|
|
|||||||
Quote: As posted elsewhere, I am a diehard Ruger fan, but I have to admit I modify every one I buy; freefloat the barrels, bed the action, relieve the tang, rework the trigger. Feeding and functioning I've never had a problem with except for one old tang-safety 7x57 that had a bad extractor which once switched with a new one has lived happily ever after. When you say the new ones feed better than the old ones, that is really saying something as I haven't ever had a functioning problem with Rugers except for the 7x57 above-mentioned. Phil, what about the new trigger? I have handled a couple of the standard "Hawkeyes" and I was not impressed at all. Spongy, lots of creep, in short, no difference between the factory Hawkeye trigger and the old M77MKII. A real letdown as I know Savage has set the bar high for all the companies and a bad trigger is not going to play well in Peoria, or I suppose up there where you are. How about the ones you have used? Maybe that is an irrelevant question though since you are a very well-respected fellow in the industry and unless you just bought one off the rack I reckon the gents at Ruger made sure yours was a good'un {??}. Every one I have tried here in North Idaho was BAD and I am a bit sore about it because I read all the advertising hype in print before I saw the guns and really anticipated a dramatic improvement over the old M77MKII. If they are all as bad as the ones I tested I just hope they are as easy to work on as are the M77MKII's... |