Forums.NitroExpress.com

Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact NitroExpress.com: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD)

*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

You are not logged in. [Login]

Main Index · Search · Active Topics
New user · Who's Online · FAQ · Calendar

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Big Bore Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)

Handloader52
.224 member

Reged: 13/12/09
Posts: 40
Loc: Maryland, USA

How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD)
#171979 - 24/11/10 08:26 AM

How popular is the 416 Taylor among serious shooters and should it be built on a Mark X Mauser with a McMillan stock? Looking for candid feedback.

Post Extras:

pablo_mauser_66
.275 member

Reged: 01/03/07
Posts: 80
Loc: Australia, Sydney

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Handloader52]
#171981 - 24/11/10 09:09 AM

I would have said it wasn't that popular at all but in the last 2-3 years I have seen quite a few custom guns get built in OZ, it doesn't have the history of a 404J but its an easy build on a standard length action.

Post Extras:

gryphon
.450 member

Reged: 01/01/03
Posts: 5487
Loc: Sambar ground/Victoria/Austral...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: pablo_mauser_66]
#171982 - 24/11/10 09:39 AM

one of the sambar deer hunters here I know of has one built on a commercial 98 and swears by its hammer factor and accuracy

Post Extras:

FATBOY404
.400 member

Reged: 14/11/09
Posts: 1730
Loc: QLD

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: gryphon]
#171988 - 24/11/10 12:15 PM

PM 450 Ackley he has one.
I am sure he gets 2400 fps out of 400 grain Woodleigh's.
Very practical in my opinion and if I didn't like the history of the 404j it is what I would have built.

--------------------
"WHATEVER BLOWS YOUR HAIR BACK"

Post Extras:

tophet1
.400 member

Reged: 15/09/07
Posts: 1873
Loc: NSW, Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: FATBOY404]
#171992 - 24/11/10 12:51 PM

I had a couple of shots from one earlier this year. It was Mauser 98 in a Boyds Stock. I don't know if the stock design had anything to do with it but the recoil was savage and vile. The classic slap not a push.

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: tophet1]
#171994 - 24/11/10 01:48 PM

It's ballistics mirror, or rather can mirror .416 Rigby or .416 Reminton & therefore I feel the weight of the rifle should be in the 9 to 9 1/2 pound category with iron sights - IF full power loads are going to be used. Loaded down to just over .450/400 levels, the rifle could be a bit lighter, of course.

Whatever stock and barrel contour that needs to be used to make weight, use it - imho, of course.

Anymore, heavy kickers are not fun for me to shoot - I really like my 9.3x57.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

DoubleD
.400 member

Reged: 23/11/03
Posts: 2399
Loc: Retired in Oklahoma

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DarylS]
#172002 - 24/11/10 03:36 PM

I have a 404 Express made by Barnes before he connected with Johnson. Late 40's early 50's? The rifle is a .416 caliber...don't ask me why 404 Express. It predates the Chatfield Taylor. The only difference between this chambering and the Chatfield-Taylor, is the Taylor has a slightly smaller shoulder diameter. I mean slight perhaps .010.

The interest in this cartridge configuration goes way back....I think at one time the Taylor was being looked at to become a commercial loading....some else might be able to shed some light on that.

I have only used it on deer using Barnes 300 grain bullet. It is extremely accurate and pleasant to shoot.

It is built on a 98 Mauser.

--------------------
DD, Ret.

Post Extras:

ozhunter
.400 member

Reged: 18/08/04
Posts: 1692
Loc: Sydney, Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DoubleD]
#172012 - 24/11/10 07:37 PM

A very good round, but with the new 416Ruger, it will lose even more future users .

Post Extras:

Homer
.416 member

Reged: 07/04/09
Posts: 3081
Loc: Canberra, Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: ozhunter]
#172014 - 24/11/10 08:09 PM

G'Day Fella's,

Handloader 52, The whole reason for the .416 Chatfield-Taylor coming into being, was it's ability to operate in a .30-06 length magazine/action.
As Oz Hunter mentioned, now that the .416 Ruger is available, there really is no practical use for the .416 C-T.

