The 90% number was an off the wall comment, to make a point that I beleive to be true but to what % I have no clue..

The point is most of the doubles in my price range of $10 to $12,000 have bores that have shot too much cordite, surely no one is going to deny that and most have been reblacked ( a common practice back then ) and few have ever had the locks and inside checked IMO...Now that is what I have seen...

This does not effect those who have a knowledge of double rifles, they simply put them back on the table and look for something else...But the number of bad guns I see in proud owners possession is sometimes an amazment to me and you guys know thats a fact...

Now I have also owned some bad bored guns that shot like a house on fire, and they suited me fine because that is my primary concern, my number one criteria as it is with most around here and AR..We seek the ones that will shoot a small hole in the target as opposed to the quaoted minute of grapefruit that is suppposed to be the norm.

If I offended anyone with the 90% statement I apoligise for it you touchy rascals!