Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact
NitroExpress.com: Are Iron Sights Obsolete?

View recent messages : 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days | 60 days | More Smilies


*** Enjoy NitroExpress.com? Participate and join in. ***

Shooting & Reloading - Mausers, Big Bores and others >> Rifles

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Are Iron Sights Obsolete?
      #380510 - 01/11/23 01:54 AM

https://www.fieldandstream.com/guns/iron-sights-obsolete-hunting/

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
szihn
.400 member


Reged: 24/06/07
Posts: 2112
Loc: Wind River Valley, Wyoming
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380521 - 01/11/23 02:00 PM

Nope.
I use irons probably about 980% of the time for my hunts.
I bring home the meat most times too, so it doesn't seem to hurt me at all.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: szihn]
      #380522 - 01/11/23 02:09 PM

That's all my 1886 .45/70, my 1876 .50/95 and all my muzzleloaders have.

I placed in the top 10 of a BP ctg. match at Rendezvous with my 14 bore rifle, but they were only shooting to 300yards that year.

That was my moose rifle for a few years - it STAGGERS them.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380526 - 01/11/23 06:06 PM

A lot of traditional double rifles still of course use open sights.

Handguns are also pretty much standard with open sights.

Shotguns still have a front head.

If optics are so essential, why don't most shotguns have a red dot sight?

One thing I like about the BGRC competitions is the use of open sights. Optics are penalised when permitted, in most but a few competitions. There is an argument currently that there is a need to attract younger members and competitors, and scopes shouldn't be penalised else those with youthful better eyes won't compete? I think it possibly changes the BGRC into a club originally designed to celebrate vintage rifles, into another ho hum paper target shooting comps. A lot won't have a scope 3x power or less anyway. A 16x variable is needed nowadays!

Having said that, unless I get in more practice I was thinking next time I'll use my scopes. Getting a score penalty is better than missing the longer range - 100 yards - targets completely too many times. More proactive, ammo I've used before, and enough rounds, might be a bigger improvement though.

I like the fact open sights are required. Not sure just adding a scope will attract youthful shooters.i think more of the "dangerous game" adhoc shoots, especially "practical" action shoots, and charging, and running targets would be far more attractive. These are any sights already. \

All of my double rifles have open sights. Except the Tikka/Valmet U/O with its near useless tiny flip up rear sight. Even the combination barrels have a low powered scope. My military bolt actions all gave open sights. My Martinis. A Lithgow .22 RF single shot. The safecquerns never used.

I think it should be mandatory for any new shooter to learn using open sights, not start with optics. IMO. Of course lesser eyesight forces some to for go open sights.

When younger I could shoot very well with my open sights. With good eyesight it merely a skill to learn.

No doubt the smartphone glued Creedmoor obsessed generation disagrees.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380528 - 01/11/23 07:34 PM

In the past I shoot often game with rifles only equipped with iron sights, unfortunately as I get older and now wear glasses, I have great difficulty shooting accurately with such sights. A diopter has made things easier, but I only have one hunting rifle that is equipped with it, and besides, such sights are not common among European hunters.

When it comes to shoot at longer range or when you have to shoot under poor conditions, for example under poor light conditions or in the dense bush, a scope is already an advantage and should no longer be missed nowadays. That's why nowadays you should not work without the technology if this is available. For these reasons I also have a scope on my rifles caliber 460 WBY-Magnum and 500 Schüler. It's about hunting and shooting game under the best conditions, and not just about demonstrating your skills.

As far as the use of weapons without iron sights is concerned, as it is very often or almost exclusively the case nowadays, hunters have to consider that carefully. If, under special circumstances, you need to shoot game at short range, iron sights are often very advantageous. For these reasons, it is a must for a hunter in Africa to always use a weapon that also has iron sights, be it in all cases when hunting big game, but even if you are just hunting plain game, because you can also encounter something dangerous. Defending yourself against an attack without iron sights is a very uncertain and dangerous matter.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380529 - 01/11/23 09:24 PM

Quote:



When it comes to shoot at longer range or when you have to shoot under poor conditions, for example under poor light conditions or in the dense bush, a scope is already an advantage and should no longer be missed nowadays. That's why nowadays you should not work without the technology if this is available. For these reasons I also have a scope on my rifles caliber 460 WBY-Magnum and 500 Schüler. It's about hunting and shooting game under the best conditions, and not just about demonstrating your skills.

As far as the use of weapons without iron sights is concerned, as it is very often or almost exclusively the case nowadays, hunters have to consider that carefully. If, under special circumstances, you need to shoot game at short range, iron sights are often very advantageous. For these reasons, it is a must for a hunter in Africa to always use a weapon that also has iron sights, be it in all cases when hunting big game, but even if you are just hunting plain game, because you can also encounter something dangerous. Defending yourself against an attack without iron sights is a very uncertain and dangerous matter.




A reason good QD mounts are standard for most scoped DG rifles.

I question how many people with scoped DG rifles have ever used the rifle's open sights?

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380532 - 02/11/23 12:40 AM

I shot a few of DG using only the open sights, but it rarely happened.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380534 - 02/11/23 04:48 AM

An alternative is the diopter for people who can no longer see so well.

In this case a Rigby-style Diopter on my rifle caliber 500 Schüler.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380536 - 02/11/23 05:10 AM

Quote:

..

A reason good QD mounts are standard for most scoped DG rifles.

...




