Back to Steve's original question.

If an outfitter knows a competitor being considered is dishonest, not ethical, or has questionable practices, it is hard for a competing business to criticise a competitor as it might just be seen as trying to rubbish a competitor for personal gain.

What can be done?

Carefully point out things to check on the competitor, such as check references carefully, maybe provide a reference which the competitor does not (ie a negative one). That way it is a previous client doing it, not the competing outfitter.

Advise them to check if the person is licenced as a PH, for the area, country, actually has access to the proposed concession etc.

Another way, is to diplomatically point out sources of other information, such as forums, hunt reports, and other websites where such information might also be obtained.

With so many operators in the marketplace to choose from, why would anyone run the risk of blowing away a lot of money if there are serious questions.

And while it may appear difficult to the operator if they go ahead and book they can't say they weren't forewarned at least.

The other alternative is just to say nothing, and look for the next client.

***

Of course I am talking as a client and a forum host.

Any other outfitters here got any answers or experiences on this? It would be interesting to see how it would be handled or has been handled.