|
|
|||||||
Quote: Harnihal: I think the problem started with this statement: Quote: What I think Mehul meant was that your statement was simply not well-informed. In fact, you have it backwards. Also, perhaps you didn't intend it to sound quite the way it did (Mehul's wasn't the only post that followed yours in similar vein). In reading this string, I initially didn't quite understand where you were coming from either. I think maybe the problem here is communication failure rather than intent. You were given a number of well-intentioned and very well-informed responses here, and I think your perception is wrong. |