As far as a good scope mount is concerned, on the scope of my rifle caliber 500 Schüler you can see the traces of what due to the recoil happens when a scope is not particularly solidly anchored. The gunsmith built the weapon very nicely, but when it came to scope, he did not take a few practical points into account. A few tries were necessary on my part and three scope mounts before I found the right one.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sharps4590
.333 member


Reged: 09/03/16
Posts: 250
Loc: Missouri Ozarks
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380537 - 02/11/23 05:23 AM

I still use open sights just about exclusively, at 70 years old and with corrective lenses. I have one, centerfire rifle with a scope on it just because I had the scope and that was the only rifle I had with bases and rings.

I can still shoot 2 inch groups with revolvers/pistols at 25 yards.
I can still shoot 1 inch groups with open sighted rifles at 50 yards. (just did, two days ago)
With aperture sights 2 inches at 100 yards is pretty normal.

All with accurate firearms, benched and bagged, obviously.

I haven't shot a big game animal with a scoped rifle in over 30 years.

When I can no longer see to use open sights, I'll go to a scope.

--------------------
Jesus said, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me." John14:6


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: sharps4590]
      #380538 - 02/11/23 05:57 AM

As I wrote above, it's not just about the eyesight, but that a rifle scope allows shots under conditions that are not possible with open sights. We don't need to talk about shooting at longer range, but a rifle scope is also of great help when there are poor light or visibility conditions. At night you need a scope in all cases, but even in dense bushes or forests a shot can be placed much better with that than with open sights. With a scope you can focus through the dense vegetation than looking at a green wall through the open sights. This is my personal experience, especially when it comes to buffalo hunting. I could not have shot under good conditions two thirds of my buffalos with open sights.

As far as hunting at night is concerned, we often do that in Europe when we hunt wild boars, but in Africa it can also happen under special conditions. I shot an elephant, a crop raider in the middle of the night, and something like that was only possible with an optic. That was the first thing the PH asked me, if I had with me a rifle with a scope.

Edited by grandveneur (02/11/23 06:17 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380539 - 02/11/23 09:21 AM

Everything you say is correct, grandveneur, however I hold same as John, new shooters should be taught to shoot open sights - first.
An air rifle is very good for this 'early' teaching.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sharps4590
.333 member


Reged: 09/03/16
Posts: 250
Loc: Missouri Ozarks
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380541 - 02/11/23 10:45 AM

Hunt at night here and you'll end up in jail.

I never have taken questionable shots, with or without a scope. One could call me very patient and particular. As with szihn, the game always comes home whether flintlock, single shot, double rifle or repeater.

You hunt with a scope, fine, I'm glad for you. Your wants apparently warrant using a scope vastly more than mine. I neither need nor want one, not yet. I used to use one but, it was too easy. Shots that could easily be made with a scope were often impossible with open or aperture sights and, that's fine with me, I don't hunt for "easy", I hunt for the challenge. I WANT it difficult, it's vastly more rewarding, for me. I simply don't take those shots or ponder them later. If it's too dark for open sights I wait till later in the day or don't go. If it's evening, I simply walk back to my house. Tomorrow's another day and if I'm here, great. If not, I bet Heaven is even better than I imagine!!

My days of travelling to hunt are over. Small game and whitetail here on our property satisfy any urges I have to kill something or, there's wild boar down the road a piece.

I might have been on my last hunt. The fire burns pretty dim these days but, for the better part of 60 years it was nearly all consuming.

I agree with Daryl and others, new shooters should become proficient with open sights before ever being allowed a scope and, learning with an open sighted flintlock would be better yet. They would REALLY learn how to shoot.

So no, they aren't obsolete. People simply don't take the time to learn to use them, become proficient with them and STAY proficient with them. Were I still shooting 1000 yards Hi Power competitively I'd assuredly use a scope. For hunting, not yet.

--------------------
Jesus said, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me." John14:6

Edited by sharps4590 (02/11/23 10:50 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fjrdoc
.300 member


Reged: 20/05/22
Posts: 177
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: sharps4590]
      #380542 - 02/11/23 12:40 PM

Well put sharps. We are kindred spirits.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: fjrdoc]
      #380544 - 02/11/23 02:45 PM

At the eye doc right now. I only have reading glasses and rarely use them. Last time 6-6 or 20-20 vision. Hopefully still.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380546 - 02/11/23 05:24 PM

Quote:

At the eye doc right now. I only have reading glasses and rarely use them. Last time 6-6 or 20-20 vision. Hopefully still.




Still good. Eighteen months before the next appointment.

Acscooevos certainly useful for lesser light, dawn, dusk, night, Shooting in a foresr or a herd, a scope is very useful.

Lots of different people, lots of different hunting scenarios, places, types of game. I think hunting a sambar is far different to stand hunting a whitetail. Or hunting a boar from a hochsitz at midnight.

Of course asking this question on the NE forums gets very different answers than some plastic rifle "tactical" forum or one saturated with Creedmoor buyers.

On some of those forums, the guys probably don't know how to use open sights.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380548 - 02/11/23 05:44 PM

Quote:

Everything you say is correct, grandveneur, however I hold same as John, new shooters should be taught to shoot open sights - first.
An air rifle is very good for this 'early' teaching.




I absolutely agree with that.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.416 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 4917
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380549 - 02/11/23 05:52 PM

I still use open and peep sights but nowhere near as I use to, mainly due to aging eyes. I have used scopes for many years and yes in low light, distance or in some vegetation they are an advantage. Also with ageing eyes I find I am using 4 and 6 power settings for 200mt or longer shots more. Never really used 4 power for much. Just think 4 power makes something at 400mts look like it is at 100mts.

