What always amuzes me is how the .303 gets snubbed as being archaic, and ballistically inferior to other calibres in its range (usually the .308win and the 30-06). I wonder if the guys that shoot off their mouths about how inferior it is have ever looked at the ballistics tables comparing these three! I have never noticed the .308, or the 30-06 for that matter, killing any deader than my .303!