Here we go AGAIN!!!

I think that all of these arguments have been trotted out in another thread, so I can't see the point in going over old ground - except to say - why is it that all British guns are lumped together??

This has as much validity as comparing the relative merits of beer and red wine - naturally there are good and bad examples. I dare say even Searcy doesn't get it exactly right every time - like all manufactured products - otherwise there would be no need for a manufacurers warranty!

The futility of the debate becomes even more evident when posters insist on extrapolating experiences with 100 year old guns from British makers to making assessments about their modern production!

That some of these makers are still in existence however does say something about their products, but would anybody seriously draw on their experiences with an A Model Ford to provide a basis to make a buying decision about a Ford of 2004 manufacture?

A good gun is where you find it! MOVE ON!