I agree with John, Daryl and others that shooters should learn to use and become proficient with open sights first. Then learn to use scopes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: sharps4590]
      #380551 - 02/11/23 06:37 PM

As far as hunting at night is concerned, it has become a must in our countries due to the nuisance that wild boars represent. In some areas we even have permission to hunt with light sources and even use light amplifiers. Nobody goes to the jail there, rather you have problems if you don't follow the authorities prescribed shooting plan of wild boars.

It is absolutely true that you learn to shoot first by practicing with air rifles or small-caliber weapons and using open sights. Whether one should also practice with muzzle-loaders is open to debate.

Hunting is not just shooting at game with anything, but killing wild animals in order to prey on them, doing so as perfectly and, in particular, with as little agony as possible. To do this, we should use the best technology available to us today and not use tools that come from past times. When hunting, we should not play but work, and this is always done with the best tools available. I don't need to write what I think about hunting with bow and arrows, crossbow or muzzle loaders.

The same applies to some extent when shooting with open sights by hunting. There are certainly hunts where something like this is perfekt. I am thinking of driven hunts or, to some extent, big game hunting if the distances and the field allow it, but you should not force it. If things get difficult, modern technology should be used. The game is a creature and not our toy.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380552 - 02/11/23 07:42 PM

Hunting is a sport not work.

Fair chase is about limiting oneself to provide a challenge and give the prey some chance of escape.

Hunting may also be part of wildlife population management.

Professional hunting, commercial hunting is a different thing.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380553 - 02/11/23 07:50 PM

Quote:



Hunting is a sport not work.

...




We have already discussed this on several forums, taking into account that in our countries, especially Germany, it is not easy to become a hunter.

We have come to the conclusion that hunting can be a passion, like a work can also be, but neither a hobby nor a sport.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380557 - 02/11/23 10:06 PM


Open sights are not the way to go for accuracy. Having done the trip from open to peep to scope to red dot to thermal. In pistols, rifles and shotties.
Practice is the only way with more practice on top of more practice.
Alot of hunting sporter firearms come without sights of any sort.
F Class shooters have a saying to the TR peep sight shooters you aim for the barn door we pick the lock through the key hole.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380560 - 03/11/23 03:30 AM

Quote:

At the eye doc right now. I only have reading glasses and rarely use them. Last time 6-6 or 20-20 vision. Hopefully still.




I taped my daughter's rifle's scope at 4X. She then proceeded to shoot a 5 shot, 1 1/2" group at 100 meters elbow resting on the bench, no other rest. No bags. The rifle shot a 1 1/2", 5 shot group for me, using the BR and sand bags. LOL She doesn't need glasses.

From age 42, until just 10 or 11 years ago, just over age 61, my vision was correctable to 20-20.

The last 3 times I have had testing and got glasses, it was correctable to 20-15, which is a LOT better.

Good luck with your appointment.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? *DELETED* [Re: DarylS]
      #380571 - 03/11/23 08:25 AM

Post deleted by grandveneur

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380572 - 03/11/23 01:26 PM

With enough kinetic energy and Hydro shock the accuracy issue is not so important. 1oz to 1.5oz of lead doing 2,000 to 2500 FPS pushes most animals backwards no matter what speed they are doing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sharps4590
.333 member


Reged: 09/03/16
Posts: 250
Loc: Missouri Ozarks
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Bindi2]
      #380592 - 04/11/23 12:21 AM

The middle of the Ozarks is not Germany and yes, hunting IS a sport and the challenge is very much a part of it. You embrace technology, I eschew it for sport hunting. Perhaps I would not for animal control but, that isn't hunting, that's the high side of just killing. I've taken several head of big game with flintlocks ranging from finely crafted, reproduction Jaegers to the same kind of crafted American long rifles and probably more squirrels with my 36 cal., Southern Mountain flintlock than my old scoped CZ 22. 78 in one year, 75 of which were head shots. I'd say that's a pretty good average.

In 60+ years of hunting I have had the misfortune to lose one whitetail but, I did find it later. It still bothers me. I've seen more lost by hunters using scoped rifles.

I won't write the obvious about those with beliefs of superiority.

--------------------
Jesus said, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me." John14:6

Edited by sharps4590 (04/11/23 10:25 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fjrdoc
.300 member


Reged: 20/05/22
Posts: 177
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: sharps4590]
      #380595 - 04/11/23 05:27 AM

We all have options when it comes to hunting. Archery hunters can choose traditional recurve, compound or crossbows. Firearm hunters can choose traditional muzzleloaders, inlines, handguns, shotguns and rifles.
I have always been more of a traditionalist when it comes to rifle hunting. I hunt with a 45 caliber Pennsylvania long rifle that I made on my own. I have yet killed a deer with it but I'm trying. I own a variety of pre-war vintage hunting rifles. All of these rifles sport aperture sights. I couldn't ever bring myself to drill and tap these original receivers. That's the way I like to hunt and I will continue until my eyes dictate the use of opitics.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lancaster
.470 member


Reged: 06/05/08
Posts: 8731
Loc: There's a lighthouse in the mi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: fjrdoc]
      #380627 - 04/11/23 11:25 PM

maybe its obsolete but a gun without looks like a woman without breast.
if you like this?

--------------------
Norwegian hunter misses moose, shoots man on toilet
.
bringing civilisation to the barbarians


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: lancaster]
      #380635 - 05/11/23 06:24 AM

There are weapons that were always designed without iron sights and that definitely have a certain style.