Hope this helps

Doh!
Homer

--------------------
"Beware the Lolly Pop of Mediocrity,
Lick it Once and You Will Suck Forever"

Post Extras:

Dr_Deer
.300 member

Reged: 23/02/09
Posts: 212
Loc: Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Homer]
#172019 - 24/11/10 10:07 PM

Given the options for parent brass to neck up or down to .416 C-T are varied whilst the Ruger relies on only Hornady .416 or .375 Ruger brass at this stage, I'd say the .416 C-T will be around for a while yet

Post Extras:

Dr_Deer
.300 member

Reged: 23/02/09
Posts: 212
Loc: Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DoubleD]
#172020 - 24/11/10 10:11 PM

Quote:

The interest in this cartridge configuration goes way back....I think at one time the Taylor was being looked at to become a commercial loading....some else might be able to shed some light on that.

Commercially loaded by A Square, along with a few other obscurities
http://a-squareco.com/Ammunition.html

Whilst I've never heard of the ammo being available here, we can get the appropriately headstamped brass

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Dr_Deer]
#172030 - 25/11/10 02:23 AM

Ken Waters wrote that he had a Ruger factory chambered Ruger M77 in .416 Taylor in his possession - the gun he used for the artical and load developement, of course. Ruger failed to go ahead with those plans on the .416 Taylor - obviously.

Waters was also able to achieve 2,400fps with 400gr. bullets. This is quite remarkable, as Ken has always been quite conservative in his loads. He did note he had to use the slower burning IMR4320, compared to "Charlie's"( think it was C. Askin's) IMR3031.

John Whooters is one more hunter who used a .416 Taylor for Cape Buffalo. His loads were 2,400fps using IMR420 with the Colorado Custom(early Barnes, were't they?) pure lead cored, copper tubing jacketed 400's - spun closed for solids and rounded lead tipped for softs - all in .049" jacketes. At that time, you could get either .032" or .049" jackets for every bullet diameter made. Today, all the 'original' Barnes have only .032" jackets.

This is all IIRC. Sometimes the memory works well, sometimes it doesn't.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

szihn
.400 member

Reged: 24/06/07
Posts: 2113
Loc: Wind River Valley, Wyoming

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DarylS]
#172038 - 25/11/10 03:21 AM

I have built quite a few 416s in the last 25 years and in my opinion, the .416 Taylor is the very best of the .416s for an all around rifle one can get. It has no faults at all.

In the world of custom guns, the Taylor will give you excellent ballistics that are exactly equal to the original .416 Rigby load, in a standard GEW length 98 Mauser action.

What that means to the buyer is that for any given budget (let's say $2500) you will get a far less expensive action and far less expensive brass to start out with. So in the $2500amount, you will get more gunsmithing and/or better wood, and have more money to spend on other features than you would if you wanted to make a .416 bore rifle on a longer and more expensive action.
Anyone that thinks that a .416 bullet of 400 grains at 2350 FPS is “just not enough” has either never used one, or should step up to a larger bore size. The Old Rigby is never condemned by anyone that has used it, or even seen it used, and the Taylor is identical in its ballistics.

In short, at a given budget, you will get a nicer 416 caliber rifle in the Taylor then you will in about any other .416, and you give up absolutely nothing in doing it.

Post Extras:

hunter_angler
.300 member

Reged: 24/03/10
Posts: 104
Loc: Grand Marais, Michigan (home i...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: szihn]
#172043 - 25/11/10 06:03 AM

I have always been more of a rimmed cartridge (double/single/lever) guy (just old school I guess), but I have always been intrigued by the .416 Taylor.

First, just the fact that the much-maligned .458 WIN was improved by necking the case down to create a winner in .416 caliber, as Mr. Zihn has pointed out, matching the ballistics of one of the best all around African cartridges of all time, the Rigby, in a round that can fit in a shorter, handier action.

Second, being a lever aficionado, I would love some day to have a custom Browning BLR built in .416 Taylor or maybe the new .416 Ruger. That would be a modern levergun I would scope and use on virtually anything, anywhere on the planet.

Enough velocity to shoot relatively flat out to 200 yards, and enough power for dangerous game in a gun you can confidently and fully cycle without it ever leaving your shoulder.

