Where do you get the idea that a modern double has better fit and finish that something made in the UK, before WW2?

Have a look at the wood to metal fit on the Searcy? What do you see? As I have said, I think the rifle would be a good practical hunting rifle. I have no doubts about that. However, the fit/finish could only be described as 'ordinary' for a post war effort. It certainly wouldn't have been allowed out of the shop if it had been put together by one of the renowned London makers. There is simply no comparison between pre and post war firearms (other than true custom weapons) when it comes to the marriage of wood and steel.