Here for example a Lloyd rifle caliber 7mm rem mag, a rifle specifically designed for deer hunting in Scotland.



http://gavingardiner.com/BidCat/detail.asp?SaleRef=0007&LotRef=5


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380649 - 05/11/23 11:42 AM


Thats not flat chested


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Bindi2]
      #380652 - 05/11/23 07:21 PM

My .30-06 currently has no open sights. I removed the hooded front sight and the flip up rear sight in the past. Now want to find them again and put back on. Or replace.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380655 - 05/11/23 10:02 PM


6 to 24x40 scope works well


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: lancaster]
      #380658 - 05/11/23 10:38 PM

Quote:

maybe its obsolete but a gun without looks like a woman without breast.
if you like this?




Like female breasts without nipples ...

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lancaster
.470 member


Reged: 06/05/08
Posts: 8731
Loc: There's a lighthouse in the mi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380661 - 06/11/23 03:47 AM

Quote:

There are weapons that were always designed without iron sights and that definitely have a certain style.

Here for example a Lloyd rifle caliber 7mm rem mag, a rifle specifically designed for deer hunting in Scotland.



http://gavingardiner.com/BidCat/detail.asp?SaleRef=0007&LotRef=5




despite don't like guns without iron sights I have to admit this is one of the best looking ever seen

--------------------
Norwegian hunter misses moose, shoots man on toilet
.
bringing civilisation to the barbarians


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: lancaster]
      #380665 - 06/11/23 05:51 AM

For me, a hunting rifle has normally open sights. However, every shooters, and especially long range shooters, knows that a free-swinging barrel is better in terms of precision.

David Lloyd's rifles were primarily intended for long range shooting at deers and were also zeroed in up to 400 yards, according to the customer's wishes. Strangely, Lloyd only used scopes with fixed magnification and these 4x or 6x, which is paradoxical for rifles that were intended for long range shooting. In addition, the scopes were delivered with the turrets removed, which makes subsequent regulation with another ammunition very difficult. It was a very personal concept from the manufacturer. The rifles were built from the fifties until supposedly the early nineties. According to him, it should be very robust rifles for demanding deer hunters in the highlands. By the way, David Lloyd is also the designer of the cartridge that was later called 244 H&H Magnum.

Since the ammunition with which the rifle above was regulated was not known, it was difficult to first find a suitable load and then to gain with tools an access to the control of the scope. We finally succeeded, and the rifle also shoots very accurate.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380669 - 06/11/23 11:28 AM

Interesting concepts - all.

Not for me.

I decide what the rifle will shoot and at what range.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380671 - 06/11/23 11:37 AM


Where i shoot and the type of shooting done open sights are very rare and seldom used any way.
I understand the reason why that rifle had a fixed low power scope. Many times i have cranked my variable scopes to max for a long shot then been caught out on high magnification for a very close shot.
Just for you open sight guys and gals take your open sighted 22 out to the range and try shooting matchsticks at 25 yds/M then do it with a fine cross hair scope.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Bindi2]
      #380672 - 06/11/23 11:45 AM

I understand where you are coming from, Bindi2, however my iron sighted hunting rifles are fully capable and have taken deer and moose to 200yards, which is my limit, for iron sights. Those shots were as easy as taking them with a scope, and perhaps taken more quickly as well.
.45/70 rolling block as well as 9.3x57 Husky.
When I was in my 20's or even up to about 35, I could do the matchstick deal with an iron sighted rifle (.50 cal MLoader).
The deer and moose were after that period of time. I did not need the precision of what you mention to cleanly kill both animals. Actually the deer was closer to 300yards. The 200yard shot on the moose was a chip shot - piece of cake. Boom/flap.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380673 - 06/11/23 03:49 PM


The kinetic energy of the .50 is the killer. Just like 12bore slugs no pass through for best results.
The matchstick game got harder the further we went out but great fun and bragging rights. Some rifles were very accurate others were just hopeless.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380675 - 06/11/23 06:16 PM

Quote:

...

I decide what the rifle will shoot and at what range.




Lloyd's customer also decided that and after he chose his cartridge and the zeroing distance, the rifle was delivered according to his wishes.

Unfortunately, there was hardly anything that could be changed after that, but the mounts of the scopes of these weapons, according to Lloyd's concept and statement, were so strong that apparently nothing wrong more could happen.

I also find the concept very strange, because there are enough scope mounts that are very strong and allow the use of rifles with recoil on various terrain and under much more difficult conditions than a red deer hunting in Scotland. But you have to take into account the social environment and the hunting concept of a certain class of hunters from the British Islands. You look at Rigby's advertising and you will understand what I mean.

By the way, I bought this rifle by Rigby in London, but I am not a Gentleman Hunter British-style.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380676 - 06/11/23 09:01 PM

Quote:

For me, a hunting rifle has normally open sights. However, every shooters, and especially long range shooters, knows that a free-swinging barrel is better in terms of precision.

David Lloyd's rifles were primarily intended for long range shooting at deers and were also zeroed in up to 400 yards, according to the customer's wishes. Strangely, Lloyd only used scopes with fixed magnification and these 4x or 6x, which is paradoxical for rifles that were intended for long range shooting.




Must like open sights, a 4x or 6x scope is very adequate for normal hunting requirements.

My .30-06 wore a 4x scope for most of its career. Shots at pigs, goats, deer to 250 to 300 yards, very possible. The longest I took was approx. 400 yards at a herd of feral goats running along a mountain path O E by one fell off the path dead. Until I wounded one and half trouble finishing it off at the base of the cliff.

A 6x is better but lesser at closer ranges. A 4x is a better compromise. A 6x is better for shooting small game.