Edited by hunter_angler (25/11/10 10:46 AM)

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: hunter_angler]
#172046 - 25/11/10 06:57 AM

I've got both a 416 Taylor and a 416 Ruger.
They both have the same make of barrel, the same specs, twist, length etc. The barrels are even consecutively serial numbered, one is stainless (Taylor) and the Ruger barrel is Chrome-moly. I can get near enough to 2400 in the Taylor using RE 15, but can't get anywhere near 2400 in the Ruger without flattening primers. Apparently the makers CM barrels are not lapped, whereas the stainless ones are, which would make me think that the stainless barrel is very slightly larger and smoother, allowing a greater velocity.
I built both to compare them against one another, have'nt had the Ruger long enough to form a solid opinion yet, but it will have to be good to beat a 416 Taylor in my humble opinion.

David.

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: hunter_angler]
#172047 - 25/11/10 07:03 AM

Quote:

Second, being a lever aficionado, I would love some day to have a custom Browning BLR built in .416 Taylor or maybe the new .416 Ruger. That would be a modern levergun I would scope and use on virtually anything, anywhere on the planet.

A gunsmith mate of mine has anready built 3 Browning BLR's in 416 Ruger, he starts with a 300 Win Mag and using the takedown feature, rebarrels to 416 Ruger, no other modifications at all. Feeds great, they shoot really well, other than recoil being a bit heavy.
He now has an engineering firm making the "locking recess" part to then have a number of barrels already chambered and headspaced, making it a true switch barrel affair.

David.

Post Extras:

hunter_angler
.300 member

Reged: 24/03/10
Posts: 104
Loc: Grand Marais, Michigan (home i...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172050 - 25/11/10 07:21 AM

Thanks for the info, David.

I know some BLRs and even BARs have been built in .416 Taylor as well, again with the longer (relatively speaking) action in .300 WIN Mag as the starting point.

I am sure you would need to add a very good recoil pad, and maybe some extra weight and porting too as the BLR is a relatively light gun. Then again, the quick handling characteristics are part of the appeal.

It would be cool to have a takedown with a two barrel set in .300 + .416!

Just day dreamin' I guess...

Jeff.

--------------------
old school rimmy

Edited by hunter_angler (25/11/10 07:27 AM)

Post Extras:

Dr_Deer
.300 member

Reged: 23/02/09
Posts: 212
Loc: Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172063 - 25/11/10 11:57 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Second, being a lever aficionado, I would love some day to have a custom Browning BLR built in .416 Taylor or maybe the new .416 Ruger. That would be a modern levergun I would scope and use on virtually anything, anywhere on the planet.

A gunsmith mate of mine has anready built 3 Browning BLR's in 416 Ruger, he starts with a 300 Win Mag and using the takedown feature, rebarrels to 416 Ruger, no other modifications at all. Feeds great, they shoot really well, other than recoil being a bit heavy.
He now has an engineering firm making the "locking recess" part to then have a number of barrels already chambered and headspaced, making it a true switch barrel affair.

David.

David,

Good to know someone is cornering this market, any chance of naming the 'smith (by PM if you wish)?

It would also be interesting to know if they went the whole hog and are producing enlarged lever loops for "gloved hands" aka those with big hands who do not fancy having them crushed in the manner that Marlin .45/70's with full house loads are notorious for.

Post Extras:

hunter_angler
.300 member

Reged: 24/03/10
Posts: 104
Loc: Grand Marais, Michigan (home i...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Dr_Deer]
#172065 - 25/11/10 01:05 PM

In the USA I believe Z-Hat has done the BLR conversions.

http://www.z-hat.com/

DoubleTap also loads .416 Taylor, including 450 grain Woodleighs at 2250 fps.

http://www.doubletapammo.com/php/catalog/index.php?cPath=21_61

Nice, huh?

--------------------
old school rimmy

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: hunter_angler]
#172076 - 25/11/10 06:54 PM

Dr. Deer,
I'm happy to name the 'smith, he won't mind.
It's Jim Kent, Buffalo Gunsmithing in Toowoomba.
I won't put his phone number on here, but if anyone wants it, I'm happy to PM it to them.

The enlarged lever might be a bit harder on a BLR, from a trigger and manufacturing point of view I would expect.

Regards,
David.

