.

I back off the FL die a bit to make sure I don't push the shoudler back when sizing. I've never had to 'bump' a shoulder as the BR boys continually must. That is due to the REALLY high pressures they generate. The fact that I only have to neck size, should show my loads are usually discrete - as least on the low sideof max, yet I do like to get what the case and action is capable of. That is why my 9.3x62 and .375/06IMP both post better ballistics than 1912 .375 H&H mag ammo. Do be careful, keeping a close eye on the progression of pressures.

We found that moderate to max. .358 Winchester data was useable in the 9.3x57 M96 Huskys. I suspect moderate or middle of the road data will also work OK in the 9x57, with same weight bullets. It gives a place to start. With moderate powders like Varget and H4895, you can start with middle of the road WW .358 data and 200 through 250gr. bullets & loads.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217480 - 02/10/12 02:33 PM

Thanks Daryl. 2,400 seemed a bit of a stretch. The 2,390 for the .358 Winchester also seemed pretty high. I'll start low and see where the pressure signs take me. Which 250 grain bullets do you think would be best? I would prefer a pointed bullet if possible.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217500 - 03/10/12 01:05 AM

The Hornady 250gr. SP might be soft enough for low speeds with a pointed bullet. I've a feeling that the 250gr. RN, which gave us excellent results on moose from a 20" .356 Winchester, driven at 2,156fps,that that's the bullet I'd choose. Due to the lower speeds of the 9x57, I'd not worry about a pointed bullet. The RN's will work very easily to 200yards and I'd sight them in at 3" high at 100. That would give about a 160yard zero and maybe 3-4" low at 200. Just a guess - I'll check a chart and edit this if necesary.

See the next post for chart figures.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Edited by Daryl_S (03/10/12 01:23 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217502 - 03/10/12 01:19 AM

Oops - I was out a bit on the drop and zero's with my guess. The conersion to yards from meters is the problem- yup- that's my story. Obviously, it's a lot flatter shooting than I thought. No wonder my bro had no difficulty dropping previously wounded moose at 200yards with it - raking shots, as Elmer would say.

This is what Point Blank says. It's proven to be quite reliable with my .375 and .17 cal. rifles.
Here's that bullet at 2,200fps: No flies on it at all.
a good shot, with some practise and a range finder, could quite easily drop one of those very accurate RN's into the boiler of a moose or elk at from 250 to 300yards.