A 4x or 6x scope is very adequate.

Quote:


In addition, the scopes were delivered with the turrets removed, which makes subsequent regulation with another ammunition very difficult. It was a very personal concept from the manufacturer. The rifles were built from the fifties until supposedly the early nineties. According to him, it should be very robust rifles for demanding deer hunters in the highlands.




Interesting and perfectionist, but ridiculous, the turrents removed.

Quote:


By the way, David Lloyd is also the designer of the cartridge that was later called 244 H&H Magnum.




Btw is the .244 a 243/6mm cartridge? Or larger bore a la Brit nomenclature?

What sort of ballistics and bullet weights did it achieve?

Quote:


Since the ammunition with which the rifle above was regulated was not known, it was difficult to first find a suitable load and then to gain with tools an access to the control of the scope. We finally succeeded, and the rifle also shoots very accurate.




Well done.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380677 - 06/11/23 09:25 PM

Quote:

But you have to take into account the social environment and the hunting concept of a certain class of hunters from the British Islands. You look at Rigby's advertising and you will understand what I mean.

By the way, I bought this rifle by Rigby in London, but I am not a Gentleman Hunter British-style.




Can you elaborate? Just interested.

Perhaps you mean the "gentleman" huntersthe client hunter type whether in Scotland or Africa where for examplethe gamekeeper carries the rifle for the client.The PH or gamekeeper has the binoculars and sights the game. Works out the stalk. Positions the didn't hunter. Tells the the animal to shoot and where to shoot it. The client pulls the trigger, hands the rifle back Later the beast is delivered to the game skinning room the triumphant hunter toasts his success with a Scotch. ???

Not much hands on A rifle already setup to be theoretically full proof is loaned to the client.

I remember the Brit approach when hunting Roebuck in Northumberland Not as bad as I describe sarcastically above, but I get the picture. I did get to sit in a highseatby myself for a few hours in the middle of the day.

We've probably all been there or partly there. Especially with African PHs. I had one saying I didn't need binoculars as the PH does it all. All I needed was to shoot the rifle .... I asked him if the arrogant c#nt wanted to pull the trigger as well . Not those words but that attitude in my words. Most of these dumb c#nt PHs don't realise they are only used by some clients mostly because it is required by law. Access to properties could be purchased directly just like many outfitters do. Their camp setup is handy of course. They have more experience judging African trophies of course. Blacks are often very good trackers. Hiring a good one is hit and miss, so if the PH has good trackers that's a plus. Skinning,trophy prep, if you don't at home, you can do it in Africa.

A guy in the 1980s wrote articles on how to hunt South Africa solo. Hire a 4WD, What gear to buy. How one could buy access directly to game farms hunting areas. Farm staff might accompany you. How to sell the meat to reduce costs etc. I think later on banning foreign hunters from Soo hunting was enforced

Friends and acquaintances of mine used to hunt Zimbabwe solo. A local farmer provided a vehicle and camp equipment and some staff. Self hunting including buffalo and lion. They purchased hunt quotas and dates in auctions in the citizens hunting areas. With Mugabe's farm invasion era and south African white outfitters poaching Zimbabwe , these auctions were ffffed up.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (06/11/23 11:41 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380678 - 06/11/23 09:31 PM

That's the problem with the cartridge 244 H&H Magnum. Typically British, it should not be a caliber .243 but a .245, which poses a problem with the availability of bullets, and you have to reload this cartridge as there are hardly any or even no factory loads available at the moment.

Rifles of this caliber are still available used for purchase at times. Initially I wanted a Lloyd rifle in this caliber, but because of the availability of the cartridge I decided against it. In addition, the cartridge seem not to deliver ballistically what it promises. It was not a success.

David Lloyd initially wanted to produce his rifles primarily for the cartridge 244, but after that he built above all rifles in caliber 243 Winchester, 25-06 Remington, 264 Winchester Magnum, and a little bit later 7mm Rem Mag.

The cartridge 244 was handed over to the company Holland & Holland and hence the name 244 H&H Magnum. This company also built rifles for this cartridge, the used rifles which can actually be found primarily on the market.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380679 - 06/11/23 09:47 PM

Quote:

...

Can you elaborate without being rude? Just interested.

Perhaps you mean the "gentleman" huntersthe client hunter type whether in Scotland or Africa where for examplethe gamekeeper carries the rifle for the client.The PH or gamekeeper has the binoculars and sights the game. Works out the stalk. Positions the didn't hunter. Tells the the animal to shoot and where to shoot it. The client pulls the trigger, hands the rifle back Later the beast is delivered to the game skinning room the triumphant hunter toasts his success with a Scotch. ???

Not much hands on A rifle already setup to be theoretically full proof is loaned to the client.

I remember the Brit approach when hunting Roebuck in Northumberland Not as bad as I describe sarcastically above, but I get the picture. I did get to sit in a highseatby myself for a few hours in the middle of the day.

...







I don't need to explain it in more detail because you have already explained it very well.

I am not criticizing that, one can definitely go hunting with a tie and a tweet suit and then to carry a matching rifle, for certain circumstances built in such a way that the hunter believes that he is optimally equipped for the "extreme" wilderness of the Scottish highlands.

All of this is definitely not my hunting style, despite it I still like the David Lloyd rifles, but I would never take such a rifle with me to Africa or to the mountains of Central Asia.

Edited by grandveneur (06/11/23 09:52 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sharps4590
.333 member


Reged: 09/03/16
Posts: 250
Loc: Missouri Ozarks
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380680 - 06/11/23 11:54 PM

Quote:

Interesting concepts - all.