Post Extras:

CptCurl
.450 member

Reged: 01/05/04
Posts: 5273
Loc: Fincastle, Botetourt County, V...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172089 - 25/11/10 10:35 PM

Quote:

I've got both a 416 Taylor and a 416 Ruger.
They both have the same make of barrel, the same specs, twist, length etc. The barrels are even consecutively serial numbered, one is stainless (Taylor) and the Ruger barrel is Chrome-moly. I can get near enough to 2400 in the Taylor using RE 15, but can't get anywhere near 2400 in the Ruger without flattening primers. Apparently the makers CM barrels are not lapped, whereas the stainless ones are, which would make me think that the stainless barrel is very slightly larger and smoother, allowing a greater velocity.
I built both to compare them against one another, have'nt had the Ruger long enough to form a solid opinion yet, but it will have to be good to beat a 416 Taylor in my humble opinion.

David.

David, it's interesting to hear your first-hand comparison of these two cartridges. Can you or anybody tell us how the case capacity compares between the .416 Taylor and the .416 Ruger? Also, in terms of loading one or the other, how do powder charges compare?

What actions are your two rifles on?

Thanks,
Curl

--------------------
RoscoeStephenson.com

YOUR DOUBLE RIFLE IS YOUR BEST FRIEND.

Post Extras:

SharpsNitro
.375 member

Reged: 12/08/08
Posts: 729
Loc: Arizona, USA

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: CptCurl]
#172098 - 26/11/10 03:10 AM

The case capacities on www.ammoguide.com list them as being 86.0gr water for the Taylor and 95.7gr water for the Ruger. This sounds reasonable given the larger body diameter of the Ruger.

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: SharpsNitro]
#172100 - 26/11/10 04:36 AM

Interesting - the Ruger Capacity is then virtually identical to my .450/.458 Alaskan. Of course, the .348 case is somewhat stronger.

I am also somewhat miffed as to why David's Ruger won't match the smaller cased Taylor.

Perhaps a different powder would work? It is possible that Re#15 is too fast burning for the Ruger's case, but shouldn't be that much too fast. The larger the capacity for any given bore size, the slower the powder that must be used.

I don't think the difference is whether it's polished or not - my .375/06 IMP has a fairly heavy taper 416 stainless, certainly not polished and rough'ern a cob inside - it copper fouls badly, but - does manage to beat chronographed factory .375H&H ballistics, so it's a 'fast' barrel. It also puts 270gr. TSX's into touching cloverleafs virtually every three shots - at 2,700fps.(2,770fps is max) 80gr., capacity to the top of the neck.

Some barrels are slow - - - some are fast. Then, there's everything in between.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DarylS]
#172107 - 26/11/10 08:02 AM

Curl,
My 416 Taylor is a Classic stainless Win M70 and the Ruger is an old P14, quite heavily modified.
At one stage I tried a load of AR 2208 (Varget) in the Ruger and got a bit closer, but still not up to Taylor velocities. I'm thinking of trying a bit slower powder again, maybe even AR 2209 (H 4350) but I think it will be too slow perhaps. I've also just got a tin of RE 17, it might be just what I need, also have some VV N540 as well.
The Ruger hasn't fired a lot yet, so it needs a lot more work. I've got the page of load data from Hornady, so need to have a better read of that to see what they found.
A fellow shooter at Dalby has a 338-06 with a Douglas barrel which is a really slow barrel, he has trouble getting to the 3000 ft lb limit for Group 1, mine has a Lilja barrel and gets a lot higher velocities, and Fatboy has one with a MADDCO barrel that seems quite a deal faster again. (Although his is built on a pipe gun!)

All very interesting.

Regards,
David.

Post Extras:

Dr_Deer
.300 member

Reged: 23/02/09
Posts: 212
Loc: Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172120 - 26/11/10 01:30 PM

Quote:

Dr. Deer,
I'm happy to name the 'smith, he won't mind.
It's Jim Kent, Buffalo Gunsmithing in Toowoomba.
I won't put his phone number on here, but if anyone wants it, I'm happy to PM it to them.

The enlarged lever might be a bit harder on a BLR, from a trigger and manufacturing point of view I would expect.

Regards,
David.

Thanks mate.

With the integrated trigger in the lever it would be a complex exercise but a worthwhile one in my mind, as would be a drop box mag giving it a profile looking like a bastard son of a 1895 (which is what they are anyway

)

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Dr_Deer]
#172142 - 27/11/10 04:14 AM

Quote:

A fellow shooter at Dalby has a 338-06 with a Douglas barrel which is a really slow barrel, he has trouble getting to the 3000 ft lb limit for Group 1, mine has a Lilja barrel and gets a lot higher velocities, and Fatboy has one with a MADDCO barrel that seems quite a deal faster again. (Although his is built on a pipe gun!)

