Mike,
As Micky said there is no comparison.

To be fair though - some C&H guns are very good indeed BUT they produced many guns that by their design were less than attractive, added to that the fact that C&H quality (within whatever price band) was far more variable than that of WR for example.

The best thing about some of the 1950's 60's C&H guns is that they were made by W&S (thus were fine).

General comments are one thing but ranking makers by scales or tiers is something I avoid.

Regards
Webley