|
|
|||||||
Kuduae, This is what comes of old age and failure to check sources. My humble apologies for the mistakes you pointed out. Maybe nearing the 3/4 century mark is some excuse. Incidentally, I thoroughly enjoyed your contributions to Der Waffenschmidt! I'm a little curious about the subject raised by Lancaster. I believe 9.3X64 required a 92mm magazine box, so some modification was likely necessary. |