Not for me.

I decide what the rifle will shoot and at what range.




Precisely. No one from this board was looking over your shoulder, or mine, and is in absolutely no position to pass judgment on who is to use what. Opinions is all they are and everyone knows the truth of opinions.

--------------------
Jesus said, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me." John14:6


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380681 - 06/11/23 11:58 PM

I don't know how many Brits are reading the forum, but I don't want to annoy this group in any way. There is a certain caricature of the British hunter, just as there is a caricature of the French or German hunter. In practice, however, things often look completely different.

In the area of southwest Germany where I sometimes hunt, on driven hunts where many guests are invited, I have at times met British hunters as guests. In terms of their appearance, these hunters in no way corresponded to the cliché of the British hunter, but were hardly distinguishable from the local hunters. Their rifles was also comparable to ours, as does their concept of hunting.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380682 - 07/11/23 12:00 AM

Btw I didn't mean you would be rude. I sensed you might want to avoid criticising Brit hunting styles.

The wealthy urbanite the "city" broker, banker sort going out for a get no hands dirty shoot is very much of the scene.

I was once in a London gun show room where they were saying they knew when City brokers were getting good Christmas bonuses rather than after Christmas Party termination letters, as with the first, they received lots of new shotgun orders.

At least some brokers still just go shooting. Even if only for the annual company shoot.

This sort of behaviour is not just British by any means. Different cultures, different ways.

As for Rigby, they make excellent product. All sorts of different customers. Ordinary guys, NE members, rich guys, less rich guys, professional hunters, clients, the works. They make excellent products. Rigby filled the huge void of Mauser action rifles so demanded for many years. Not making three rifles per year like some makers but many times that.

PS some of the replies were after I started this post.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (07/11/23 12:03 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380683 - 07/11/23 12:09 AM

Again, I definitely don't want to criticize the British hunting style. In the family we are more Scottish friendly than English friendly, but that is a different topic.

All comments refer to the Lloyd rifles which, as already mentioned, are more rifles for urban people who want to penetrate the wilderness.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lancaster
.470 member


Reged: 06/05/08
Posts: 8731
Loc: There's a lighthouse in the mi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380690 - 07/11/23 05:34 AM

Quote:

In addition, the cartridge seem not to deliver ballistically what it promises. It was not a success.





how many times have we read this about new wonder cartridges when the first excitement was gone.

--------------------
Norwegian hunter misses moose, shoots man on toilet
.
bringing civilisation to the barbarians


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.416 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 4917
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380691 - 07/11/23 09:08 AM

Quote:

There are weapons that were always designed without iron sights and that definitely have a certain style.

Here for example a Lloyd rifle caliber 7mm rem mag, a rifle specifically designed for deer hunting in Scotland.



http://gavingardiner.com/BidCat/detail.asp?SaleRef=0007&LotRef=5




Please excuse my ignorance but what action did Lloyd use? That looks a bit like a Rem Model 30, a factory rebuild of the M17.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Rule303]
      #380694 - 07/11/23 02:28 PM

Yes - it certainly does look like a Rem. M30, doesn't it.
I used one of those in .30/06 for a .30/338, then re-chambered that to a standard .300 Win. Mag. and sold it to a young fellow who "needed it" more than I did.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380696 - 07/11/23 06:00 PM

Iron sights obsolescence discussion, three thread pages of posts, only at NE.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bindi2
.275 member


Reged: 03/03/11
Posts: 80
Loc: WA, Aust
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380700 - 07/11/23 09:06 PM

TR shooting which is probably the largest user of Iron sights (peep) is dying scopes have moved in. Small bore (22) is probably holding its own every other discipline is going gang busters all scoped.
The BBRG Nationals had how many shooters.
And i haven't touched on the vermin shooting Brigade.
Lazers are quietly moving in with thermals, starlight died.
Times and gear is certainly changing


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Rule303]
      #380701 - 07/11/23 09:28 PM

Quote:

...

Please excuse my ignorance but what action did Lloyd use? That looks a bit like a Rem Model 30, a factory rebuild of the M17.




Gewehr 98 / lateral slide safety





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Bindi2]
      #380709 - 08/11/23 03:17 AM

Quote:

TR shooting which is probably the largest user of Iron sights (peep) is dying scopes have moved in. Small bore (22) is probably holding its own every other discipline is going gang busters all scoped.
The BBRG Nationals had how many shooters.
And i haven't touched on the vermin shooting Brigade.
Lazers are quietly moving in with thermals, starlight died.
Times and gear is certainly changing




Currently, all my powder burners, EXCEPT for the muzzleloaders, model 86/71 in .45/70, the model76 in 50-95 & the 8.15x46R M71 have scopes. My .25 cal. air rifles have mostly 6-24X scopes. LOL

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
HeymSR20
.300 member


Reged: 23/11/11
Posts: 244
Loc: Scotland
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DarylS]
      #380711 - 08/11/23 05:36 AM

Here in Scotland we pretty much all use telescopic sights. Indeed most use a 4-12x50 or 56 type scope, if not more powerful, all with lots of clicky turrets etc.

Go back 30 years a 4x32 or a 6x42 was considered a powerful optic.

With the David Lloyd rifles you need look at them with regard to when the were built. David Lloyd died in the mid 1990’s in his 80’s.

When he developed and patented his mounting system most sporting rifles still were open sighted and if scoped, scope mounts were flimsy affairs easily knocked off zero. The David Lloyd Rifles were built to maintain zero and they generally did very well.