All very interesting.

Regards,
David.

Now that seems really "slow".

Is that 3,000fpe required at 100 yards or meters - not the muzzle?

The reason I ask, is that my little weak actioned 9.3x57, a M94/96 Husky, gets over 3,000fpe at easily less than 50,000psi (.0005" case web expansion from sized) Even the little 232gr. & moderate load with 285gr. almost makes 3,100fpe.

2,350fps with a 250gr. will make 3,066fpe, same fpe as a 285gr. at 2,200fps or 232gr. at 2,450fps.

My 'slow' by accurate .30/06 with 24" bl., which was a Model 30 Remington ie: sporter P-14 with P-17 bolt and new barrel, was a full 150fps slower than any load in Speer's manual at maximum pressures. I re-chambered it to .300 Winchester mag, hoping to get .300 H&H ballistics from the 'slow' barrel, only to find it turned into a quite fast barrel that would no longer shoot 180gr. bullets, but loved 165's. The FailSafes ran 3/4" at 3,265fps with 75.0gr. IMR4831, while the same load with Nosler Partitions ran 1/2" to 3/4" at 3,365fps. I used Hodgdon data, starting low and worked to a useable max.
Because it was quite accurate before the re-chamber, I can not understand the difference re-chambering made.

This has little or nothign to do with the .416 Taylor, but might explain something about slow and fast barrels, maybe not. They are a world unto their own.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

hunter_angler
.300 member

Reged: 24/03/10
Posts: 104
Loc: Grand Marais, Michigan (home i...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: Dr_Deer]
#172144 - 27/11/10 06:14 AM

Quote:

like a bastard son of a 1895 (which is what they are anyway )

Mr. Deer:

as you are probably aware there are other Leverites now throating the barrels of their Winny 95s and loading .405 WIN with 400 grain bullets to near .450/400 ballistics. Or alternatively necking the .30-06 case up to .411 Hawk.

Not quite the oomph of the .416 Taylor, but old school options for a dangerous game levergun. And the side benefit is you will feel like Teddy Roosevelt on safari...

--------------------
old school rimmy

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: hunter_angler]
#172145 - 27/11/10 08:20 AM

Daryl,
That's 3000 ft/lb at the muzzle. One of the events we shoot requires a minimum of 0.330" bullet diameter, min of 165 grain bullet weight and a minimum of 3000 ft/lb at the muzzle.
The Douglas barreled rifle in question is a LH Rem 700, the owner reckons he can only get near the ME limit with 275 grain Speer's and a compressed load of "X" powder.
Yet Fatboy and myself can get easily over the limit without trying.
On a real sidetrack to the original post, the 338 Federal (with handloads) is really struggling as well.

I suppose all of this is what keeps all of us buying tins of powder and different packets of bullets.

David

Post Extras:

mauserand9mm
.400 member

Reged: 03/09/09
Posts: 1006
Loc: Queensland, Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172149 - 27/11/10 10:55 AM

450_Ackley,

Actually I think the minimum for Group 1 is 2900 ft/lb.

By the way, have you seen any photos from the State Titles up at Gladstone? I was only there on the Saturday (I was on position 9 I think, and didn't do so well - shooting 8 shots on someone elses target during one event didn't help either).

Post Extras:

szihn
.400 member

Reged: 24/06/07
Posts: 2113
Loc: Wind River Valley, Wyoming

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: mauserand9mm]
#172150 - 27/11/10 11:31 AM

Please explane for us here in the USA what "group #1 and Group #2" are.

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: szihn]
#172165 - 27/11/10 07:31 PM

Mauser and 9mm,
Yep, I stand corrected, you are right, the old limit a few years ago was indeed 3000 ft lb, it's now 2900, If I remember correctly, they changed it because there was a calibre that people were shooting, but loading the crap out of it to make the limit, not safe, so they dropped it 100 ft/lb.
Greg sent through the results spreadsheet, but I haven't seen any photos yet, other than the ones Kayleen took.
I've you've got some photos, please start a post and put them on.
I was on position number 3 at Gladstone, but I suppose you have worked that out by now.

szihn, We shoot target events over here in the Big Game Rifle Club. The groups relate to power factors, bore diameters etc.
Very briefly -
Group 1 Nitro Express, min 0.330" bore dia, min 165 grn bullet weight, min 2900 ft/lb muzzle energy. Common calibres include 338-06, 9.3 x 62, 35 Whelen, 375 H&H.

