Quote:
Quote:
BTW it is considered very bad form for a gunmaker to criticise another gunmakers works especially in a non-constructive manner.
All it does is encourage a shit between gunmakers.
If someone is dressing up magnum mauser rifles and selling them as London guns, I see no problem in pointing out the obvious? Americans usually call it as they see it and personally I prefer the refreshing honesty.
Quote:
Looks like a fat bloated pig compared to the original. The german influence is very visible, reminds me of a tarted up M03!
If you criticise others you open yourself up to critisism, and critizm in its truest form is the father of innovation.
The Big game rifle have a mass-produced air to it with plenty of cheap solutions and fit/finish not usually seen on London guns - which was a concern when it was announced Blaser/Sauer/Mauser bought the brand and planned on ressurecting the Rigby name.
The concerns were justified it seems and as such I see nothing wrong in pointing that out.
You do realise an administrator is giving you very clear and direct comments and hints.....
So a different method is obviously necessary. A "law student" should be able to actually read what has been said to them.
You continue to mis-represent the comments and posts on post after post after post. Repeating the same thing, again, again and again endlessly. Without even directly having handled the Big Game model yourself. And the thread is not even about that model ... lots of other members HAVE actually handled one and commented on an earlier thread about that model and made informed comments ... yet do not need to keep posting again again the same stuff. No one could claim any sort of censorship if one looks seriously at either of the two threads ...
The member is consistently attempting to wreck a thread, has been given a break.
|