In the past when a Gentleman or a Lady bought a rifle the rifle “shot and regulated” for a particular ammunition. Open sights would be filed in for such ammo, and scope zeroed for such ammo.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: HeymSR20]
      #380712 - 08/11/23 06:38 AM

Good info. I do know that a LOT of people shoot factory ammunition. Those who do, do little shooting, I assume. I started handloading with my first 3 CF rifles, every one of them, back in the late 1960's.
The first factory ammo I purchased, was just about 10 years ago, for a trial, for a new Browning .300 mag. I already had been handloading .300 mag. for it and wanted to test the new WW 180gr. bonded ammunition. It shot identically to my handloads, clover-leafs at 100 meters.
Just a few years ago, I bought another box of factory ammo, for a new-to-me 30/06 M70, that was made in September of 1936. This was also 180gr. bonded WW ammo. Seems to me, it was around $30.00 for that 20rounds. It shot around an inch, whereas the handloads, in that "old" rifle, do just over .6" for 5 rounds.
Just last Saturday, I checked the pricing of ammo in .45/70. I was quite shocked to see it was from $70.00 to $85.00. YIKES - for 20 rounds.
Then, I saw a box of 50 350gr. FN bullets for handloading, was $82.99 & 325gr. were $80.00 for 50 bullets.
Yikes again.
Good thing I cast for the big bores and have a decent stock of smaller bullets for the smaller ones - for handloading.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
grandveneur
.400 member


Reged: 21/09/08
Posts: 1297
Loc: France / Germany
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: HeymSR20]
      #380714 - 08/11/23 06:48 AM

Quote:

Here in Scotland we pretty much all use telescopic sights. Indeed most use a 4-12x50 or 56 type scope, if not more powerful, all with lots of clicky turrets etc.

Go back 30 years a 4x32 or a 6x42 was considered a powerful optic.

With the David Lloyd rifles you need look at them with regard to when the were built. David Lloyd died in the mid 1990’s in his 80’s.

When he developed and patented his mounting system most sporting rifles still were open sighted and if scoped, scope mounts were flimsy affairs easily knocked off zero. The David Lloyd Rifles were built to maintain zero and they generally did very well.

In the past when a Gentleman or a Lady bought a rifle the rifle “shot and regulated” for a particular ammunition. Open sights would be filed in for such ammo, and scope zeroed for such ammo.




The problem was that nobody in England knew with what ammunition the rifle was zeroing.

We had once again to shot and regulate the rifle for a ammunition our choice, but due to the marks on the screws of the scope mount, we were not the first to do something like that.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.416 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 4917
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: grandveneur]
      #380716 - 08/11/23 07:57 AM

Quote:

Quote:

...

Please excuse my ignorance but what action did Lloyd use? That looks a bit like a Rem Model 30, a factory rebuild of the M17.




Gewehr 98 / lateral slide safety








Thanks for the info. I see he bent the bolt handle back so the bolt nob is close to the trigger.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Rule303]
      #380717 - 08/11/23 09:18 AM

That weird dog-leg bolt and the seemingly long, differently shaped sleeve fooled me. not hard to do with guns I had 35 years ago.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
luv2safari
.400 member


Reged: 09/11/03
Posts: 1401
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #380783 - 30/11/23 12:10 PM

Quote:



I think it should be mandatory for any new shooter to learn using open sights, not start with optics. IMO. Of course lesser eyesight forces some to for go open sights.

When younger I could shoot very well with my open sights. With good eyesight it merely a skill to learn.

No doubt the smartphone glued Creedmoor obsessed generation disagrees.




Hell John. Today's snowflakes can't change a spare tire or do arithmetic. A letter written in cursive is some strange code to them.

Do you actually believe they'll frustrate themselves with open sights. They're too complicated.

--------------------
Hunt with Class and Classics


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yamoon
.275 member


Reged: 19/06/22
Posts: 78
Loc: Kansas USA
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: luv2safari]
      #383130 - 06/03/24 02:50 AM

I shoot hundreds of 8.15x46r down range from German schuetzen rifles, all open sights. I have had cataract surgery with astigmatism correction. 80 years old, still love those open sights.
Mike

--------------------
Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: yamoon]
      #383137 - 06/03/24 04:18 AM

Here, NOT obsolete:

1) Super bad weather with sleet and heavy snow it's irons. Constant wiping of the scope lenses is a pain and in the woods shots are close and in the open close, too, under those conditions when you can't see very far anyhow.

2) For butcher stock shooting. Scope places the line of sight very high and it's best to look right down the barrel. We use irons exclusively for that and I've never seen a mobile butcher with a scoped rifle. Friday we put another couple ram lambs in the freezer and it'll be the same-old-same-old Paratrooper 94 that's the companion on the snare line, too where the same circumstances exist.



--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rule303
.416 member


Reged: 05/07/09
Posts: 4917
Loc: Woodford Qld
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #383146 - 06/03/24 09:15 AM

I like your paratrooper 30-30.

I agree that in bad weather open sights are less of a problem than scopes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: Rule303]
      #383153 - 06/03/24 01:36 PM

Quote:

I like your paratrooper 30-30.

I agree that in bad weather open sights are less of a problem than scopes.




Absolutely.

I should have been clear. It is a 94 but it's one of those tang safety factory .44 magnums.

i hated the tang safety so i drilled a hole, threaded it and set a machine screw in it to block it.



the folding stock idea i got from a local old timer who had the idea back in the '50's. gun and old timer long gone now.




--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #383154 - 06/03/24 01:41 PM

On irons, my favorite setup is quite like most modern combat pistols:

Rear, filed flat on top, square notch:



Front is square top post.