Load Data
~~~~~~~~~

Name: 9X57 250 Hornady RN
Ballistic Coeff: 0.271
Bullet Weight: 250
Velocity: 2200
Target Distance: 175
Scope Height: 1.500
Temperature: 60
Altitude: 2000

Ballistic Data
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Range Elevation Velocity Energy
0 yds -1.50 in 2200 fps 2687 fpe
25 yds 0.32 in 2131 fps 2522 fpe
50 yds 1.66 in 2064 fps 2365 fpe
75 yds 2.48 in 1998 fps 2216 fpe
100 yds 2.81 in 1932 fps 2073 fpe
125 yds 2.53 in 1869 fps 1938 fpe
150 yds 1.61 in 1807 fps 1812 fpe
175 yds 0.00 in 1746 fps 1693 fpe
200 yds -2.34 in 1688 fps 1581 fpe
225 yds -5.43 in 1630 fps 1476 fpe
250 yds -9.30 in 1575 fps 1376 fpe
275 yds -13.97 in 1520 fps 1282 fpe
300 yds -19.64 in 1468 fps 1196 fpe

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GK
.300 member


Reged: 29/10/09
Posts: 161
Loc: Adelaide
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217542 - 03/10/12 09:32 PM

I'm pretty certain l will be able to get 2300 f/s with the 250gr hornady spire points and l'll be happy to leave at that.

Daryl
You have got me curious about the 250gr hornady RN. Will l have to start a bit lower with these since they have a larger bearing surface?

George

Edited by GK (03/10/12 10:11 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: GK]
      #217556 - 04/10/12 02:01 AM

Boys, I'd go middle or light .358 loads for a start, just to get a feel for your individual rifles. You should have and use a chronograph in your load development, watching for good SD's and leveling of velocity increases as powder charges increase which suggests gettingclose maximum loads, as the efficiency levels off for that powder.

I'd personally start with H4895 and 41gr. or 42.0gr. and with standard primers. 41.0gr. load is listed as 2,100fps in Hornady's 7th Edition book.

Another would be, with 40gr. IMR3031 - again with standard primers.

Another would be 42gr. BLC2 with a magnum primer, say CCI250. The mag primer becomes quite important in colder climates for good ignition.

Re#15 is listed - start at 39gr. It's maximum is listed at 45gr. at 2,300fps.

The .358 Winchester loads in Speers book are somewhat higher for starting loads, sometimes only 3gr. between start and max - just shows the differences, gun to gun as well as different loading practises, book to book.

Hornady notes it calls a load max when they lose accuracy in testing, which may or may not have anything to do with pressure. It's sort of difficult to surmise if your rifle shoots with better accuracy than their's did - is the load max due to their pressure, or lack of accuracy. Best to look at other books before proceeding.

The starting loads above will get you going in the right direction.

I like Barnes idea of picking a powder to work with.

Load several powders with bullets, from a starting load to near max, then shoot each powder's loads into separte groups, one powder with varrying charges per group. The best accuracy powder shows the powder to use, then experiment with that powder to find the best loads. Their reasoning is that with fluctuations in temperatures, your accuracy will be effected less than with a powder that has only 1 charge that shoots well. Better to have a powder that shoots a lot of different charges into a small group.

With that in mine, H4895 (or Varget-same loads for starting) will probably show the best accuracy, along with BLC2. The stick Hodgdon powders are Extreme Powders ie: not effected by heat or cold and are first choice for me in this type of ctg. I use a lot of BLC2 as it's just so dang accurate in these rounds as well, from my 9.3x57, through 9.3x62 and .375/06IMP. Highests speeds and bug hole accurate.

Watch your pressures. Measure web expansion increases per charge. Look for even measurements around the case. The amount of expansion will depend on your actual chamber dimensions.

If you measure base, ie: rims, you must mark the rim at two adjacent spots then measure the rim at those 2 spots prior to firing, then again same spots after firing. The allowable increase for modern rounds is .001" - apparently. Use a 1" micrometer readable to .0001" as calipers are not accurate enough, not even the digital ones.

I would not allow more than .0005" and probably none at all. If you get expansion of the rim, that means you've exceeded the elasticity of the case - already too far as far as I'm concerned.

Seat your bullets out as far as possible without them jamming into the lands. The longer the OAL, the better potential for accuracy and the lower the speed and pressure for a given load. The more deeply seated, the higher the speed for any given round and the higher the pressure, but less accuracy potential.

In my 9.3x57, this amounted to 3 gr. of ball powder difference with .150" deeper seating, ie: 50gr. with deep seating gave the same speed as 53gr. with long seating. Note, even seated long, the bullets had considerable jump to the lands. If they jam the lands, this also can raise pressure. Be aware of how your rifle is chambered. When developing loads, record ALL the data - including OAL.

Take care and go slowly. The only data I have for that round is for the 9x56 Mann. They went to 46.0gr. 3031 with the Speer 250gr. at 2,205fps and 46.0gr. 3031 with the same bullet in the second rifle gave 2,088fps.

LC mil. '06 brass used in the first rifle - gave higher speeds, ie: higher pressures.
Necked up RP 7x57 brass used in the second rifle, lower pressures and speeds. The article I have compares 9x56 Mann. with the 9x57 Mauser in Stoeger's book. Mannlicher ammo running 245gr. at 2,160fps from 22" bl. and the 9x57 Mauser running 245gr. at 2,296fps from a 22 1/2" bl., just about what we figured. The author of that book I just quoted, Big Bore Rifles and Cartridges suggests .358 Winchester starting loads + 5% as the place to start.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217688 - 06/10/12 09:04 AM

Thanks very much for the great information,Daryl. Sorry I didn't reply sooner but I was on the road and just returned home. I had never heard of the Point Blank software before. I ran it using the same parameters you did, but I entered the .375 ballistic coefficient of the 250 grain Hornady soft point spitzer. I expected a more dramatic difference in trajectory than what it showed. The drop at 300 yards was 17.48" verses the 19.64" with the round nose. The remaining velocity at 300 yards was 1649 fps compared to 1468. There was a fairly substantial increase in the foot pounds of energy. The pointed bullet was 1510 compared to 1196. The velocity and energy differences are enough of an improvement that I'll try the pointed bullets. I was in Edmonton for a few days and picked up a box each of the 250 grain Hornady and 250 grain Speer spitzers to go with the 225 grain bullets I had.

I just weighed the two small ring mausers. Something must be wrong with my scale. According to it the longer barreled rifle reads 6 lbs 3 oz. The shorter barreled rifle weighs even less at 5 lbs 15 oz. I'll have to check the scale. They are light and with a steel butt plate I may not want a heavy load. I don't have any BLC2 or H4895 on hand but I have Varget and 3031. I'll give those a try. Thanks again.