Group 2 Nitro Express, min 0.400" bore dia, min 400 grn bullet weight, min 3900 ft/lb muzzle energy. Common calibres include 458 win Mag, 458 Lott, 404 Jeffery, 416 Taylor and of course the superb 450 Ackley Mag!!

Group 3 Nitro Express, min 0.485" bore dia, min 525 grn bullet weight, min 5300 ft/lb muzzle energy. Common calibres include 500 Jeffery, 500 Nitro 3" and sometimes 505 Gibbs, 500 A-Square.

We have a lot of other events to cater for pretty much every calibre you can think of, except rimfires.

Regards,
David.

Post Extras:

CptCurl
.450 member

Reged: 01/05/04
Posts: 5273
Loc: Fincastle, Botetourt County, V...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: szihn]
#172168 - 27/11/10 11:04 PM

Quote:

Please explane for us here in the USA what "group #1 and Group #2" are.

Steve,

Here is a link to the Big Game Rifle Club competition rules here on NE.com, which will lend more explanation:

http://forums.nitroexpress.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=16543

BTW, you can become an international member of the BGRC if you are interested. You may find it a bit difficult to travel to the shooting events, but the club has a provision for submitting your targets by mail if you want to join the competition.

Curl

--------------------
RoscoeStephenson.com

YOUR DOUBLE RIFLE IS YOUR BEST FRIEND.

Post Extras:

szihn
.400 member

Reged: 24/06/07
Posts: 2113
Loc: Wind River Valley, Wyoming

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: CptCurl]
#172174 - 28/11/10 02:06 AM

Thanks CptCurl, that link explanes it all very well.

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: szihn]
#172192 - 28/11/10 05:54 AM

David - an interesting grouping of categories for sure. Now, that contest would be something to watch, let alone participate in.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

450_Ackley
.375 member

Reged: 06/02/03
Posts: 583
Loc: Darling Downs, Qld Australia

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: DarylS]
#172196 - 28/11/10 06:36 AM

Daryl,
It sure is interesting. The State shoots run for 2 days, where we would end up shooting about 12-13 events, by the end of the second day, it's starting to pay a toll. And of course Group 3 is always last, just to make it fun.

David.

Post Extras:

DarylS
.700 member

Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26533
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172197 - 28/11/10 07:25 AM

I couldn't even compete in group 2 at the start, let alone group 3 at the end of it all. WOW!

My little Husky 9.3 would work in group 1 though, quite easily.

If it wasn't for bullet diameter & weight, the .375/06IMP would make group 2. It isn't a lot of fun for me to shoot, either - not any more, that is.

--------------------
Daryl

"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V

Post Extras:

mehulkamdar
.416 member

Reged: 09/01/04
Posts: 3688
Loc: State of Ill-Annoy USA.

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: szihn]
#172216 - 28/11/10 11:30 AM

Steve,

They have a US match in Lodi WI twice a year. As you know, I'm in the process of moving out of Chicago, but this is a great match. If you're interested in attending one of the two days (one is in July and the other in October) next year, maybe we could plan to drive there. I know that Ka'imiloa and Mrs Ka'imiloa are planning to go sometime - you'll like the crowd. Some great people there and Ernie and Gerri Stallman of Badger Barrels are the organizers. I'd like to take my little girl along and slowly get her interested in shooting, and later in hunting.

Good hunting, my friend!

--------------------
The Ark was made by amateurs. Experts built the Titanic.

Mehul Kamdar

Post Extras:

Con
.333 member

Reged: 24/05/04
Posts: 261
Loc: Victoria

Re: How popular is the 416 Taylor? (MD) [Re: 450_Ackley]
#172434 - 01/12/10 05:59 AM

Quote:

Apparently the makers CM barrels are not lapped, whereas the stainless ones are, which would make me think that the stainless barrel is very slightly larger and smoother, allowing a greater velocity.

David,
Have you slugged the barrels for size ... slightly larger may not be so slightly. There are two local manufacturers prone to making the odd undersized barrel.
Cheers...
Con

Post Extras:

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)

Extra information

0 registered and 37 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 14920

Jump to

NitroExpress.com

Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact