Sure Steve, you don't have a problem as long as it agrees with what you perceive to be accurate.

You have pointed out twice now that the partition beat the A-frame--which is only partially true..the A-Frame smoked the partition by 50% more retention..you seem to not want to mention that little fact..plus that the A-Frame beat the partition by a similar amount in the other distance..another item not mentioned in the last post..sorry this isn't CNN ..all the facts please not just the ones you agree with ..

Secondly, as I stated in previous posts, you keep moving the goal post in an attempt to make it suit your beliefs on the comparison..you move distance, game or whatever it is that needs to be moved to make your point..

You freely admit you have never used an A-Frame but yet seem to want to comdemn them for cost and or effectiveness without ever even having used them...

I am fully aware of the history of the partition. ..I have used them in the past..which is why I don't use them today...

At this point in this thread, I am done..and don't have time to read all you are posting..was on the road for work yesterday and back in today to catch up..this, for me, is starting to become very monotonous ..sorry.... My God, this post has been beat to death ..Let it go.. Obviously you are not changing my mind and I am not yours..at this juncture some of the arguments are just a little over the top....

Best of luck to you..

I actually do have a day job that requires some focus on my part..

Perhaps that is why I don't mind paying the extra for the A-Frames..

Over and out..

Ripp