Here are a few photos of the two small rings. It doesn't show in the photos, but the bolt knob is flat and checkered on the underside. Am I right in thinking that these were conversions from military. There must have been many done between the wars. Ay comments on them would be appreciated.






Edited by CptCurl (02/12/12 01:50 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217706 - 06/10/12 10:05 PM

Bob - are these from tradeex? Forend is a mite short for me, on the top one, while the bottom rifle, with the set triggers looks much better to my eye.

The ballistics are close due to the low initial velocity.
Spitzer -type bullets usually don't show any advantage on actual animals until you get past 300yards. 300yards is my max. range on the larger species of big game - self imposed - merely my own rules.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217713 - 07/10/12 01:46 AM

Yes, these were both from tradeex. The rifle with the DST is a bit better done all around. The blueing is better, everything including the shotgun style trigger guard is polished more. The bores were heavily leaded when they arrived. A lot of scrubbing and patches before they started to come out clean. Other than that the short forend stock has a few cracks, but nothing major. My shooting limits are about the same as yours, though with iron sights it would be around 150-200 depending on the rifle, sights, light, and how much I've practiced with it. Shooting longer distance would be saved for fun at the range.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217714 - 07/10/12 03:19 AM

Bob - about leading in the future - Wholesalesports in Calgary (and probably Edmonton as well) is where I mail ordered Kleen Bore brand "Lead Away" cloth and cleaning patches.

When they say, Lead Away, that is exactly what happend when you shove a patch down the bore. There is no need for bronze brushes or JB to try to get the lead out. "Lead Away" does it all.
The last time I bought this stuff, it came in small patcheds in a blister pack. This is the last of the previous purchase - large square cloth for cutting patches from. Too, a swipe across the front of a revolver's cylinder with a patch of this stuff removes all the baked-on lead. Incredible material - kind scary even, the way it works. Seems like magic after all those decades of scrubbing with solvents and brushes.Now, just a patch of material on a jag and the lead's gone.



--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Edited by CptCurl (02/12/12 01:50 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217718 - 07/10/12 04:09 AM

I picked up the 250 grain bullets at Wholesale in Edmonton a couple of days ago. I'll take a look for this product when I get back there next time. I tried the usual brass brushes and solvent first and when the patches kept coming out with lead I used a foaming bore cleaner. Ended up leaving the foam in overnight to get them clean.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217740 - 08/10/12 03:21 AM

You have slugged the bores, haven't you? some 9mm's run as small as .354" to .356".

As a side note, I just got my own 9mm back from my brother - .356 Winchester, in trade for my 9.3x57. We're both happy.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217779 - 09/10/12 06:35 AM

I'm surprised you traded off your 9.3x57. You had such good success with it.

I should have slugged the bores as soon as they arrived. The short forend rifle has measurements of .3545"/.3440" and the DST rifle is a very tight .3515"/.3400". What would I need to swadge the bullets down to? Should I be looking at two sizing dies to get down to the bore diameter? Thanks again.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217797 - 09/10/12 11:30 PM

Drawing or sizing the bullets down is the proper terminology, Bob. I found that out the same way.
Lee makes lead (& usable with jacketed) bullet sizing dies &, for about $30.00 each, will make you dies for sizing down the bullets to whatever size you need. This custom work was not mentioned on thier site last time I looked.
The best result with their dies is .003" per die, so to go down to .354",you'd need 2 dies - maybe. Since it's only .004", a single die might be all that's needed and there could be .0005" spring-back on that .004" reduction. The spring-back makes picking sizes a bit important, but know, a thou here or there is not important, as long as the rounds chamber easily and the bullets will slide into a fireformed case easily. If not, the necks are too tight or bullets too large for that rifle.

Lee has been doing this for a few nears now and has developed some experience making them for jacketed bullets thanks to Rod Halverson's (Idaho) insistance and experimentation. A local friend of mine reduces 220gr. 8mm's to .314" for his .303 and 200gr. .338's down to .330" for his 8x56R, both using a set of 3 Lee bullet sizing dies.

The DS rifle might need 2 dies to get down to .352" or .3515".

As to trading off my 9.3x57 - I'll be getting another - maybe a M146 this time so I can make around 2,275fps to 2,325fps with 286's. It's too great a round not to have one. I still have my 9.3x62 Oberndort and the .375/06IMP. The opportunity to get my M94.356 back from my brother could not be missed.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernBob
.224 member


Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 37
Loc: Northern Alberta
Re: 9x57 information [Re: DarylS]
      #217798 - 10/10/12 12:02 AM

Thanks for the advice,Daryl. I'll look into the Lee dies. I have an RCBS Ammo Master press and a sizing die that I use to go from .323 to .318 for a Sauer 8x57I that I've had for a few years. It worked fine with most bullets, but the Nosler Solid Base didn't work too well.

On another subject I bought a copy of Ken Howell's Custom Cartridges on the weekend. Has anyone tried the fire forming method he mentions using small charges of Bullseye powder and inert filler? He feels it does a better job of opening up the neck or fireforming brass.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26488
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: 9x57 information [Re: NorthernBob]
      #217803 - 10/10/12 03:31 AM

The only time I tried small charges of BullsEye was in forming .17AH from Hornets. I think it was 1.5gr, not sure, either with a bit of toilet paper or none, and fired upwards. The fellow who mentioned this method on the site, noted to not use any filler or pressures would skyrocket - in that case. Of course much depends on the ctg. case capacity and amount of powder used.

Since forming works so well in normal methods, that's what I use.

When necking up straight, then down in the FL die to postion the shoulder pefectly, there is little case movement in standard chambers and normal loads can be used.

Due to problems at the shoulder of the Hornet brass wanting to split if FForm pressures arne't high enough, I went back to using a normal load in the .17AH and bullets as fireforming for the Pac-Nor bl. were just as accurate as in formed brass. Same loads, too. 34fps slower when forming than in formed brass. I assume that was due to energy used up in bowing the brass out to fit the chamber.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 48 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  NitroX 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 12790

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved