Quote:
9ThreeXFifty7,
To be honest, I cannot think of anything that a flashlight would prove with a scope and an analogue light meter. In any case, barring any more concrete information about this test, I should not make any judgement or presuppose what it might have been. I am, though, still curious about this test and would appreciate any pictures if you have them of the entire test that was carried out.
I have no argument with you.
What I saw was that the other scope companies were very testy about this little display and Burris kept it right up.
Look, I do not want to overplay this little test. I merely stated what I saw because it was interesting to me and because it stirred the pot at the SHOT Show. Maybe it proved nothing. I have no idea. But what I do know is that Burris scopes were once upon a time darn good scopes and as far as light transmission is concerned, were very clear scopes, particularly the old Signature series.
If a guy wants to spend $2,000 for a rifle scope I have no problem with him. I guess what I am saying is that I don't feel the need to spend that much and I believe from my experience my choice of a Leupold will not lose me one single animal the guy who spent $2,000 will bag.
|