A comment that was once put to me, was if you need to pull the rear trigger first you then loose the versatility of loading both a soft and a FMJ in a double, and being able to choose which one you use for the appropriate situation.

I thought that was a very good point to make.

Now doesn't this argument that you have to shoot one barrel before the other for the double ti regulate properly also shoot down the same versatility???

Isn't the two things very contradictorary?

So IF the need to shoot one barrel first to get proper regulation is very widespread, doesn't that make the doubles which can shoot EITHER first that much more desirable from a practical hunting point of view?