NitroX
|
| (.700 member) |
| 20/12/21 03:10 PM |
|
Re: Four rifles for Alaska
|
Quote:Quote:
Ripp. I like the humour. But I wonder if, in the event something actually happened, would a malevolent prosecutor would try and twist it into being a sign of premeditation?
As previously stated..for now..not uncommon for this to happen here..in the more populated areas..we r still allowed to protect ourselves..hence the 8 MILLION new gun owners in the last 3 years..
https://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A...clleA1WUW4DHx0I
As far as I know, self protection is still legal in defence here in South Aust. It is not legal to own a firearm for this purpose as ridiculous as that is. But if a person feels in danger, a firearm may be used if they personally feel they are in danger. Last time I saw it tested in court at least.
Putting up a sticker "Protected by Smith and Wesson" or similar would be very stupid. Legally it would be construed as an admission of intent. And also an advertisement to crims to steal your firearms.