At an SCI convention here in Australia a couple of years ago I talked to an agent or outfitter who had some good deals where the client got to hunt a grizzly and a moose on the same hunt.

But on the way to the airport later a hunter from Melbourne kept telling me it wasn't a good idea or good value and it is much better to hunt them separately.

I didn't really understand his point as yes if you have unlimited $$$ yes it is better to book separate hunts and maybe get slightly better animals.

Now considering it probably costs more than 70% more to do separate hunts, what do people here think? Do combination hunts work at least in the majority of cases?

If I was to hunt Alaska I think grizzly and moose would be number one targets, though an elk would be fantastic as well (and big horn sheep and mountain goat ..........).

If I hunted the 48 states even a black bear and a whitetail or Mulie would be great.