|
|
|||||||
Quote: Like I said, I don't count the brown/win/ruger/cz's as Mausers, because they are not. You got the $600 Zastava (which cheaps out on certain aspects) and then straight into 5K+ custom land for a complete rifle. There's nothing factory in the mid range. A 1911 is a 1911. Nobody tries to call a SIG 220 or H&k USP a 1911. Nor any other gun made using operating principles derived from John Browings 1911. Just like people don't call a Beretta 92 a Walther P38. I feel same rule holds true for the Mauser 98. Quote: I think that the avaliability of cheap 98 actions is what kept the 98 design from quality mass production for so long. Once these "cheap" actions started running out, I don't think that anyone wanted to invest in making an action that required so many steps. Especially since the vast majority of consumers don't care about the differences. They only care about price. And so you begin to see the rise of the pushfeed action in the middle of the last century. Quote: Quote: I must quibble with your example. A Rigby of any era is at least a semi-custom gun, and commanded some type of premium. I think it would be a more apples to apples comparison if someone knows what a Mauser Model A cost in the pre-war era compared to other factory rifles of the same period. . |