|
|
|||||||
Quote: DonZ, No one has answered, I don't have any experience with brown bear, but if hunters use .30-06's a 9.5x56 would be superior in performance at a shorter range than a .30-06. Given the use of proper bullet construction. Due to the heavier projectiles. Years ago most stories had hunters using .270's, .30-06's, .300's etc for bear and they still died back then but the modern trend has been to use heavier rifles. Regarding how it compares to a .30-06. You can compare the 9.5x56 to a 9.3x62. The 62 is basically a necked up .30-06. The 9.3x62 outperforms the 9.5x56/57 as a result. The 9.5x57 is similar to a necked up 8x57 so a small amount lesser in performance in case capacity. The 9.5x56/57 will have a more arced trajectory to a .30-06 but uses heavier wider calibre bullets. I think it would be fine for most North American game if loaded with suitable projectiles at closer ranges and proper shot placement. I have no doubt it will work well on moose, deer, and bear at reasonable ranges. The .375 H&H Mag might be used more often as it is a commercially available cartridge in rifles and loaded ammo. It also is the standard to judge others by and certainly more powerful than a 9.5x57. The .375 H&H Mag has a similar trajectory to a .30-06 as well with bullets of a similar sectional density. (PS If anyone here WITH bear experience has different opinions please correct me!) |