Fast acquisition when needed and solid fine sight picture when needed.



--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #383155 - 06/03/24 01:49 PM

My 2 lever guns both have irons, of course. Pedersoli M1886/71 .45/70, 350's at 2,050fps and the Uberti 1876 in .50/95, 368gr.FN's @ 1,750fps.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: luv2safari]
      #383161 - 06/03/24 02:45 PM

Quote:


Hell John. Today's snowflakes can't change a spare tire or do arithmetic. A letter written in cursive is some strange code to them.

Do you actually believe they'll frustrate themselves with open sights. They're too complicated.




Change a tyre? Don't you have a smartphone to telephone a roadside assistant?

Arithmetic ? What, I've got a calculator on my smartphone for that.

Cursive? That's like Arabic. Who needs to use a pen and paper. Pens and paper is destroying the planit. So "boomer" old school. I just send a text via my smartphone.

The smarter phones get, the dumber people get.

Thanks for the laugh I got reading your reply.


--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Edited by NitroX (06/03/24 02:49 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DORLEAC
.333 member


Reged: 22/01/12
Posts: 464
Loc: Perpignan, France
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #383168 - 06/03/24 07:10 PM


I'm not going into the discussion between open sights pro and con.
I have always attached great importance to the metallic sight line on the rifles we manufacture.
Of course we respect the requirements of our customers but, for me, a rifle without a set of perfectly regulated metallic sights and without an hand fitted quick detachable scope mount guaranteeing a perfect return to zero is not a real rifleman rifle....
I also note that many forget all the benefits that the addition of a quality diopter can bring to our ageing eyes.
This is just my personal opinion and I don't impose it on anyone.

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
9.3x57
.450 member


Reged: 22/04/07
Posts: 5504
Loc: United States
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #383170 - 06/03/24 09:11 PM

Quote:


I'm not going into the discussion between open sights pro and con.
I have always attached great importance to the metallic sight line on the rifles we manufacture.
Of course we respect the requirements of our customers but, for me, a rifle without a set of perfectly regulated metallic sights and without an hand fitted quick detachable scope mount guaranteeing a perfect return to zero is not a real rifleman rifle....
I also note that many forget all the benefits that the addition of a quality diopter can bring to our ageing eyes.
This is just my personal opinion and I don't impose it on anyone.

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com




I've had sights put on various rifles and lament the fact that they are no longer standard issue on factory rifles, so I see nothing controversial in what you post here. The only reason my sightless rifles are sightless is that standard sights were not available and for most shooting I don't absolutely NEED them. But given the option to have them, your points are 100% solid. I still think a barrel sans sights looks odd and unfinished as well.

--------------------
What are the Rosary, the Cross or the Crucifix other than tools to help maintain the fortress of our faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lancaster
.470 member


Reged: 06/05/08
Posts: 8731
Loc: There's a lighthouse in the mi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: 9.3x57]
      #383185 - 07/03/24 05:25 AM

when the rifle have no scope iron sights are essential. if there is a scope and the rifle have no iron sights the rifle looks like cultural bolshevism

--------------------
Norwegian hunter misses moose, shoots man on toilet
.
bringing civilisation to the barbarians


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: DORLEAC]
      #383209 - 07/03/24 03:44 PM

Quote:


I'm not going into the discussion between open sights pro and con.
I have always attached great importance to the metallic sight line on the rifles we manufacture.
Of course we respect the requirements of our customers but, for me, a rifle without a set of perfectly regulated metallic sights and without an hand fitted quick detachable scope mount guaranteeing a perfect return to zero is not a real rifleman rifle....
I also note that many forget all the benefits that the addition of a quality diopter can bring to our ageing eyes.
This is just my personal opinion and I don't impose it on anyone.

DORLEAC
www.dorleac-dorleac.com




Good post as one would expect.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NitroXAdministrator
.700 member


Reged: 25/12/02
Posts: 39248
Loc: Barossa Valley, South Australi...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: lancaster]
      #383211 - 07/03/24 03:54 PM

Quote:

when the rifle have no scope iron sights are essential. if there is a scope and the rifle have no iron sights the rifle looks like cultural bolshevism




Funny.

I succumbed to trendy fashion and removed open sights from my Parker Hale M98 .30-06. if I could find them again, I'd restore them. Just looks better, especially now as the MontecCarlo stock was replaced with a bespoke modern "American" style classic stock.

My old Remington 788 .222 has no open sights, removed. It doesn't matter on that rifle.

Modern makers make rifles with cheap and nasty stocks, plastic, synthetic, composite, ugly rifles, no open sights, picatinny rails etc. All for cost reasons. Entirely suitable for a 6.5 Creedmoor type rifle. A classic 6.5x55 rifle would demand more style.

--------------------
John aka NitroX

...
Govt get out of our lives NOW!
"I love the smell of cordite in the morning."
"A Sharp spear needs no polish"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DarylS
.700 member


Reged: 10/08/05
Posts: 26514
Loc: Beautiful British Columbia, Ca...
Re: Are Iron Sights Obsolete? [Re: NitroX]
      #383221 - 08/03/24 03:49 AM

Used the factory iron sights on my 9.3x57 for a moose, in 2009.
A chip-shot at 200yards. Pretty easy.

--------------------
Daryl


"a gun without hammers is like a Spaniel without ears" King George V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 43 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 4396

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us NitroExpress.com

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Home | Ezine | Forums | Links | Contact


Copyright 2003 to 2011 - all rights reserved